Connect with us

Published

on

The Irish government has been defeated in the twin referendums on changing the country’s constitution.

Prime Minister Leo Varadkar, who said he wanted to remove “very old-fashioned language” in his country’s constitution, admitted the amendments had been “defeated comprehensively on a respectable turnout”.

“It was our responsibility to convince the majority of people to vote ‘yes’ and we clearly failed to do so,” he said.

Official results, shortly after 7pm, showed 67.7% voting against the family amendment, which had proposed extending the meaning of “family” beyond marriage, instead including households based on “durable” relationships.

Just before 9.30pm, 73.9% rejected the care amendment, which proposed deleting references to the centrality of a woman’s “life within the home” and mothers’ “duties in the home” when providing care, replacing them with an article acknowledging the importance of family members in general, without defining them by gender.

Earlier, transport minister Eamon Ryan said the government “didn’t convince the public of the argument for a ‘yes, yes’ vote”.

Mr Ryan said: “You have to respect the voice of the people. It’s a complex issue, both are complex.

More from World

“I would have preferred a ‘yes, yes’ (but) I don’t accept that our campaign did go wrong.”

Irish transport minister Eamon Ryan speaking to media as counting for the twin referenda to change the Constitution on family and care continues at the Royal Dublin Society in Dublin (RDS) in Dublin. The family amendment proposes extending the meaning of family beyond one defined by marriage and to include those based on "durable" relationships. The care amendment proposes deleting references to a woman's roles and duties in the home, and replacing it with a new article that acknowledges family carers. Picture date: Saturday March 9, 2024. PA Photo. See PA story IRISH Family. Photo credit should read: Damien Storan/PA Wire
Image:
Irish transport minister Eamon Ryan. Pic: PA

Changes to the constitution must be approved by Irish citizens through a national vote, which happened on Friday.

But turnout was just 44.36%, well down on the abortion referendum in 2018, which saw a turnout of 64%.

The Irish government campaigned for ‘yes’ votes to both amendments, saying the changes would get rid of sexist language, recognise family care and extend protection to more families.

Opinion polls had suggested support for the ‘yes’ side on both votes.

But commentators said the proposal to spread the burden of care for family members with disabilities to the entire family instead of just women became a row about the willingness and ability of the state to support carers.

Senator Michael McDowell, a former tanaiste (second-highest ranking member of the Irish government) and ex-justice minister, campaigned for a ‘no, no’ vote, describing the proposals as “unwise social experimentation” with the constitution.

He said: “I trust individual voters – they looked at what was being put before them and they said ‘no’.

“Many of them will have a slightly different perspective as to why they were voting ‘no’, but in the end we live in a republic and the sovereign power is the people and every individual vote is as good as anybody else’s vote and this is an emphatic repudiation of what I think was unwise social experimentation with the constitution.”

Sinn Fein, which is currently leading the polls ahead of the next general election, also supported a ‘yes, yes’ vote and blamed the government.

Party leader Mary Lou McDonald said: “If there is one big takeaway message from this, it is that support for people with disabilities as full and equal citizens and support for carers is something that has to be taken seriously by government.”

A slam dunk, but the government dropped the ball

For years, actually decades, everyone in Ireland knew the outdated “women” language in the constitution would be eventually be ditched by referendum.

It was just a matter of timing and wording really.

This is a modern and fairly liberal European democracy, gradually shedding the vestiges of conservative Catholic control by popular vote. Divorce, same-sex marriage, abortion. All gone, all by referendum.

Language drawn up by men born in the 1800s, referencing a woman’s life and duties being in the home? Easy by comparison. No government could mess this one up.

Enter Leo Varadkar and his hapless coalition.

This will be held up for many years as an example of how not to run a referendum campaign. Pay no attention to any international clickbait headlines declaring that on International Women’s Day, the Irish voted to keep women at home.

This wasn’t about the “sexist” language. It was about the government’s shambolic approach to the vote.

A reluctance to commit resources. Rejecting recommended replacement language in favour of vague aspirations that convinced no one. Poor messaging. And a perceived arrogance and complacency toward the electorate.

Replacing marriage as the family foundation with “durable relationships”, but not defining what on earth a durable relationship was? Ah sure, the courts will sort that one out, the people were told.

Ditching the sexist language, and replacing it with a vague commitment to “strive” to support family carers (who are mostly women)? What does that mean? How do you define “strive” in a legal sense? Do or do not, there is no try, according to Yoda, who definitely would have voted ‘no’.

The answers simply didn’t come, and history shows the Irish voters are more than happy to shoot down referendums when they don’t feel the tangible results to a Yes vote have been explained. Brexit would never have passed with Irish voters. They don’t do vague. Better the devil you know. Status quo prevails.

This was supposed to be the first of a string of feel-good results for Leo Varadkar’s government, ahead of an anticipated early general election. The main opposition party Sinn Fein have been slipping back substantially in polling.

A win in the referendums, good results in the local/European elections in June, a nice give-away budget in October, and boom – the election can be called. If that was indeed the plan, it’s fallen at the first hurdle.

Instead, Mr Varadkar heads off to Washington for the annual bout of St Patrick’s jollity at President Biden’s place, with a pair of ears as red as the shamrock is green.

Continue Reading

World

Helicopter carrying Iran’s president Ebrahim Raisi involved in ‘hard landing’ – state media

Published

on

By

Helicopter carrying Iran's president Ebrahim Raisi involved in 'hard landing' - state media

A helicopter carrying Iran’s president has been involved in a “hard landing” during bad weather, Iranian state media has said.

President Ebrahim Raisi was travelling across the far northwest of Iran following a visit to Azerbaijan.

Rescue teams are trying to reach the scene but are reportedly being hampered by fog and heavy rain in a mountainous area.

State media initially said it happened near Jolfa, about 375 miles (600km) northwest of Tehran, but then put it further east near the village of Uzi.

The president was said to be travelling with foreign minister Hossein Amirabdollahian, the governor of East Azerbaijan province and other officials.

State media says this is the last-known picture of the helicopter carrying the president. Pic: IRNA
Image:
State media says this is the last-known picture of the helicopter carrying the president. Pic: IRNA

However, Iranian interior minister Ahmed Vahidi didn’t confirm whether Mr Raisi was on board the helicopter involved, saying he was travelling in a convoy of three aircraft.

Mr Raisi had been in Azerbaijan for the inauguration of a dam with the country’s president, Ilham Aliyev.

“The esteemed president and company were on their way back aboard some helicopters and one of the helicopters was forced to make a hard landing due to the bad weather and fog,” the interior minister said on state TV.

“Various rescue teams are on their way to the region but because of the poor weather and fogginess it might take time for them to reach the helicopter.”

Helicopter carrying Iran's president Ebrahim Raisi involved in 'hard landing' - state media. Pic: IRNA
Image:
Iran state media showed images of rescue teams. Pic: IRNA

Helicopter carrying Iran's president Ebrahim Raisi involved in 'hard landing' - state media. Pic: IRNA
Image:
The helicopter came down in Iran’s East Azerbaijan province. Pic: IRNA

He added: “The region is a bit [rugged] and it’s difficult to make contact. We are waiting for rescue teams to reach the landing site and give us more information.”

Many of Iran’s military aircraft date back to before the 1979 revolution and international sanctions can make it hard to obtain parts.

Mr Raisi, 63, is a hardliner and former head of the judiciary who some have suggested could one day replace Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

He was elected in 2021 at the second time of trying.

Pic: IRNA
Image:
President Raisi (left) had been in Azerbaijan to inaugurate a dam alongside the country’s leader. Pic: IRNA

President Raisi (left) had been in Azerbaijan to inaugurate a dam alongside the country's leader. Pic: IRNA
Image:
Pic: IRNA

Mr Raisi’s time in charge has included major protests over Mahsa Amini – the woman who died after she was arrested for allegedly not wearing her hijab properly.

Iran also took the unprecedented decision in April to launch a drone and missile attack on Israel.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow @SkyNews on X or subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Continue Reading

World

Shooter in assassination attempt on Slovak PM may not have been ‘lone wolf’, minister says

Published

on

By

Shooter in assassination attempt on Slovak PM may not have been 'lone wolf', minister says

Officials in Slovakia are investigating whether the attacker who shot the prime minister was not a “lone wolf”.

The interior minister Matus Sutaj Estok issued the update on Sunday, after the suspect was previously believed to be a “lone wolf”.

Robert Fico’s condition is no longer life-threatening but is still very serious, his team said on Sunday.

Deputy prime minister Robert Kalinak issued the update four days after the assassination attempt on the populist leader.

Speaking to reporters outside the Banska Bystrica hospital, where Mr Fico is being treated, he said: “The worst that we feared had passed, at least for the time being.

“We are all a little calmer. When we were saying that we want to get closer to a positive prognosis, then I believe that we are a step closer to that.”

The prime minister, 59, was shot multiple times on Wednesday in an attack that raised fresh concern over the polarisation of politics in the central European country of 5.4 million people.

Follow live: Ukraine ‘destroys Russian Black Sea minesweeper’

Mr Fico was shot in the abdomen as he greeted supporters – the first major assassination attempt on a European political leader for more than 20 years.

Video footage showed the Slovak premier approach people gathered at barricades and reach out to shake hands as a man stepped forward, extended his arm and fired five rounds before being tackled and arrested.

Mr Estok has previously said the suspect objected to the government’s Ukraine policy.

Mr Fico’s government has ended official military support for Ukraine and taken a more pro-Russian line on the conflict than most European Union partners.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Slovak PM shooting suspect’s home raided

The Slovak Specialised Criminal Court ruled on Saturday that the suspect, identified by prosecutors as Juraj C, should remain behind bars until the trial charged with attempted murder.

Prosecutors said they feared he could flee or commit other crimes if freed, a court spokesperson said.

The suspect can appeal the order, but so far no statement has been published by him or a lawyer on his behalf.

Little information about the would-be assassin has been made public, after prosecutors told police not to identify him or release details about the case.

Unconfirmed media reports said he is a 71-year-old former security guard and an amateur poet.

Read more from Sky News:
Boy, 14, dies in river
Helicopter carrying Iran’s president in ‘hard landing’
Women and children ‘killed in Israeli airstrikes’

Meanwhile, Mr Kalinak, who is also Slovakia’s defence minister, said Mr Fico’s condition was still too serious to consider transferring him to a hospital in the capital.

Milan Urbani, deputy director of the Banska Bystrica hospital, told reporters that, as of Sunday morning: “The patient is currently out of a life-threatening condition”.

He added: “His condition remains very serious, and he needs a long time to rest to recover. We firmly believe that everything will go in a good direction.”

Continue Reading

World

Ukrainian soldiers reveal how they were secretly moved ahead of new Russian invasion

Published

on

By

Ukrainian soldiers reveal how they were secretly moved ahead of new Russian invasion

Members of a Ukrainian brigade have described how they were secretly relocated to help defend a section of the country’s border with Russia a few days before a new invasion began.

The commander of an artillery unit from 57 Brigade said his guns were even firing at Russian troops the day before the ground incursion into the northeastern region of Kharkiv, which started on 10 May. He said the forces had been “brazenly” amassing on the Russian side of the border.

“We were hitting tanks on the border… it was already a real war,” said Sasha, 26, who uses the callsign “black”.

Follow latest: Ukraine ‘destroys Russian Black Sea minesweeper’

The commander of a second artillery unit similarly confirmed the brigade had been moved early to bolster defences in this direction.

The troops had previously been defending the city of Kupiansk, also in Kharkiv.

An Artillery Battery Commander of the 57th Brigade says his unit was moved into position days before the new Russian invasion
Image:
Sasha, an artillery battery commander of the 57 Brigade

The comments offer a sense of how Ukraine attempted – ahead of time – to scramble forces to counter a Russian build-up along its long, northeastern border.

But the move was nowhere near enough to prevent the largest assault into Ukraine since Russia launched its full-scale invasion almost two and a half years ago.

A Ukrainian source, describing the first few days of the Kharkiv offensive just over a week ago, said there had been moments when he feared “we had lost the frontline”.

The source said the situation had since stabilised but warned: “We don’t know how long it could be like this”.

Sky News on Saturday tried to visit an artillery position, manned by soldiers from 57 Brigade, just outside the town of Vovchansk – a key target of the Russian offensive.

While trying to reach an artillery position outside the town of Vovchansk, Sky News crews were told over the radio to turn back for safety
Image:
While trying to reach an artillery position, a Sky News crew was told to turn back for safety

As we approached at speed by road, a soldier travelling with us said we had to pull over because he needed to communicate via radio with troops on the gunline.

Suddenly a voice over the radio could be heard saying: “Don’t come here. Don’t come at all.”

We were told it was too dangerous to travel further and we had to leave. It was not immediately clear what was happening on the ground.

At a makeshift base, safely back from the frontline, the artillery unit commander Sasha uses electronic maps on a tablet and laptop to confirm targets for his guns to attack.

Read more:
Inside Ukraine’s new northern frontline

Putin thanks Xi for efforts to resolve Ukraine conflict
Ukraine’s second city hit by drones

He said he and his team relocated from the Kupiansk front on the 4 to 5 May.

“We were indeed moved here earlier,” Sasha said. But he signalled he would have liked longer to prepare.

“I don’t know all the situation and why it happened like this. But I know for sure that to better repel [an attack], we might need either more time or better-prepared positions,” he said.

“Ahead of the assault, we were already hitting targets on Russian territory because we knew they were gathering there. They were brazenly assembling.”

Sasha described the moment the Russians started to advance.

He said it began with three hours of artillery fire against Ukrainian targets before ground troops crossed the border.

“I would love that they [the Russians] had been stopped at the border,” he said.

Soldiers say they could inflict more damage on Russian soldiers if they had more ammunition and better weapons
Image:
Soldiers say they could inflict more damage on Russian soldiers if they had more ammunition and better weapons

Instead, a fierce battle erupted, as Russian infantry, backed by airstrikes, drone attacks and artillery fire, pushed forward.

“For the first few days, they [the Russians] were storming our positions – columns of 30 to 50 soldiers. We were hitting them.”

In the chaos, Sasha said he worked to gather information to ensure his troops were able to operate.

“I am proud that my guys managed to do their best,” he said. “All credit to those who stayed on their artillery positions.”

A Soviet-era D-10 Howitzer artillery piece nicknamed "grandma" by soldiers
Image:
A Soviet-era D-20 Howitzer artillery piece nicknamed “grandma” by soldiers

He described the frontline as initially being “fragile” but said reinforcements were now in place. The commander said Russia had lost the opportunity to make a significant breakthrough.

“Until now they had a chance. Even in my area, I knew where we had gaps where they could have slipped through. Now we don’t have such gaps,” he said.

“I am satisfied that we have managed to stabilise the situation.”

At a second artillery position, on a different section of a frontline that has expanded by some 40 miles in the wake of the new attack, a Soviet-era gun, hidden under netting and tree branches, points in the direction of Russia.

Shells used by the D-20 Howitzer artillery piece, which was built in the 70s
Image:
Shells used by the D-20 Howitzer artillery piece, which was built in the 1970s

Soldiers here said they would be able to inflict a lot more damage on the invaders if they had more ammunition and better weapons.

Nicknamed “grandma”, their D-20 Howitzer artillery piece, which fires 152mm shells, was built in the 1970s.

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

“We’re saving our artillery shells right now. We fire one, they fire back five,” said one of the servicemen, who – at 50 years old – has the callsign “Grandpa”.

A second soldier said Russia has more weapons than his side.

Asked what difference additional munitions would make, he said with a laugh: “It would increase the number of dead Russians – 100%”.

Additional reporting by Azad Safarov, Ukraine producer

Continue Reading

Trending