Connect with us

Published

on

Rishi Sunak has condemned Lee Anderson’s attack on London mayor Sadiq Khan as unacceptable and “wrong” – as the suspended MP said his words were “borne out of sheer frustration”.

Mr Anderson, the former deputy party chair of the Conservative Party, was suspended at the weekend after he refused to apologise for claiming “Islamists” had achieved “control” over London and that Mr Khan had “given our capital city away to his mates”.

On Monday, the now independent MP for Ashfield stood by his position and refused to apologise – while also describing his words as “clumsy”.

Politics latest: Tories label MP’s suspension ‘final nail in the party’s coffin’

Speaking on BBC Radio York, the prime minister denied the Tory party has “Islamophobic tendencies” and said: “Lee’s comments weren’t acceptable, they were wrong. That’s why he’s had the whip suspended.”

He added: “Words matter, especially in the current environment where tensions are running high. I think it’s incumbent on all of us to choose them carefully.”

But speaking to reporters later on Monday, the prime minister repeatedly refused to call Mr Anderson’s remarks Islamophobic.

‘Clearly racist’

Mr Khan said he was “bewildered why Rishi Sunak and the cabinet are refusing to call this out”.

The London mayor added: “They should say what the problem is. The problem is you have a senior Conservative saying things that are clearly racist, anti-Muslim and Islamophobic.

“That is leading to an environment where anti-Muslim crime is spiralling and what they are doing is pouring petrol on the flames of Islamophobia.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Khan: ‘Pouring petrol on the flames of Islamophobia’

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer also attacked Mr Sunak for being “too weak” on the issue.

He told broadcasters: “This is really basic. Islamophobia is something which should be called out by every political leader and the prime minister isn’t calling it out because he’s too weak.

“I don’t think anybody can make excuses for this prime minister and say it’s all too difficult. It’s very straightforward.

“He lacks the backbone to call this out for what it is, because he’s leading a divided party, a chaotic party, and it’s no wonder people have just had enough of this after 14 years and desperately want change.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Can Lee Anderson be a Tory candidate again?

Mr Sunak’s statement to local radio was the first time he has directly addressed the comments made by Mr Anderson.

The MP told GB News last week: “I don’t actually believe that the Islamists have got control of our country, but what I do believe is they’ve got control of Khan and they’ve got control of London…

“He’s actually given our capital city away to his mates.”

Mr Anderson’s comments sparked condemnation from across the political divide, including from Tory peer Baroness Warsi, who said she was “really disturbed by where the Conservative Party has gone” and that “anti-Muslim racism is being used as an electoral campaign tool”.

‘My words were clumsy’

In a fresh statement published by GB News on Monday, Mr Anderson said his words were “clumsy” and “borne out of sheer frustration at what is happening to our beautiful capital city”.

However, he doubled down on his refusal to apologise, saying: “If you are wrong, apologising is not a sign of weakness but a sign of strength.

“But when you think you are right you should never apologise because to do so would be a sign of weakness.”

He said: “Seeing the words ‘From the river to the sea’ on [the] Elizabeth Tower made me feel sick to the pit of my stomach.”

Read more from Sky News:
US airman dies after setting himself ablaze in ‘genocide’ protest

Everton Football Club’s 10-point deduction reduced
Cruise ship blocked from docking over ‘health risks’

Repeating his opposition to the mayor, Mr Anderson said: “Khan has stood by and allowed our police to turn a blind eye to the disgusting scenes around parliament.

“It is not my intention to upset anyone, I believe in free speech and have 100% respect for people of all backgrounds.

“The vast majority of Muslims are not Islamists in the same way the vast majority of Christians are not conservatives or socialists.

“My words may have been clumsy but my words were borne out of sheer frustration at what is happening to our beautiful capital city.

“We’ve got to get Khan out at the elections in May.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Anti-Muslim racism being used as an electoral campaign tool’

He added: “Sadiq Khan is failing London across the board. On transport with ULEZ and the strikes which he pledged to end. On knife crime and violence against women and girls. The list is endless.

“He’s more interested in virtue signalling to his trendy lefty mates by renaming train lines and street signs at a cost of millions of pounds rather than in delivering for our capital city which should be the greatest city on Earth.”

Mr Anderson’s statement, published by GB News, was drawn up on Saturday, shortly after he made his provocative comments to the channel.

? Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts?

However, it was not released because of Mr Anderson’s refusal to apologise to the London mayor as requested by Tory chief whip Simon Hart.

Mr Sunak said it was “incumbent on all of us, especially those elected to parliament, not to inflame our debates in a way that’s harmful to others”.

“Words matter, especially in the current environment where tensions are running high and I think it’s incumbent on all of us to choose them carefully, he said.

Elsewhere in his interview with local radio, Mr Sunak rejected suggestions his party had a problem with Islamophobia.

Rishi Sunk has tried to draw a line under Lee Anderson – but the row could run on


Tamara Cohen

Tamara Cohen

Political correspondent

@tamcohen

Rishi Sunak this morning tried to close down a row over suspended Tory MP Lee Anderson, describing his comments as “wrong” and saying MPs shouldn’t “inflame our debates in a way that’s harmful to others”.

Mr Anderson – the often controversial MP, who was a surprise pick as the party’s deputy chairman last year – claimed on GB News last week that “Islamists” had “got control” of Labour mayor Sadiq Khan.

The prime minister today went further than his deputy, Oliver Dowden, over the weekend – but would not say whether he thought the remarks were racist, as Mr Khan himself and some Tories have.

It’s an attempt to draw a line under the row, allowing his colleagues to claim Mr Sunak acted “decisively”.

But there are several reasons this could run and run.

One is that Mr Sunak has touched on one of his party’s fault lines, with some 2019 MPs defending Mr Anderson in their WhatsApp groups – although other senior figures are horrified.

Mr Anderson himself, who could have avoided suspension by apologising, could stoke it further – he is already tweeting about people’s support for him, and has a TV platform to make further noise.

Mr Sunak has been trying in recent days to make a point about protests that are “hijacked by extremists” who he says are undermining democracy by intimidation.

Tory sources admit Mr Anderson’s comments are particularly unhelpful in this context. With another vote on Gaza on the cards, tensions will be running high on all sides.

The prime minister said it was “not a fair characterisation at all” to argue he had taken a tough stance on antisemitism but had overlooked Islamophobia in his party – saying racism or prejudice “any kind” was “completely unacceptable” and “not British”.

Earlier today, a cabinet minister appeared to leave the door open to Mr Anderson regaining the Tory whip, which allows him to sit as a Conservative MP in the Commons.

‘Reflection needed’

Asked what Mr Anderson needed to say to be welcomed back, Transport Secretary Mark Harper told Kay Burley on Sky News he should “reflect on what he said” and “retract those comments and apologise”.

“He’s contributed a lot in the past. I’d like to see him be able to contribute to the Conservative Party in the future,” he said.

Read more:
More than 40% of public ‘think Labour still has antisemitism problem’

Anderson row blunts Sunak’s moral authority on racism
Speaker retracts offer for emergency ceasefire debate

While a number of senior Tories have criticised Mr Anderson for his comments, Mr Harper was the second cabinet minister to refuse to say whether the remarks were “racist”.

Yesterday, Mr Dowden backed the decision to suspend the Ashfield MP but refused to say whether he was racist.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘It was wrong’

WhatsApp messages leaked to Sky News reveal some Tory MPs regard Mr Anderson’s suspension as a mistake.

The WhatsApp forum is called the “109 group” of Tory MPs elected in 2019.

Jill Mortimer, the Conservative MP for Hartlepool, shared messages from constituents saying they would not vote Tory again and that “Lee Anderson’s suspension is the final nail in the party’s coffin”.

Continue Reading

UK

Why many victims will welcome a national inquiry into grooming gangs

Published

on

By

Why many victims will welcome a national inquiry into grooming gangs

In 2019, nine men were jailed for raping and abusing two teenage girls living in a children’s home in Bradford.

One of the victims, Fiona Goddard, says more than 50 men raped her.

When the government began to talk about offering councils money for local inquiries, Fiona hoped Bradford would be one of the first to take up the offer. But there didn’t seem to be much enthusiasm.

The council was quick to point out that there had already been an independent case review into Fiona’s case, along with four other victims.

This, then, was Fiona’s first reasoning for wanting a national inquiry: The council felt it had done all that needed to be done. Fiona didn’t.

The Independent review, published in July 2021, found that while in the children’s home, Fiona “went missing almost on a daily basis”. The police attitude was that she could look after herself – she was “street-wise”.

There was “agreement by all agencies that Fiona was either at risk of Child Sexual Exploitation (CSE) or actively being sexually abused and exploited”. But “this was not addressed by any single agency”.

And “when Fiona became pregnant at the age of 15, there was little curiosity or enquiry who the father was”.

So, obvious failings were discovered.

The predictable response was that lessons had been learned and new processes put in place. But no one seemed to be held accountable.

Grooming gangs timeline: What happened, what inquiries there were and how Starmer was involved

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Grooming gangs: What happened?

Ms Goddard told Sky News: “In my serious case review she [Jane Booth, the independent chair] found seven incidences at least, in them records that she found, of them not reporting sexual abuse or rape or assault, from as young as eight years old, and one of the incidences I literally turned up covered in blood and they didn’t report it.

“That is not just misunderstanding a crime, that is making intentional decisions not to report the sexual abuse of a child.”

She adds: “Let’s not forget, these people still work within social services and the police force.”

Not only did this Independent review not satisfy Fiona, but it also didn’t begin to reflect the levels and scale of abuse Fiona had experienced outside of Bradford.

Fiona Goddard, who says more than 50 men raped her in Bradford
Image:
‘I literally turned up covered in blood and they didn’t report it,’ Fiona says

Asked where she was trafficked to, Fiona rattles off a list of cities.

“Blackburn, Rotherham, Rochdale, Birmingham, Edinburgh, Oldham – never Telford, I’d never even heard of Telford until it all came out if I’m honest – Nottingham, Oxford.”

Then she remembers she didn’t go to Oxford – men from Oxford came to her – but the point is made.

Local enquiries can’t possibly begin to explore the networks of men who traffic women, often down routes of drug trafficking being done by the same gangs.

Bradford Council told Sky News it contributed to the national Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) and published more than 70 reports where child sexual exploitation was discussed and has implemented findings from the independent local review which included Fiona’s case.

Fiona believes there are numerous connections leading back to Bradford – but victims from each city often believe their abusers are at the centre of it.

We’ve spoken to grooming victims across the country, and in 2022, a case was reopened in Humberside after a Sky News investigation, where we found diary entries, texts, photos, and school reports all indicating that teenage victims had been abused.

Read more on this story:
Telford child abuse victims speak out

What we know about grooming gangs, from the data
The women who blew whistle on Rotherham

One of them was “Anna”, who also wants a national inquiry. She believes there is a national pattern of police forces not believing victims or even criminalising them instead.

Obtaining her own police records using a Subject Access Request (SAR), Anna found officers’ attitudes towards her were similar to what we heard with Fiona in Bradford, blaming her abuse and injuries on “lifestyle choices of her own”.

Anna said: “Every time I look at my Subject Access Request, I still think it’s shocking.

“It was the same sort of terminology – lifestyle choices, liar, attention seeker, and the majority of it was negative.

“It was really rare that I’d come across something where they were actually listening or they were concerned.”

Humberside Police told us: “As the investigation is active, it is imperative we protect its integrity; as such are unable to comment on aspects of the investigation as this could impact or jeopardise any criminal or judicial proceedings.”

But it is years now since Anna first reported her abuse, and she believes the police have left it too late to gather evidence.

She told Sky News: “I think it’s either happening everywhere, or young people have been taken everywhere.

“I think the attitudes of the professionals, the police, social services, from what I’ve heard and seen, they seem very similar in every area.”

The government-commissioned rapid review by Baroness Casey is due to be published next week and is expected to call for a national inquiry into grooming gangs.

Like Anna and Fiona, many victims will welcome Sir Keir Starmer’s early response accepting the recommendation.

They will want the inquiry to probe into the operations of the perpetrators – who they are and how they are connected.

But they will also want clear accountability of the people and organisations who failed to act when they reported their abuse – and an understanding of why, so often, authorities fail to protect these vulnerable girls.

Continue Reading

UK

Woman, 23, dies after falling in water at beauty spot in Scottish Highlands

Published

on

By

Woman, 23, dies after falling in water at beauty spot in Scottish Highlands

A woman has died after falling into the water at a popular beauty spot in the Scottish Highlands.

The 23-year-old had fallen into the water in the Rogie Falls area of Wester Ross.

Police Scotland confirmed emergency services attended the scene after being called at 1.45pm on Saturday.

“However, [she] was pronounced dead at the scene,” a spokesperson said.

“There are no suspicious circumstances and a report will be submitted to the Procurator Fiscal.”

Rogie Falls are a series of waterfalls on the Black Water, a river in Ross-shire in the Highlands of Scotland. They are a popular attraction for tourists on Scotland’s North Coast 500 road trip.

Continue Reading

UK

‘Happy Father’s Day, Papa’: Royal children share ‘before and after’ photos with Prince William

Published

on

By

'Happy Father's Day, Papa': Royal children share 'before and after' photos with Prince William

Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis have wished their “Papa”, Prince William, a happy Father’s Day.

The post on the Prince and Princess of Wales‘s official social media pages features two photos – captioned “before and after”.

The children are seen hugging their father – and then piling on top of him.

The post reads: “Happy Father’s Day, Papa (before and after!) We love you! G, C & L.”

The two photographs of the family – one colour and one black and white – were taken earlier this year in Norfolk by photographer Josh Shinner, who also took Prince Louis’s birthday portraits earlier this year.

The post follows yesterday’s Trooping the Colour, celebrating King Charles‘s official birthday, after which the family shared a rare posed photo taken on the day of the event.

The first photo shows the Prince of Wales wearing a green woollen jumper and jeans, with his arms around George, 11, and Charlotte, 10, with Louis, seven, standing in front of him.

The second picture shows everyone in a bundle, lying on grass and daffodils, with Prince William at the centre.

The Royal family traditionally shares public wishes for Father’s Day and Mother’s Day.

Last year, the Prince of Wales shared a photo of himself playing football with the King, taken in the gardens of Kensington Palace in June 1984, just ahead of his second birthday.

This year, Buckingham Palace posted a black and white photo of Prince Philip pushing a young King Charles and Princess Anne on a swing.

A second photo showed the Queen and her father, Major Bruce Shand, taken on the day of her wedding to Charles in 2005.

The message read: “To all Dads everywhere, we wish you a happy Father’s Day today.”

Continue Reading

Trending