
What did we get wrong in MLB Rank? Snubs, overrated and underrated players
More Videos
Published
1 year agoon
By
adminOur ranking of the top 100 MLB players in 2024 is here! And you know what that means: It’s time to talk about what we got right — and wrong.
We asked five of our voters — Buster Olney, Jeff Passan, Jorge Castillo, Bradford Doolittle and David Schoenfield — to take a look at our MLB Rank list and tell us what they and their colleagues messed up and what surprised them the most. Who did we leave out? Who’s too high or too low? And what players will crack the top 100 — and even the top five — in the future?
Let’s hear what they had to say.
What surprised you most on this year’s list?
Olney: The presence of relievers, as well as their collective impact, is growing in MLB. But it was Atlanta Braves reliever A.J. Minter who noted, as he looked over our Top 100 list, how few relievers we had on it. Devin Williams, who could be one of the most important players to move before this year’s trade deadline, is at No. 99. Given the volume of innings that individual relievers throw, the lack of bullpen guys makes sense, but it doesn’t square with the collective impact that bullpens have in the game in this era.
Passan: Just how few starting pitchers populate the top of the list. Gerrit Cole is the only one in the top 10. Just four are among the top 30: Cole, Spencer Strider, Corbin Burnes and Zack Wheeler. Of the top 50 players, 22% are starting pitchers; on the whole list, it’s 28%. The degradation of the starting pitcher is one of the biggest stories of the last 20 years in baseball, and the consequence is evident when the person who dictates the game — the one standing on the mound — is seen almost as an afterthought by those weighing its best players.
Castillo: Seeing just one catcher in the top 45 and just six overall. Adley Rutschman, the Baltimore Orioles’ franchise cornerstone, is the first catcher on the list at No. 11. Next up? Will Smith at No. 46. Catchers, for good reason, usually don’t put up the huge offensive numbers stars at other positions produce. The position is a grind; the physical toll and daily responsibilities are tiresome. You could argue they should be graded on a curve. The best teams often feature a standout behind the plate. But this list doesn’t attach the necessary value to the position. If it did, Smith, J.T. Realmuto and Sean Murphy — a trio of starting catchers for playoff clubs in 2023 — would undoubtedly be higher.
Doolittle: We get very excited about good, young players but sometimes the thrill we get from watching them seems to overwhelm our empirical sense. So, we’ve got a few too many very young players who have flashed their potential at the big league level but probably shouldn’t be counted among the top 100 just yet. There are exceptions — Corbin Carroll and Gunnar Henderson, among last year’s rookies — but we’ve probably gotten a bit over our skis on others, especially Eury Perez, Elly De La Cruz and Anthony Volpe.
Schoenfield: Name recognition still matters a lot — even if some of the statistical evidence doesn’t always back up the ranking. Bryce Harper has missed time each of the past two seasons and is moving to first base on a full-time basis, a position that requires a higher offensive threshold and which we’ve only seen him play 36 games at. He still comes in at No. 13. Trea Turner didn’t have his best season and is a below-average defensive shortstop but is still at No. 20. Mike Trout, while one season removed from slugging .630, was injured and had the worst rate stats of his career with a .263/.367/.490 in 2023. He’s one spot ahead of Turner. All three could absolutely end up justifying those rankings, but they all feel a little high to me.
Who is the biggest snub from our list?
Olney: Jose Ramirez is going to go down in history as one of the most underrated players ever, and this is reflected in his standing at No. 17 on our list. Since the start of the 2020 season, these are the leaders among position players (Shohei Ohtani not included, because of his special circumstance): Aaron Judge, Freddie Freeman and Mookie Betts. Maybe it’s because he plays in a small market or maybe it’s because he seems to shy away from the spotlight, but his numbers don’t speak for him in the way they should: Every year, he carries the Cleveland Guardians lineup with a bunch of extra-base hits and stolen bases, while playing well defensively. We have done him wrong.
Passan: It’s understandable that Cole Ragans didn’t make the list. At 26 years old, he has started all of a dozen big league games. At one point, he didn’t throw a professional pitch for three years because of injuries. He also plays for the Kansas City Royals, not exactly a team anyone with functional eyes cared to watch last season. Well, do yourself a favor this season: Watch one start. See the 100-mph fastball from the left side. And the cutter. And changeup. And slider. And curveball. And do so knowing that as long as he stays healthy — no sure thing — he’s a lock for this list next year.
Castillo: Yainer Diaz was a force in the batter’s box when he was in the Houston Astros’ lineup last season. The problem was that, as the team’s backup catcher, he didn’t get regular at-bats. As a rookie, Diaz batted .282 with 23 home runs and an .846 OPS in just 104 games. Now, after Martin Maldonado’s departure, Diaz will be the Astros’ starting catcher. The 25-year-old Dominican will need to work more walks — he accumulated just 11 last season — but he’s primed for a big season with increased playing time.
Doolittle: Jung Hoo Lee. We should be at the vanguard ringing the bell for the “Grandson of the Wind.” His projections justify a top-60 slot but, I get it, that’s based on KBO translations and Lee doesn’t have anywhere near the same level of Pacific Rim-based hype as Yoshinobu Yamamoto or Ohtani. But as a career .340 hitter in Korea with a miniscule strikeout rate, Lee is the kind of player I want to overtake baseball. We’ve got Luis Arraez on the East Coast; now we need a peer for him on the West Coast. Then we can work on the middle of the country. Is it too late for Nick Madrigal?
Schoenfield: I’ll go with the player with the highest WAR last season not to crack our top 100: Mariners shortstop J.P. Crawford at 5.1, which ranked tied for 20th among position players. He hit .266/.380/.438 in 2023 while leading the American League with 94 walks, and he also added more power to his game, hitting 19 home runs and 35 doubles. I’m buying the swing change will stick as he hit for a much higher exit velocity and a more optimal launch angle.
Which player in the top 100 is most underrated?
Passan: Over his first two seasons, Julio Rodriguez produced more than 11 wins above replacement by FanGraphs and Baseball-Reference. Both agreed that he ranked among the eight most productive position players in baseball. To see Rodriguez ranked 18th then — below a number of players he has outplayed — feels like an oversight.
Certainly there’s a case to be made for all of those who rank higher than Rodriguez, but add the fact that he’s 23 years old and on the upswing in his career, and it’s difficult to peg him below some of those ahead of him. In the last two years, only one player has hit at least 60 home runs and stolen at least 60 bases: Rodriguez. An elite center fielder who hits for power and runs like a madman feels a lot better than the 18th-best player in baseball.
Castillo: Not often (maybe never?) do you see an uninjured reigning Cy Young winner in his early 30s ranked 59th on a list of the best players in MLB. Blake Snell is one of 22 people to have ever won the Cy Young award twice. He is one of just seven to earn it in both leagues. But here we are. The skepticism surrounding Snell is understandable. It’s March and he has yet to sign with a team, which could especially hinder someone who historically has been a slow starter. The highest ERA+ he’s posted outside of his two elite seasons is 113. He hasn’t logged more than 180 ⅔ innings in a campaign. He even led the majors in walks in 2023. But results are results. The point is to stop the other team from scoring. Snell has shown he can be one of the best — and certainly better than the 17th-best starting pitcher in the majors.
Doolittle: Kyle Tucker, at No. 28, still doesn’t get enough recognition for how good he is. Maybe it’s the team, as Jose Altuve and (the also underrated) Alex Bregman were already there when he became a regular in Houston. Both are still playing at an All-Star level. Then Yordan Alvarez came around and immediately morphed into perhaps baseball’s best all-around hitter. But there are a number of teams — good teams — on which Tucker would be the best player. He’s one of the best 15-to-20 hitters in the game, plays elite defense and stole 30 bags in 2023. This year marks his age-27 season. It’s time for Tucker to take his place under the spotlight.
Schoenfield: Marcus Semien was third in the AL MVP voting in 2023. He was third in 2021. Over the past three seasons, he’s averaged 33 home runs, 95 RBIs and 113 runs scored while ranking second behind only Andres Gimenez in fielding runs at second base. In that time frame, he ranks third among all hitters in extra-base hits, second in runs and second in WAR, behind only Judge … and yet comes in just 24th on our list. He’s missed one game in three years. Durability is a skill and it makes Semien one of the most valuable players in the league.
Which player in the top 100 is most overrated?
Olney: Luis Robert Jr. has the ability to be an MVP candidate, but he should not be at No. 23 on this list. He’s played one season of 100 games, and in that year, 2023, he had an on-base percentage of .315. He had 30 walks and 172 strikeouts. He is clearly improving, especially on defense, but he shouldn’t be that high on this list merely because of his potential. Blame injuries, blame inconsistency, blame the Chicago White Sox’s seasons of weirdness lately, but he shouldn’t be ahead of Semien, Manny Machado, Altuve and others.
Passan: Maybe this one is a little unfair. Kodai Senga, after all, is currently on the injured list with a strain in the posterior capsule of his right shoulder — an injury that concerns even the best orthopedists. Elbow issues tend to be pretty straightforward. Shoulders, with their tangle of muscles and ball-and-socket joints, present far more complicated cases. Still, the voting was going on after the New York Mets had shut down Senga, so really there’s no excuse. He may wind up just fine, of course, in which case he warrants a spot in the range of No. 75. Add a heaping helping of uncertainty, though, and his case for any spot on the list is questionable at best.
Castillo: The truth is nobody knows where Yamamoto belongs on this list, but No. 45 — above the likes of fellow starters Kevin Gausman, Aaron Nola and Snell — seems high for someone who hasn’t thrown a pitch in the majors. The Los Angeles Dodgers obviously disagree. The organization chose to invest $325 million in Yamamoto, their likely Opening Day starter, for a reason. The right-hander is just 25 years old, and his pitching resume in Japan is unparalleled for someone making the jump to the United States.
The Dodgers believe he’ll be elite right away, but there will be a learning curve. He’s on a new team in a new league in a new country. He’ll throw a different, slicker ball. He’ll face better hitters. He’ll be occasionally asked to pitch every fifth day for the first time. And yet, he might end up being better than his spot on this list. But for now, 45th is aggressive.
Doolittle: Adolis Garcia is fun to watch and he was awesome during the Texas Rangers’ playoff run. But No. 34 is way too high for him. He’s still a player with a baseline OBP that barely cracks .300 and who strikes out too much. He’s very much a winning player, with an adjusted OPS that should be at least 10% better than the league average, excellent defense, a few steals and a competitive demeanor. But he just turned 31 years old and any kind of decline with his power bat exposes his lack of secondary skills at the plate. Garcia is a very good player but more 80-to-100 good, not No. 34.
Schoenfield: I mentioned him earlier and it’s possible Turner will hit all season like he did the final two months of 2023, when he hit .339 with a 1.069 OPS. He’s obviously a good, valuable player and one of the most exciting in the game, but I also see a player who has gone from 6.4 WAR in 2021 to 4.9 to 3.4 and is now 31 years old with declining defensive metrics (and who hit just .242/.296/.387 on the road). He’s definitely worthy of the top 100 and maybe the top 50, but I’m not sure about the top 20.
Which player could make the biggest jump on our list next year?
Olney: Triston Casas is going to be an absolute monster, something he showed in the second half of last season, and in the years to come, he’ll be the sort of player for whom you can pencil in 35 homers and a .400 on-base percentage. Between his command of the strike zone, his strength, his bat-to-ball skills and the inherent advantage of being a talented left-handed hitter in Fenway Park, he will soon become one of the game’s pre-eminent sluggers. A perfect candidate for the Home Run Derby.
Passan: Ten days after his 21st birthday, Evan Carter made his major league debut for the Rangers. In 75 regular-season plate appearances, he OPS’d 1.058. He chased that with one of the best Octobers for a neophyte in recent memory, wrecking Tampa Bay in the wild-card series and finishing the month with a .300/.417/.500 line. Carter ranks 92nd on the list, and with full-time at-bats coming his way for the first time, he is a Kyle Tucker starter kit, with a sweet left-handed swing that goes for average and power, savviness on the basepaths and plenty of glove to be one of the best all-around outfielders in baseball.
Castillo: Being named the New York Yankees’ starting shortstop out of spring training as a 21-year-old rookie came with outsized pressure. Add being a hometown kid who idolized Derek Jeter growing up and that pressure turned up a notch. Volpe adeptly handled the assignment in 2023. He became the first Yankees rookie to ever post a 20-20 season. He won a Gold Glove. He played in 159 games. But he hit just .209 with 167 strikeouts. To improve those numbers, he’s implemented swing adjustments to better cover the plate and handle high fastballs. Better contact should generate better results. That, in combination with his speed and power, should make him a more dangerous weapon at the bottom of the Yankees’ lineup in 2024 — and a riser on the 2025 list.
Doolittle: I think we’ve probably underrated Henderson this season and it’s not far-fetched that he could go from No. 37 to top 10 (or better) by this time next year. If he can make a leap against lefties and cut his whiffs just a tad, all while continuing to produce defensively at a Gold Glove level, that’s superstar stuff. Even if he doesn’t quite get there in 2024, I suspect we’ll know he’s on the cusp of it when we make our picks next year.
Schoenfield: I’m still on the Michael Harris II bandwagon and I think he’ll climb a lot higher than this year’s No. 53 ranking. He started off slow last season, landed on the IL and was hitting .163 on June 3. He still finished at .293 with 19 home runs after slashing .335/.360/.552 over his final 100 games. He’s still just 23 years old, has good range and a plus arm in center field. I’d like to see a few more walks and a little less chase. If he can do that, there’s top-25 potential here.
Predict the top five for 2027
Olney:
1. Shohei Ohtani
2. Julio Rodriguez
3. Ronald Acuña Jr.
4. Juan Soto
5. Bobby Witt Jr.
My list effectively parrots the opinion of some players who looked over our Top 100 list — they view J-Rod as a monster talent who is zooming into superstardom with his broad range of skills. It didn’t surprise me that other players recognized J-Rod’s ability; what’s surprising is how adamant they already are about his preeminence.
Passan:
1. Shohei Ohtani
2. Ronald Acuña Jr.
3. Julio Rodriguez
4. Bobby Witt Jr.
5. Corbin Carroll
All of this is subject to Ohtani returning as a starting pitcher, of course, but if he does and is even just a league-average performer, he will top this list ad infinitum. While putting Acuña second when he’s going to be 29 years old is iffy, he’s leaps and bounds better than the other position players today, and the king must be usurped. It could be any of the Millennium Trio: Rodriguez, Witt and Carroll all were born in 2000, and they’ll all be 26, smack in the middle of their prime.
Castillo:
1. Shohei Ohtani
2. Juan Soto
3. Aaron Judge
4. Julio Rodriguez
5. Bobby Witt Jr.
This list starts with two assumptions: Ohtani has another monster season as a hitter in 2024 and is 100% ready to pitch in 2025. Wherever Soto ends up in 2025, he’ll be fresh off thriving in the Bronx hitting in front of Judge — giving the Yankees the best one-two punch in the majors for at least one season. Rodriguez and Witt will each take another leap in Year 3 to cement themselves as two of the game’s best all-around players. Wondering where Acuña is? He would’ve made the cut had it not been for the ominous knee trouble that surfaced early in spring training.
Doolittle:
1. Shohei Ohtani
2. Julio Rodriguez
3. Bobby Witt Jr.
4. Juan Soto
5. Ronald Acuña Jr.
This is tough. I wanted to include Carroll, who, like Soto, Rodriguez and Witt, will be at a career-peak age in 2027. But Ohtani is Ohtani and may deserve to be here even if he gives up pitching before then because, at that point, he could become a Gold Glove outfielder. And Acuña is just too good to leave off even though he’ll be closing in on 30. Meanwhile, I’m assuming Judge and Betts are starting to age out. I could see injuries becoming even more of a problem for Judge. As for Betts … I certainly wouldn’t want to put any money down that he’ll fall out of the top five. And there are others — Rutschman, Fernando Tatis Jr, Henderson. The future is hard to predict — but is looking bright.
Schoenfield:
1. Ronald Acuña Jr.
2. Gunnar Henderson
3. Julio Rodriguez
4. Jackson Holliday
5. Bobby Witt Jr.
Enjoy it, Orioles fans.
You may like
Sports
How proposed CEO could dole out punishments in college sports
Published
4 hours agoon
May 19, 2025By
admin
With a long-awaited ruling in the settlement of the House case expected this week, college sports are on the precipice of a major overhaul.
While Judge Claudia Ann Wilken still needs to issue a final approval on the long-awaited settlement, a decision is expected to arrive in the near future.
Changes will come quickly to the way college sports work if the settlement is formalized. Most prominent among them will be a change in how enforcement works, as the NCAA will no longer be in charge of traditional enforcement, and a CEO will soon be put in place with powers that never existed prior.
The CEO of college sports’ new enforcement organization — the College Sports Commission — will have the final say in doling out punishments and deciding when rules have been violated, according to sources, a level of singular power that never existed during the NCAA’s era of struggling to enforce its rules.
The CEO’s hire is expected to come quickly after the House settlement is finalized and has been spearheaded by the Power 4 commissioners from the SEC, Big Ten, Big 12 and ACC. Their pick to lead the new agency will quickly become one of the most powerful and influential people in college sports. The hiring of a new CEO of the College Sports Commission already is deep in the process, per ESPN sources. The conducting of the search process before the job can officially be created is indicative of how quickly the entire billion-dollar industry will have to transform before games are played again in August. Nothing can happen formally until the judge’s decision, but the process is well underway.
The CEO of the commission will be one of the faces of this new era of college athletics. Sources have told ESPN to expect the person to come from outside college athletics and not to be a household name to college sports fans. The CEO is expected to make seven figures and, once the settlement is in place and they are hired, will have significant authority.
“All the institutions are going to have new membership agreements that we’re all agreeing to these new rules,” said an industry source familiar with the process. “The CEO is going to have responsibility to make sure everything is enforced and the governance model is sound. It’s a critically important role for the future of college sports and college football.”
The CEO is expected to report to a board, which is expected to include the power conference commissioners. The CEO will also be in charge of essentially running the systems that have been put in place — LBi Software and accounting firm Deloitte have been lined up to handle salary cap management and to manage the clearinghouse for name, image and likeness.
With the NCAA no longer involved with traditional enforcement, it will mark a distinct industry shift. (The NCAA will still deal with issues such as academics and eligibility.)
According to sources, a vision of what this leader could look like, and the extent of the position’s powers, is illustrated in drafts of so-called association documents that all schools are expected to sign to formalize the new enforcement entity. Basically, the schools need to agree that they’ll follow the rules.
While sources caution the documents that have been circulated are still in draft stage, sources say the draft includes language that the CEO will make “final factual findings and determinations” on violations of rules. The CEO will also “impose such fines, penalties or other sanctions as appropriate,” in accordance with the rules.
The schools have to accept these rulings “as final,” with the exception being if a school or athlete wants to challenge the discipline. They’d be required, per sources, “to engage in the arbitration process,” which is expected to be the sole recourse.
Per sources, when cases do end up in arbitration, under the procedures that govern arbitration, subpoena power is a potential option via the discovery process — an authority that was not available during NCAA investigations.
As college sports have zigzagged to where they are thanks to the direction of myriad lawsuits and rulings, the association agreement could also include a clause where the schools “agree to waive any right to a jury trial with respect to all disputes arising out of or relating to this agreement.” That notion would still need to be accepted by all the schools, and it’s not expected to prevent lawsuits from entities outside of the schools.
It’s worth noting that the lawsuits that have brought major changes to NCAA rules in recent years have started with attorneys general or with athletes. Congress is expected to still be needed to help create a legal framework for the new system to function without being tripped up by the current patchwork of state laws.
Enforcement has long been a thorn for the NCAA, which is now offloading one of its most controversial and least effective departments. All schools agree with enforcement as an ideal, but the issues come once the enforcement is enacted on them or their athletes.
Few coaches this generation have seen NCAA enforcement as an effective threat to follow the rules.
“It all starts with enforcement, and I’ve said this for a long time, ‘Until we have an enforcement arm put into place, we’re always going to be working sideways,'” Ohio State coach Ryan Day told ESPN on the “College GameDay” podcast recently. “I feel like before we set a rule, before we do anything, we have to put a structure in place where we can enforce rules on and off the field.”
The new organization looks to have expedited timelines and a highly compensated CEO to be the face of the decisions. (The NCAA used a committee on infractions.)
The drumbeat leading to the settlement is indicative of the past generations of behavior, as schools have been rushing to spend outside of the expected cap, with frontloading so significant that the highest-paid basketball roster is expected to have compensation totaling close to $20 million and football rosters are expected to be in the $40 million range.
Will schools fall in line once rules are put into place? Will the threat of enforcement be enough to settle down the landscape? It’s difficult for coaches to imagine player salaries going backward for 2026.
The ultimate deterrent will be stiff and consistent penalties to deter rule-breaking behavior, which have been elusive historically because of lack of NCAA enforcement prowess and the lengthy process of enforcement.
Purdue AD Mike Bobinski told ESPN in March that the punishments need to “leave a mark,” and he mentioned the New Orleans Saints’ Bountygate sanctions as an example of the type of punishment that changed behavior. (Then-Saints coach Sean Payton was suspended for the entire 2012 season as part of the penalties.)
“We’ve screwed this thing up now to the point where we have to be willing to draw a line in the sand, and that will create some pain,” Bobinski said. “There’s no two ways about it, and we’ll find out who’s just going to insist on stepping over the line. But if they do, you got to deal with it forcefully and quickly.”
He added that the Big Ten has put a lot of thought and conversation into this, as he said the mindset has to be changed to where coaches and programs can’t consider breaking the rules “worth it.”
Bobinski added: “People are working hard on this thing. That doesn’t mean it’s going to be easy or it’s going to be accepted right out of the box, but I’d like to think we’ve got a chance at least to do it well.”
ESPN reporter Dan Murphy contributed.
Sports
Who wins the Eastern Conference finals? Early look at keys to Hurricanes-Panthers
Published
10 hours agoon
May 19, 2025By
admin
Following the Florida Panthers‘ Game 7 win over the Toronto Maple Leafs on Sunday, the NHL’s final four is official: The defending Stanley Cup champion Panthers will take on the Carolina Hurricanes in the Eastern Conference finals, while the Dallas Stars face the Edmonton Oilers in the Western Conference finals.
This Eastern matchup is a rematch of the 2023 conference finals, won by the Panthers in a sweep. Can Carolina win this time, or will Florida head back to the Stanley Cup Final for a third straight year?
To help get you up to speed before the series begins Tuesday, we’re here with key intel from ESPN Research, wagering info from ESPN BET and more.
Paths to the conference finals:
Hurricanes: Defeated Devils in five, Capitals in five
Panthers: Defeated Lightning in five, Maple Leafs in seven
Leading playoff scorers:
Hurricanes: Seth Jarvis (four goals, six assists), Sebastian Aho (three goals, seven assists)
Panthers: Brad Marchand (three goals, nine assists), Eetu Luostarinen (three goals, nine assists)
Schedule:
Game 1: Panthers at Hurricanes | May 20, 8 p.m. (TNT)
Game 2: Panthers at Hurricanes | May 22, 8 p.m. (TNT)
Game 3: Hurricanes at Panthers | May 24, 8 p.m. (TNT)
Game 4: Hurricanes at Panthers | May 26, 8 p.m. (TNT)
Game 5: Panthers at Hurricanes | May 28, 8 p.m. (TNT)
Game 6: Hurricanes at Panthers | May 30, 8 p.m. (TNT)
Game 7: Panthers at Hurricanes | June 1, 8 p.m. (TNT)
Series odds:
Panthers: -125
Hurricanes: +105
Stanley Cup odds:
Panthers: +250
Hurricanes: +300
Matchup notes from ESPN Research
Hurricanes
The Hurricanes reached the conference finals for the sixth time in franchise history and third time in the past six years. Carolina’s three conference finals appearances since 2019 are tied with the Edmonton Oilers, Tampa Bay Lightning and Vegas Golden Knights for the second most in the NHL. The Dallas Stars have gone four times in the past six years.
Logan Stankoven is expected to make his Eastern Conference finals debut, after he appeared in the Western Conference finals with the Stars last year in his first NHL season. He will join Ville Leino (2009 and 2010) as the only players to play in both the Eastern and Western Conference finals in their first two seasons in the NHL (since 1994).
The Hurricanes have lost 12 straight games in the conference finals round. Their last win was Game 7 in 2006 vs. the Buffalo Sabres, when now-coach Rod Brind’Amour scored the eventual winning goal on a power play with 8:38 left in the third period after a puck-over-glass penalty. That 12-game losing streak includes being swept by the Panthers in 2023.
Carolina won its 10th playoff series under Brind’Amour since 2019; only the Lightning (11) have more series wins during that span.
Andrei Svechnikov‘s series-clinching goal 18:01 into the third period is the second-latest series-clinching goal in regulation in franchise history. Eric Staal scored 19:28 into the third period in Game 7 of the 2009 first round at the New Jersey Devils.
With their series win over Alex Ovechkin and the Washington Capitals in the second round, the Hurricanes became the first team to eliminate the NHL’s all-time leading goal scorer since the 1997 Philadelphia Flyers, who ousted Wayne Gretzky and the New York Rangers in the conference finals. Brind’Amour, then with the Flyers, had the series-clinching goal.
Panthers
The Panthers advanced to their third straight conference finals with a 6-1 win over the Maple Leafs in Game 7 in Toronto. Florida joins the Dallas Stars in 2023-25, Tampa Bay Lightning in 2020-22, Chicago Blackhawks in 2013-15, Los Angeles Kings in 2012-14 and Detroit Red Wings from 2007-09 as the only teams in the salary cap era (since 2005-06) to make it to three straight conference finals.
Florida trailed 2-0 in the series before coming back to win 4-3, marking the first time in franchise history they’ve overcome a 2-0 series deficit in a best-of-seven playoff series (they had previously been 0-5). The Panthers are the seventh reigning Stanley Cup champions in the NHL’s expansion era (since 1967-68) to win a best-of-seven playoff round after facing a 2-0 series deficit.
The Panthers now have a 4-1 record in Game 7s, including 3-0 on the road, becoming the third franchise to win each of its first three road Game 7s (along with the Pittsburgh Penguins and Minnesota Wild).
Brad Marchand had three points for the Panthers (one goal, two assists), giving him 10 career points in Game 7s, moving ahead of Alex Ovechkin (eight) for the most Game 7 points among active players, and tied him with Paul Stastny and Jari Kurri for 10th place on the all-time list. Marchand’s three-point total gives him 37 career playoff points vs. the Maple Leafs, passing Alex Delvecchio (35) for the second most by any player against Toronto in their playoff history, behind Gordie Howe (53). Marchand improved to 5-0 against the Maple Leafs in Game 7s for his career, becoming the first player in NHL history to defeat one franchise in five winner-takes-all games.
Panthers coach Paul Maurice also stayed perfect in Game 7s as a head coach, improving to 6-0. He is one of two head coaches in NHL history to win each of his first six career Game 7s, along with current Dallas bench boss Peter DeBoer (9-0).

-
Greg WyshynskiMay 18, 2025, 10:22 PM ET
Close- Greg Wyshynski is ESPN’s senior NHL writer.
No player in Stanley Cup playoff history has tormented an opponent the way Florida Panthers winger Brad Marchand has tormented the Toronto Maple Leafs.
The Panthers eliminated the Maple Leafs 6-1 in Game 7 on Sunday night in Toronto, advancing to the Eastern Conference finals against the Carolina Hurricanes. Marchand became the first player in NHL history to defeat the same opponent in at least five winner-take-all games. He moved to a perfect 5-0 in Game 7s against the Maple Leafs — winning with the Boston Bruins in 2013, 2018, 2019 and 2024, before winning with the Panthers on Sunday.
Marchand had a goal and two assists in the victory.
“I grew up a Leafs fan. I enjoy playing against the Leafs. I enjoy interacting with fans. Like, it’s fun. It’s not something I’ll forever get to do,” he said after Game 7, which was Toronto’s seventh straight loss in a Game 7.
Marchand said that he hadn’t historically played well against Toronto in Game 7s. “It wasn’t me that beat them, it was our team,” he said. But Marchand was anything but a bystander in Florida’s Game 7 win. Marchand set up two goals — including the primary assist on Eetu Luostarinen‘s critical third-period goal just 47 seconds after Max Domi scored for the Maple Leafs — and tallied an empty-net dagger for his third goal of the playoffs.
With his three-point effort, Marchand is now second all time in career playoff scoring against the Maple Leafs with 37 points, trailing only Hockey Hall of Famer Gordie Howe (53).
“I think the thing about Toronto is that their fans are very in your face. They’re aggressive. They let you hear it all the time. So it’s just fun to interact [with them]. I interact with a lot of fans and I enjoy that part of it,” said Marchand, who also passed Washington Capitals star Alex Ovechkin (8) for the most career Game 7 points (10) among active players.
Boston traded Marchand, its captain, to Florida at March’s NHL trade deadline, ending a 16-year run with the Bruins that included a Stanley Cup championship in 2011 and two other trips to the Stanley Cup Final.
“It was his personality that I didn’t know,” Panthers coach Paul Maurice said. “He’s moved into that Matthew Tkachuk ‘hate them’ [role]. That’s a horrible word, but it’s close. And then they get here and they’re the exact opposite person that you thought they were. He’s just a wonderful human being.”
The Panthers dominated the Leafs from the opening draw, carrying play in Game 7 after Toronto extended the series with a Game 6 road victory Friday night. After two periods, the Panthers held a 70-33 advantage in shot attempts. That included a 39-14 gap in the second period, when Florida scored its first three goals.
Marchand factored into two important ones. Just 4:03 after Seth Jones opened the scoring, Marchand’s shot was deflected by Luostarinen off of goalie Joseph Woll‘s pads, and center Anton Lundell was there to clean it up for his fourth goal of the playoffs to make it 2-0. In the third period, Marchand’s pass was tipped home by Luostarinen.
“There are moments that you need to enjoy. Careers fly by. I’ve been at it a long time. I’m very fortunate. But it’s almost over. I can’t believe how fast it’s gone by. I wish I was able to enjoy more moments,” Marchand said.
With the loss, the Maple Leafs suffered yet another postseason failure. Toronto hasn’t advanced past the second round since 2002. They infamously haven’t won the Stanley Cup since 1967, the longest drought in the NHL for any franchise — including those that have never won a Cup in their existence.
After the game, Marchand was complimentary of this Toronto team. He said of all the Game 7s he has played against the Leafs, he was most nervous about this one because “they competed way harder than they ever have.” He felt criticism of this group, which might have played its last game together, was unwarranted.
“If you look at the heat this team catches, it’s actually really unfortunate. They’ve been working at building something really big here for a while,” he said. “They were a different brand of hockey this year, and they’re getting crucified. I don’t think it’s justified.”
That said, Marchand did have a little fun at Toronto’s expense on the TNT postgame show. When asked what the difference was in the Panthers locker room from Game 6 to Game 7, Marchand said “we just had that be-Leaf” — a winking reference to one of the rallying cries of Toronto fans.
Trending
-
Sports3 years ago
‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year ago
Story injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years ago
Game 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years ago
MLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years ago
Japan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years ago
Game-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business3 years ago
Bank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway