The US Supreme Court is expected to issue a ruling on Monday on Colorado’s bid to ban Donald Trump from running for president.
It comes after the Colorado Supreme Court said in December that the Republican could not stand for election in the state because he had “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” – as is forbidden under the US Constitution’s 14th Amendment.
The former president strongly denies the claims and his lawyers argue the riot did not amount to an insurrection.
Following the Colorado ruling, the case was taken to the US Supreme Court, the highest court in America, for a final decision.
In an unusual move, officials issued an update on Sunday to reveal that an unspecified Supreme Court ruling would be published on Monday – even though judges are not scheduled to sit that day.
However, it is widely expected that the announcement will be about the Colorado case because so-called “Super Tuesday” will be held this week.
On that day a total of 15 states – including Colorado – will host primary elections for voters to pick their party candidates for November’s presidential election.
Most commentators believe that the Supreme Court, which has a six to three conservative majority, will reject Colorado’s ruling and allow Trump to stand in the state.
Advertisement
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Chief justice John Roberts said there would be “daunting consequences” if the Colorado decision was upheld and other states also barred Trump from office – as it could “decide the presidential election”.
His colleague, justice Elena Kagan, appeared to agree, telling the court: “I think that the question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the United States.
“It seems quite extraordinary, doesn’t it?”
Other states, including Maine and Illinois, have also sought to ban Trump from running, but the cases are on hold pending the outcome of the Colorado case.
Last week former president Trump continued his seemingly unstoppable march to the Republican nomination with victories in the Michigan, Missouri and Idaho caucuses.
His main and last major rival, former UN ambassador Nikki Haley, is yet to achieve a single win in the race.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:26
From February: Supreme Court considers Trump election ban
Last week the US Supreme Court announced it would also rule on whether Trump can be prosecuted for alleged interference with the 2020 election.
However, the justices will not hear the case until late April, with a decision likely no later than the end of June.
Three of the judges on the court – Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett – were appointed by Trump during his presidency.
But there are fears they will discuss a deal robbing Ukraine of the land currently occupied by Russia – something Volodymyr Zelenskyy has said he won’t accept.
Here’s what three of our correspondents think ahead of the much-anticipated face-to-face.
Putin’s legacy is at stake – he’ll want territory and more By Ivor Bennett, Moscow correspondent, in Alaska
Putin doesn’t just want victory. He needs it.
Three and a half years after he ordered the invasion of Ukraine, this war has to end in a visible win for the Russian president. It can’t have been for nothing. His legacy is at stake.
So the only deal I think he’ll be willing to accept at Friday’s summit is one that secures Moscow’s goals.
These include territory (full control of the four Ukrainian regions which Russia has already claimed), permanent neutrality for Kyiv and limits on its armed forces.
I expect he’ll be trying to convince Trump that such a deal is the quickest path to peace. The only alternative, in Russia’s eyes, is an outright triumph on the battlefield.
Image: Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump meeting in Osaka in 2019
I think Putin‘s hope is that the American president agrees with this view and then gives Ukraine a choice: accept our terms or go it alone without US support.
A deal like that might not be possible this week, but it may be in the future if Putin can give Trump something in return.
That’s why there’s been lots of talk from Moscow this week about all the lucrative business deals that can come from better US-Russia relations.
The Kremlin will want to use this opportunity to remind the White House of what else it can offer, apart from an end to the fighting.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
4:25
What will Kyiv be asked to give up?
Ukraine would rather this summit not be happening By Dominic Waghorn, international affairs editor, in Ukraine
Ukraine would far rather this meeting wasn’t happening.
Trump seemed to have lost patience with Putin and was about to hit Russia with more severe sanctions until he was distracted by the Russian leader’s suggestion that they meet.
Ukrainians say the Alaska summit rewards Putin by putting him back on the world stage.
But the meeting is happening, and they have to be realistic.
Most of all, they want a ceasefire before any negotiations can happen. Then they want the promise of security guarantees.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:35
Does Europe have any power over Ukraine’s future?
That is because they know that Putin may well come back for more even if peace does break out. They need to be able to defend themselves should that happen.
And they want the promise of reparations to rebuild their country, devastated by Putin’s wanton, unprovoked act of aggression.
There are billions of Russian roubles and assets frozen across the West. They want them released and sent their way.
What they fear is Trump being hoodwinked by Putin with the lure of profit from US-Russian relations being restored, regardless of Ukraine’s fate.
Image: US Army paratroopers train at the military base where discussions will take place. File pic: Reuters
That would allow Russia to regain its strength, rearm and prepare for another round of fighting in a few years’ time.
Trump and his golf buddy-turned-negotiator Steve Witkoff appear to believe Putin might be satisfied with keeping some of the land he has taken by force.
Putin says he wants much more than that. He wants Ukraine to cease to exist as a country separate from Russia.
Any agreement short of that is only likely to be temporary.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:41
Zelenskyy: I told Trump ‘Putin is bluffing’
Trump’s pride on the line – he has a reputation to restore By Martha Kelner, US correspondent, in Alaska
As with anything Donald Trump does, he already has a picture in his mind.
The image of Trump shaking hands with the ultimate strongman leader, Vladimir Putin, on US soil calls to his vanity and love of an attention-grabbing moment.
There is also pride at stake.
Image: Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska, where Trump will meet his Russian counterpart. File pic: Reuters
Trump campaigned saying he would end the Russia-Ukraine war on his first day in office, so there is an element of him wanting to follow through on that promise to voters, even though it’s taken him 200-plus days in office and all he’s got so far is this meeting, without apparently any concessions on Putin’s end.
In Trump’s mind – and in the minds of many of his supporters – he is the master negotiator, the chief dealmaker, and he wants to bolster that reputation.
He is keen to further the notion that he negotiates in a different, more straightforward way than his predecessors and that it is paying dividends.
Spotify
This content is provided by Spotify, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spotify cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spotify cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spotify cookies for this session only.
Photos of rabbits in Colorado with black, horn-like growths around their faces have gone viral, with some describing the animals as “Frankenstein-“, “zombie-” and “demon-rabbits”.
Warning: This article contains images of infected rabbits, which some readers may find disturbing.
Residents in Fort Collins near Denver recently began posting pictures of the cottontail bunnies, causing a stir online.
“This is how the zombie virus starts,” posted one Instagram user on a post showing the rabbits.
“We’ve got freaking zombie rabbits now?!” posted another on YouTube.
So what’s going on?
Firstly, the pictures are real – despite some wishing they weren’t.
“One time I need this to be AI,” wrote one Instagram user on a post showing the horned bunnies.
The rabbits are suffering from a relatively harmless disease called Shope Papilloma Virus, according to Colorado Parks and Wildlife.
Image: A rabbit infected with Shope Papilloma Virus. Pic: Iowa Department of Natural Resources
Although the wildlife agency is getting calls from people spotting the infected rabbits in Fort Collins, they’re not an unusual sight, according to spokesperson Kara Van Hoose.
The disease is mainly found in America’s Midwest, according to the University of Missouri, and is more noticeable in the summer, when the fleas and ticks that spread the virus are most active.
The virus can also spread through rabbit-to-rabbit contact but not to other species like humans or dogs and cats, according to Ms Van Hoose.
People are being warned not to touch the infected rabbits, however.
The horn-like growths, or papillomas, are harmless to the bunnies, unless they grow on sensitive areas like the eyes or mouth or interfere with eating.
Once the rabbits’ immune systems have fought the virus, the growths will disappear.
Although infected wild rabbits usually don’t need treatment, it can be dangerous to pet rabbits, so officials recommend getting pet bunnies treated by a vet.
Image: The myth of the jackalope may have been inspired by rabbits with Shope Papilloma Virus. File pic: iStock
The mythical jackalope
It’s not a new illness, and is even thought to have inspired the centuries-old myth of the “jackalope”, a rabbit with antelope antlers.
Although hunters had long known about the disease, it was first scientifically reported in 1931 by Richard E Shope – hence the name.
Since then, the rabbits’ warts and horns have contributed to life-saving scientific understanding, including how viruses can be linked to cancer, like the HPV virus to cervical cancer.