Connect with us

Published

on

By Dr. Sushama R. Chaphalkar, PhD. Mar 7 2024 Reviewed by Lily Ramsey, LLM

In a recent cross-sectional study published in JAMA Network Open, researchers from the United States of America (US) investigated, at the county level, the association between medical debt and population health outcomes in the US.

They found that medical debt is associated with worsened health status and increased premature deaths and mortality in the population.

​​​​​​​Study:  Associations of Medical Debt With Health Status, Premature Death, and Mortality in the US . Image Credit: Pormezz/Shutterstock.com Background

Increasing economic burden and out-of-pocket costs for healthcare in the US have led to a concerning rise in medical debt, affecting 17.8% of individuals in 2020.

Certain vulnerable populations, including racial and ethnic minorities, females, younger individuals, and those with chronic diseases face a higher risk of incurring medical debt.

This debt is linked to adverse impacts on well-being, such as delayed healthcare, prescription nonadherence, and increased food and housing insecurity. Despite these individual-level associations, the county-level impact of medical debt on health outcomes remains poorly understood.

The present study aimed to address this gap by examining the relationships between medical debt and health status, mortality, and premature death at the county level in the US, using data from the Urban Institute Debt in America project. About the study

In the present study, debt data was obtained from a 2% nationally representative panel of deidentified records from a credit bureau. A total of 2,943 US counties were included, of which 39.2% were in metropolitan regions. The counties had a median 18.3% of residents above 65 years of age.

The median racial breakdown of residents was as follows: 0.4% American Indian/Alaska Native, 0.8% Asian/Pacific Islander, 3.0% Black, 4.3% Hispanic, and 84.5% White.

The excluded counties were predominantly non-metropolitan and had a smaller population size and a reduced socio-demographic diversity. Related StoriesDaily aspirin linked to higher mortality in older adults, study findsStudy suggests high levels of vitamin B3 breakdown products are linked to higher risk of mortality, heart attacks, and strokeCirculatory cholesterol levels are inversely linked to mortality of patients with sepsis and critical illness

The study investigated three health outcome sets from public data sources, including self-reported health status, premature death measured by years of potential life lost, and age-adjusted all-cause mortality rates and cause-specific mortality rates for leading causes such as cancers, heart disease, Alzheimer's, diabetes, and suicide, at the county level in the US.

Furthermore, the study considered county-level sociodemographic factors from the US Census data, including racial distribution, educational attainment, uninsured status, unemployment, and metropolitan status, as potential confounders.

The analysis considered two medical debt measures: the primary measure assessed the percentage of individuals with medical debt in collections, while the secondary measure focused on the median amount of medical debt (in 2018 US dollars).

Overall debt, including medical and other kinds of debt, were also included in the supplementary analyses.

Statistical analysis involved the use of descriptive analysis as well as bivariate and multivariable linear models, incorporating random state-level intercepts and weighted by county population size. Results and discussion

An average of 19.8% of the studied population had medical debt. Counties with fewer White and more Black residents, lower education levels, increased poverty, lack of insurance, and unemployment appeared to have higher medical debt rates.

It was found that a 1% increase in the population of medical debt-holders was associated with 18.3 more physically unhealthy days and 17.9 more mentally unhealthy days per 1,000 people in 30 days.

The percent-increase in medical debt-holders was also found to be associated with 1.12 years of life lost per 1,000 people and a rise of 7.51 per 100,000 person-years in age-adjusted all-cause mortality rate.

Consistent associations were found for major causes of death, including heart disease, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, and suicide.

Patterns were found to be similar for associations between the median amount of medical debt and the selected health outcomes. Supplemental analyses showed similar association patterns between medical debt and health outcomes.

This nationwide study reaffirms that medical debt remains a significant social determinant of public health.

However, the study is limited by the potential underrepresentation of medical debt in less populous counties, the inability to examine specific sources of medical debt, the exclusion of individuals not in the credit system, and the need for further research on the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related policies on medical debt and population health.

Additionally, a broader focus on overall debt suggested that policies addressing various debts, like student loans, may impact population health. Conclusion

In conclusion, the study revealed associations between medical debt and adverse health outcomes, such as increased unhealthy days, premature deaths, and elevated mortality rates.

The results highlight the need for collaborative efforts among various stakeholders, including government entities, healthcare systems, hospitals, and employers, to mitigate medical debt with paid sick leave, clear financial assistance policies, and improved cost-related communication with patients.

Further, enhancing access to affordable healthcare through policies like expanding health insurance coverage may improve the overall health of the US population. Journal reference:

X. et al., (2024) Associations of Medical Debt with Health Status, Premature Death, and Mortality in the US. Han JAMA Network Open, 7(3):e2354766. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.54766.https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2815530 

Continue Reading

Sports

Jeff Kent elected to HOF; Bonds, Clemens still out

Published

on

By

Jeff Kent elected to HOF; Bonds, Clemens still out

ORLANDO, Fla. — Jeff Kent, who holds the record for home runs by a second baseman, was elected to the National Baseball Hall of Fame on Sunday.

Kent, 57, was named on 14 of 16 ballots by the contemporary baseball era committee, two more than he needed for induction.

Just as noteworthy as Kent’s selection were the names of those who didn’t garner enough support, which included all-time home run leader Barry Bonds, 354-game winner Roger Clemens, two MVPs from the 1980s, Don Mattingly and Dale Murphy, and Gary Sheffield, who slugged 509 career homers.

Bonds, Clemens, Sheffield and Dodgers great Fernando Valenzuela were named on fewer than five ballots. According to a new protocol introduced by the Hall of Fame that went into effect with this ballot, players drawing five or fewer votes won’t be eligible the next time their era is considered. They can be nominated again in a subsequent cycle, but if they fall short of five votes again, they will not be eligible for future consideration.

The candidacies of Bonds and Clemens have long been among the most hotly debated among Hall of Fame aficionados because of their association with PEDs. With Sunday’s results, they moved one step closer to what will ostensibly be permanent exclusion from the sport’s highest honor.

If Bonds, Clemens, Sheffield and Valenzuela are nominated when their era comes around in 2031 and fall short of five votes again, it will be their last shot at enshrinement under the current guidelines.

Kent, whose best seasons were with the San Francisco Giants as Bonds’ teammate, continued his longstanding neutral stance on Bonds’ candidacy, declining to offer an opinion on whether or not he believes Bonds should get in.

“Barry was a good teammate of mine,” Kent said. “He was a guy that I motivated and pushed. We knocked heads a little bit. He was a guy that motivated me at times, in frustration, in love, at times both.

“Barry was one of the best players I ever saw play the game, amazing. For me, I’ve always said that. I’ve always avoided the specific answer you’re looking for, because I don’t have one. I don’t. I’m not a voter.”

Kent played 17 seasons in the majors for six different franchises and grew emotional at times as he recollected the different stops in a now-Hall of Fame career that ended in 2008. He remained on the BBWAA ballot for all 10 years of his eligibility after retiring, but topped out at 46.5% in 2023, his last year.

“The time had gone by, and you just leave it alone, and I left it alone,” Kent said. “I loved the game, and everything I gave to the game I left there on the field. This moment today, over the last few days, I was absolutely unprepared. Emotionally unstable.”

A five-time All-Star, Kent was named NL MVP in 2000 as a member of the Giants, who he set a career high with a .334 average while posting 33 homers and 125 RBIs. Kent hit 377 career homers, 351 as a second baseman, a record for the position.

Kent is the 62nd player elected to the Hall who played for the Giants. He also played for Toronto, the New York Mets, Cleveland, Houston and the Dodgers. Now, he’ll play symbolically for baseball’s most exclusive team — those with plaques hanging in Cooperstown, New York.

“I have not walked through the halls of the Hall of Fame,” Kent said. “And that’s going to be overwhelming once I get in there.”

Carlos Delgado was named on nine ballots, the second-highest total among the eight under consideration. Mattingly and Murphy received six votes apiece. All three are eligible to be nominated again when the contemporary era is next considered in 2028.

Next up on the Hall calendar is voting by the BBWAA on this year’s primary Hall of Fame ballot. Those results will be announced on Jan. 20.

Anyone selected through that process will join Kent in being inducted on July 26, 2026, on the grounds of the Clark Sports Center in Cooperstown.

Continue Reading

Environment

Chinese quality: BYD launches ‘Zero Defects’ as it crosses 113 GWh in Q3

Published

on

By

Chinese quality: BYD launches 'Zero Defects' as it crosses 113 GWh in Q3

This week, BYD crossed a major manufacturing milestone as its battery production crossed 113 GWh in the first three quarters of 2025 – but instead of celebrating, the company is doubling down with a new “Zero Defects” initiative to bring battery quality to an even higher level.

CarNewsChina reports that the new “Zero Defects” plan at BYD was launched internally at the start of Q3, with a focus on minimizing manufacturing defects across all stages of the battery’s life, from the manufacturing line to the end user.

The initiative coincides with BYD’s growing role as a battery supplier to other automakers and its expanding battery energy storage system (BESS) business, which are giving BYD both an international footprint and global benchmarks.

In its ongoing bid to prove itself even further in the global battery market, BYD will reportedly emphasize operational efficiency, error reduction, and standardization across manufacturing, process control, and customer service, with the end goal believed to be, “management practices comparable to those of Toyota.”

Advertisement – scroll for more content

BYD on a charge


BYD-EV-growth
Sealion 7 midsize electric SUV; by BYD.

The Chinese automaker seems to be going from strength to strength in 2025, having overtaken EV sales leader Tesla in China back in June and repeating the trick again by overtaking Tesla sales in Europe in August.

Combine those EV sales with the fact that its domestic traction battery production reached 113.42 GWh in just the first three quarters of the year (with 23.65 GWh, or ~20%, being supplied to outside customers – including Tesla), and you might agree that betting against BYD seems to be a bad idea.

Note that BYD has not released official details regarding performance metrics or milestones for its new Zero Defects goal, but the message is clear: BYD plans to keep getting better.

SOURCE: CarNewsChina; images via BYD.


If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them. 

Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Technology

CNBC Daily Open: Everyone’s watching the Netflix deal

Published

on

By

CNBC Daily Open: Everyone's watching the Netflix deal

The Netflix logo is pictured at the company’s offices on Vine in Los Angeles, California on Dec. 5, 2025.

Patrick T. Fallon | AFP | Getty Images

“Who’s watching?” Netflix asks whenever someone accesses its site. On Friday, it was probably everyone with an interest in business, markets and television.

The key characters that had people hooked were Netflix and Warner Bros. Discovery, which jointly announced that the streaming giant will acquire the latter’s film studio and streaming service, HBO Max. The equity deal value is pegged at $72 billion.

Netflix investors did not seem too jazzed about the deal, with shares dropping 2.89% on the sheer size of the transaction.

“Look, the math is going to hurt Netflix for a while. There’s no doubt,” Rich Greenfield, co-founder of LightShed Partners, told CNBC. “This is expensive,” he added.

But if one side is paying a lot, that means the other is receiving a bounty. Indeed, investors cheered the potential Warner Bros. Discovery windfall, sending the stock up 6.3% on the news.

It is not a done deal yet, and faces regulatory scrutiny. U.S. President Donald Trump said he would be involved in the decision, Reuters reported Monday, after a senior official from the Trump administration told CNBC’s Eamon Javers on Friday that they viewed the deal with “heavy scepticism.”

Despite this initial show of resistance, stranger things have happened in this administration, and the transaction might eventually go through. Should we get ready for Netflix’s next blockbuster: “The K-Pop Demon Hunters’ Song of Ice and Fire”?

What you need to know today

U.S. stocks had a positive Friday. The S&P 500 had its ninth winning session in 10 and rose 0.3% for the week. Europe’s regional Stoxx 600 closed flat. Separately, third-quarter euro zone economic growth was revised upward to 0.3%.

Netflix to buy Warner Bros. Discovery’s film and streaming businesses. The total equity value of the deal is $72 billion, announced the two companies Friday. But the transaction could run into regulatory hurdles.

Core inflation in the U.S. cools down. September’s core personal consumption expenditures price index was 2.8% on an annual basis, 0.1 percentage point lower than expectations and August’s figure. Other numbers were in line with expectations.

A Ukraine peace deal is ‘really close.’ That’s according to Keith Kellogg, the U.S. special envoy for Ukraine, who reportedly said Saturday that there were two key outstanding issues: the future of Ukraine’s Donbas region and its Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant.

[PRO] Goldman Sachs unveils its top five global stocks. The picks are from China, Taiwan, India, Germany and the U.K. — and all offer an upside of at least 70%, according to the bank.

And finally…

The Sizewell A and B nuclear power stations, operated by Electricite de France SA (EDF), in Sizewell, UK, on Friday, Jan. 26, 2024. Photographer: Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

The history of nuclear energy lies on British soil – does its future?

The U.K. once had more nuclear power stations than the U.S., USSR and France combined. It was a global producer until 1970 but hasn’t completed a new reactor since Sizewell B in 1995.

There is ambition to change that. Authorities want a quarter of the U.K.’s power to come from nuclear by 2050. The country is spreading its bets across tried-and-tested large nuclear projects and smaller, next-generation reactors known as small module reactors.

— Tasmin Lockwood

Continue Reading

Trending