Connect with us

Published

on

Prohibition’s 14-year span in the early 20th century caused a boozy brain drain as droves of American bartenders shuttered their watering holes and moved abroad. With them went America’s Golden Age of Cocktails. Reason’s Peter Suderman in 2017 brilliantly laid out the backstory behind how the federal governmentalmost killed the cocktail. But the government’s anti-alcohol tantrum also nearly killed off another product further up the alcohol supply chainthe humble apple. America’s Apple Exceptionalism

Today, the produce section of your average American grocery store is dominated by a small handful of commercial apples. A mere 510 varietalssuch as the ubiquitous Red and Golden Delicious, Gala, Granny Smith, and Honeycrisprule the country’s apple market. In my humble opinion, other than the flavorful Honeycrisp (developed via cross-breeding at the University of Minnesota in the 1960s), these varietals are largely bland, flavorless, and uninspiring.

It wasn’t always this way. In the 18th and 19th centuries, America was home to well over10,000 apple varieties, more than any othernation on earth. The names were as wide-ranging and extraordinary as the species diversity, with monikers like Yarlington Mill, Spitzenburg, Northern Spy, and Winter Banana.

America’s apple exceptionalism camelong before the Department of Agriculture doled out millions of dollars in annual grants to farmers, and even before land grant colleges were established to advance the nation’s agricultural knowledge. Instead, it was almost entirely a bottom-up, grassroots groundswell that solidified the country’s apple hegemony, with nearlyevery farm in early America containing an apple orchardand nearly every American (nine out of 10)living on a farm.

To understand the story of the apple, one must first understand the story of cider. Nowadays called “hard cider,” cider’s American bona fides ironically far outstripthat of apple piewith alcoholic cider’s roots tracing back to the very birth of our nation. Heralded by some as the “fuel of the revolution,” cider was not only allegedly passed out to both colonial and British troops duringlulls in the action at the Battle of Concord, but it helped propel George Washington’sfirst election to the Virginia House of Burgesses by ensuring his voters were well-lubricated. John Adams drank a gill of ciderfor breakfast before his daily five-mile walks, Thomas Jefferson made cider at hisMonticello orchards, and Ben Franklin famouslyquipped: “He that drinks his cyder alone, let him catch his horse alone.”

Given its role as cider’s irreplaceable ingredient, the apple rose hand in hand with cider as a sine qua non of early American life. Needless to say, cider is only as good as the apples that go into it, which is why the nearly endless variety of apples found in 18th and 19th century America produced some of the most unique and flavorful ciders the world has ever known. In the words of cicerone Michael Agnew, these early apples were “cultivated for their tannins and acidity, [and] produced complex quaffs with flavors that rivaled fine wine, quite unlike the sweetened, alco-pop or non-alcoholic juice-in-a-jug that passes for cider today.”

Early Americans consumed anaverage of 35 gallons of cider per year, in part because it wasmuch safer to imbibe than water. “Up until Prohibition, an apple grown in America was far less likely to be eaten than to wind up in a barrel of cider,” as author Michael Pollannoted. “In rural areas cider took the place of not only wine and beer but of coffee and tea, juice, and even water.”

Proverbs 27 intones: “If you care for your orchard, you’ll enjoy its fruit.” But America didn’t care for its orchards. At the very moment cider, and the apple, were becoming hard-wired pieces of Americana, everything began to change. First, the European revolutions of 1848 spurred awave of German immigration to the United States. Unsurprisingly, more Germans meant more beer, which provided a ready challenger to contest cider’s heavyweight title as America’s alcoholic beverage of choice. Around the same time, the Industrial Revolution led to America’s first greaturbanization pushand German immigrants themselves were part of this trend, choosing to settle in Upper Midwest cities like Milwaukee.

This provided a natural competitive advantage for beer over cider, as grains like barley and wheat were cheaper to grow, easier to haul into urban environs, and less perishable than the apple. “Beer was made in breweries, which are like factoriesthey’re modern,” asWilliam Kerrigan, author ofJohnny Appleseed and the American Orchard: A Cultural History, pointed out. “Beer seemed cleaner and a more efficient, modern drink.” Prohibition Enters the Picture

As cider declined in prominence, the bucolic rural apple orchard became less important to the American lifestyle. But while the apple was already declining across the nation’s cultural landscape, it was the U.S. government that delivered the coup de grce to this noble fruit.

With Prohibition’s advent in 1920, not only alcohol but also the ingredients that made alcohol became public enemy No. 1. As Smithsonian Magazine recounts, FBI agents took tochopping down acres and acres of backwoods apple orchards, “effectively erasing cider…from American life.”

Even if they escaped the G-men’s axes, orchard owners had little incentive to maintain their orchards in the absence of cider. “[Prohibition] caused orchards to stop growing cider apples altogether, dealing our cider traditionand the apples themselvesa death blow,”writes Jonathan Frochtzwajg of Modern Farmer.

Whether at the foot of an ax, or via the headwinds of the temperance-induced gutting of the apple’s highest and best economic use as a progenitor of cider, the American apple would never be the same. “Among the causes that contributed to the demise of cider in the United States, without question the Temperance Movement belongs near the top of the list,”according to David R. Williams of George Mason University.

By the time Prohibition ended nearly 14 years later, America’s cider and apple culture had been decimated. Part of this is attributable to the fact that mechanized urban breweries were betterpositioned to weather Prohibition, given that the factory setting allowed for a more ready transition to other product lines like soft drinks or selling ice during the country’s dry spell.

An additional factor is inherent to the apple itself. Barley and wheat grow as annual crops, which allows their production to be curtailed or ramped up on relatively short notice, thereby allowing breweries tospring back into action quickly once Prohibition ended. In contrast, planting a new orchardmeans committing to a 25-year investmentone which, quite literally, takes at least three to six years to bear fruit. “When prohibition ended in the 1930s, there was neither the desire nor the means to resuscitate the cider industry,” notes Williams.

To the extent the apple maintains its titular banner today as America’smost popular fruit, it is only in the form of those aforementioned, depressingly bland grocery store varietals. These homogeneously boring modern apples are a poor substitute for their pre-Prohibition ancestors. By the 1990s, commercial orchards weregrowing fewer than 100 types of apples, with a mere 11 varietals constituting 90 percent of grocery sales. Over 10,000 apple varieties are believed to have goneextinct since Prohibition. Apples Bounce Back

Were the story to end there, we would likely be forever condemned to a never-ending conveyor belt of Galas and Granny Smiths in the produce aisle. But just as the apple’s fall came at the very moment it reached its apex, its resurrection began only once it hit its nadir. For while the government nearly killed the apple, the free market is saving it.

As America’s modern craft cider boom took hold in recent decades, cidermakers began scouring the countryside for those unique, flavorful, spectacularly named apple varietals of yesteryear. Often called “spitter apples” since they are less sweet than the standard grocery tore offerings, thousands of heirloom apple varietals thought to be lost are being rediscovered, and saved, by American cidermakers.

Stories abound of Appalachian appleenthusiasts who havesaved thousands of “lost” apple varieties and now work closely with craft cidermakers. Famed cidermaker Diane Flynt of Foggy Ridge Cider, whom many consider the founder of today’s craft cider movement, hascredited cider’s modern rise as being built “on the backs of these old fashioned apples…. If I didn’t have these apples, my cider wouldn’t taste very good.”

Flynt, who won a James Beard Award in 2018, recently took things even further by shuttering Foggy Ridge toconcentrate solely on apple growing. Other Virginia cideries, like Blue Bee Cider and Albemarle Ciderworks havehelped save the Hewes Crab applea favorite of both Washington and Jefferson. The Hewes Crab was presumed to be extinct before asolitary tree was discovered near Williamsburg in the 1990s. Other heirlooms are similarly enjoying arenaissance, such as the Arkansas Black, another beloved cider-making apple.

Slowly but surely, the epicnames are reentering the American lexicon: Bitter Buckingham, White Winter Jon, Royal Lemon, Candy Stripe, and Black Winesap. For that, we can thank Adam Smith’s invisible handwhich, a hundred years later, has finally stayed the hand of the government’s apple ax.

American ’76 Recipe

A patriotic spin on the French 75, this libation celebrates cider’s irreplaceable role in the American story.

3 ounces of craft cider

2 ounces of bourbon

an ounce of lemon juice

an ounce of maple syrup

Heirloom apple slice

Shake bourbon, lemon juice, and maple syrup in a shaker filled with ice. Double-strain into a rocks glass containing fresh ice; top with cider and give a quick stir. Garnish with a slice of your favorite heirloom apple varietaland save the Red Delicious for the fruit salad.

Recipe adapted fromGive Me Liberty and Give Me a Drink! by Jarrett Dieterle.

Continue Reading

Technology

Sam Altman says OpenAI isn’t ‘moral police of the world’ after erotica ChatGPT post blows up

Published

on

By

Sam Altman says OpenAI isn't 'moral police of the world' after erotica ChatGPT post blows up

Sam Altman, chief executive officer of OpenAI Inc., during a media tour of the Stargate AI data center in Abilene, Texas, US, on Tuesday, Sept. 23, 2025.

Kyle Grillot | Bloomberg | Getty Images

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said Wednesday that the company is “not the elected moral police of the world” after receiving backlash over his decision to loosen restrictions and allow content like erotica within its chatbot ChatGPT.

The artificial intelligence startup has expanded its safety controls in recent months as it faced mounting scrutiny over how it protects users, particularly minors.

But Altman said Tuesday in a post on X that OpenAI will be able to “safely relax” most restrictions now that it has new tools and has been able to mitigate “serious mental health issues.”

In December, Altman said it will allow more content, including erotica, on ChatGPT for “verified adults.”

Altman tried to clarify the move in a post on X on Wednesday, saying OpenAI cares “very much about the principle of treating adult users like adults,” but it will still not allow “things that cause harm to others.”

“In the same way that society differentiates other appropriate boundaries (R-rated movies, for example) we want to do a similar thing here,” Altman wrote.

Read more CNBC tech news

The Federal Trade Commission launched an inquiry into OpenAI and other tech companies in September over how chatbots like ChatGPT could negatively affect children and teenagers. OpenAI is also named in a wrongful death lawsuit with a family who blamed ChatGPT for their teenage son’s death by suicide.

In the months following the inquiry and the lawsuit, OpenAI has taken several public steps to enhance safety on ChatGPT.

The company announced on Tuesday that it has assembled a council of eight experts who will provide insight into how AI impacts users’ mental health, emotions and motivation.

OpenAI also launched a series of parental controls late last month, and it is building an age prediction system that will automatically apply teen-appropriate settings for users under 18.

As a result, Altman’s post about loosening restrictions on Tuesday sparked confusion and swift backlash on social media. He said it “blew up” much more than he was expecting.

Altman’s post also caught the attention of advocacy groups like the National Center on Sexual Exploitation, which called on OpenAI to reverse its decision to allow erotica on ChatGPT.

“Sexualized AI chatbots are inherently risky, generating real mental health harms from synthetic intimacy; all in the context of poorly defined industry safety standards,” Haley McNamara, NCOSE’s executive director, said in a statement on Wednesday.

If you are having suicidal thoughts or are in distress, contact the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988 for support and assistance from a trained counselor

WATCH: AI is not in a bubble, valuations look ‘pretty reasonable’, says BlackRock

AI is not in a bubble, valuations look 'pretty reasonable', says BlackRock

Continue Reading

US

US defence secretary Pete Hegseth’s jet makes unscheduled landing in UK after in-air issue

Published

on

By

US defence secretary Pete Hegseth's jet makes unscheduled landing in UK after in-air issue

An aircraft carrying US defence secretary Pete Hegseth has had to make an “unscheduled landing” in the UK.

The jet was about 30 minutes into its journey back to the US after a NATO defence ministers’ meeting in Brussels, when it suffered a “depressurisation issue”.

Sean Parnell, chief Pentagon spokesman, confirmed the aircraft had been diverted to the UK due to a crack in the aircraft windscreen.

He posted on X: “On the way back to the United States from NATO’s Defence Ministers meeting, Secretary of War Hegseth’s plane made an unscheduled landing in the United Kingdom due to a crack in the aircraft windshield.

“The plane landed based on standard procedures, and everyone onboard, including Secretary Hegseth, is safe.”

Mr Hegseth also posted: “All good. Thank God. Continue mission!”

Open source flight trackers spotted the aircraft lose altitude and begin broadcasting an emergency signal.

Read more from Sky News:
Who is Pete Hegseth?
Trump rebrands Pentagon the Department of War

The aviation news website Airlive reported the Boeing C-32A – a military version of the Boeing 757 – had a “depressurisation issue”.

It went on to land at RAF Mildenhall in Suffolk at about 7.10pm.

Mr Hegseth had been at a meeting of NATO defence ministers which was also attended by UK Defence Secretary John Healey.

In February, a US Air Force plane carrying secretary of state Marco Rubio and the Senate foreign relations committee chairman, Senator Jim Risch, was similarly forced to return to Washington DC after an issue with the cockpit windscreen.

Continue Reading

Sports

The legacy and legality of the Bush Push 20 years later

Published

on

By

The legacy and legality of the Bush Push 20 years later

ON THE SIDELINE at Notre Dame Stadium, USC coach Pete Carroll frantically waved for quarterback Matt Leinart to spike the ball. The Trojans trailed 31-28, inches from the goal line with seven seconds left.

“[Leinart] was to look back at [offensive coordinator Steve Sarkisian] on the sidelines, and if we wanted to sneak it, we could sneak it,” Carroll said this week. “And he had to point at him. So, we tell him to sneak it. So, he points at the line, and he looks at the line of scrimmage, and he goes, ‘There’s no way, they’re all jammed up.’ And he looks back at us, and Reggie [Bush] yelled something at him, ‘Go for it. Go for it.'”

Moments earlier, Leinart had fumbled out of bounds inside the 1. The clock mistakenly ran out, and NBC’s Tom Hammond declared, “Notre Dame has won,” as Notre Dame coach Charlie Weis raised his arms and fans stormed the field.

When play resumed, the Trojans would have one last chance to extend their winning streak to 28 games.

Leinart sneaked left from under center, but he was bounced backward into a half spin and into the path of Bush, who famously shoved him across for the winning score.

“It was about as sweet a finish as you could have in a great situation to keep the streak alive and all that, too,” Carroll said.

Twenty years ago, the “Bush Push” would become one of the most unforgettable moments in college football history — and one of its most controversial. In the box score, it was the touchdown that preserved USC’s dynasty and allowed for the Rose Bowl matchup with Texas that became an all-time classic. In the rulebook, though, it was illegal.

Except, it was almost never called. In fact, the rule had become a running joke among officials.

“You were teased if you made the call,” said former NCAA official and current ESPN analyst Matt Austin. “It was such a rare occurrence.”

In the years that followed, an obscure rule became a flashpoint. It was debated, tweaked and, eventually, led to strategic evolution.


THE “HELPING THE Ball Carrier” rule had been part of the NCAA rulebook for decades. Its language was virtually identical in every edition dating back to at least 1950.

“No [teammate] shall grasp, pull, push, lift or charge into him to assist him in forward progress.”

The idea is believed to have originated as a way to differentiate football from rugby. Teammates could block defenders, but once the ball carrier was engaged, the play was meant to be his alone. Anything more — a shove, a tug, a lift — was considered an unfair advantage.

It was almost impossible to enforce in short-yardage piles, where pushes and blocks blur together, especially near the goal line.

Steve Shaw remembers that problem well. Now the NCAA’s national coordinator of officials, Shaw spent more than two decades on the field, and he has seen just about everything. But in the 2000 season, his crew made a rare, yet memorable call.

It happened during a Middle TennesseeUConn game. Late in the contest, a Middle Tennessee lineman reached out and grabbed his running back, helping drag him toward the end zone. Shaw’s line judge, Mike Taylor, threw the flag.

“At the end of the year, there’s a report listing every penalty called nationally,” Shaw said. “Under aiding the runner, there was one — and it was ours. We gave him a hard time for calling it, but it was the right call.”

The rule technically existed, but almost nobody enforced it. And when it was flagged, it was usually because a player was being pulled, not pushed.

So when Bush shoved Leinart across the goal line in 2005, the officials did what most would have done: They kept the flag in their pockets. In fact, after Leinart’s touchdown, the Pac-10 officiating crew huddled up to discuss the play only to emerge with an unsportsmanlike contact penalty against the Trojans for their celebration after. There was no mention of the legality of the push on the broadcast, either.

It wasn’t until the next day when the conversation shifted from the game’s remarkable ending into a nationwide rules debate that is still built into the game’s lore.

Pac-10 commissioner Tom Hansen admitted to the Los Angeles Times that his conference’s officiating crew could have called a penalty, but made essentially the same point Shaw did two decades later.

“I just don’t think they ever call it,” Hansen said, adding it would have been different if it was a pull, not a push.

This is where the consensus seemed to land. The play looked like part of the normal chaos that happens at the goal line. By the letter of the law, Bush committed a foul. But by the spirit of the game, he just did what any teammate would do.


RULE CHANGES IN college football often move slowly. Proposals wind through the NCAA Rules Committee, a rotating group of coaches, officials and administrators who meet each offseason.

Most suggestions come after issues are identified over the course of a season. If the committee deems something urgent, it can move quickly. If not, it can linger in discussion until a consensus forms.

Sometimes, a single play can trigger an immediate rewrite. When Pitt quarterback Kenny Pickett faked a slide in the 2021 ACC championship game — beginning to give himself up before resuming his run for a long touchdown — the reaction was instant. Within days, the NCAA issued a memo closing the loophole. The same thing happened last year when Oregon‘s Dan Lanning found a way to shave off game time by using a 12th man on defense.

The Bush Push didn’t work that way.

Despite the fierce public debate — and the way it was officiated — the rule remained unchanged in the years that followed.

It wasn’t until 2013, when the rules committee formally decided to adjust the official wording.

“The rules committee had a good debate about this and they watched much video, including the Bush Push play,” Shaw said. “Overall, they came to the conclusion that it was very difficult to determine when a push was truly a foul.

“There were few guidelines that could be given to make this a consistent call. Examples were pushing a rugby scrum pile vs. pushing the runner specifically, and they felt it was nearly impossible to distinguish between pushing a runner, leaning on a runner, pushing the pile or leaning on the pile. They felt removing the ‘push’ component would be the best course of action.”

When the NCAA released its updated rulebook for the 2013 season, the word “push” was simply deleted, bringing it in line with a similar rule change the NFL made in 2005.

Without realizing it, the committee paved the way for innovation in the sport.

Right away, coaches tried to use the subtle change to their advantage, including former Kansas State coach Bill Snyder, whose Wildcats started running what is now commonly referred to as the tush push later that year.

“It was just a natural thing to do,” Snyder told ESPN’s Kalyn Kahler earlier this year. “We needed to create a way in which we could take the shortest distance to get the short distance we needed to go and not get held up, because everybody put all the people over there, so we wanted to compete against no matter how many people you put there.

“We wanted to be strong enough not to get held up at the line of scrimmage. And we would bring one or two, or on occasion, three backs up right off of the hip of the center, and on the snap of the ball, we would push the center or push the back of the quarterback.”

That small tactical adjustment eventually made its way to the pros. Nearly a decade later, the Philadelphia Eagles adopted a version of the play built around quarterback Jalen Hurts, perfecting it into an almost unstoppable short-yardage weapon. Which, once again, led to a nationwide debate about whether pushing — once outlawed, then ignored and finally embraced — belonged in football at all.

In May, a proposal from the Green Bay Packers to ban the tush push came up two votes shy of the 24 it needed to pass.

At the NCAA level, the play drew some discussion over the offseason, too, but those conversations were more centered on potential injury concerns.

“The NCAA rules committee has looked at it and really up to now have not seen it become an injury, a player safety issue,” Shaw said. “So it really becomes a strategic part. Is that something strategically we want in the game? And so far there’s not been a big driver to try to put together a reason to eliminate it from our game.”

Over the past four seasons, the current rule has been enforced only six times, according to Shaw. Three times in 2022, and just once in 2021, 2023 and 2024.


AS USC RETURNS to Notre Dame this weekend for a top-20 matchup, the Bush Push helps define one of the sport’s most storied rivalries.

Carroll, now the Las Vegas Raiders coach, has very specific memories of that game in South Bend: the high grass, the green Notre Dame jerseys, the legends in the crowd.

“The stories I heard are that they sold out the night before the game at their rally that they had,” Carroll said. “And they brought Joe Montana back, and Rudy [Ruettiger] came back to speak to the crowd and a guy dressed up as Jesus showed up trying to bring home the power. … It was just an incredible setting for college football.”

The push that once went uncalled now defines the rule. Twenty years later, it’s still moving the game forward.

ESPN NFL reporter Ryan McFadden contributed to this story.

Continue Reading

Trending