A Shell logo displayed on a sign at a gas station in Nakuru, Kenya.
Sopa Images | Lightrocket | Getty Images
British oil giant Shell on Thursday announced plans to moderate its near-term carbon emissions cuts, while maintaining its pledge to become a net-zero company by the middle of the century.
In its latest energy transition strategy update, the oil and gas major said it is now aiming to reduce its net carbon intensity on the third-party use of products it sells by 15% to 20% by 2030, compared with a previous target of 20%.
Shell said it had also dropped its goal of a 45% reduction by 2035, citing “uncertainty in the pace of change in the energy transition.” The net carbon intensity targets are measured against a baseline of emissions in 2016.
“Our focus on value has led to a strategic shift in our power business towards select markets and segments,” Shell CEO Wael Sawan said in a statement. “As a result, we expect lower growth in sales of power overall. We have updated our net carbon intensity target to reflect that change.”
Shell said that by the end of 2023, it had achieved over 60% of its target to halve emissions from its operations by 2030, compared with 2016.
The company also said it achieved its target to reduce the net carbon intensity of the energy products sold last year, with a 6.3% reduction compared to 2016. Shell said this marked the third straight year it had hit its target.
Shell’s update comes as European energy majors continue to tweak their plans in the transition to clean-energy technologies. Last year, British rival BPsaid it was targeting a 20% to 30% emissions cut by the end of the decade, compared to a previous commitment to a 35% to 40% trim.
BP, which is also planning to become a net-zero company by 2050, said at the time that it needed to keep investing in oil and gas to meet global demand.
Activist investors have put pressure on fossil fuel companies to do more to align their emission reduction targets with the landmark 2015 Paris Agreement, while some have urged firms to scale back on green pledges and instead lean into their core oil and gas businesses.
The burning of fossil fuels, such as coal, oil and gas, is the chief driver of the climate crisis.
‘Exacerbating the climate crisis’
“With this backtrack, Shell bets on the failure of the Paris Climate Agreement which requires almost halving emissions this decade,” said Mark van Baal, founder of activist shareholder group Follow This.
“This backtracking removes any doubt about Shell’s intentions: the company wants to stay in fossil fuels as long as possible,” van Baal said.
“The board not only endangers the global economy by exacerbating the climate crisis, but also puts the company’s future at risk through policy interventions, disruptive innovation, stranded assets, and accountability for the costs of climate change.”
Chief executives of some of the world’s largest energy companies have repeatedly sought to fend off criticism, claiming that Big Oil is not to blame for the climate crisis and saying it isn’t possible to keep everyone happy in the energy transition.
Shell on Thursday reaffirmed its target to become a net-zero company by 2050, a pledge it first made in 2020 under previous CEO Ben van Beurden. The company said it planned to spend $10 billion to $15 billion on unspecified low-carbon solutions between 2023 and 2025.
Shares of Shell were 0.2% higher on Thursday morning. The London-listed stock price is around 1.3% lower year-to-date.
In his latest crackdown on e-bike riders, New York City Mayor Eric Adams is pushing for a new citywide e-bike speed limit of 15 mph (25 km/h), despite the fact that no one seems to know how it would actually be enforced.
The proposal, introduced last month as part of a broader package aimed at improving safety on city streets, would make it illegal to ride an e-bike over 15 mph. But experts, advocates, and even city officials are scratching their heads about how the rule would work in practice.
Most consumer e-bikes are already sold with speed limits in place: 20 mph (32 km/h) for throttle assist and 28 mph (45 km/) for pedal assist, per classifications used in the majority of states in the US. Yet those limits are controlled by the bike’s electronics, not by any city infrastructure.
According to reporting by Hell Gate NYC, even the Mayor’s own office couldn’t explain what the enforcement mechanism would look like, and no single agency has so far been put in charge of enforcing the speed limit. Will the city mandate software modifications such as those that limit Class 3 e-bikes to 25 mph (40 km/h) in NYC? Would they rely on radar guns like traditional speeding enforcement for cars? Install speed cameras that can identify bikes? So far, there are no answers.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Citi Bike has already reduced its electric bicycle fleet’s speed limits to 15 mph, but that only impacts shared e-bikes used in the city. Complicating matters further is the fact that most delivery riders – who are clearly the unspoken target of this policy – don’t use mainstream e-bikes from the major manufacturers, or even those that can accept firmware updates to adjust speed and power. Many of them ride inexpensive, sometimes heavily modified throttle bikes purchased online or from bike shops like FLY that cater to these types of riders. Such e-bikes often lack more sophisticated software speed-limiting features, and few, if any, have any form of digital connectivity that could allow for remote speed capping.
City transportation experts note that enforcement of speed limits on e-bikes is nearly impossible without clocking and stopping each rider. Unlike cars, bikes don’t have license plates. And even if a bike is capable of going faster than 15 mph, it doesn’t mean the rider is actually breaking the law – unless caught in the act. Nearly every car in NYC can likely push close to or past 100 mph (160 km/h), despite the city wide’s vehicular speed limit of just 25 mph. Advocates have also questioned the wisdom of focusing on e-bike speed while car crashes continue to injure and kill far more people.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Range Rover’s first EV was initially scheduled to arrive later this year, but that won’t be the case. JLR has delayed the launch of the Range Rover Electric after telling customers they will have to wait a little longer. However, that may not be the only EV JLR is delaying.
Range Rover Electric and Jaguar EVs are being delayed
Although the electric SUV was originally due to hit showrooms in late 2025, it’s now being pushed back until next year.
The British automaker claimed it needed more time for testing while it waited for stronger demand. However, there’s more to the story. According to The Guardian, Jaguar Land Rover wrote to clients waiting for the Range Rover Electric, telling them deliveries will not start until 2026.
Sources close to the matter said the delay could also impact two Jaguar EV models, including the radical blue-and-pink Type 00 Concept. Jaguar’s electric vehicles are expected to be delayed by several months.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
The news comes after JLR announced plans to cut up to 500 management positions in the UK this week. Britain’s largest carmaker was hit hard by the Trump Administration’s new auto tariffs.
Range Rover Electric SUV prototype testing (Source: JLR)
JLR’s sales plunged over 15% in the previous quarter after the company was forced to temporarily halt shipments to the US.
A company spokesperson confirmed that “By 2030 JLR will sell electric versions of all its luxury brands,” adding “we will launch our new models at the right time for our clients, our business and individual markets.”
Jaguar Type 00 first public debut in Paris (Source: Jaguar)
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has secured over 61,000 customers on the waiting list. JLR claims it’s currently undergoing “the most intensive testing any Range Rover vehicle has ever endured.”
An electric version of the Velar is due for a radical new look. It’s scheduled for production in April 2026, but that could also be delayed. An electric Defender is due out in early 2027.
Meanwhile, production on Jaguar’s new EV, its first since the I-PACE, is set to begin in August 2026. Jaguar’s electric GT is expected to cost over £100,000 ($135,000) as part of its brand revamp. Its second EV may not launch until December 2027 now.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
This week on Electrek’s Wheel-E podcast, we discuss the most popular news stories from the world of electric bikes and other nontraditional electric vehicles. This time, that includes new e-bikes from Aventon and Lectric, a surge in Amish riding e-bikes, a wireless charging kickstand, cheaper electric motorcycles coming from Honda and LiveWire and more.
The Wheel-E podcast returns every two weeks on Electrek’s YouTube channel, Facebook, Linkedin, and Twitter.
As a reminder, we’ll have an accompanying post, like this one, on the site with an embedded link to the live stream. Head to the YouTube channel to get your questions and comments in.
After the show ends, the video will be archived on YouTube and the audio on all your favorite podcast apps:
We also have a Patreon if you want to help us to avoid more ads and invest more in our content. We have some awesome gifts for our Patreons and more coming.
Here are a few of the articles that we will discuss during the Wheel-E podcast today:
Here’s the live stream for today’s episode starting at 9:00 a.m. ET (or the video after 10:00 a.m. ET):
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.