Connect with us

Published

on

Two Britons who nearly died fighting in Ukraine have told why they have returned to the war-torn country – and warn urgent help is needed on the frontline in the battle against Russia.

Shareef Amin was seriously wounded by Russian fire after answering President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s call for foreigners to join the Ukrainian military in 2022.

The 41-year-old from Bristol lost part of his hand and his right leg was paralysed from the knee down. He also suffered punctured lungs and severe injuries to his shoulder and forearm.

Recovering in hospital after he was ambushed. Pic: Shareef Amin
Image:
Recovering in hospital after he was ambushed. Pic: Shareef Amin

Fellow Briton Shaun Pinner was captured and tortured by Russian forces after fighting alongside Ukrainian troops in 2022.

The 50-year-old from Hertfordshire was imprisoned for five months – during which time he said he was “electrocuted, starved, beaten… and stabbed” – before he was released in a prisoner swap.

Speaking just before the second anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Mr Amin and Mr Pinner told Sky News there is no prospect of an end to the war anytime soon – and fear Vladimir Putin will be free to invade more of Europe if urgent help isn’t sent.

“We need support – from Britain, America, Europe – whether it’s bombs, helmets, body armour, or medical equipment, there isn’t enough,” Mr Amin says.

“This is a really dangerous situation. If Russia gets the upper hand and they take Ukraine, they’re not going to stop at that.

“The British and the Europeans need to know this is all of our wars.”

Ukraine war:
Follow the latest updates

Pic: Shareef Amin
Image:
Pic: Shareef Amin (left)

Mr Pinner says Ukraine is “probably a year off being able to produce enough shells to be able to support” itself.

“We’re going to go through a really tough time before then,” he adds.

“I’ve never lost faith that Ukraine can win. But we’ve got ammo shortages on the frontline that are a real worry. How can you fight with one hand tied behind your back?”

Pic: Shaun Pinner
Image:
Pic: Shaun Pinner

‘Chaotic’ first months in Ukraine

Mr Amin – who spent 13 years in the British military – says he travelled to Ukraine to join the fight against Russia in March 2022 after watching a speech by President Zelenskyy on Instagram.

“I managed to get hold of a group of British guys through WhatsApp and TikTok, and by 11 March we were in Lviv,” he says.

He described his first two months in the country as “chaotic” as he and others felt there wasn’t enough time to go to the British embassy and join the foreign legion through official channels.

“We almost got arrested three times at gunpoint, because we weren’t there under official paperwork – we just had passports, uniforms, and military kit,” he says.

Mr Amin says he initially decided to do some humanitarian work instead, delivering medical supplies around the country, until he was asked to teach one of the territorial units in Western tactics.

By mid-2022, Mr Amin was on the frontline but left after a few months to sign up officially to the Ukrainian military.

He went in search of more specialised work and joined the Main Directorate of Intelligence Unit (GUR) with some fellow Britons.

Shareef Amin (left). Pic: Shareef Amin
Image:
Pic: Shareef Amin (left)

‘All of a sudden, there was this explosion’

On the frontline in November 2022, Mr Amin’s team was ambushed.

After his team found itself in a line of trees, beyond which there was nothing but flat land, “three or four tanks” emerged and began shooting – followed by artillery, drones and laser-guided missiles, he says.

He and other members of his team were hit. Some of them were killed.

“All of a sudden, there was this explosion,” he recalls.

“The air got sucked out of my lungs and all I could see was a flash of light and it felt like I was pulled underground like an empty can.”

Pic: Shareef Amin
Image:
Pic: Shareef Amin

‘He’s not going to make it’

Mr Amin says he was hit by a round of fire that had gone underground before exploding and ricocheting back up through his body armour.

When he eventually got to an ambulance and was taken to hospital, he heard a doctor say “he’s not going to make it” – but he survived despite more than 20 pieces of metal being pulled out of his back.

He spent six weeks in a hospital in Odesa, hoping to recover and quickly return to the frontline.

But he says: “You don’t really come to the realisation your body is destroyed.”

In December 2022, he was flown to the UK for further treatment – but went back to Ukraine in the summer of 2023.

He says he is working with intelligence units there and helping with medical evacuations on the frontline.

“Psychologically, I had to have that purpose again,” Mr Amin says.

“The idea of actually going home and giving up was a no-go.

“I’ve had my ups and downs, but the idea of coming back and still being able to wear the uniform has kept me sane.”

‘You can’t train for pain of torture and starvation’

Mr Pinner was already in Ukraine when Russia invaded on 24 February 2022.

Having spent nine years in the British Army, he had been living with his fiancée in Mariupol since 2018 and was serving in the Ukrainian military.

“I was on a routine deployment when the full-scale invasion happened,” he recalls.

Shaun Pinner (right) and fellow Briton Aiden Aslin (left). Pic: Shaun Pinner
Image:
Shaun Pinner (right) and fellow Briton Aiden Aslin (left). Pic: Shaun Pinner

Mr Pinner says he was the first foreigner to become a commander on the frontline as he spoke Russian and had previous military experience.

But in April 2022, he and four other British soldiers were captured and taken prisoner.

He was “electrocuted, starved, beaten, tortured, stabbed in the leg,” he tells Sky News, before being put on a show trial and sentenced to death in Russia’s self-proclaimed People’s Republic of Donetsk.

“I wasn’t expecting the brutality of it,” he says.

“You can’t train for pain. The worst torture was starvation… thinking about food – it’s with you every day, it’s still with me now.”

Image:
Shaun Pinner in captivity in Donetsk. Pic: Reuters

‘If I got executed, I was dying for a cause’

Mr Pinner says that the Russian he learned as a resident of Mariupol helped him to decipher what was going on during his captivity.

Reflecting on challenges he’d faced outside the military – such as relatives dying, and previous relationship breakdowns – helped keep things in perspective, he adds.

“I was never as low as that when I was in captivity, because I knew if I did get executed, I was dying for a cause,” Mr Pinner says.

He and the other four Britons were unexpectedly freed as part of a prisoner exchange in September 2022.

He was reunited with his family in the UK before returning to Ukraine to live with his wife the following month.

Shaun Pinner
Image:
Pictured with his family in the UK in 2022. Pic: Shaun Pinner

‘I don’t talk to Westerners who’ve just turned up’

Mr Pinner admits being “nervous coming across the border” for the first time after he was freed.

But he says: “My life has changed now. I’m not fighting but I’m helping in another capacity.

“I try to talk about what it’s actually like to live here – and what it was like before the invasion.

“I try to dispel Putin’s narratives on social media because I’m now in a position where I can say, ‘actually that’s not correct, because I’m here and I know’.”

Speaking from Dnipro, where he warns an air raid siren might interrupt the call, he says he discourages any foreigners he speaks to who say they want to come and fight.

“There are some good guys here,” he says. “But they’ve either been here a long time or they’re married to Ukrainians.”

He adds: “I don’t talk to Westerners who have just turned up. You don’t want people coming over who just want to update their YouTube.”

Read more:
Estonia’s volunteer army warns about Russia
Russia takes complete control of Ukrainian city
Was lack of ammo to blame for Russia taking Avdiivka?

Should the West provide more weapons to Ukraine?

Military analyst Sean Bell agrees with Mr Pinner’s view about Westerners joining the fight.

He stresses the Ukrainians have enough personnel already, and ex-soldiers from NATO countries fighting in a war NATO has refused to enter can cause problems.

Bell says there is even a problem with donating shells, as they encourage attritional warfare, “which generally favours the bigger side” – Russia.

He adds that while the West readily donated precision weapons, as well as long-range missiles and tanks at the start of the conflict, now the UK has “emptied its war chest” of the older, stockpiled equipment, and “it’s got to a stage where we’re not comfortable with giving any more”.

New weapons systems risk falling into the wrong hands and compromising security, he adds, so most focus has now fallen on the US, which is trying to get a $60bn (£47bn) military aid package through Congress.

But Bell warns: “If funding was the only issue, the EU has already promised that much. It’s about converting dollars into weapons. They’re built to order and that all takes years not weeks.”

Mr Amin has written a book about his experience in Ukraine, Freedom At All Costs: A British Veteran’s Experiences Of The War In Ukraine.

Mr Pinner has also written a book, Live. Fight. Survive. He also teaches English and gives talks to Ukrainian soldiers.

Continue Reading

UK

US accuses UK of ‘significant human rights issues’ and restricting free speech

Published

on

By

US accuses UK of 'significant human rights issues' and restricting free speech

The US State Department has accused the UK of having “significant human rights issues”, including restrictions on free speech.

The unflattering assessment comes via a new version of an annual Human Rights Practices report, with its publication coinciding with Vice President JD Vance’s holiday in the Cotswolds.

Politics Hub: Follow latest updates and analysis

It says human rights in the UK “worsened” in 2024, with “credible reports of serious restrictions on freedom of expression”, as well as “crimes, violence, or threats of violence motivated by antisemitism” since the 7 October Hamas attack against Israel.

On free speech, while “generally provided” for, the report cites “specific areas of concern” around limits on “political speech deemed ‘hateful’ or ‘offensive'”.

Sir Keir Starmer has previously defended the UK’s record on free speech after concerns were raised by Mr Vance.

In response to the report, a UK government spokesperson said: “Free speech is vital for democracy around the world including here in the UK, and we are proud to uphold freedoms whilst keeping our citizens safe.”

Keir Starmer and JD Vance have clashed in the past over free speech in the UK. Pics: PA
Image:
Keir Starmer and JD Vance have clashed in the past over free speech in the UK. Pics: PA

The US report highlights Britain’s public space protection orders, which allow councils to restrict certain activities in some public places to prevent antisocial behaviour.

It also references “safe access zones” around abortion clinics, which the Home Office says are designed to protect women from harassment or distress.

They have been criticised by Mr Vance before, notably back in February during a headline-grabbing speech at the Munich Security Conference.

The report also criticises the Online Safety Act and accuses ministers of intervening to “chill speech” about last summer’s murders in Southport, highlighting arrests made in the wake of the subsequent riots.

Ministers have said the Online Safety Act is about protecting children, and repeatedly gone so far as to suggest people who are opposed to it are on the side of predators.

Read more politics news:
Is Keir Starmer falling into booby trap?
What is ex-minister Tulip Siddiq on trial for?

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why do people want to repeal the Online Safety Act?

The report comes months after Sir Keir bit back at Mr Vance during a summit at the White House, cutting in when Donald Trump’s VP claimed there are “infringements on free speech” in the UK.

“We’ve had free speech for a very long time, it will last a long time, and we are very proud of that,” the PM said.

But Mr Vance again raised concerns during a meeting with Foreign Secretary David Lammy at his country estate in Kent last week, saying he didn’t want the UK to go down a “very dark path” of losing free speech.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Lammy-Vance bromance: Will it last?

The US State Department’s report echoes similar accusations made by the likes of Nigel Farage and Elon Musk.

The Trump administration itself has been accused of trying to curtail free speech and stifle criticism, most notably by targeting universities – Harvard chief among them.

Continue Reading

UK

US woman Aimee Betro found guilty of conspiracy to murder Birmingham shop owner

Published

on

By

US woman Aimee Betro found guilty of conspiracy to murder Birmingham shop owner

A would-be assassin who flew from the US to kill a Birmingham shop owner as part of a violent feud has been found guilty of conspiracy to murder.

Birmingham Crown Court heard how Aimee Betro, 45, flew from the US to murder shopkeeper Sikander Ali at point-blank range outside his home in the Yardley area of the city in September 2019.

Prosecutors alleged that Betro hid her identity using a niqab when she tried to shoot Mr Ali – but the gun jammed, allowing him to flee.

Betro – originally from Wisconsin – was part of a plot orchestrated by co-conspirators Mohammed Nabil Nazir, 31, and his father, Mohammed Aslam, 56, who were in a violent feud with Mr Ali’s family.

Mohammed Nabil Nazir and Mohammed Aslam were jailed in November 2024.
Pic: West Midlands Police/PA
Image:
Mohammed Nabil Nazir and Mohammed Aslam were jailed in November 2024.
Pic: West Midlands Police/PA

During her trial, Betro said she had travelled to the UK on two previous occasions, having met Nazir on a dating app.

Asked why she had paid a third visit to the UK, arriving at Manchester Airport from Atlanta around two weeks before the shooting, Betro told jurors: “To celebrate my birthday, and I won tickets for another boat party in London.”

The court was shown CCTV of Betro waiting for 45 minutes outside Mr Ali’s house on the night of 7 September 2019.

As Mr Ali arrived home, Betro approached him with a firearm, but the gun failed to fire. Mr Ali is seen jumping back into his car and reversing away, clipping Betro’s driver’s side door in the process.

CCTV image said to show Aimee Betro in Birmingham following the attempted shooting of Sikander Ali in September 2019. Pic: PA
Image:
CCTV image said to show Aimee Betro in Birmingham following the attempted shooting of Sikander Ali in September 2019. Pic: PA

The court heard Betro then goaded Mr Ali’s father, Aslat Mahumad, with whom her co-conspirators had a feud, through text messages including: “Where are you hiding?”, “Stop playing hide and seek, you are lucky it jammed,” and asking him to meet her at a nearby Asda.

Jurors were told co-conspirators Nazir and Aslam had been injured during disorder at Mr Mahumad’s clothing boutique in Birmingham in July 2018, leading them to conspire to have someone kill him or a member of his family.

In the early hours of the next morning and just hours after the failed shooting, Betro booked a taxi and returned to Mr Ali’s home, where she fired three shots at the property, which was empty at the time.

She then fled back to the US the next day before becoming involved in another of Nazir’s plots to get revenge on a rival.

Read more from Sadiya Chowdhury:
Two terminally ill people give their views on assisted dying vote
Teen who murdered his family will not be given whole-life order

Prosecutors also said Betro sent three parcels full of ammunition and gun parts to the UK on 16 October 2019.

The court heard the parts, which were wrapped in foil and paper inside three cardboard boxes, were addressed to a man from Derby, with Nazir tipping off the police with the intent to frame him.

While the packages were intercepted and the man arrested as part of what the prosecution said was Nazir’s “devious scheme”, his involvement in the plan eventually came to light, and he was released without charge.

Betro, it said, was seen at a post office 100 miles away from her home address in the US posting the parcels under a fake name.

In the case of each of those three packages, Betro’s DNA has been found on the gun parts and ammunition inside them.

Betro had claimed it was all a coincidence, saying the woman on the CCTV was another American who looked, dressed and sounded like her.

It was alleged that Betro was in Armenia when Nazir and Aslam were jailed for 32 years and 10 years respectively in November 2024, but was extradited in January this year to face her own criminal proceedings.

Jurors deliberated for almost 21 hours before convicting Betro of conspiracy to murder, possessing a self-loading pistol with intent to cause fear of violence, and a charge of illegally importing ammunition.

She was found guilty by majority verdicts on the conspiracy to murder and firearm charges, and by a unanimous verdict on the ammunition charge.

Speaking to Sky News, Detective Chief Inspector Alastair Orencas, from West Midlands Police’s Major Crime Unit, called Betro’s crime “a brazen attempt,” adding that there “doesn’t seem to be a whole lot of effort to avoid detection”.

“I think she fell foul of a really slick, dynamic law enforcement operation over here,” he said.

“I don’t know whether that was her perspective from America, that that’s how we operate, but zero tolerance around firearms, criminality on these shores.”

Betro was remanded in custody and will be sentenced on 21 August.

Hannah Sidaway, specialist prosecutor from the Crown Prosecution Service in the West Midlands, said: “Only Betro knows what truly motivated her or what she sought to gain from becoming embroiled in a crime that meant she travelled hundreds of miles from Wisconsin to Birmingham to execute an attack on a man she did not know.”

Continue Reading

UK

Thames Water crisis: Ministers line up administrator for utility giant

Published

on

By

Thames Water crisis: Ministers line up administrator for utility giant

Ministers have lined up insolvency practitioners to prepare for the potential collapse of Thames Water, Britain’s biggest water utility.

Sky News can exclusively reveal that Steve Reed, the environment secretary, has signed off the appointment of FTI Consulting to advise on contingency plans for Thames Water to be placed into a Special Administration regime (SAR).

Sources said on Tuesday that the advisory role established FTI Consulting as the frontrunner to act as the company’s administrator if it fails to secure a private sector bailout – although approval of such an appointment would be decided in court.

Money latest: Supermarket coffee beats big brands in taste test

Thames Water, its largest group of creditors and Ofwat, the industry regulator, have been locked in talks for months about a deal that would see its lenders injecting about £5bn of new capital and writing off roughly £12bn of value across its capital structure.

The discussions are said to be progressing constructively, although they appear to rely in part on the prospect of the company being granted forbearance on hundreds of millions of pounds of regulatory fines.

Responding to an enquiry from Sky News on Tuesday, a government spokesperson said: “The government will always act in the national interest on these issues.

More on Thames Water

“The company remains financially stable, but we have stepped up our preparations and stand ready for all eventualities, including applying for a Special Administration Regime if that were to become necessary.”

Insiders stressed that FTI Consulting’s engagement by the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) did not signal that Thames Water was about to collapse into insolvency proceedings.

A SAR would ensure that customers would continue to receive water and sewage services if Thames Water collapsed, while putting taxpayers on the hook for billions of pounds in bailout costs – a scenario the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, is keen to avoid at a time when the public finances are already severely constrained.

The SAR process can only be instigated in the event that a company becomes insolvent, can no longer fulfil its statutory duties or breaches an enforcement order, according to insiders.

Mr Reed has repeatedly stressed the government’s desire to avoid taking Thames Water into temporary public ownership, but that it was ready to deal with “all eventualities”.

“Thames Water must meet its statutory and regulatory obligations to its customers and to the environment–it is only right that the company is subject to the same consequences as any other water company.

The company remains financially stable, but we have stepped up our preparations and stand ready for all eventualities,” he told the House of Commons in June.

Thames Water, which has about 16m customers, serves about a quarter of the UK’s population.

It is drowning under close to £20bn of debt, and was previously owned by Macquarie, the Australian infrastructure and banking behemoth.

Its most recent consortium of shareholders, which included the Universities Superannuation Scheme and an Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund, have written off the value of their investments in the company.

The government’s SAR process has only been tested once before, when the energy retailer Bulb failed in 2021.

Bulb was ultimately sold to Octopus Energy with the taxpayer funding used to save and run the company since having been repaid.

Thames Water is racing to secure a rescue plan involving funds such as Elliott Management and Silver Point Capital, with a deadline of late October to appeal to the Competition and Markets Authority against Ofwat’s final determination on its next five-year spending plan.

Ofwat has ruled that Thames Water can spend £20.5bn during the period from 2026, with the company arguing that it requires a further sum of approximately £4bn.

Mike McTighe, a veteran corporate troubleshooter who chairs BT Group’s Openreach division, has been parachuted in to work with the funds.

The company said in its accounts last month that there was “material uncertainty” over whether it could be solvently recapitalised.

Earlier this year, Thames Water was fined a record £123m over sewage leaks and the payment of dividends, with Ofwat lambasting the company over its performance and governance.

In recent weeks, Thames Water has been engulfed in a row over the legitimacy of bonuses paid to chief executive Chris Weston and other bosses, even as it attempts to secure its survival.

Under new laws, Thames Water is among half a dozen water companies which have been barred from paying bonuses this year because of their poor environmental records.

The creditor group was effectively left as the sole bidder for Thames Water after the private equity firm KKR withdrew from the process, citing political and reputational risks.

The Hong Kong-based investor CK Infrastructure Holdings (CKI), which already owns Northumbrian Water, has sought to re-engage in talks about a rescue deal but has gained little traction in doing so.

News of FTI Consulting’s appointment also comes on the same day as a “nationally significant” water shortfall was declared across swathes of the country.

Last week, Sky News revealed that David Black, the Ofwat chief executive, was to step down following the publication of a government-commissioned review which recommended the regulator’s abolition.

He has been replaced by Chris Walters, another Ofwat executive, on an interim basis.

Continue Reading

Trending