What Rishi Sunak didn’t say is more notable than what he did
The prime minister’s comments were notable because of what he chose to omit.
On a day when the party was rocked by allegations of Islamophobia and anti-Muslim hatred- a day when it had to suspend one of its own MPs because of these very issues- Rishi Sunak chose to make some comments.
Instead of condemning the remarks or distancing the party from them, the prime minister chose not to make any reference to them at all, rather, he chose to speak more explicitly about antisemitsm.
The prime minister said: “The explosion in prejudice and antisemitism since the Hamas attacks on the 7 October are as unacceptable as they are un-British. Simply put antisemitism is racism”.
We know that hate crime towards both Muslim and Jewish communities has been rising since 7 October.
However, some may question why, after a day like this, Mr Sunak chose to omit explicit reference to Muslim communities.
These comments, and the tone of the remarks, do not challenge the prevailing view held in some quarters that the Conservative party doesn’t take Islamophobia seriously.
The prime minister avoids using the word at all when discussing anti-Muslim hatred.
Of course, the Labour party, which over the years has faced accusations of antisemitism, had no such problem calling it out.
Sir Kier Starmer said: “It’s right that Lee Anderson has lost the whip after his appalling racist and Islamophobic outburst against Sadiq Khan.”
He went on to question Mr Sunak’s judgement saying he needed to get a grip of “extremists” in his own party.
The incident does expose how difficult the prime minister is finding it to exert authority over his fracturing right-wing coalition and create some semblance of a unified identity for his party.
He knows that he needs to placate the right of his party, which sometimes means turning a blind eye to some of its more outspoken characters, like Suella Braverman and Liz Truss.
However, there’s a line and it’s becoming more and more difficult for the prime minister to tread.
With this statement the prime minister was, once again, speaking to this right-wing faction (on a day when they lost a key figure in Lee Anderson) instead of the communities that may have been affected by his remarks.