Apple fined £1.5bn for not notifying users of cheaper music streaming options
Apple has been fined €1.8bn (£1.54bn) by the EU for favouring its own music streaming service rather than rivals.
Apple did not fully inform their device users there were alternative and cheaper subscription services for more than a decade, said the EU executive, the European Commission.
Money blog: Holidays get cheaper as pound strengthens – except in these four countries
As a result, iPhone and iPad users paid “significantly higher prices for music streaming subscriptions”, it said, and Apple abused its dominant position as the provider of music streaming services in its app store.
The fine has been issued due to a complaint by streaming service Spotify which then launched a five-year EU investigation focused on how Apple prevented app developers from telling users of cheaper ways to pay for subscriptions without going through an app.
It found that Apple stopped streaming services, such as Spotify, from letting users know the cost of non-Apple subscription offers.
Penalty much larger than expected to have deterrent effect
It’s a pretty significant number.
Most people thought that the EU was going to fine Apple for this particular breach of its anti-trust rules but the number that was doing the rounds was round €500m, so to come in at €1.8bn is a thumping penalty indeed.
The EU is making the point that the reason the fine was so big partly was as a deterrent against future anti-competitive behaviour but the second point was because Apple filed incorrect information while it was going back and forth with the European Commission on this.
At the heart of this is the fact that Apple did not make clear to its users that music streaming was available through other app stores other than its own.
Interestingly, Spotify actually doesn’t sell subscriptions through Apple’s app store, which is something that’s got Apple particularly hot under the collar and it will appeal against the decision accordingly.
It’s worth pointing out that under the EU’s new Digital Markets Act, which was passed at the end of last year and comes into effect later this week, Apple will have to allow other app stores onto its iOS operating system so in theory, this sort of breach shouldn’t happen again.
Apple is likely to appeal against this ruling and it could go through European courts. It could take years, effectively.
The tech giant banned app makers from “fully informing iOS users about alternative and cheaper music subscription services outside of the app,” said the EU’s competition commissioner, Margrethe Vestager.
“This is illegal, and it has impacted millions of European consumers.”
To comply with the finding, Apple said it will allow iPhone users in Europe to use app stores other than its own and enable developers to offer alternative payment systems.
It is likely it will appeal.
“The decision was reached despite the commission’s failure to uncover any credible evidence of consumer harm, and ignores the realities of a market that is thriving, competitive, and growing fast.”
While the sum is significant, it accounts for only 0.5% of Apple’s worldwide revenue and it could have been fined 10% of global turnover.
There’s going to be a direct benefit to the UK from the fine. As it was still a member of the EU when the investigation was launched and Apple was perpetrating the wrong, it will be one of the 28 countries sharing in the sum Apple pays.
Sales through the app store are a lucrative part of Apple’s business as it charges 30% fee on all purchases.
It’s the first time it has been subject to an EU anti-monopoly law levy and the third largest one issued by the commission.
The largest was the €4.34bn (£3.8bn) issued against Google for abusing its control of the Android operating system by forcing vendors to pre-install apps.
From Thursday this week such examinations and fines will not take place as mobile phone makers will be required to have other payment methods and app stores within their operating systems as part of the Digital Markets Act.
Fears of a US-EU trade war have been reignited after Europe refused to back down in the face of fresh threats from Donald Trump.
The word tariff has dominated much of the US president’s second term, and he has repeatedly and freely threatened countries with them.
Money blog: Trump sends message to UK on energy bills
This included the so-called “liberation day” last month, where he unleashed tariffs on many of his trade partners.
On Friday, after a period of relative calm which has included striking a deal with the UK, he threatened to impose a 50% tariff on the EU after claiming trade talks with Brussels were “going nowhere”.
The US president has repeatedly taken issue with the EU, going as far as to claim it was created to rip the US off.
However, in the face of the latest hostile rhetoric from Mr Trump’s social media account, the European Commission – which oversees trade for the 27-country bloc – has refused to back down.
EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic said: “EU-US trade is unmatched and must be guided by mutual respect, not threats.
“We stand ready to defend our interests.”
Donald Trump speaks to reporters in the Oval Office on Friday
Fellow EU leaders and ministers have also held the line after Mr Trump’s comments.
Polish deputy economy minister Michal Baranowski said the tariffs appeared to be a negotiating ploy, with Dutch deputy prime minister Dick Schoof said tariffs “can go up and down”.
French trade minister Laurent Saint-Martin said the latest threats did nothing to help trade talks.
He stressed “de-escalation” was one of the EU’s main aims but warned: “We are ready to respond.”
Mr Sefcovic spoke with US trade representative Jamieson Greer and commerce secretary Howard Lutnick after Mr Trump’s comments.
Mr Trump has previously backed down on a tit-for-tat trade war with China, which saw tariffs soar above 100%.
Read more:
Trump accepts $400m plane from Qatar
Judge blocks Trump’s Harvard foreign student ban
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
US and China end trade war
Sticking points
Talks between the US and EU have stumbled.
In the past week, Washington sent a list of demands to Brussels – including adopting US food safety standards and removing national digital services taxes, people familiar with the talks told Reuters news agency.
In response, the EU reportedly offered a mutually beneficial deal that could include the bloc potentially buying more liquefied natural gas and soybeans from the US, as well as cooperation on issues such as steel overcapacity, which both sides blame on China.
Stocks tumble as Trump grumbles
Major stock indices tumbled after Mr Trump’s comments, which came as he also threatened to slap US tech giant Apple with a 25% tariff.
The president is adamant that he wants the company’s iPhones to be built in America.
The vast majority of its phones are made in China, and the company has also shifted some production to India.
Shares of Apple ended 3% lower and the dollar sank 1% versus the Japanese yen and the euro rose 0.8% against the dollar.
-
Sports3 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years agoGame-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business3 years agoBank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway