Connect with us

Published

on

It’s an election year – and that means political donations have ramped up.

And this has been compounded by the alleged comments of Frank Hester, who is reported to have said Labour MP Diane Abbott made him “want to hate all black women”, after giving £10m to the Conservatives.

But what exactly are the rules on donations? Do they change for elections? Who gets the most money? Why do people donate? And can parties give funds back?

Here we explain:

What are the rules on donations?

Politics and money is a rabbit hole that Lewis Carroll would be jealous of, and the UK’s system is no different.

One of the most important things to note is that the figures are on a much smaller scale to those in the US – in the tens of millions rather than billions.

More on Conservatives

One key distinction is that donations to MPs are different to political party donations.

Frank Hester. Pic: PA/CHOGM Rwanda 2022
Image:
Frank Hester has given millions to the Conservatives. Pic: PA

MPs have to declare all their interests on a public register, which can be easily searched using the Sky News Westminster Accounts tool.

This is how we know that Frank Hester’s The Phoenix Partnership donated a £15,900 helicopter flight to Rishi Sunak late last year.

His company gave £5m, and he gave £5m personally to the Conservative Party itself.

The rules for these donations require all contributions over £11,180 to be declared. This was recently increased from a threshold of £7,500.

Money donated to political parties in this fashion goes into their accounts but, according to Professor Justin Fisher, an expert in political finance at Brunel University, it does not need to be “ring-fenced”.

This is why there is no way to see what the money donated by Mr Hester and his company was spent on.

The body responsible for regulating and setting standards for donations and party finances is the Electoral Commission.

Read more:
Sunak appears to rule out handing back Hester money
Labour enjoys best year ever for individual donations

Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge
Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge

Sky News Monday to Thursday at 7pm.
Watch live on Sky channel 501, Freeview 233, Virgin 602, the Sky News website and app or YouTube.

Tap here for more

Are there different rules for elections?

In short – yes, many different restrictions.

The aforementioned increase in the floor for the declaration of donations was done as part of measures to update financial restrictions that had laid untouched for two decades.

The spending limit for parties during elections also increased. For a party contesting all 650 UK seats it went from around £18m to just over £35m.

However, as no party contests every seat, the effective limit is just over £34m.

According to the Electoral Commission, this applies to spending on certain activities in the 365 days before the election.

Confusingly, it is impossible to know the start date of this period, as the government can call an election whenever it wants, so in November 2023 the Electoral Commission encouraged parties to “behave as if you are in a regulated period from now onwards”.

Other changes included how often parties have to report their donations.

In normal times, figures are published quarterly. After an election is called and parliament is dissolved, publication takes place every week.

There are also restrictions on how much money a prospective MP can spend in an election period.

Each constituency has a limit based on the number of people who live there.

And those hoping to get elected have to declare all their spending, as well as any donation the candidate received over £50.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why don’t we know when the UK election is?

Who gives the most money – and why?

The biggest donors to political parties can be easily identified through the Sky News Westminster Accounts interface.

It is dominated by individuals, unions, and just a few companies.

At the top of the list sits Lord David Sainsbury, the supermarket heir, who has given more than £13m in donations since the last election – including £5.1m to Labour and £8m to the Liberal Democrats.

He is not to be confused with his cousin, the late Lord John Sainsbury, who gave £10.2m to the Conservatives in the same period.

Next up is the union Unite, which has given £10.7m to Labour, and hundreds of thousands of pounds to Labour MPs.

The GMB union and Unison have both given around £6m to Labour since 2019.

Businessman Graham Edwards gave £5.2m to the Conservatives in this period.

Next on the list is Mr Hester’s The Phoenix Partnership, which has given £5.2m, including the helicopter flight to Mr Sunak.

Mr Hester also donated £5m in a personal capacity to the Conservatives.

Read more:
Sky News wins data journalism award for Westminster Accounts
Labour calls for ‘urgent investigation’ into Conservative donor

Prof Fisher explained that it used to be more common for companies to donate, instead of individuals – but it is harder to justify this now in an era when spending plans have to get past powerful boards.

Instead, companies can benefit from different, less expensive (on a balance sheet) endeavours, like lobbying or hosting events.

Donors tend to hand over cash or gifts because they want to see a party win which will improve their position, or because of a prior affiliation. Or an individual could just be politically aligned with the party in question.

Can parties return money?

Once again, the short answer is yes.

There have been calls for the Conservatives to return the money given to them by Mr Hester or his company.

Political parties can spend their money how they choose – and this could include giving it back or donating it to charity.

It is not the first time there have been calls for money to be returned.

? Listen above then tap here to follow Electoral Dysfunction wherever you get your podcasts ?

The Liberal Democrats faced calls to return money donated to them by Michael Brown, who lived in Majorca but gave money through a company based in the UK – something the rules do not allow.

The Electoral Commission investigated but did not take further action. Mr Brown was later convicted of fraud.

The Labour Party faced calls in 2002 to return a donation from publisher Richard Desmond because his publication “titles are demeaning and degrading to women”.

One time when money did get returned was when Labour accepted a £1m donation from Formula 1 chief Bernie Ecclestone shortly before they came to power in 1997.

At the time, the donation was not made public as there was no requirement to do so. Labour did, however, have a policy at the time of declaring donations.

After coming to power, Labour announced it would ban all sports sponsorships from tobacco companies.

But, following talks with Mr Ecclestone, the government proposed exempting Formula 1 from the ban.

The donation then became public, and a political scandal erupted, so the party committed to give the money back.

Labour handed back money given to them by Formula One chief Bernie Ecclestone. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Labour handed back money given to them by Formula 1 chief Bernie Ecclestone. Pic: Reuters

In March 1998, Mr Ecclestone cashed a cheque which Labour had written to him for the £1m.

This shows money can be returned, if there is a will to do so.

Continue Reading

Politics

South Korea to impose bank-level liability on crypto exchanges after Upbit hack: Report

Published

on

By

South Korea to impose bank-level liability on crypto exchanges after Upbit hack: Report

South Korea is preparing to impose bank-level, no-fault liability rules on crypto exchanges, holding exchanges to the same standards as traditional financial institutions amid the recent breach at Upbit.

The Financial Services Commission (FSC) is reviewing new provisions that would require exchanges to compensate customers for losses stemming from hacks or system failures, even when the platform is not at fault, The Korea Times reported on Sunday, citing officials and local market analysts.

The no-fault compensation model is currently applied only to banks and electronic payment firms under Korea’s Electronic Financial Transactions Act.

The regulatory push follows a Nov. 27 incident involving Upbit, operated by Dunamu, in which more than 104 billion Solana-based tokens, worth approximately 44.5 billion won ($30.1 million), were transferred to external wallets in under an hour.

Related: Do Kwon says five-year US sentence is enough as he faces 40 years in South Korea

Crypto exchanges face bank-level oversight

Regulators are also reacting to a pattern of recurring outages. Data submitted to lawmakers by the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) shows the country’s five major exchanges, Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit and Gopax, reported 20 system failures since 2023, affecting over 900 users and causing more than 5 billion won in combined losses. Upbit alone recorded six failures impacting 600 customers.

The upcoming legislative revision is expected to mandate stricter IT security requirements, higher operational standards and tougher penalties. Lawmakers are weighing a rule that would allow fines of up to 3% of annual revenue for hacking incidents, the same threshold used for banks. Currently, crypto exchanges face a maximum fine of $3.4 million.

The Upbit breach has also drawn political scrutiny over delayed reporting. Although the hack was detected shortly after 5 am, the exchange did not notify the FSS until nearly 11 am. Some lawmakers have alleged the delay was intentional, occurring minutes after Dunamu finalized a merger with Naver Financial.

Related: South Korea targets sub-$680 crypto transfers in sweeping AML crackdown

South Korea pushes for stablecoin bill

As Cointelegraph reported, South Korean lawmakers are also pressuring financial regulators to deliver a draft stablecoin bill by Dec. 10, warning they will push ahead without the government if the deadline is missed.