Connect with us

Published

on

The chancellor has said that the current tax system for non-doms will be abolished – and confirmed a 2p cut to national insurance.

In the budget, Jeremy Hunt said “permanent cuts in taxation” were possible because of the progress made in bringing down inflation – with forecasts suggesting it will fall to the target level of 2% within months.

Scrapping the “non-doms” regime, which allowed certain wealthy individuals to avoid paying tax on their foreign income, is expected to raise £2.7bn a year.

Budget live: No rabbit out of the hat on income tax from chancellor

Mr Hunt spoke about cutting taxes to increase growth, and the official Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) forecast predicted that living standards will grow faster than expected.

But real disposable household disposable income is not expected to recover to pre-pandemic levels until the 2025-26 period, after the next election.

And the tax burden is also set to continue to rise – albeit at a slightly reduced level when compared to last autumn’s forecast.

More on Budget

In total, the government will take £19.7bn more in tax by 2029 than forecasted in March 2021, even when the cuts to national insurance are included, due to fiscal drag.

Read more:
What key budget terms mean – fiscal drag, headroom and tax thresholds
The key announcements of the 2024 Budget

What is the non-dom tax status

Removing the non-dom tax regime is a move straight from Labour’s playbook.

Potentially designed to take the wind out of Labour’s sales, it takes away a clear dividing line between the parties’ policies.

A non-dom is someone who lives in the UK but whose permanent home is abroad.

The term is short for non-domiciled individual.

Under the UK’s current regime they only pay tax on money earned in the UK, their income and wealth from outside the UK isn’t taxed.

As a result, rich people make considerable savings if they choose to be tax domiciled abroad.

Non-doms can benefit from the tax arrangement for up to 15 years.

But that’s to change.

Labour wanted this to be cut just to four years. And that’s just what Chancellor Jeremy Hunt has done.

For those currently using the non-dom tax system “transitional arrangements” will be made, Mr Hunt said, including a two-year period in which individuals will be encouraged to bring wealth earned overseas to the UK.

This measure will attract an additional £15bn of foreign income and gains and generate more than £1bn of extra tax, he said.

In terms of spending, Mr Hunt earmarked almost £6bn for the NHS – with artificial intelligence set to be used to “cut form-filling for doctors” in a digitisation drive.

A 5p cut to fuel duty will be extended for another 12 months – with the government “backing the Great British pub” by holding the price of beer, wine and spirits steady until February 2025.

Meanwhile, Britons will be able to invest up to £5,000 in UK companies tax-free – in addition to their current ISA allowance – through a new “British ISA”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Chancellor cuts national insurance in budget

He also announced:

• The High Income Child Benefit Charge threshold will increase from £50,000 to £60,000

• A new excise duty on vaping, as well as a one-off increase to tobacco duty

• The higher capital gains tax rate on property will fall from 28% to 24%

• The VAT registration threshold will rise from £85,000 to £90,000 from 1 April – the first increase in seven years

• A fund aimed at supporting vulnerable households with the cost of living will be extended by a further six months

• The UK economy is expected to grow by 0.8% this year – and 1.9% in 2025

• Hundreds of millions of pounds to tackle “historic underinvestment in our nations and regions”

The 2p cut to national insurance was widely trailed – and follows a previous 2p cut announced in the autumn statement. Combined, this could save the average worker up to £900 a year.

But the chancellor had faced calls from Tory MPs to cut income tax or unfreeze tax thresholds to prevent Britons from being dragged into higher bands when they get pay rises.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Awkward wait for chancellor outside No 11

Drab fiscal statement will cool May election rumours

We were promised a tax cutting budget, and we got a tax cutting budget.

The budget this year was a bit more straightforward than usual – with big announcements pre-briefed ahead of time, and no big standout measures held back to surprise voters with.

The chancellor cut national insurance by the expected two percentage points in a move that impacts 27 million people, worth £450 per year for the average person.

Capital gains tax will also be reduced, but the slightly more flamboyant move was stealing Labour’s proposals to scrap the non-dom tax status loophole and replace it with a new residency based system.

It means that an extra £2.7 billion a year will be used to fund tax breaks elsewhere in the budget.

There was a lot of pressure riding on Jeremy Hunt today among swirling chatter in Westminster of a May election, but this rather drab fiscal statement may have cooled those rumours.

But both parties could still be accused of electioneering today.

Mr Hunt thanked a list of Conservative MPs for their lobbying and campaigning as he announced certain measures, and even sometimes name checked the constituencies they represent.

Labour were much louder in their disagreement than usual, heckling the chancellor barely two minutes in.

The chancellor even started his speech at the despatch box with a bizarre, unrelated reference to Israel and Gaza, in a striking example of just how much the conflict has impacted UK politics since 7 October.

In terms of the immediate offerings, Jeremy Hunt confirmed the 5p fuel duty cut will continue, after it was due to expire at the end of March and confirmed a continuation of the alcohol duty freeze.

The Household Support Fund has also been extended for another six months.

There were elements in there for savers too, a new British ISA was announced allowing another £5,000 on top of existing ISA offerings and further tax relief for creative industries.

There was also a noticeable pivot back to more traditional Conservatism.

With the Conservatives 20 points behind in the polls, the chancellor must have been hoping that his budget can turn around Tory fortunes.

But today showed that for him this mission is clearly more of a marathon, not a sprint.

Mr Hunt is already facing anger from Scottish Conservatives, after he announced an extension of the windfall tax on profits made by energy companies in the North Sea.

The leader of the Scottish Tories, Douglas Ross, said he would not vote with the legislation – implying he would either oppose or abstain on the motion to introduce the measure.

Andrew Bowie, a Tory minister, said the will be “working with” Mr Ross to “resolve” the matter.

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer said the budget was “bereft of ideas”.

This budget is set to be the last before the election – with Mr Hunt under pressure to revive economic growth and the government’s prospects at the ballot box.

The UK economy slipped into a technical recession at the end of last year, and the Tories are about 20 points behind in the opinion polls.

Money blog: What budget means for you

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why don’t we know when the UK election is?

Before the budget was announced, shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves said: “The Conservatives promised to fix the nation’s roof, but instead they have smashed the windows, kicked the door in and are now burning the house down.

“Taxes are rising, prices are still going up in the shops and we have been hit by recession. Nothing the chancellor says or does can undo the economic vandalism of the Conservatives over the past decade.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Coinbase CEO to meet with Trump to discuss personnel appointments — WSJ

Published

on

By

Coinbase CEO to meet with Trump to discuss personnel appointments — WSJ

Before US Election Day, Brian Armstrong said Coinbase was “prepared to work” with either a Kamala Harris or Donald Trump administration.

Continue Reading

Politics

Row over how many farms will be affected by inheritance tax policy – as PM doubles down ahead of farmers protest

Published

on

By

Row over how many farms will be affected by inheritance tax policy - as PM doubles down ahead of farmers protest

Sir Keir Starmer has insisted the “vast majority of farmers” will not be affected by changes to Inheritance Tax (IHT) ahead of a protest outside parliament on Tuesday.

It follows Chancellor Rachel Reeves announcing a 20% inheritance tax that will apply to farms worth more than £1m from April 2026, where they were previously exempt.

But the prime minister looked to quell fears as he resisted calls to change course.

Speaking from the G20 summit in Brazil, he said: “If you take a typical case of a couple wanting to pass a family farm down to one of their children, which would be a very typical example, with all of the thresholds in place, that’s £3m before any inheritance tax is paid.”

Politics latest: No 10 insists chancellor has been ‘straight’ about her CV

The comments come as thousands of farmers, including celebrity farmer Jeremy Clarkson, are due to descend on Whitehall on Tuesday to protest the change.

And 1,800 more will take part in a “mass lobby” where members of the National Farmers’ Union (NFU) will meet their MPs in parliament to urge them to ask Ms Reeves to reconsider the policy.

Speaking to broadcasters, Sir Keir insisted the government is supportive of farmers, pointing to a £5bn investment announced for them in the budget.

He said: “I’m confident that the vast majority of farms and farmers will not be affected at all by that aspect of the budget.

“They will be affected by the £5bn that we’re putting into farming. And I’m very happy to work with farmers on that.”

Sir Keir’s spokesman made a similar argument earlier on Monday, saying the government expects 73% of farms to not be affected by the change.

Environment, Farming and Rural Affairs Secretary Steve Reed said only about 500 out of the UK’s 209,000 farms would be affected, according to Treasury calculations.

However, that number has been questioned by several farming groups and the Conservatives.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Farming industry is feeling ‘betrayed’ – NFU boss

Government figures ‘misleading’

The NFU said the real number is about two-thirds, with its president Tom Bradshaw calling the government’s figures “misleading” and accusing it of not understanding the sector.

The Country Land and Business Association (CLA) said the policy could affect 70,000 farms.

Conservative shadow farming minister Robbie Moore accused the government last week of “regurgitating” figures that represent “past claimants of agricultural property relief, not combined with business property relief” because he said the Treasury does not have that data.

Read more:
Farmers warn of food price hikes due to inheritance tax policy

Minister downplays risk of empty shelves if farmers strike

Farmers' tractor protest outside the Welsh Labour conference in Llandudno, North Wales
Image:
Welsh farmers carried out a protest outside the Welsh Labour conference in Llandudno, North Wales, over the weekend

Agricultural property relief (APR) currently provides farmers 100% relief from paying inheritance tax on agricultural land or pasture used for rearing livestock or fish, and can include woodland and buildings, such as farmhouses, if they are necessary for that land to function.

Farmers can also claim business property relief (BPR), providing 50% or 100% relief on assets used by a trading business, which for farmers could include land, buildings, plant or machinery used by the business, farm shops and holiday cottages.

APR and BPR can often apply to the same asset, especially farmed land, but APR should be the priority, however BPR can be claimed in addition if APR does not cover the full value (e.g. if the land has development value above its agricultural value).

File pic: iStock
Image:
APR and BPR can apply to farmland, which the Conservatives say has been overlooked by the Treasury in compiling its impact figures. File pic: iStock

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

Mr Moore said the Department for the Environment, Farming and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) and the Treasury have disagreed on how many farms will be impacted “by as much as 40%” due to the lack of data on farmers using BPR.

Lib Dem MP Tim Farron said last week1,400 farmers in Cumbria, where he is an MP, will be affected and will not be able to afford to pay the tax as many are on less than the minimum wage despite being asset rich.

Continue Reading

Politics

Cabinet split over assisted dying as Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson latest to reveal she will vote against bill

Published

on

By

Cabinet split over assisted dying as Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson latest to reveal she will vote against bill

A split is emerging in the cabinet, with Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson revealing she will join several of her colleagues and vote against the bill to legalise assisted dying.

Ms Phillipson told Sky News she will vote against the proposed legislation at the end of this month, which would give terminally ill people with six months to live the option to end their lives.

She voted against assisted dying in 2015 and said: “I haven’t changed my mind.

“I continue to think about this deeply. But my position hasn’t changed since 2015.”

Politics latest: Starmer on Ukraine as he attends Rio G20

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Details of end of life bill released

MPs will be given a free vote on the bill, so they will not be told how to vote by their party.

The topic has seen a split in the cabinet – however, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has yet to reveal how he will vote on 29 November.

Ms Phillipson joins some other big names who have publicly said they are voting against the bill

These include Deputy PM Angela Rayner, Health Secretary Wes Streeting, Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood and Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds.

Border security minister Angela Eagle is also voting against the bill.

Senior cabinet members voting in favour of assisted dying include Energy Secretary Ed Miliband, Science Secretary Peter Kyle, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy, Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn, Transport Secretary Louise Haigh and Welsh Secretary Jo Stevens.

The split over the issue is said to be causing friction within government, with Sir Keir rebuking the health secretary for repeatedly saying he is against the bill and for ordering officials to review the costs of implementing any changes in the law.

Read more:
What is in the assisted dying bill?

Why is assisted dying so controversial and where is it already legal?

Health Secretary Wes Streeting delivering a keynote speech on the second day of the 2024 NHS Providers conference and exhibition, at the ACC Liverpool. Picture date: Wednesday November 13, 2024. PA Photo. See PA story POLITICS NHS. Photo credit should read: Peter Byrne/PA Wire
Image:
Health Secretary Wes Streeting has called for a cost report into assisted dying. Pic: PA

Sky News’ deputy political editor Sam Coates has been told Morgan McSweeney, the PM’s chief of staff, is concerned about the politics of the bill passing.

He is understood to be worried the issue will dominate the agenda next year and, while he is not taking a view on the bill, he can see it taking over the national conversation and distracting from core government priorities like the economy and borders.

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

Details of the bill were published last week and include people wanting to end their life having to self-administer the medicine.

It would only be allowed for terminally ill people who have been given six months to live.

Two independent doctors would have to confirm a patient is eligible for assisted dying and a High Court judge would have to give their approval before it could go ahead.

Continue Reading

Trending