Connect with us

Published

on

The New York Stock Exchange welcomes Reddit, Inc. (NYSE: RDDT) to celebrate its initial public offering. To honor the occasion, Snoo, rings the Opening Bell®.

NYSE

Wall Street’s tech IPO bankers may finally have a reason to break out the champagne after an extended drought was broken up this week with the market debuts of Reddit and Astera Labs.

While occupying very different corners of the technology market, Reddit and Astera were the first notable venture-backed tech companies to go public in the U.S. since Instacart and Klaviyo in September. Before that, there hadn’t been a significant deal since late 2021.

Morgan Stanley was the big winner among banks, having captured the coveted lead left spot on both IPOs. Goldman Sachs led last year’s only two big venture-backed offerings, meaning it had been a long dry spell for Morgan Stanley. The bank was lead left on IPOs for HashiCorp and Samsara in December 2021.

In the past two years, there have only been 15 tech IPOs total, according to research provided by University of Florida finance professor Jay Ritter. That came after a booming market in 2021, when 121 tech companies went public, the most since the dot-com bubble in 2000. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley cut thousands of jobs last year in part due to the downturn in initial public offerings.

“The capital markets have been relatively quiet the past couple of years,” said Eric Juergens, a partner at law firm Debevoise and Plimpton who focuses on capital markets and private equity. Investment banks have “certainly been active in pitching clients on IPOs and other transactions and positioning themselves to be there when companies are finally ready,” he said.

Some market experts see the past week’s action as a sign of what’s to come. New York Stock Exchange President Lynn Martin told CNBC on Thursday, at the opening of Reddit trading, that a lot of companies are working toward going out in the second quarter.

NYSE President Lynn Martin: Reddit IPO was a 'big test' for other companies

That would be welcome news for Morgan Stanley. The bank collected around $37 million in total fees as the lead underwriter for the Astera and Reddit IPOs. It’s a drop in the bucket for the bank, which reported $12.9 billion in net revenue last quarter, largely from wealth management. But it could be a sign of life in the investment banking unit, which saw revenue drop by 46% over a two-year stretch from the fourth quarter of 2021 to the final three months of last year.

The 12 underwriters on Astera’s IPO this week collected $39.2 million in fees, with Morgan Stanley taking one-third of the total, or around $12.9 million. The overallotment, or greenshoe option, which allows underwriters to purchase an additional 15% of shares for clients, would add $5.9 million to the fees paid out.

Astera sells data center connectivity chips to cloud and artificial intelligence infrastructure companies. The stock soared 72% in its Nasdaq debut on Wednesday and continued rallying, gaining another 13% over the next two days, benefiting from investors’ seemingly insatiable appetite for all things AI.

‘Everyone was watching’

Reddit’s long-awaited IPO came Wednesday night, with shares hitting the open market Thursday. Morgan Stanley made $13 million in fees in the deal and stood to make up to $5.6 million from fees on the greenshoe option.

Shares of the 19-year-old social media company popped 48% in their first day of trading on the NYSE, before dropping 8.8% on Friday.

Lise Buyer, founder of IPO consultancy Class V Group, said the market is showing signs of thawing.

“A warm reception in the market for these IPOs surely will help open the floodgates,” Buyer said. “Everyone was watching these. Investors, boards of directors and management were encouraged by them.”

She added that the bankers who have been waiting for action, “have to be delighted by this.”

Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley’s biggest rival, had the No. 2 position on the Reddit IPO, capturing about 19% of the fee payout. The firm scored wins last year as the lead on the Instacart and Klaviyo IPOs, which brought in combined fee revenue of around $35 million. When SoftBank took semiconductor design company Arm Holdings public last year, Barclays led the deal, with participation from Goldman Sachs, and JP Morgan.

Arm Holdings CEO Rene Haas poses for a photo with members of leadership outside of the Nasdaq MarketSite on September 14, 2023 in New York City. 

Michael M. Santiago | Getty Images

For Investment banks, the IPO is often viewed as just the beginning of the relationship with a company. The future could bring follow-on offerings, debt raises and acquisitions, which are all specialties of the top Wall Street firms.

Morgan Stanley is finding another way to bring in additional potential business. In both the Reddit and Astera IPOs, a portion of the equity was set aside for so-called directed-share programs (DSPs), giving high-valued customers, business partners or company insiders a chance to participate.

The model was previously employed by Airbnb, Rivian and Doximity, bringing power users or early customers into their IPOs. For Morgan Stanley, the DSPs have the potential to lure new individual customers into the bank for wealth management and other services.

In Reddit’s case, the company said tens of thousands of Redditors participated in its DSP.

“The goal is just to get them in the deal,” Reddit CEO Steve Huffman told CNBC in an interview on Thursday. “Just like any professional investor.”

Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO:

Reddit pops 48% in NYSE debut after selling shares at top of range

Continue Reading

Technology

AI’s potential excites executives and investors, but general public remains skeptical, survey says

Published

on

By

AI's potential excites executives and investors, but general public remains skeptical, survey says

Several AI applications can be seen on a smartphone screen, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot, Meta AI, Grok and DeepSeek.

Philip Dulian | Picture Alliance | Getty Images

Corporate leaders and investors are brimming with optimism about the potential of artificial intelligence to boost worker productivity, profitability and shareholder returns.

The general public remains unconvinced.

That’s according to a report published Tuesday by nonprofit group Just Capital, examining how different groups are feeling about the potential risks and benefits of AI adoption. Between Sept. 27 and Nov. 14, Just Capital collected data from institutional investors and analysts, corporate executives and U.S. adults.

Roughly 93% of corporate leaders and 80% of investors said they believe AI will have a net positive impact on society within the next five years, according to the report. Only 58% of respondents from the public said they share that sentiment.

The survey lands three years after OpenAI kickstarted the generative AI rush with the launch of ChatGPT, sparking a flood of investments into AI infrastructure, startups and products. With some analysts forecasting that AI spending will reach into the trillions of dollars by the end of the decade, the boom is boosting excitement about economic advancement and the future of technology while simultaneously raising concerns about privacy, safety and job security.

The disparate views are particularly noticeable when looking at AI in the workplace.

Just 47% of the general public said they think AI will have a positive net impact on worker productivity, compared to 94% of investors and 98% of corporate leaders.

Read more CNBC tech news

Meanwhile, nearly half of respondents from the general public said they expect AI to replace workers and eliminate jobs, the report said. Only 20% of corporate leaders agreed.

Conversely, 64% of executives said AI will help workers be more productive in their current jobs, while only 23% of the public agreed.

“The survey findings reveal widespread public concern that companies’ growing adoption of AI will have swift, direct consequences for workers through job cuts,” Just Capital said.

All three categories of respondents are concerned about safety and security risks that could stem from AI, but corporate leaders and investors are especially worried about disinformation and malicious use of the technology. In addition to those categories, the public is also fears loss of control and the environmental impact of AI.

More than 40% of corporate leaders said environmental issues are not being factored into their AI deployment strategy, according to the report.

Roughly 60% of investors and half of the public said companies should spend more than 5% of their total AI investment on safety, while 59% of corporate leaders said they should spend up to 5%.

Just Capital said it will continue to track sentiments around AI deployment every quarter.

WATCH: Gibbs: AI can boost profitability without massive infrastructure

Gibbs: AI can boost profitability without massive infrastructure

Continue Reading

Technology

House Democrats establish AI working group as industry bolsters DC presence

Published

on

By

House Democrats establish AI working group as industry bolsters DC presence

U.S. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) raises a finger as he speaks during a press conference, more than a month into the longest U.S. government shutdown in Washington, D.C., U.S., November 10, 2025.

Evelyn Hockstein | Reuters

House Democrats are forming a commission on artificial intelligence to position themselves as leaders on the issue as AI companies train their focus — and campaign contributions — on Washington, D.C.

The House Democratic Commission on AI and the Innovation Economy, set to begin meeting this month, will work with AI companies, stakeholders and congressional committees that oversee aspects of the sector to help develop policy expertise.

The commission is a response to the growing presence of AI policy and AI companies around Washington.

AI companies are ramping up lobbying, opening offices close to the Capitol, and launching campaigns through a super PAC with at least $100 million to spend on the midterms elections in 2026.

There has been a growing debate over AI, specifically related to an increasing number of individual state laws that could conflict with a federal standard.

OpenAI, Andreessen Horowitz and Google are lobbying to block state laws that regulate AI. Democrats have largely opposed that push.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., in a statement shared with CNBC about the working group, said that Democrats are “ready, willing and able to lean into those issues so we can uplift the health, safety and economic well-being of the American people.”

House Democratic Caucus vice-chair Ted Lieu, D-Calif., participates in the House Democrats’ post-caucus news conference in the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday, July 23, 2024. 

Bill Clark | CQ-Roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images

Rep. Ted Lieu of California, Rep. Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey, and Rep. Valerie Foushee of North Carolina will lead the commission. Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California and Rep. Frank Pallone of Massachusetts, the top Democrats on committees that cover AI, will serve as ex-officio co-chairs. All House Democrats will be invited to participate.

Lieu drew a line between how Republicans and Democrats have handled AI issues.

He slammed the Trump administration for proposing to sell advanced chips to China, striking revenue-sharing agreements, and posting deepfake videos. Trump announced Monday that he will allow Nvidia to send advanced H200 chips to “approved customers” in China and elsewhere.

“House Democrats reject this misguided approach, which risks leaving Americans vulnerable and our competitiveness weakened,” Liu said in a statement. “Instead, Democrats will meet the moment by working with all stakeholders to develop smart, durable solutions that strengthen innovation and protect the public.”

Gottheimer said the group also wants to find ways to keep the U.S. “ahead of the curve” when it comes to AI and work with the larger industry.

“We need to ensure Congress is educated on these new technologies, that we’re putting the right policies and guardrails in place to grow and protect Americans,” he said in a statement.

The House previously had a bipartisan task force on AI that issued a report in December 2024, which laid out recommendations for action at both the Congressional and executive levels.

Continue Reading

Technology

U.S. uncovers scheme to reroute Nvidia GPUs worth $160 million to China despite export bans

Published

on

By

U.S. uncovers scheme to reroute Nvidia GPUs worth 0 million to China despite export bans

NVIDIA AI Computing Card captured in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China on Dec. 9, 2025.

Cfoto | Future Publishing | Getty Images

U.S. authorities announced Tuesday that they have shut down yet another China-linked smuggling network that trafficked or attempted to traffic more than $160 million in export-controlled Nvidia AI chips.

According to a press release from the U.S. Attorney’s Office, two businessmen were taken into custody, while a Houston-based company and its owner have already pleaded guilty to chip smuggling as part of the wider investigation.

The case comes as Washington steps up its enforcement of export controls aimed at curbing China’s access to advanced AI technologies, including Nvidia’s Graphics Processing Units. 

The operation, dubbed “Operation Gatekeeper,” exposed efforts to funnel cutting-edge AI chips — with military and civilian applications — to entities that could undermine U.S. national security, according to a statement from U.S. Attorney Nicholas J. Ganjei for the Southern District of Texas.

Newly unsealed documents show that Alan Hao Hsu, 43, of Missouri City, Texas, and his company, Hao Global LLC, pleaded guilty to smuggling and unlawful export activities on Oct. 10. 

Officials said Hsu and associates had exported or attempted to export at least $160 million worth of Nvidia H100 and H200 GPUs between October 2024 and May 2025.

The H200 and H100 models, while not Nvidia’s most advanced chips, still require a special license to be shipped to China under current controls.

Hsu’s operation allegedly falsified shipping documents to misclassify the GPUs and hide their true destinations, including China, Hong Kong and other prohibited locations. Investigators traced more than $50 million in funds originating from China to help fund the scheme by Hsu and Hao Global.

Hsu, who remains free on bond, faces up to 10 years in prison at his Feb. 18 sentencing, while Hao Global could be hit with fines up to twice its illicit gains plus probation. 

In a statement shared with CNBC, an Nvidia spokesperson said that export controls remain rigorous and that “even sales of older generation products on the secondary market are subject to strict scrutiny and review.”

“While millions of controlled GPUs are in service at businesses, homes, and schools, we will continue to work with the government and our customers to ensure that second-hand smuggling does not occur,” the spokesperson said.

Relabeled Nvidia GPUs

U.S. officials also charged Fanyue Gong, 43, a Chinese citizen residing in New York, and Benlin Yuan, 58, a Canadian citizen living in Ontario, as part of their investigation.

Yuan serves as CEO of a U.S. subsidiary of a Beijing-headquartered Chinese IT company, while Gong owns a New York technology firm. Both allegedly conspired independently with a Hong Kong logistics company and a China-based AI firm to evade chip controls.

Prosecutors alleged Gong used straw purchasers and intermediaries to acquire GPUs by misrepresenting the end customers as being in the U.S. or in unrestricted third countries.

Workers at U.S. warehouses would then rebrand shipments under fictitious names and mislabel them as generic parts for export to China and Hong Kong, according to the case.

Meanwhile, Yuan is accused of recruiting inspectors for the Hong Kong firm, instructing them to conceal Chinese destinations, devising cover stories to release detained shipments, and providing false information to authorities. He also allegedly handled storage for additional GPU exports.

If convicted, Yuan could face up to 20 years for conspiracy to violate the Export Control Reform Act, while Gong could receive as much as 10 years for conspiracy to smuggle.

The investigation involved the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security, which oversees and enforces U.S. export controls, including those on Nvidia. The case comes amid a flurry of similar busts regarding unauthorized Nvidia exports in recent months. 

Lawmakers have been attempting to tighten oversight of U.S. chip controls following reports of loopholes in existing rules.

However, the U.S. President signaled this week that he would allow Nvidia to ship its H200 chips to “approved customers” in China and elsewhere, on the condition that Washington gets a 25% cut on the profits.

Although the H200 isn’t state-of-the-art in Nvidia’s lineup, it would become the most advanced model available to China and could help satiate demand for AI compute power in the country. 

Continue Reading

Trending