Connect with us

Published

on

Feb 28 2024 University of Exeter

Young people could be spared from going blind by a new genetic risk tool that could also help diagnose multiple sclerosis (MS) earlier, to start effective treatments.

Optic neuritis is a condition that affects people of all ages, but especially young adults, usually manifesting in blurred vision and sometimes pain when moving the eyes. Up to half of people affected in the UK eventually go on to develop MS – often many years later. Emerging evidence indicates that starting the very effective MS treatments earlier may improve long term health.

Optic neuritis occurs because of swelling in or around the optic nerve. For those with MS-related optic neuritis, the swelling subsides on its own, and vision usually recovers. For many people whose optic neuritis does not result from MS, the optic nerve can be permanently damaged unless high doses of steroids are given quickly, resulting in loss of sight. However, steroids can result in harmful side effects. When people first develop optic neuritis, it can be difficult for patients and their doctors to decide whether the possible benefits of steroid outweigh the possible harms, when the likely cause of the optic neuritis is unclear.

Identifying whether there is an underlying cause of optic neuritis can be challenging for clinicians, with many important test results taking weeks to return. Now, new research, published in Nature Communications and led by the University of Exeter and King's College London, has shown for the first time that combining genetic risk for MS with demographic factors significantly improves MS risk prediction in people presenting with optic neuritis.

Co-author Dr Tasanee Braithwaite, consultant ophthalmologist to the Medical Eye Unit at Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, and Adjunct Senior Lecturer at King's College London said: "As a doctor caring for many patients with optic neuritis, I'm excited by the possibility of translating this pilot research into front line clinical care in the near future. Whilst more research is needed, our study provides a strong signal that we could better identify patients at high risk of MS, perhaps enabling these people to have earlier MS treatment in the future. Whereas, if we could better identify people whose optic neuritis is very unlikely to result from MS, we could treat these people urgently to reduce irreversible vision loss and blindness."

The team analysed more than 300 common genetic variants linked to developing MS, combining them into a genetic risk score that helps clinicians understand an individual's chance of developing MS. They analysed data from 500,000 people in the UK Biobank, who have shared genetic samples, questionnaires and linked health information from their electronic medical records.

The researchers found 2,369 people who had MS in the UK Biobank, and 687 people with optic neuritis. Of those, 545 had no identifiable cause for their optic neuritis at the start of the study, and 124 went on to develop MS.

Applying the genetic risk score effectively helped separate those at lowest risk from those at high risk. Whilst the MS genetic risk score is not a diagnostic test, this study highlights that it could add one valuable additional piece of information to support doctors and patients to make better decisions. Since the first genome was sequenced three decades ago, we've been working towards the promise of being able to use genetics to improve outcomes for individual patients. This research is an excellent example of precision genetic diagnosis in practice."

Richard Oram, Co-Author, Professor of the University of Exeter Medical School Related StoriesCaffeine's protective effects against obesity and joint diseases supported by genetic studyMapping the genomic landscape of Type 2 diabetesIdentification of genetic determinants of micronucleus formation

Dr Clare Walton, Head of Research at MS Society, said: "Currently, 130,000 people live with MS in the UK and one in five will have experienced optic neuritis at the start of their MS journey. This research shows how using genetic scores could be a useful way to predict who will likely continue to an MS diagnosis. 

"Using immunotherapies in people at high risk of MS could significantly delay the onset of the condition, but these drugs come with side effects. This exciting study opens up the possibility of finding people in which the benefits will outweigh the risks." 

The research stemmed from a summer project led by University of Exeter Medicine student Pavel Loginovic. With funding from the University of Exeter, it expanded into a research collaboration involving academics in Finland and the US. The research was further funded through Fight for Sight and the Royal College of Ophthalmologists, who awarded Dr Braithwaite a Zakarian Award to support this work.

Pavel said: "I'm elated to see this paper published, and it's gratifying that it could have a real impact in moving research forward, ultimately aiming to get people with MS diagnosed and perhaps treated earlier. Leading this analysis while staying on top of my medical studies has been a challenge and an immense opportunity for growth, professional and personal. I've enjoyed the academic journey so far, and I'm excited for what's to come."

The study is entitled, 'Applying a genetic risk score model to enhance prediction of future Multiple Sclerosis diagnosis at first presentation with optic neuritis', and is published in Nature Communications. Source:

University of ExeterJournal reference:

Loginovic, P., et al. (2024). Applying a genetic risk score model to enhance prediction of future multiple sclerosis diagnosis at first presentation with optic neuritis. Nature Communications. doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-44917-9.

Continue Reading

Business

UK economy contracts – with record fall in exports to the US after Trump tariff hikes

Published

on

By

UK economy contracts - with record fall in exports to the US after Trump tariff hikes

The UK economy shrank more than expected in April as the worst of President Trump’s tariffs hit.

The standard measure of economic output (GDP) contracted a sharp 0.3% in April, data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed.

During the month, Mr Trump’s so-called “Liberation Day” applied steep tariffs to countries around the world and sparked a trade war with China, the world’s second-largest economy.

The outcome is worse than expected by economists. A contraction of just 0.1% had been forecast by economists polled by the Reuters news agency.

It’s also down from the growth of 0.2% recorded in March.

Blow for Reeves

It’s also bad news for Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who has made the push for economic growth her number one priority. Speaking to Sky News following the news, she described the figures as “disappointing”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Reeves refuses to rule out tax rises

Additional costs on businesses were also levied during the month, as higher minimum wages and employer national insurance contributions took effect, which businesses told the ONS played a part in their performance.

Why?

The biggest part of the economy, the services sector, contracted by 0.4%, and manufacturing dropped 0.9%.

There was the largest ever monthly fall in goods exported to the United States, the ONS said.

Decreases were seen across most types of goods due to tariffs, it added.

Higher stamp duty depressed house buying and meant legal and real estate firms fared badly in the month.

After a strong showing in the first three months, car manufacturing performed poorly.

Continue Reading

Politics

Economy shock overshadows Reeves’ big day

Published

on

By

Economy shock overshadows Reeves' big day

Sky News’ Sam Coates and Politico’s Anne McElvoy serve up their essential guide to the day in British politics.

Rachel Reeves has said this morning that the latest figures showing the UK economy has shrunk by more than expected are “disappointing”. How much will this overshadow yesterday’s major spending announcement?

The chancellor has now planted Labour’s fiscal flag in the sand – and spending mistakes from here on in certainly cannot be blamed on their predecessors. How will Labour react to a potential internal revolt over disability benefit cuts? And how will the party manage the politics around expected tax rises in the autumn?

Continue Reading

Politics

Did ChatGPT get the spending review right? Treasury minister gives his verdict

Published

on

By

Did ChatGPT get the spending review right? Treasury minister gives his verdict

The chief secretary to the Treasury has called the Sky News-Chat GPT spending review projection “pretty good” and scored it 70%.

Darren Jones compared the real spending review, delivered by Rachel Reeves on Wednesday, and the Sky News AI (artificial intelligence) projection last week.

Sky News took the Treasury’s spring statement, past spending reviews, the ‘main estimates’ from the Treasury website, and the Institute for Fiscal Studies’ projections, and put them into ChatGPT, asking it to calculate the winners and losers in the spending review.

Politics Hub: Tap here for live updates

This was done 10 days ahead of the review – before several departments had agreed their budgets with the Treasury – on the basis of projections based on those public documents. It also comes amid a big debate kicked off by Sky News about the level of error of AI.

The Sky News-AI projection correctly put defence and health as the biggest winners, the Foreign Office as the biggest loser, and identified many departments would lose out in real terms overall.

It suggested the education budget would be smaller than it turned out, but correctly highlighted the challenges for departments like the Home Office and environment.

More on Artificial Intelligence

Watch what happened with Sky’s AI-generated spending review

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

AI writes the spending review

Reviewing the exercise, the author of the real spending review told Sky News that this pioneering use of AI was “pretty, pretty good”.

He added: “I could be out of a job next time in 2027, which to be honest, it’s not a bad idea given the process I’ve just had to go through.”

The Treasury made a number of accounting changes to so-called “mega projects” which AI could not have anticipated, and changed some of the numbers.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sky’s economics editor Ed Conway takes a look at the key takeaways from chancellor Rachel Reeves’ spending review.

Asked to give it a score, Mr Jones replied: “I’m going to give it 70%.”

The spending review includes AI as a tool to save money in various government processes.

Asked if 70% accuracy is good enough for government, he replied: “Well we’re not using your AI. We’ve got our own AI, which is called HMT GPT, and it helps us pull together all the information across government to be able to make better, evidence-informed decisions.”

Continue Reading

Trending