Connect with us

Published

on

Nike has said it was not its “intention to offend” after a row erupted over the sportswear giant’s changes to the St George’s Cross on the new England shirt.

The US firm issued a statement which said: “We have been a proud partner of the FA since 2012 and understand the significance and importance of the St George’s Cross and it was never our intention to offend, given what it means to England fans.

“Together with the FA, the intention was to celebrate the heroes of 1966 and their achievements.

“The trim on the cuffs takes its cues from the training gear worn by England’s 1966 heroes, with a gradient of blues and reds topped with purple.

“The same colours also feature an interpretation of the flag on the back of the collar.”

Earlier, Sky Sports News was told the Football Association (FA) has no intention of withdrawing the controversial kit and England manager Gareth Southgate said the row wasn’t “high on my list of priorities”.

The row erupted after Nike revealed it had altered the traditional red cross of the England flag on the back of the shirt’s collar, introducing purple and blue stripes.

Explainer: From Leeds United’s badge redesign to Spain’s ‘second republic’ row: The most famous kit and logo controversies

The company dubbed it “a playful update” to the shirt ahead of Euro 2024.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘You wouldn’t change the Welsh dragon to a pussycat’

But Prime Minister Rishi Sunak warned Nike “should not mess” with the flag while Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer urged the firm to “reconsider” the design.

Speaking in a press conference this evening, England manager Gareth Southgate said: “I don’t know if the debate is about the St George flag needing to be on the England shirt because obviously it has not always been.

“I think the most important thing that has to be on our shirt is the Three Lions. It’s our iconic symbol. It’s what distinguishes us from football teams around the world and England rugby and England cricket.

“I suppose what you’re really asking is should we be tampering with the cross of St George, in my head if it’s not a red cross and white background then it’s not the cross of St George.

What are the origins of the St George’s Cross?

The St George’s Cross, featuring a white background with a red cross, is the national flag of England.

The standard hails back to the time of the crusades, with the two colours used to distinguish between English and French troops.

The red cross on a white background subsequently became representative of the religious military campaigns and was used by many nations to show their support for them.

The first record of the standard being associated with St George was in Genoa, which adopted him as patron saint during the 12th century as the personification of the ideals of Christian chivalry.

St George was a soldier in the Roman army, who allegedly slayed a dragon in order to save the Princess of Libya.

When he was rewarded by the King, he gave all the money to the poor and then converted to Christianity.

He died a martyr in 303 because he refused to recant his faith.

England adopted him as its patron saint in 1348.

In 1552, all saints’ flags were abolished in England apart from St George’s in the English Reformation under King Edward VI who also used it as his royal standard.

In 1606, the flag was incorporated into the official design of the Union Jack, which united the four nations as they then existed.

Still widely used today, Church of England churches often fly the St George’s flag.

More recently the English national emblem is flown at sporting events to represent the country.

The flag flies with the Union Flag every St George’s Day, which is celebrated on 23 April.

“It’s a hard question to answer. It’s presumably some artistic take on [the flag] which I’m not creative enough to understand.”

He insisted the row wasn’t taking away from their preparation ahead of two upcoming friendly games.

Fans are demanding the original flag be reinstated and an online petition has collected thousands of signatures.

But a spokesperson for the FA said: “The new England 2024 home kit has a number of design elements which were meant as a tribute to the 1966 World Cup winning team.

“The coloured trim on the cuffs is inspired by the training gear worn by England’s 1966 heroes, and the same colours also feature on the design on the back of the collar.

“It is not the first time that different coloured St George’s Cross-inspired designs have been used on England shirts.

“We are very proud of the red and white St George’s Cross – the England flag. We understand what it means to our fans, and how it unites and inspires, and it will be displayed prominently at Wembley tomorrow – as it always is – when England play Brazil.”

Mr Sunak said: “Obviously I prefer the original, and my general view is that when it comes to our national flags, we shouldn’t mess with them.

“Because they are a source of pride, identity, who we are, and they’re perfect as they are.”

Labour’s shadow attorney general Emily Thornberry told Sky News: “It’s all very peculiar. The England flag is a symbol of unity.

“[For] people, particularly in the last few years when we’ve been having such a difficult time, the England flag at the time has been a symbol of unity… the Lionesses and so on.

“So you wouldn’t expect Nike to go off and have a look at the Welsh flag and decide to change the dragon to a pussycat.

“I mean, you wouldn’t expect the England flag to be changed like this.

“You wouldn’t expect bits of purple in the French tricolour. I mean, why are they doing it? I don’t understand.”

Read more on Sky News:
Police investigate Tory donor’s alleged racist comments
Home secretary spent £165,000 on flight to Rwanda

Back in 2014, Ms Thornberry was forced to resign from the shadow cabinet by the then party leader Ed Miliband after being accused of mocking “White Van Man” in a social media post during a visit to Rochester, which pictured a housing block with St George’s flags flying from the window.

Responding to the Nike design, England’s most capped men’s player, Peter Shilton, wrote on X: “Sorry but this is wrong on every level I’m totally against it.”

Another former England goalkeeper David Seaman said: “It doesn’t need fixing. What’s next, are they going to change the Three Lions to three cats? Leave it alone. It’s the St George’s Flag. Leave it alone.”

But John Barnes, who also previously played for the national side, said: “I don’t get involved in culture wars anymore but this whole furore… I didn’t even know there was a St George’s Cross.

“If they were going to change the Three Lions then that’s a debate to be had. I don’t see what the fuss is. I think it’s a much ado about nothing.

“They are not changing the colour of the shirt, the lions are still there. If they were going to change the national flag for England and change the colours then that’s a proper debate to have.”

The price of the shirt has also faced criticism since it was launched earlier this week.

An “authentic” version costs £124.99 for adults and £119.99 for children while a “stadium” version is £84.99 and £64.99 for children.

Continue Reading

UK

Head of Southport attacker’s former school tells inquiry he was ‘building up to something’

Published

on

By

Head of Southport attacker's former school tells inquiry he was 'building up to something'

The head teacher of the Southport attacker’s former school has told a public inquiry she felt like he was “building up to something”.

Joanne Hodson, head of The Acorns School in Ormskirk, said she had a “visceral sense of dread” that he would do something.

“I felt like something was going to happen and there was a level of agitation with direct challenges to staff, the way he was with other pupils. I felt like every day it was building and building and building,” she told the inquiry at Liverpool Town Hall.

Axel Rudakubana, then aged 17, killed six-year-old Bebe King, seven-year-old Elsie Dot Stancombe, and nine-year-old Alice da Silva Aguiar and attempted to murder 10 others at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Southport on 29 July last year.

He was later jailed for a minimum of 52 years.

Families of the victims with their legal team arrive at Liverpool Town Hall for the Southport Inquiry.
Pic: PA
Image:
Families of the victims with their legal team arrive at Liverpool Town Hall for the Southport Inquiry.
Pic: PA

Rudakubana, referred to during the public inquiry as AR, came to Ms Hodson’s school after he was permanently excluded from the Range High School, in Formby, due to taking knives to school in October 2019.

‘Devoid of any remorse’

Ms Hodson said she first met Rudakubana at his admissions meeting for the Acorns, when she asked him why he had taken a knife to his former school.

“He looked me in the eyes and said ‘to use it’. This is the only time in my career that a pupil has said this to me or behaved in a manner so devoid of any remorse,” she said.

“What also surprised me was that AR’s parents did not flinch at this comment.”

She said the parents saw Rudakubana “as the victim” and believed he had taken the knife to school as a response to being bullied.

His parents thought he was a “good boy” who never did anything wrong and that “any issues were someone else’s fault”, according to Ms Hodson.

Members of the public leave flowers at a memorial site for the victims of the Southport stabbings. File pic
Image:
Members of the public leave flowers at a memorial site for the victims of the Southport stabbings. File pic

Ms Hodson said she had feared Rudakubana was going to “bring something” to the Acorns.

Instead, he returned to the Range in December 2019 to assault another student with a hockey stick while carrying a knife in his bag.

‘Sinister undertone’

Ms Hodson described Rudakubana as the “most unusual” pupil she had experienced during her career, adding in a statement: “There was a sinister undertone and it was difficult to build rapport.

“He had no respect for authority and generally a lack of respect of other pupils and staff. He was insistent that his views alone were correct and everyone else was wrong. There was never any sense of remorse or accountability for his actions.”

In his education, health and care plan, it was noted there were concerns that Rudakubana said or did things which had been described as “sinister”, the inquiry heard.

More from the inquiry:
Rudakubana judged as posing no risk to others
His parents struggled to deal with outbursts

Taxi driver waited 50 minutes to call 999
The missed chances to stop Rudakubana

A three-minute silence was held in Town Hall Gardens, Southport, marking one year since the attack. File pic: PA
Image:
A three-minute silence was held in Town Hall Gardens, Southport, marking one year since the attack. File pic: PA

Ms Hodson said she was asking other agencies for help, but the word “sinister” was crossed out in the report and changed to “inappropriate” after professional views were submitted by the child and adolescent mental health service (CAMHS).

“I was challenged quite heavily and told no child should ever be described as sinister and as a professional I should not be using those words,” she said.

‘Let down’ by Prevent

Ms Hodson said school staff were concerned about Rudakubana attacking his peers and made three referrals about him to the government’s anti-terror programme Prevent.

The head teacher said staff felt “let down” after their third referral caused in the school’s relationship with Rudakubana and his father, but was not acted on by Prevent.

When Rudakubana made comments thought to be antisemitic in school in January 2022, teachers did not make another referral to Prevent, with Ms Hodson telling the inquiry: “On reflection, whilst I regret not submitting further Prevent referrals in 2022, I think by this point Acorns had lost faith that anything would be done.”

She said staff were concerned about Rudakubana being radicalised, but “he was so socially isolated that I could not conceive of the idea that he might attack a group of strangers, let alone young children”.

“The tragic events are so far removed from what I would have associated AR with in terms of risk,” Ms Hodson said.

The inquiry was adjourned until Monday.

Continue Reading

UK

Post Office compensation ‘worse than original injustice’, victims’ commissioner says

Published

on

By

Post Office compensation 'worse than original injustice', victims' commissioner says

A leaked letter, seen by Sky News, warns government that victims of the Post Office scandal find compensation schemes “worse than the original injustice”.

The letter was written by victims’ commissioner Baroness Newlove and sent to the Post Office minister Blair McDougall earlier this month.

“Far from offering catharsis,” she writes, “the compensation process was seen to be as bad as or even worse an experience than the initial investigation, prosecution and injustice itself.”

She adds that “hearing this from victims, time and again, shocked me”.

Victims told her that initial offers were “insultingly low” and that constant delays and requests for decades-old paperwork had left them offended and “distressed”.

Some described the process as “adversarial”, with Baroness Newlove comparing it to fighting an insurance company rather than receiving justice from the state.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Unbearable’ wait to clear names for Post Office victims

The letter urges the government to abandon “commercial tactics” such as making low initial offers – approaches the Commissioner says are “not appropriate when dealing with traumatised victims”.

More on Post Office Scandal

“It might be better to come back with a request for more information, rather than make an offer that is guaranteed to offend the victim,” she said.

The letter was sent on 3 October, shortly before the government outlined its official response to part one of the Horizon inquiry report.

It announced that it would accept most of the recommendations, including on redress, put forward by the chair of the inquiry Sir Wyn Williams.

In her four-page letter, Baroness Newlove also welcomes access to “free legal advice” to help victims with claims but calls for earlier cases to be reviewed.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Minister: No deadline on Horizon scandal compensation

She explains that where advice had not been available, some victims “might have been disadvantaged as a result”.

“Is it possible these early cases can be reviewed to ensure everyone has been treated fairly and equally?” she asks.

The letter also raises concerns that some current serving sub postmasters feel “under pressure” from managers not to pursue claims, urging the department to ensure this “is not the case”.

Baroness Newlove also relays victims’ frustration that Fujitsu, the company behind the faulty Horizon system, continues to work with the government and asks whether this is “an issue the government is looking to address”.

Post Office Minister Blair McDougall said in response to the letter: “We pay tribute to all the postmasters who have suffered from the Horizon scandal, which is why we have increased the total amount paid to postmasters fivefold to over £1 billion as part of our ongoing commitment to deliver justice to victims as swiftly as possible.

“Since this letter was sent we set out our response to Sir Wyn Williams’ inquiry proposals, which will help us further speed up claims, and which offers legal advice to sub postmasters.

“I look forward to working with postmasters in making further improvements to the redress schemes so that they get the compensation they deserve.”

Read more from Sky News:
Doctors in England to go on strike
Two dead and five injured after fire

A Post Office spokesperson said: “We have and continue to actively support all Post Office colleagues, but particularly those with direct contact with Postmasters, to encourage them to submit a claim to the Horizon Shortfall Scheme if they believe they suffered losses in the past.

“Our Area Managers are playing a pivotal role in guiding Postmasters on how to submit a claim and signposting where there’s additional support to do so. We have a dedicated claimant support team available on the phone to discuss options, provide support, and answer any questions a Postmaster may have so that we can begin to process their claim right away.

“We would welcome contact with the Victim Commissioner directly so that we can understand more about what they have been told and to ensure all of us work together so that current and former postmasters get their claims in as soon as possible.

“To assist this, we will shortly be launching a national advertising campaign urging any current or former Postmaster who has not submitted a claim to do so as soon as possible and by 31 January 2026.”

A Fujitsu spokesperson said in a statement: “We continue to work with government to ensure we adhere to the voluntary restrictions we put in place regarding bidding for new contracts while the Post Office Inquiry is ongoing, and we are engaged with government regarding Fujitsu’s contribution to compensation.”

Continue Reading

UK

Ringleader behind arson attack and kidnap plot was ‘groomed’ by Russian chatbot, court told

Published

on

By

Ringleader behind arson attack and kidnap plot was 'groomed' by Russian chatbot, court told

The ringleader behind an arson attack and plot to kidnap a billionaire Russian dissident had been “groomed” by a chatbot, operated by Wagner mercenaries, a court was told.

The Old Bailey heard the fire at an industrial estate in Leyton, East London, on 20 March 2024, caused an estimated £1m of damage, including to vital Starlink satellite equipment destined for Ukraine.

Dylan Earl, 21, a builder and part-time drug dealer who lived with his parents in Elmesthorpe, Leicestershire, has admitted his role in orchestrating the attack by recruiting others to carry it out.

During his trial, the court heard he also tasked two people to burn down an exclusive restaurant and wine dealership in Mayfair and to kidnap Evgeny Chichvarkin, the billionaire owner.

Two units in the Cromwell Industrial Estate were set on fire in March 2024. Pic: London Fire Brigade
Image:
Two units in the Cromwell Industrial Estate were set on fire in March 2024. Pic: London Fire Brigade

Damage to an east London warehouse that was shown to the jury at the Old Bailey.
Pic: PA
Image:
Damage to an east London warehouse that was shown to the jury at the Old Bailey.
Pic: PA

However, Paul Hynes KC, defending, told a sentencing hearing on Thursday that the Russians were “trash fishing” using a Russian language chatbot called PrivetBot on the encrypted Telegram platform and Earl was “easy meat”.

“Our prime submission is that he is, or was at the time, a sad individual who sat for lengthy periods alone in his bedroom at his parents’ house.

“His minimalist existence was taking drugs, particularly cannabis and involving himself in online gaming.

“We do not seek to characterise Dylan Earl as a victim in this case but there are vulnerable elements in him that were used by PrivetBot, acting on behalf of the Wagner Group, as a proxy for the Russian Federation.”

In April 2024, PrivetBot messaged Earl. His replies had been deleted, but the Wagner contact said: “I see that you know what you want. It’s a great happiness that you have realised so early that you are a WARRIOR. We need your connections and your capabilities.”

Mr Hynes told the judge, Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb, Earl was “very much a sad individual” who “had a certain detachment from reality” and “sought praise, importance and significance”.

“The potent effect of the messaging is shown in his desperate, pathetic and delusional responses,” he added.

Read more from Sky News:
Arsonist told to watch spy drama
Explainer: US sanctions on Russia
Fake celebrity chatbots targeting children

Earl messaged the contact, offering to recruit thousands more to join their operation and boasting of his underworld contacts.

“If you need connections with IRA, I can sort it. You want criminal connections with murderers, kidnappers, soldiers, drug dealers, fraudsters, car thieves, I can sort it all,” Earl wrote.

But the court heard Earl never left his bedroom and never met the people he recruited.

Earl and five other men are being sentenced for their part in the Russian-ordered arson attack on behalf of the Wagner Group, a Russian mercenary company, which is proscribed as a terrorist organisation in the UK.

The Kremlin denies accusations that it is involved in any such acts of sabotage.

The men will be sentenced on Friday.

Continue Reading

Trending