Connect with us

Published

on

Michael Gove is poised to unveil a new definition of extremism amid jitters in government at his plan.

The Politics at Jack and Sam’s podcast discusses the big announcement by Rishi Sunak‘s government this week – designed to update and increase the number of organisations that are classed as “extremist” and put new limits on their activities.

? Listen above then tap here to follow Politics at Jack at Sam’s wherever you get your podcasts ?

The plan, due to be launched on Thursday – subject to cross-government sign-off – will see a change in the definition.

The 9-year-old definition defines extremism as “vocal or active opposition to British values”.

The updated definition is going to, according to a source, be the “promotion or advancement of ideology based on hatred, intolerance or violence or undermining or overturning the rights or freedoms of others, or of undermining democracy itself”.

Government sources confirm this is the intent of the new wording but the exact phraseology has not been published.

More from Politics

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Health secretary defends new definition of extremism

Other ministers are cautious about the plan, suggesting that it is unclear who the definition will and won’t cover, amid fears that other groups – such as trans rights activists, gender critical organisations and even anti-House of Lords campaigners – could be caught by this new wider definition.

It will be for the government, in the first instance, to say who is and isn’t on the list.

Mr Gove will reject these fears, saying that the anti-democratic clauses mean that organisations such as trans rights groups will be fine.

More politics news from Sky:
Labour says it won’t bail out bankrupt councils
Boris Johnson’s secret talks in Venezuela

Trans rights activists take part in a demonstration outside Portobello Library, Edinburgh, where parents are attending a meeting, organised by Concerned Adults Talking Openly About Gender Identity Ideology, to discuss transgender ideology in Scottish schools. Picture date: Tuesday March 14, 2023. Pic: PA
Image:
Mr Gove is set say trans rights groups will not be affected by the new definition. File pic: PA Wire

The government is intending to release lists of organisations classed as “extremist”, and these groups will then be banned from meeting with ministers or other elected officials, receiving public money or seeing individuals appointed to government boards.

However, the guidance is non-statutory, meaning it will not give police or other law enforcement powers to deal with this issue. This is separate from proscription, the process of banning organisations that promote terror.

There are also fears that the government will use the new lists of extremists to try and embarrass Labour, pointing out links between Labour figures and the names on the government-determined lists. One government minister said Mr Gove was pursuing a “culture war” through this approach.

Further police powers to deal with behaviour on marches and other protests are likely to come at a later date.

Continue Reading

Politics

OCC boss says ‘no justification’ to judge banks and crypto differently

Published

on

By

OCC boss says ‘no justification’ to judge banks and crypto differently

Crypto companies seeking a US federal bank charter should be treated no differently than other financial institutions, says Jonathan Gould, the head of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).

Gould told a blockchain conference on Monday that some new charter applicants in the digital or fintech spaces could be seen as offering novel activities for a national trust bank, but noted “custody and safekeeping services have been happening electronically for decades.”

“There is simply no justification for considering digital assets differently,” he added. “Additionally, it is important that we do not confine banks, including current national trust banks, to the technologies or businesses of the past.”

The OCC regulates national banks and has previously seen crypto companies as a risk to the banking system. Only two crypto banks are OCC-licensed: Anchorage Digital, which has held a charter since 2021, and Erebor, which got a preliminary banking charter in October.

Crypto “should have” a way to supervision

Gould said that the banking system has the “capacity to evolve from the telegraph to the blockchain.”

He added that the OCC had received 14 applications to start a new bank so far this year, “including some from entities engaged in novel or digital asset activities,” which was nearly equal to the number of similar applications that the OCC received over the last four years.

Comptroller of the Currency Jonathan Gould giving remarks at the 2025 Blockchain Association Policy Summit. Source: YouTube

“Chartering helps ensure that the banking system continues to keep pace with the evolution of finance and supports our modern economy,” he added. “That is why entities that engage in activities involving digital assets and other novel technologies should have a pathway to become federally supervised banks.”

Gould brushes off banks’ concerns

Gould noted that banks and financial trade groups had raised concerns about crypto companies getting banking charters and the OCC’s ability to oversee them.

Related: Argentina weighs letting traditional banks trade crypto: Report

“Such concerns risk reversing innovations that would better serve bank customers and support local economies,” he said. “The OCC has also had years of experience supervising a crypto-native national trust bank.”