Michael Gove has urged pro-Palestinian protesters to question whether extremist groups are behind some of the demonstrations – days ahead of publishing a new official definition of extremism.
The housing secretary said “good-hearted people” attending the marches should be aware they could be “lending credence” to extremists.
Tens of thousands of people participated in a Gaza protest organised by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) on Saturday in London – the fifth march in the capital this year – which saw five arrests and a counter-demonstrator de-arrested.
While marching through central London, protesters chanted “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” and waved banners demanding a “ceasefire now”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:42
Charlotte Church joins pro-Palestine march
Mr Gove condemned the chant saying it called for the “erasure” of Israel and could fuel hate, in an interview with the Sunday Telegraph.
He said the upcoming revised definition of extremist groups would help protesters decide whether to attend future pro-Palestine events.
In the interview, he said: “If we’re clear about the nature of extremist organisations, then I think that means that some of the people – and there are good-hearted people who go on these marches, I don’t agree with them, but they’re moved by suffering and they want peace – but it may help some of them to question who are organising some of these events.”
More on Gaza
Related Topics:
The minister said some of the events had been “organised by extremist organisations” but would not elaborate just yet.
He continued: “That doesn’t mean that people who have gone on them are extremist, quite the opposite.
Advertisement
“But it means that you can begin to question: do you really want to be lending credence to this organisation? If you do, fair enough. But now there is no excuse for ignorance.”
The controversial chant of “from the river to the sea” – a reference to a Palestinian state stretching from the River Jordan to the Mediterranean – has drawn anger from some pro-Israel supporters, who argue the phrase calls for the eradication of the Israeli state.
Some pro-Palestinian supporters reject this, saying it is simply expressing the need for equality for all inhabitants of historic Palestine.
Image: Michael Gove. Pic: PA
Mr Gove said: “We can also have a broader conversation about the way in which some of what’s said on these marches springs from an extremist ideology, rather than simply being an expression of passionate opposition to conflict.
“‘From the river to the sea’ is not a call for peace… when you’re saying ‘from the river to the sea’, you’re explicitly saying: ‘I want to see the end of Israel as a Jewish state, the Jewish homeland erased’.
“Be clear about the fact that you know a key Islamist demand is the erasure of what they see as the ‘Zionist entity’ or the ‘crusader Zionist state’.
“And therefore, let’s be clear that there is a difference between a cry for peace and the legitimisation of an extremist position which intimidates and leads to hate.”
The existing definition of extremism features in the government’s Prevent counter-radicalisation programme, which aims to stop vulnerable people from being drawn into extremism.
It’s defined as “vocal or active opposition to fundamental British values, including democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty and mutual respect and tolerance of different faiths and beliefs”.
The new definition will receive “more specificity”, and will enable the government and other public bodies to ban funding and engagement with Islamist and far-right groups.
Groups including the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), and Palestine Action – the organisation behind the recent defacing of Lord Balfour’s portrait at the University of Cambridge – could reportedly fall under the new extremist definition.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:22
Balfour painting slashed in Gaza protest
In a pre-emptive statement, Zara Mohammed of the MCB said suggesting the group would be identified “under arbitrary definitions of extremism is offensive, ludicrous and dangerous”.
“Tackling extremism is a serious issue that requires serious leadership from us all. Weaponising extremism for divisive electoral gain is dangerous and we must all see through it,” she added.
Mr Gove sought to address fears from some Conservatives that the new definition could encompass gender-critical feminists or devout religious groups.
“It’s only extremism if you translate that into a political ideology that is anti-democratic,” he said.
“Private belief should be cherished. Free speech has to be protected.”
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
Mr Gove hinted that foreign governments such as Iran could be behind some of the extremist groups operating in the UK.
“One of the things that we’re explicitly looking at is the way in which foreign state and non-state actors seek to encourage extremism here,” he said.
“And again, this is inevitably sensitive work about which I can say only a very limited amount because it’s not only Iran that attempts to use some of these forces to destabilise British democracy.”
Meanwhile, The Observer reports there are fears within the government that the new definition could face a legal challenge.
“The government wants to launch this without a public consultation on the definition, or proper engagement with faith leaders,” one official, who claims to have seen the proposals, told the newspaper.
The bitter war of words between Nigel Farage and Reform MP Rupert Lowe has dramatically escalated with the pair launching fierce new personal attacks on each other.
Mr Farage revealed accusations of bullying by Mr Lowe and accused him of falling out with all his fellow Reform UK MPs, with too many “outbursts” using “inappropriate language”.
And he took the highly unusual step of quoting a Labour minister, Mike Kane, who said after a confrontation with Mr Lowe in the Commons that his anger “showed a man not in charge of his own faculties”.
On Friday, party chairman and Farage lieutenant Zia Yusuf and chief whip Lee Anderson MP disclosed accusations that two female workers had complained of “serious bullying” in Mr Lowe’s offices, and said he had been reported to police over allegations he threatened Mr Yusuf with physical violence.
Mr Lowe, who has been suspended by the parliamentary party, denied the claims.
The worsening of the feud between the Reform UK leader and the millionaire MP for Great Yarmouth came in articles in The Sunday Telegraph in which they both furiously attacked each other.
Lowe alleges ‘witch hunt’
More on Nigel Farage
Related Topics:
Mr Lowe stepped up his verbal onslaught on Mr Farage by claiming that a “witch hunt” against him risked destroying Reform’s attempts at removing Labour from power.
And he claimed that at a time when Reform UK’s poll ratings were rising the attacks on him by the party would be a turn-off to voters, declaring: “Infighting failed the Tories – and it’s failing Reform.”
Mr Farage also began his Telegraph article by claiming: “If the last general election taught us anything, it is that the public does not like political parties that engage in constant infighting.”
But he claimed that thanks to Mr Lowe “unloading a barrage of criticisms against our operations and its main actors”, Reform’s unity has been dented.
Image: Rupert Lowe MP. Pic: PA
‘Containment strategies invariably fail’
Mr Farage said Mr Lowe had “managed to fall out with all his parliamentary colleagues in one way or another”, adding: “We did our best to keep a lid on things but, in the end, containment strategies invariably fail.”
He then referred to a Commons clash with Mr Kane just before Christmas, after Mr Lowe staged a debate about a damaged ship containing toxic cargo docked in his Great Yarmouth constituency.
“Mr Lowe was unhappy with the answer that he received from Mr Kane and, at the end of the debate, he crossed the floor to make his feelings known,” Mr Farage wrote.
“A confrontation ensued. Heated language was heard. The minister’s shoulder was pushed. In the end, the Serjeant at Arms had to step in to calm things down between the two parliamentarians.
“Commenting on Mr Lowe’s conduct later, Mr Kane (said) ‘the anger displayed towards me clearly showed a man not in charge of his own faculties’. Nobody in Reform UK said anything publicly about what had happened. Instead, we carried on.
“Yet the fact is that, sadly, there have been too many similar outbursts from Mr Lowe, often involving the use of inappropriate language, to the despair of our chief whip, Lee Anderson.
“I have been surprised and saddened at this behaviour. Certainly, I never saw anything like it in the European Parliament in 2019 when I was the leader of the Brexit Party and Mr Lowe was an MEP colleague.”
Image: (L-R) Nigel Farage and party chairman Zia Yusuf. Pic: PA
On bullying allegations, Mr Farage wrote: “Last week, the chairman of Reform UK, Zia Yusuf, showed me two letters sent by female members of staff to our party headquarters. Each letter contained an accusation of workplace bullying involving Mr Lowe.
“One of the incidents in question is alleged to have taken place within the parliamentary estate. Both women’s letters stated that these allegations had been reported to the parliamentary authorities.
“As a responsible political party, Reform UK has a duty of care to every single member of staff, whether they are employed by us directly or indirectly.
“With that in mind, I believe that our chairman was entirely right for Reform to appoint a KC to conduct an independent inquiry. It is inconceivable that we could simply ignore such allegations.”
Image: Pic: PA
‘I will not tolerate these falsehoods’
In his Telegraph article, Mr Lowe repeated his claim that there is no credible evidence against him and he was removed from the party before any investigation had started.
“I will not tolerate these falsehoods, and discussions have already taken place with my legal team,” he wrote. “Is it a surprise that these allegations were made public the day after I made reasonable criticisms of Nigel Farage and the Reform leadership?
“It is a witch hunt, plain for all to see. I have been entirely frozen out of the Reform machine over the last few months, in a deliberate and calculated way.”
Without naming Mr Farage, deputy leader Richard Tice or Mr Yusuf, he said the Reform UK leadership was unable even to accept the most mild constructive criticism.
Turning on Mr Yusuf, he wrote: “The allegations against me from the chairman relate to an incident in December, but he only reported them to the police the day after my reasonable questioning was published.
“Take from that what you will. I don’t feel sorry for myself. I feel sorry for the millions of decent British men and women who put their faith in Reform. They deserve better than this vicious charade.”
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
And warning of the damage the feuding was causing, Mr Lowe said: “Everything has been put at risk. Everything. The future of the Right in Britain is now in peril. How can Reform claim to be a party awaiting government when they can’t even follow basic process?
“Reform has been rising in the polls for months. But this spectre of infighting will leave the party looking unserious and turn voters off. Infighting failed the Tories – and it’s failing Reform.”
But Mr Lowe concluded with an olive branch. “On multiple occasions, I have invited Nigel Farage for dinner over the last few months,” he revealed. “Every single one has been refused or ignored.
“Again, I offer a public invitation to Nigel. Let’s have dinner and resolve this in the matter that our members, supporters and country would expect. Any time, any place.”
He added: “I want Reform to be professional, to be fair, to be serious. We must offer a credible alternative to the uniparty that has so failed so spectacularly.
“The leadership’s behaviour this week has undermined that cause, not only in the eyes of the electorate, but also in those of serious individuals across business and industry that any party of government needs to win over.”
Negotiators at Westminster have been trying to persuade a man to come down after he scaled the clock tower which houses Big Ben.
The barefoot man has been spoken to by emergency crews and negotiators a number of times during the day but he remains several metres up the Elizabeth Tower on a ledge where he is holding a Palestinian flag in an apparent protest.
The Metropolitan Police said they were called to the scene in central London at 7.24am on Saturday.
Photographs have shown the man sat on the ledge with the flag and a keffiyeh, a headdress worn by men in the Middle East, wrapped around the decorative stonework on the tower.
A large red stain which appears to be blood can be seen on the side of the tower around the climber’s feet.
Image: The barefoot man is holding a Palestinian flag. Pic: PA
Following the security breach at Parliament, a fire engine later raised an aerial ladder platform to the same height as the man’s position.
Three people standing on the platform have been talking to the man, who is several feet away.
Climber shares videos on social media
The climber has been sharing videos on Instagram from his viewpoint on the tower.
He tells negotiators he will come down “on his own terms”.
In the footage, negotiators appear to raise concerns about an injury to his foot, saying there is “quite a lot of blood” and that his clothes are not warm enough as temperatures drop after sunset.
But the man insists he is safe and says: “I will come down on my own terms, I have said this. But right now I am saying I am safe.
“If you come towards me you are putting me in danger and I will climb higher.”
Instagram
This content is provided by Instagram, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Instagram cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Instagram cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Instagram cookies for this session only.
Also in a video, a woman in plain clothes says: “At some point you have to come down. How long do you think you are going to be there? How long do you think you are able to be there?”
Her voice is then barely audible as she appears to say “your message was to say ‘Free Palestine'” before she encourages him to come down.
In one of the other videos, the man seems to suggest he plans to stay on the ledge for three and a half days.
Image: People in a cherry picker talk to the man
The whole of Westminster Bridge was closed later in the morning as emergency services responded to the incident.
And parliamentary tours on Saturday were cancelled.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:29
‘Unbelievable he’s up there’
A Metropolitan Police spokesperson said: “Officers are at the scene working to bring the incident to a safe conclusion. They are being assisted by the London Fire Brigade and the London Ambulance Service.”
Bridge Street, which is at the north end of Westminster Bridge, has been closed to allow emergency services to deal with the incident.
Image: Pic: AP
Image: The man before the cherry picker was raised
Image: Pic: PA
At least nine emergency service vehicles have lined the street in central London as crowds look on from beyond a police cordon.
A parliamentary spokesperson said: “We are aware of an incident on the Parliamentary Estate this morning, which is being handled by the Metropolitan Police, assisted by the London Fire Brigade and the London Ambulance Service.
“Parliament takes security extremely seriously, however we do not comment on the specifics of our security measures or mitigations. As a result of this incident, tours of the Parliamentary Estate today have unfortunately had to be cancelled.”
It comes as dozens of people gathered for a pro-Palestinian protest in London.
The crowd assembled on the corner of Parliament Square and appeared to be showing support for the man who climbed up Big Ben.
Trump’s Turnberry golf course vandalised
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:27
‘Gaza not for sale’ on Trump golf course
The protest in Westminster comes as the Palestine Action group said it had sprayed “Gaza is not for sale” on Donald Trump’s Turnberry golf course in Scotland.
Sharing an image of the vandalism on Saturday morning, the group wrote on X: “Whilst Trump attempts to treat Gaza as his own property, he should know his own property is within reach.”
The Turnberry protest comes after the American president claimed the US will “take over the Gaza Strip and we will do a job with it too”.
Under-performing civil servants could be encouraged to leave their jobs and senior officials will have their pay linked to performance, in a new government bid to “fundamentally reshape” the civil service.
Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden, who is appearing on Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips, said “the state is not match-fit to rise to the moment our country faces”.
The plans have been criticised by a union, however, who described them as a “retreading of failed narratives”.
The general secretary of the FDA, a union for civil servants, accused the government of delivering a “soundbite, not a credible plan for change”.
“If the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster wants civil servants to focus on delivery, while at the same time government departments are cutting resources, then ministers need to set realistic priorities,ā said Dave Penman.
“Government should get on with the difficult job of setting those priorities rather than announcing a new performance management process for civil servants every other month.”
Next week, Mr McFadden will promise a new “mutually agreed exits” process, in which civil servants who cannot perform at the level required of them are incentivised to leave their jobs.
The system will give bosses more tools to address bad performance.
Alongside the exit processes, senior civil servants who are not meeting standards will be put on development plans.
If thereās no improvement within six months, they will be sacked.
Most senior officials will also now have their pay linked to performance outcomes.
Mr McFadden will also pledge to increase the government’s digital capabilities, with more staff to be employed in relevant roles, and more public services to be digitised.