Connect with us

Published

on

Graduates in their 20s are earning less in real terms than they were before the 2008 financial crash, and are £1,200 worse off than they were at the start of the pandemic on average, despite recent cuts to national insurance.

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt has teased further national insurance cuts in his upcoming budget, following on from the recent decrease announced in his autumn statement.

It could be welcome news to some who have seen their pay packets squeezed over recent years as a result of the cost of living crisis, though economists have warned tax cuts would be unaffordable and would need to be reversed after an election.

People aged between 22 and 29 are earning less in real terms now than they were in 2002.

This is when factoring in inflation, including rising housing and food costs, over the period.

In 2023 prices, the median salary for a graduate in their 20s is £23,990 after paying taxes and student loan – compared with £25,200 in 2020.

Helen Miller, deputy director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), said: “This comes in the context of an ongoing, multi-year freeze to personal tax thresholds.

“By 2027 (the last year of the planned freezes), an employee earning £35,000 will be paying about £440 a year more in direct tax overall as a result of all the changes to income tax and NICs since 2021.

“The government has announced significant tax rises. Regardless of what the chancellor announces in the budget, it is highly likely that this will be the largest tax-raising parliament on record.”

Changes to student loan plans

Student loan repayments are set at 9% of income above the salary threshold, which has been frozen at £27,295 since 2021/22.

Still, a recent graduate on an average income is currently paying around £13 a month towards their student loan, so is it really a big deal?

A big factor in the impact of student debt is not just how much people pay back per month, but how much they pay back over their working lives, and when they started university.

Those who went to university on ‘Plan 2’ higher university fees (£9,000 and above from 2012/13) will pay back almost £20,000 more than the previous ‘Plan 1’ cohort in their lifetime, according to estimates by the IFS.

Those who started in the 2023 academic year or later will be eligible for ‘Plan 5’ student loans, which have different repayment terms.

The threshold will increase in line with the Retail Prices Index (a measure of inflation) instead – meaning it will likely increase more slowly than under the previous policy and more graduates will start paying back their debt sooner.

Under the new system, student debt will only be written off after 40 years rather than 30, meaning many will make repayments for longer, potentially into their 60s.

This particularly affects low to middle earners, who are less likely to have paid off their debt after 30 years.

However, under this new system no borrower will repay more than they borrowed (in real RPI terms) – so the highest earners can expect to repay significantly less than if they had started university in 2022 due to the lower interest rate.

On the other hand, people on lower incomes will end up paying back more.

‘A thundercloud waiting to burst’

Dr Farhana Ghaffar, researcher at the University of East Anglia, has been looking at the impact of the post-2012 loan system on students and young people and interviewed graduates who had been through this system to see how it had affected them.

“The idea was generally that a university degree would set you up for life, so it would set you up for a particular kind of life where you’d be able to have a home, start a family,” she said.

But in exchange for this, students are taking on “enormous” amounts of debt, which can have an emotional impact.

“I think sort of five or six years on, they were constantly worried about the debt that was getting bigger and bigger. And obviously they couldn’t do anything about it.

“They’re not at a stage yet where I think we can kind of talk too much about the long-term impacts. But something that was really striking is it was a future worry.

“You know, ‘when I get a mortgage’ or ‘when I start a family’. Someone described it almost as being like a thundercloud, waiting to burst and they just didn’t know when it would happen.”

Anastasia is a Romanian student at the University of Dundee. Her tuition fees are free because she started studying in Scotland while the UK was part of the EU.

Budget promo 2024

Watch Sky News’s coverage of the Budget live from 11am.

English students still have to pay to study in Scotland but students from other EU countries could study for free, as Scottish students do.

Anastasia isn’t sure if she would have gone to university at all if she had to pay fees.

She said: “I’d have to take a few months to think about it. And really, really think about it. I don’t think it’s a decision I could make just like that.

“If there was a way of knowing the payments would be acceptable and manageable – even though I probably won’t have a good job right after I graduate – maybe I would do that but very low chances.

But Anastasia knows that decision too could affect her future prospects, saying “[we are] in a world where everybody expects you to have a diploma for anything”.

“There are so many companies out there that will not give you the job even though you’re fully able to give them a wonderful performance, if you don’t have a diploma.”


The Data and Forensics team is a multi-skilled unit dedicated to providing transparent journalism from Sky News. We gather, analyse and visualise data to tell data-driven stories. We combine traditional reporting skills with advanced analysis of satellite images, social media and other open-source information. Through multimedia storytelling, we aim to better explain the world while also showing how our journalism is done.

Continue Reading

Business

Trump tariffs to knock growth but won’t cause global recession, says IMF

Published

on

By

Trump tariffs to knock growth but won't cause global recession, says IMF

The ripping up of the trade rule book caused by President Trump’s tariffs will slow economic growth in some countries, but not cause a global recession, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has said.

There will be “notable” markdowns to growth forecasts, according to the financial organisation’s managing director Kristalina Georgieva in her curtain raiser speech at the IMF’s spring meeting in Washington.

Some nations will also see higher inflation as a result of the taxes Mr Trump has placed on imports to the US. At the same time, the European Central Bank said it anticipated less inflation from tariffs.

Money: Chef on a classic he’ll never order

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump’s tariffs: What you need to know

Earlier this month, a flat rate of 10% was placed on all imports, while additional levies from certain countries were paused for 90 days. Car parts, steel and aluminium are, however, still subject to a 25% tax when they arrive in the US.

This has meant the “reboot of the global trading system”, Ms Georgieva said. “Trade policy uncertainty is literally off the charts.”

The confusion over why nations were slapped with their specific tariffs, the stop-start nature of the taxes, and the rapid escalation of the tit-for-tat levies between the US and China sparked uncertainty and financial market turbulence.

More on Tariffs

“The longer uncertainty persists, the larger the cost,” Ms Georgieva cautioned.

“Unusual” activity in currency and government debt markets – as investors sold off dollars and US government debt – “should be taken as a warning”, she added.

“Everyone suffers if financial conditions worsen.”

Read more:
Sainsburys profits top £1bn after closing all cafes and cutting 3,000 jobs
Predators eye bargain deal for struggling discount retailer Poundland

These challenges are being borne out from a “weaker starting position” as public debt levels are much higher in recent years due to spending during the COVID-19 pandemic and higher interest rates, which increased the cost of borrowing.

The trade tensions are “to a large extent” a result of “an erosion of trust”, Ms Georgieva said.

This erosion, coupled with jobs moving overseas, and concerns over national security and domestic production, has left us in a world where “industry gets more attention than the service sector” and “where national interests tower over global concerns,” she added.

Continue Reading

Business

Sainsburys profits top £1bn after closing all cafes and cutting 3,000 jobs

Published

on

By

Sainsburys profits top £1bn after closing all cafes and cutting 3,000 jobs

Annual profits at the UK’s second biggest supermarket, Sainsbury’s, have reached £1bn.

The supermarket chain reported that sales and profits grew over the year to March.

It also comes after Sainsbury’s announced in January plans to close of all of its in-store cafes and the loss of 3,000 jobs.

But the high profits are not expected to increase, according to Sainsbury’s, which warned of heightened competition as a supermarket price war heats up.

Tesco too warned of “intensification of competition” last week, as Asda’s executive chairman earlier this year committed to foregoing profits in favour of price cuts.

Sainsbury’s said it had spent £1bn lowering prices, leading to a “record-breaking year in grocery”, its highest market share gain in more than a decade, as more people chose Sainsbury’s for their main shop.

Money: Chef on a classic he’ll never order

It’s the second most popular supermarket with market share of ahead of Asda but below Tesco, according to latest industry figures from market research company Kantar.

In the same year, the supermarket announced plans to cut more than 3,000 jobs and the closure of its remaining 61 in-store cafes as well as hot food, patisserie, and pizza counters, to save money in a “challenging cost environment”.

This financial year, profits are forecast to be around £1bn again, in line with the £1.036bn in retail underlying operating profit announced today for the year ended in March.

The grocer has been a vocal critic of the government’s increase in employer national insurance contributions and said in January it would incur an additional £140m as a result of the hike.

Higher national insurance bills are not captured by the annual results published on Thursday, as they only took effect in April, outside of the 2024 to 2025 financial year.

Supermarkets gearing up for a price war and not bulking profits further could be good news for prices of shelves, according to online investment planner AJ Bell’s investment director Russ Mould.

“The main winners in a price war would ultimately be shoppers”, he said.

“Like Tesco, Sainsbury’s wants to equip itself to protect its competitive position, hence its guidance for flat profit in the coming year as it looks to offer customers value for money.”

There has been, however, a warning from Sainsbury’s that higher national insurance contributions will bring costs up for consumers.

News shops are planned in “key target locations”, Sainsbury’s results said, which, along with further openings, “provides a unique opportunity to drive further market share gains”.

Continue Reading

Business

US markets fall as AI chipmakers mourn new restrictions on China exports

Published

on

By

US markets fall as AI chipmakers mourn new restrictions on China exports

US stock markets suffered more significant losses on Wednesday, with stocks in leading AI chipmakers slumping after firms said new restrictions on exports to China would cost them billions.

Nvidia fell 6.87% – and was at one point down 10% – after revealing it would now need a US government licence to sell its H20 chip.

Rival chipmaker AMD slumped 7.35% after it predicted a $800m (£604m) charge due to its MI308 also needing a licence.

Dutch firm ASML, which makes hardware essential to chip manufacturing, fell more than 5% after it missed order expectations and said US tariffs created uncertainty.

The losses filtered into the tech-dominated Nasdaq index, which recovered slightly to end 3% down, while the larger S&P 500 fell 2.2%.

A board above the trading floor of the New York Stock Exchange, shows the closing number for the Dow Jones industrial average Wednesday, April 16, 2025. (AP Photo/Richard Drew)
Image:
Pic: AP

Such losses would have been among the worst in years were it not for the turmoil over recent weeks.

It comes as China remains the focus of Donald Trump’s tariff regime, with both countries imposing tit-for-tat charges of over 100% on imports.

The US commerce department said in a statement it was “committed to acting on the president’s directive to safeguard our national and economic security”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Could Trump make a trade deal with UK?

Nvidia’s bespoke China chip is already deliberately less powerful than products sold elsewhere after intervention from the previous Biden administration.

However, the Trump government is worried the H20 and others could still be used to build a supercomputer in China, threatening national security and US dominance in AI.

Nvidia said the move would cost it around $5.5bn (£4.1bn) and the licensing requirement would be in place for the “indefinite future”.

Nvidia’s recently announced a $500bn (£378bn) investment to build infrastructure in America – something Mr Trump heralded as a victory in his mission to boost US manufacturing.

However, it appears to have been too little to stave off the new restrictions.

Pressure has also come from the Democrats, with senator Elizabeth Warren writing to the commerce secretary and urging him to limit chip sales to China.

Meanwhile, the head of US central bank also warned on Wednesday that US tariffs could slow the economy and raise inflation more than expected.

Jerome Powell said the bank would need more time to decide on lowering interest rates.

“The level of the tariff increases announced so far is significantly larger than anticipated,” he said.

“The same is likely to be true of the economic effects, which will include higher inflation and slower growth.”

Predictions of a recession in the US have risen significantly since the president revealed details of the import taxes a few weeks ago.

However, he subsequently paused the higher rates for 90 days to allow for negotiations.

Continue Reading

Trending