Connect with us

Published

on

Some people have unfortunate weeks. But if you’re a certain octogenarian chief executive of the United States of America with a reputation for declining cognitive abilities, you just might have a terrible, horrible week that culminates in a purely distilled no good, very bad day of escalating awfulness.

As the incumbent and enormously unpopular resident of the White House, Joe Biden’s chief selling point is that at least he’s (allegedly) not as bad as presumed main challenger Donald Trump.

“The choice is clear. Donald Trump’s campaign is about him, not America, not you,” Biden told a Pennsylvania audience on this year’s anniversary of the 2021 Capitol riot. “Our campaign is different. For me and Kamala, our campaign is about America. It’s about you.”

That’s a fair enough bid for votes, so far as these things go. But, leaving aside Vice President Kamala Harris for the moment, as most Americans would very much like to do, it’s convincing only to the extent that President Biden remembers where “America” is and is clear about the identity of the “you” he is addressing. And as a series of recent incidents illustrate, that’s not at all certain.

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you. Email(Required) EmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Submit

Δ A Cascade of Mental Slips

“Right after I was elected, I went to a G7 meeting in southern England,” Biden said last week at a Nevada political rally. “And I sat down and said, ‘America is back!’ and Mitterand from GermanyI mean Francelooked at me and said, ‘How long you back for?'”

Nice catch that Mitterand was French, not German! That’s a save. But forgetting that Mitterand has been dead since 1996 and that today’s French president is named “Macron” is not.

Later in the week, in New York, Biden twice attributed a supposed 2021 comment by then-German Chancellor Angela Merkel to Helmut Kohl, who held that position in the ’80s and ’90s and died in 2017.

He also appeared to forget the name of the Hamas terrorist group that attacked Israel while he was updating the press on the continuing conflict.

This, of course, plays into the public’s perception that Biden may not be at the top of hisor anybody’sgame when it comes to his cognitive status.

Last June, an NBC News poll found “68% of all voters say they have concerns about Biden having the necessary mental and physical health to be president, including 55% who say they have ‘major’ concerns.” A similar 52.21 percent of respondents told pollsters in September that they are “very concerned” about “Joe Biden’s cognitive health affecting his ability to serve another term as President effectively.”

Many voters are also worried about Donald Trump’s mental fitness for office. He feeds into such concerns when he, for example, confuses Republican rival Nikki Haley with former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, as he did last month. But, in polling, public concerns over Trump’s mental health come in significantly lower than those for Biden. Frankly, Trump’s brand is vicious rather than addled. When You Welcome Good News for Your Opponent

So, Biden’s team must have breathed a relative sigh of relief when media attention turned on Thursday to Supreme Court hearings on the status of Colorado efforts to bar the GOP’s presumed nominee from the ballot. Then again, it wasn’t exactly positive news for the current president.

“A clear majority of justices expressed overwhelming skepticism toward the plaintiffs’ claim that Trump is disqualified under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment because he ‘engaged in insurrection,'” reported Slate’s Mark Joseph Stern. “Justices across the ideological spectrum suggested that individual states cannot enforce Section 3 against federal candidates, at least not without congressional approval.”

Well, at least it was a distraction, right? Biden’s main rival looks bound for the ballot, but at least nobody is talking about cognitive decline.

Well, they weren’t right up until Special Counsel Robert Hur released his report into Joe Biden’s mishandling of classified documents. Good News, Really Bad News

“Our investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen,” finds the report.

Uh oh.

“We decline prosecution of Mr. Biden.”

Whew.

“At trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory,” notes the report. “He did not remember when he was vice president, forgetting on the first day of the interview when his term ended (‘if it was 2013—when did I stop being Vice President?’), and forgetting on the second day of the interview when his term began (‘in 2009, am I still Vice President?’). He did not remember, even within several years, when his son Beau died.”

Ouch. That’s not where the White House team wanted this to go. The president himself bitterly responded in a press briefing where he welcomed the decision to not prosecute but denounced aspersions on his cognitive abilities, and insisted “my memory is fine.” Then he took a question about Israel.

“As you know, initially, the President of Mexico, El-Sisi, did not want to open up the gate to allow humanitarian material to get in,” he answered.

But Abdel Fattah el-Sisi is the president of Egypt.

“Mexico? Mexico? Where did that come from?” asked CNN’s Jeffrey Toobin. “That’s the only thing anyone’s going to remember from this.”

In a snap end-of-week poll by YouGov, 47 percent of respondents say Joe Biden’s health and age will “severely limit his ability to do the job” if he wins in November. Honestly, 32 percent say the same of Trump, but one third is a hell of a lot better than just shy of half when people are trying to decide which candidate is less bad.

Last week, Joe Biden had a no good very bad day and it’s a good bet there are more to come.

Continue Reading

Sports

Stanton: Could rejoin Yankees when first eligible

Published

on

By

Stanton: Could rejoin Yankees when first eligible

NEW YORK — One day after he took live batting practice, a significant step in his return from the injured list, New York Yankees designated hitter Giancarlo Stanton confirmed Wednesday he could return to the team’s lineup by the end of the month.

Stanton participated in batting practice on the field at Yankee Stadium on Tuesday, the first time he has seen live pitching this year after he was shut down with elbow tendinitis in both arms at the beginning of spring training. He saw 10 pitches, hitting a ground ball to shortstop and working a full-count walk in his two plate appearances against right-hander Jake Cousins.

The Yankees moved Stanton from the 15-day to the 60-day injured list last week, pushing his earliest possible return date to May 27. It was a procedural move for New York. The Yankees needed a 40-man roster spot to claim Bryan De La Cruz off waivers, and Stanton was not in line to return before the end of the month.

Stanton, 35, said he expects to go on a rehab assignment. He said he did not have a target date for starting one and didn’t know how long it would last. Yankees manager Aaron Boone said Stanton likely won’t need a long rehab assignment because he doesn’t play a position on defense.

“It depends on what kind of arms I get available [for live batting practice sessions],” Stanton said, “and how I feel in those at-bats.”

Stanton, who also took batting practice on the field Wednesday, has taken rounds of injections to address the pain in his elbows and reiterated that he will have to play through pain whenever he returns.

“If I’m out there, I’m good enough to play,” Stanton said, “and there’s no levels of anything else.”

Stanton’s elbow troubles go back to last season; he played through the World Series with the pain, slugging seven home runs in 14 postseason games. But he said he stopped swinging a bat entirely in January because of severe pain in the elbows and didn’t start taking swings again until March. At one point, Stanton said, season-ending surgery was possible, but that was tabled.

“I know when G’s in there, he’s ready to go,” Boone said. “He’s not going to be in there if he doesn’t feel like he can be really productive, so I know when that time comes, when he’s ready to do that, we should be in a good spot.

“And hopefully we’ve done some things, the latter part of the winter and into the spring, that will set him up to be able to physically do it and withstand it. But also understanding he’ll probably deal with some things.”

Continue Reading

Sports

Jays’ Scherzer: Thumb ‘felt good’ vs. live hitters

Published

on

By

Jays' Scherzer: Thumb 'felt good' vs. live hitters

ANAHEIM, Calif. — Max Scherzer took what the Toronto Blue Jays hope is a significant step Wednesday in his return from a right thumb injury when he threw to hitters for the first time since going on the injured list in March.

“I thought his stuff was really good,” Blue Jays manager John Schneider said before Wednesday night’s game against the Los Angeles Angels. “Afterward, he said he felt good, so that’s a really good step in the right direction.”

Scherzer, a three-time Cy Young Award winner who signed a one-year, $15.5 million deal with Toronto in February, threw 20 pitches. Barring a setback, Schneider said he would repeat the workout but with more pitches over the weekend.

“It felt good,” Scherzer, 40, said. “I’ve gotten all the inflammation out, so I can finally grip the ball again and not blow out my shoulder. But I’m not celebrating this until I’m back starting in a major league game.”

Scherzer has received two cortisone injections to relieve inflammation in the thumb this season. He was transferred to the 60-day injured list earlier this week and is not eligible to be activated until May 29.

He went 2-4 with a 3.95 ERA in nine starts for Texas last season, starting the year on the injured list while recovering from lower back surgery. He said Tuesday that his problematic right thumb, which also affected his 2022 and 2023 seasons, was just as big of an issue in 2024.

“This is what knocked me out in 2023, and [I had it] all of last year,” Scherzer said. “It wasn’t so much the back injury, it was this thumb injury giving me all the fits in the world. I thought I addressed it. I thought I had done all the grip-strength work, but I came into spring training, and it popped back out.”

Scherzer left his debut start with the Blue Jays against Baltimore on March 29 after three innings because of soreness in his right lat muscle. He said after the game that his thumb issue was to blame for that soreness.

Continue Reading

Technology

Apple says Epic Games contempt ruling could cost ‘substantial sums’

Published

on

By

Apple says Epic Games contempt ruling could cost 'substantial sums'

An Apple store in Walnut Creek, California, U.S., on April 30, 2025.

Paul Morris | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Apple is asking a court to pause a recent decision in its case against Epic Games and allow the iPhone maker to once again charge a commission on in-app transactions that link out for payment.

Last month, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland found that Apple had violated her original court order from the Epic trial, originally decided in 2021, that forced Apple to make limited changes to its linking out policy under California law.

Judge Rogers’ new ruling is more expansive, ordering Apple to immediately stop imposing its commissions on purchases made for iPhone apps through web links inside its apps, among other changes.

Apple is now looking to get a stay on that order, as well as another one from the case that prevents it from restricting app developers from choosing the language or placement of those links, until the entire decision can be appealed. Apple says that required changes in their current form will cost the company “substantial sums.”

“This is the latest chapter in Epic’s largely unsuccessful effort to use competition law to change how Apple runs the App Store,” Apple said in the emergency motion for a stay. The motion cites a previous order in the case that found that new linking policies would cost Apple “hundreds of millions to billions” of dollars annually.

If Apple succeeds, it will allow the company to roll back changes that have already started to shift the economics of app development. Developers including Amazon and Spotify have been able to update their apps to avoid Apple’s commissions and direct customers to their own website for payment.

Prior to the ruling, Amazon’s Kindle app told users they could not purchase a book in the iPhone app. After a recent update, the app now shows an orange “Get Book” button that links to Amazon’s website.

Epic also plans to introduce new software to allow app and game developers to easily link to their websites to take payments.  

“This forces Apple to compete,” Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney said shortly after last month’s decision. “This is what we wanted all along.”

Apple said in the filing that “non-party developers are already seizing upon the Order to reduce consumer choice (and damage Apple’s business) by, among other things, impeding the use of” in-app purchases.

Rogers made a criminal referral in the case, saying that Apple misled the court and that a company vice president “outright lied” about when and why Apple decided to charge 27% for external payments. The real decision, the judge said, took place in meetings involving Apple CEO Tim Cook.

Wednesday’s filing from Apple doesn’t address Rogers’ accusations that the company misled the judge, but it does argue that the ruling was punitive. Apple’s lawyers also claimed that civil contempt sanctions can only coerce compliance with an existing order, not punish non-compliance.

Apple said earlier this week in a court filing it would appeal the contempt ruling.

“We’ve complied with the court’s order and we’re going to appeal,” Cook told investors on the company’s quarterly earnings call last week.

WATCH: Apple says it strongly disagrees with Epic Games decision

Apple on Epic Games decision: We strongly disagree and will appeal

Continue Reading

Trending