Connect with us

Published

on

A former Tory minister has apologised for claiming there are “no-go areas” in London and Birmingham following a backlash.

Paul Scully, who served as the minister for London until the latest reshuffle, has expressed “regret” for the language he used in a BBC interview, where he said people were “concerned about, more and more, their neighbourhoods changing”.

In a post on X, he wrote: “Following the frenzy of yesterday I regret using language that could be misconstrued but at a time when we need to encourage moderate voices speaking up for our diverse communities, frankly my biggest regret is speaking out in the first place.”

Mr Scully, the MP for Sutton and Cheam, also used an interview with BBC Radio London to say he was “sorry for using the word “no-go areas”, adding it was a “blunt thing that also feeds into another set of conspiracy theories”.

The MP’s apology comes after he was encouraged to withdraw his comments by immigration minister Tom Pursglove.

Politics latest: Rishi Sunak tries to put lid on Lee Anderson Islamophobia row

Asked about Mr Scully’s claims on Sky News Breakfast, Mr Pursglove said: “I don’t recognise that depiction.”

More on Conservatives

He said a “key part” of his role and the government’s migration plans were encouraging immigrants to integrate.

“I think it would be best, again, if that comment was withdrawn,” he added.

Mr Scully said he was feeling “really bruised” after his comments sparked criticism.

“I’m slightly furious that some of the pile-on I had yesterday in some areas, rather than actually people asking me…’what do you mean by that?'”

Minister for legal migrations Tom Pursglove MP
Image:
Tom Pursglove MP

He added: “Frankly, at the moment, I’m just feeling that I don’t want to get involved in the conversation for some time but I know in my heart that’s not going to last for long because London matters to me, the communities in London really matter to me.”

In his original BBC interview, Mr Scully said he wanted there to be “a sensible use of language so we have a constructive adult debate”.

“If you were just looking at the colour of skin and, for example, when a number of Indians were coming in the 70s – my father is half-Burmese, so I’ve seen it first hand – and if it is about the colour of skin, that’s one thing,” he said.

“The point I am trying to make is if you look at parts of Tower Hamlets, for example, there are no-go areas.

“Parts of Birmingham, Sparkhill, where there are no-go areas, mainly because of doctrine, mainly because of people using – abusing in many ways – their religion because it is not the doctrine of Islam, to espouse what some of these people are saying.”

Read more:
Sunak ‘made calculation he doesn’t need Muslim voters’
More than 40% of public think Labour still has antisemitism problem

The comments were criticised by Tory West Midlands mayor Andy Street, who posted on X that it was “news to me and I suspect the good people of Sparkhill” to claim there were “no-go areas”.

Jess Phillips, the Labour MP for Birmingham Yardley, also wrote on the social media platform that she was “expecting an apology for this utter drivel”.

Mr Scully’s comments come as the Conservative Party faces accusations of Islamophobia following Lee Anderson’s claim that “Islamists” had taken control of London and its mayor, Sadiq Khan.

Mr Sunak has condemned Mr Anderson’s attack on Mr Khan as unacceptable and “wrong” but refused to say whether they were Islamophobic.

Asked whether Mr Anderson’s comments were racist, Mr Pursglove echoed the prime minister’s language and said: “I don’t think personally that Lee is racist, but what he said was unacceptable. He shouldn’t have said it.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Crypto to become UAE’s second-biggest sector in 5 years — Institutional investor

Published

on

By

Crypto to become UAE’s second-biggest sector in 5 years — Institutional investor

Crypto to become UAE’s second-biggest sector in 5 years — Institutional investor

The crypto industry is set to experience massive growth in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) due to its pro-tech and business regulations.

Continue Reading

Politics

Blockchain security must localize to stop Asia’s crypto crime wave

Published

on

By

Blockchain security must localize to stop Asia’s crypto crime wave

Blockchain security must localize to stop Asia’s crypto crime wave

Without localized risk detection and public–private cooperation, illicit capital will continue to flow unchecked, and trust in the system will collapse.

Continue Reading

Politics

Thousands more Afghans affected by second data breach, ministers say

Published

on

By

Thousands more Afghans affected by second data breach, ministers say

Thousands more Afghan nationals may have been affected by another data breach, the government has said.

Up to 3,700 Afghans brought to the UK between January and March 2024 have potentially been impacted as names, passport details and information from the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy has been compromised again, this time by a breach on a third party supplier used by the Ministry of Defence (MoD).

This was not an attack directly on the government but a cyber security incident on a sub-contractor named Inflite – The Jet Centre – an MoD supplier that provides ground handling services for flights at London Stansted Airport.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

July: UK spies exposed in Afghan data breach

The flights were used to bring Afghans to the UK, travel to routine military exercises, and official engagements. It was also used to fly British troops and government officials.

Those involved were informed of it on Friday afternoon by the MoD, marking the second time information about Afghan nationals relocated to the UK has been compromised.

It is understood former Tory ministers are also affected by the hack.

Earlier this year, it emerged that almost 7,000 Afghan nationals would have to be relocated to the UK following a massive data breach by the British military that successive governments tried to keep secret with a super-injunction.

Defence Secretary John Healey offered a “sincere apology” for the first data breach in a statement to the House of Commons, saying he was “deeply concerned about the lack of transparency” around the data breach, adding: “No government wishes to withhold information from the British public, from parliamentarians or the press in this manner.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

July: Afghan interpreter ‘betrayed’ by UK govt

The previous Conservative government set up a secret scheme in 2023 to relocate Afghan nationals impacted by the data breach, but who were not eligible for an existing programme to relocate and help people who had worked for the British government in Afghanistan.

The mistake exposed personal details of close to 20,000 individuals, endangering them and their families, with as many as 100,000 people impacted in total.

Read more on Sky News:
Data breach victims sent spam emails
Afghan data leak timeline
MoD urged to reveal details of nuclear incident

A government spokesperson said of Friday’s latest breach: “We were recently notified that a third party sub-contractor to a supplier experienced a cyber security incident involving unauthorised access to a small number of its emails that contained basic personal information.

“We take data security extremely seriously and are going above and beyond our legal duties in informing all potentially affected individuals. The incident has not posed any threat to individuals’ safety, nor compromised any government systems.”

In a statement, Inflite – The Jet Centre confirmed the “data security incident” involving “unauthorised access to a limited number of company emails”.

“We have reported the incident to the Information Commissioner’s Office and have been actively working with the relevant UK cyber authorities, including the National Crime Agency and the National Cyber Security Centre, to support our investigation and response,” it said.

“We believe the scope of the incident was limited to email accounts only, however, as a precautionary measure, we have contacted our key stakeholders whose data may have been affected during the period of January to March 2024.”

Continue Reading

Trending