Connect with us

Published

on

Vladimir Putin has claimed the gunmen behind the Moscow concert hall terror attack attempted to flee to Ukraine in the aftermath of the mass shooting.

The allegation, made by the Russian president during an address to the nation, came despite the Islamist terror group Islamic State Khorasan (IS-K) claiming responsibility for Friday night’s attack, in which at least 130 people were killed.

Ukraine strongly denied any involvement in the shooting, which comes two weeks after the US shared intelligence with Russian security officials warning that “extremists” had imminent plans for an attack in Moscow.

In an address to the nation on Saturday, Mr Putin described the shooting as a “bloody and barbaric terrorist attack”.

He also claimed that Russia had intelligence which suggested Ukraine had prepared a “window” to allow the gunmen across the Ukrainian border.

“All four direct perpetrators of the terrorist attack, all those who shot and killed people, were found and detained,” Mr Putin said.

“They tried to hide and moved towards Ukraine, where, according to preliminary data, a window was prepared for them on the Ukrainian side to cross the state border.”

Moscow shooting latest: Putin says terrorist ‘tackled by spectator’

On its Telegram page, Islamic State has claimed responsibility for the attacks. These claims have not been independently verified by Sky News.
Image:
Footage from the attack

In this photo taken from video released by Investigative Committee of Russia on Saturday, March 23, 2024, a Kalashnikov assault rifle lies on the ground as Investigators from the Investigative Committee of Russia together with the operational units of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the FSB, work the scene after a terrorist attack on the building of the Crocus City Hall on the western edge of Moscow, Russia. Several gunmen burst into a big concert hall in Moscow and fired automatic weapons at the crowd, injuring an unspecified number of people and setting a massive blaze in an apparent terror attack days after President Vladimir Putin cemented his grip on the country in a highly orchestrated electoral landslide. (Investigative Committee of Russia via AP)
Image:
A Kalashnikov assault rifle lies on the ground as officials from the Investigative Committee of Russia investigate the attack. Pic: AP

He also declared Sunday as a day of mourning and said those responsible could “expect only one thing, they can expect punishment”.

On Saturday afternoon, officials in Russia said at least 133 people had died in the attack on the 6,000-capacity Crocus City Hall, in the western Moscow suburb of Krasnogorsk – making it the second-deadliest single terror attack in Russia’s history.

As concert-goers gathered in the hall, the four men, armed with Kalashnikov automatic weapons, arrived in a minivan and walked calmly towards the metal detectors, before opening fire on civilians, often at point-blank range.

Russian investigators said the men began to set fire to the building during the shooting.

A Russian National Guard serviceman in front of Crocus City Hall. Pic: AP
Image:
A Russian National Guard serviceman in front of Crocus City Hall. Pic: AP

A massive blaze is seen at the Crocus City Hall. Pic: AP
Image:
A massive blaze is seen at the Crocus City Hall. Pic: AP

Hours later, IS-K, a regional branch of the Islamic State militant group operating in Central Asia and Afghanistan, claimed responsibility for the attack.

The group’s Amaq news agency said on the social media site Telegram that the attack came “within the context of a raging war between the Islamic State and countries fighting Islam”.

Central Asia is a fertile recruiting ground for IS-K, as are the restive republics of the Russian Federation, Ingushetia, Dagestan and Chechnya.

The group claims Mr Putin and his regime are killing Muslims and have previously pointed to Russia’s military operations in Chechnya, Syria, and Afghanistan.

Promo for The World with Yalda Hakim special programme on the Moscow attack.

Russia’s interior ministry said all four of the gunmen were foreign nationals, but did not specify which country they were from.

Some of the suspects were shown being interrogated on the side of the road in footage published by Russian media and Telegram channels with close ties to the Kremlin.

Russian media said the men had fled the scene in a white car and that the men were detained in the Bryansk region, about 210 miles (340km) southwest of Moscow.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Putin vows to ‘punish’ terrorists

Read more from Sky News:
Analysis: Kyiv worries Putin will exploit bloodshed
Russian rocket blasts off after launch dramatically aborted

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

Following the attack, two anonymous US officials said Washington had intelligence confirming Islamic State’s claim of responsibility.

They also said the US had warned Russia in recent weeks about the possibility of an attack – ahead of the US embassy in Moscow issuing a warning to Americans in the city.

What is IS-K and why would it target Russia?


Alex Rossi - Middle East correspondent

Alex Rossi

International correspondent

@alexrossiSKY

Islamic State Khorasan (IS-K) has taken credit for attacks by other terror networks in the past, but it is almost certainly behind the deadly assault in Russia, though nothing is impossible.

The group has claimed responsibility, and the chatter picked up by Western intelligence services in the days leading up to the atrocity also indicated something was coming.

The number of people killed in Friday’s shooting near Moscow is grim and likely to keep climbing.

Many people presumed Islamic State (IS) had been neutered, but it has been growing in strength in recent years, particularly IS-K.

Click here to read Alex Rossi’s full analysis

“We did warn the Russians appropriately,” one of the US officials said.

Ukrainian military intelligence spokesman Andriy Yusov, meanwhile, denied any Ukrainian involvement.

“Ukraine was of course not involved in this terror attack,” he told Reuters.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why would Islamic State attack Russia?

Mykhailo Podolyak, an adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, also said on X: “Ukraine has never resorted to the use of terrorist methods.

“Everything in this war will be decided only on the battlefield.”

Meanwhile, Ukraine’s foreign ministry accused Moscow of using the attack to “further fuel anti-Ukrainian hysteria in Russian society”.

“We consider such accusations to be a planned provocation by the Kremlin to… create conditions for increased mobilization of Russian citizens to participate in the criminal aggression against our country and discredit Ukraine in the eyes of the international community,” the ministry said in a statement.

Continue Reading

World

Turkey urges US to act after accusing Israel of breaching Gaza ceasefire

Published

on

By

 Turkey urges US to act after accusing Israel of breaching Gaza ceasefire

Turkey has urged the US to take action after accusing Israel of violating the Gaza ceasefire deal.

The country’s president Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Washington and its allies should consider sanctions and halting arms sales to put pressure on Israel to abide by the agreement.

Turkey, a NATO member, joined ceasefire negotiations as a mediator, and increased its role following a meeting between Mr Erdogan and Donald Trump at the White House last month.

“The Hamas side is abiding by the ceasefire. In fact, it is openly stating its commitment to this. Israel, meanwhile, is continuing to violate the ceasefire,” Mr Erdogan told reporters.

“The international community, namely the United States, must do more to ensure Israel’s full compliance to the ceasefire and agreement,” he said.

Mr Erdogan was also asked about comments from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who hinted that he would be opposed to any peacekeeping role for Turkish security forces in the Gaza Strip.

The Turkish president said talks on the issue were still underway, adding: “As this is a multi-faceted issue, there are comprehensive negotiations. We are ready to provide Gaza any form of support on this issue.”

Israel has accused Hamas of breaching the truce and previously said its recent military action in Gaza was designed to uphold the agreement.

Relations between former allies Israel and Turkey hit new lows during the Gaza war, with Ankara accusing Mr Netanyahu’s government of committing genocide, an allegation Israel has repeatedly denied.

A rally in support of Palestinians in Istanbul. Pic: Reuters
Image:
A rally in support of Palestinians in Istanbul. Pic: Reuters

Speaking during a visit to Israel on Friday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that a planned international security force for Gaza would have to be made up of “countries that Israel’s comfortable with,” but declined to comment specifically on Turkey’s involvement.

Around 200 US troops are working alongside the Israeli military and delegations from other countries, planning the stabilisation and reconstruction of Gaza.

The US is seeking support from other allies, namely Gulf Arab nations, to build an international security force to be deployed to Gaza and train a Palestinian security force.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Rubio warns against West Bank annexation

Mr Rubio said many nations had expressed interest, but decisions had yet to be made about the rules of engagement. He added that countries need to know what they were signing up for.

“Under what authority are they going to be operating? Who’s going to be in charge? What is their job?” said Mr Rubio.

Read more:
British troops deployed to Israel to ‘monitor ceasefire’
US takes centre stage in show of diplomatic power

The secretary of state also reiterated his earlier warning to Israel not to annex the occupied West Bank, land that Palestinians want for part of an independent state.

A bill applying Israeli law to the West Bank won preliminary approval from Israel’s parliament on Wednesday.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio speaks with US military personnel in Israel. Pic: Reuters
Image:
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio speaks with US military personnel in Israel. Pic: Reuters

“We don’t think it’s going to happen”, Mr Rubio said, adding that annexation “would also threaten this whole process”.

“If [annexation] were to happen, a lot of the countries that are involved in working on this probably aren’t going to want to be involved in this anymore. It’s a threat to the peace process and everybody knows it”, he added.

Continue Reading

World

US ramps up ‘drug boats’ operation by sending in aircraft carrier to region

Published

on

By

US ramps up 'drug boats' operation by sending in aircraft carrier to region

The US has announced it is sending an aircraft carrier to the waters off South America as it ramps up an operation to target alleged drug smuggling boats.

The Pentagon said in a statement that the USS Gerald R Ford would be deployed to the region to “bolster US capacity to detect, monitor, and disrupt illicit actors and activities that compromise the safety and prosperity of the United States homeland and our security in the Western Hemisphere”.

The vessel is the US Navy’s largest aircraft carrier. It is currently deployed in the Mediterranean alongside three destroyers, and the group are expected to take around one week to make the journey.

There are already eight US Navy ships in the central and South American region, along with a nuclear-powered submarine, adding up to about 6,000 sailors and marines, according to officials.

It came as the US secretary of war claimed that six “narco-terrorists” had been killed in a strike on an alleged drug smuggling boat in the Caribbean Sea overnight.

A still from footage purporting to show the boat seconds before the airstrike,  posted by US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth on X
Image:
A still from footage purporting to show the boat seconds before the airstrike, posted by US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth on X

Pete Hegseth said his military had bombed a vessel which he claimed was operated by Tren de Aragua – a Venezuelan gang designated a terror group by Washington in February.

Writing on X, he claimed that the boat was involved in “illicit narcotics smuggling” and was transiting along a “known narco-trafficking route” when it was struck during the night.

All six men on board the boat, which was in international waters, were killed and no US forces were harmed, he said.

Ten vessels have now been bombed in recent weeks, killing more than 40 people.

Mr Hegseth added: “If you are a narco-terrorist smuggling drugs in our hemisphere, we will treat you like we treat al Qaeda. Day or NIGHT, we will map your networks, track your people, hunt you down, and kill you.”

While he did not provide any evidence that the vessel was carrying drugs, he did share a 20-second video that appeared to show a boat being hit by a projectile before exploding.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Footage of a previous US strike on a suspected drugs boat earlier this week

Speaking during a White House press conference last week, Donald Trump argued that the campaign would help tackle the US’s opioid crisis.

“Every boat that we knock out, we save 25,000 American lives. So every time you see a boat, and you feel badly you say, ‘Wow, that’s rough’. It is rough, but if you lose three people and save 25,000 people,” he said.

Read more:
Survivors reported after boat strike
US destroys ‘drug smuggling submarine’

On Thursday, appearing at a press conference with Mr Hegseth, Mr Trump said that it was necessary to kill the alleged smugglers, because if they were arrested they would only return to transport drugs “again and again and again”.

“They don’t fear that, they have no fear,” he told reporters.

The attacks at sea would soon be followed by operations on land against drug smuggling cartels, Mr Trump claimed.

“We’re going to kill them,” he added. “They’re going to be, like, dead.”

Some Democratic politicians have expressed concerns that the strikes risk dragging the US into a war with Venezuela because of their proximity to the South American country’s coast.

Others have condemned the attacks as extrajudicial killings that would not stand up in a court of law.

Jim Himes, a member of the House of Representatives, told CBS News earlier this month: “They are illegal killings because the notion that the United States – and this is what the administration says is their justification – is involved in an armed conflict with any drug dealers, any Venezuelan drug dealers, is ludicrous.”

He claimed that Congress had been told “nothing” about who was on the boats and how they were identified as a threat.

Continue Reading

World

Sanctions alone won’t force Putin to end Ukraine war

Published

on

By

Sanctions alone won't force Putin to end Ukraine war

Donald Trump has swung like a pendulum between favouring Russia and less often sympathising with Ukraine. This week he has tilted more toward Kyiv.

Leaders in the coalition of the willing meeting in London on Friday were keen to add momentum to that shift.

The US president has imposed sanctions on two leading Russian oil firms, doing what many had hoped America would do months ago.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What happened at ‘coalition of the willing’ meeting?

European allies were quick to follow that lead. And some countries that have been trading Russian oil appear spooked enough to start backing away from doing so.

But analysts are warning against overstating the impact of all this.

Alexander Kolyandr, senior fellow at the Centre for European Policy Analysis, told Sky News that sanctions won’t be enough on their own.

“There should be an understanding that sanctions alone would not force Putin to stop the war,” he said.

“So Ukraine should get more arms, Ukraine should get more support, and Ukraine should get more guarantees.”

The aftermath of a Russian airstrike in Kharkiv, Ukraine. Pic: Reuters
Image:
The aftermath of a Russian airstrike in Kharkiv, Ukraine. Pic: Reuters

There appears to have been progress on sending more long-range weapons to Ukraine.

It needs them to neutralise the threat of drones launched from miles behind Russia‘s border.

And possibly towards unfreezing Russia assets to use the proceeds to help fund the Ukrainian war effort, though some nations still oppose the idea.

But this week has seen an unusual level of alignment between the allies on both sides of the Atlantic. That will last as long as Trump does not change his mind.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sanctions are ‘unfriendly act’

The US president wants to broker an end to the war.

Putin will not be serious about negotiating for peace as long as he thinks he has a chance of victory.

Read more from Sky News:
US sends its largest aircraft carrier to South America

Turkey accuses Israel of breaching Gaza ceasefire

“Putin and the Kremlin are pretty much sure that they are winning the war,” Mr Kolyandr told Sky News, “and that if they keep on pushing, Ukraine might collapse.

“And that’s why I don’t think that President Putin is ready to agree to any kind of compromise which would be acceptable for Ukraine or its European allies.”

It may take a lot more than sanctions on a handful of oil companies to persuade Putin it is not in his interest to continue this war.

Continue Reading

Trending