Connect with us

Published

on

Prohibition’s 14-year span in the early 20th century caused a boozy brain drain as droves of American bartenders shuttered their watering holes and moved abroad. With them went America’s Golden Age of Cocktails. Reason’s Peter Suderman in 2017 brilliantly laid out the backstory behind how the federal governmentalmost killed the cocktail. But the government’s anti-alcohol tantrum also nearly killed off another product further up the alcohol supply chainthe humble apple. America’s Apple Exceptionalism

Today, the produce section of your average American grocery store is dominated by a small handful of commercial apples. A mere 510 varietalssuch as the ubiquitous Red and Golden Delicious, Gala, Granny Smith, and Honeycrisprule the country’s apple market. In my humble opinion, other than the flavorful Honeycrisp (developed via cross-breeding at the University of Minnesota in the 1960s), these varietals are largely bland, flavorless, and uninspiring.

It wasn’t always this way. In the 18th and 19th centuries, America was home to well over10,000 apple varieties, more than any othernation on earth. The names were as wide-ranging and extraordinary as the species diversity, with monikers like Yarlington Mill, Spitzenburg, Northern Spy, and Winter Banana.

America’s apple exceptionalism camelong before the Department of Agriculture doled out millions of dollars in annual grants to farmers, and even before land grant colleges were established to advance the nation’s agricultural knowledge. Instead, it was almost entirely a bottom-up, grassroots groundswell that solidified the country’s apple hegemony, with nearlyevery farm in early America containing an apple orchardand nearly every American (nine out of 10)living on a farm.

To understand the story of the apple, one must first understand the story of cider. Nowadays called “hard cider,” cider’s American bona fides ironically far outstripthat of apple piewith alcoholic cider’s roots tracing back to the very birth of our nation. Heralded by some as the “fuel of the revolution,” cider was not only allegedly passed out to both colonial and British troops duringlulls in the action at the Battle of Concord, but it helped propel George Washington’sfirst election to the Virginia House of Burgesses by ensuring his voters were well-lubricated. John Adams drank a gill of ciderfor breakfast before his daily five-mile walks, Thomas Jefferson made cider at hisMonticello orchards, and Ben Franklin famouslyquipped: “He that drinks his cyder alone, let him catch his horse alone.”

Given its role as cider’s irreplaceable ingredient, the apple rose hand in hand with cider as a sine qua non of early American life. Needless to say, cider is only as good as the apples that go into it, which is why the nearly endless variety of apples found in 18th and 19th century America produced some of the most unique and flavorful ciders the world has ever known. In the words of cicerone Michael Agnew, these early apples were “cultivated for their tannins and acidity, [and] produced complex quaffs with flavors that rivaled fine wine, quite unlike the sweetened, alco-pop or non-alcoholic juice-in-a-jug that passes for cider today.”

Early Americans consumed anaverage of 35 gallons of cider per year, in part because it wasmuch safer to imbibe than water. “Up until Prohibition, an apple grown in America was far less likely to be eaten than to wind up in a barrel of cider,” as author Michael Pollannoted. “In rural areas cider took the place of not only wine and beer but of coffee and tea, juice, and even water.”

Proverbs 27 intones: “If you care for your orchard, you’ll enjoy its fruit.” But America didn’t care for its orchards. At the very moment cider, and the apple, were becoming hard-wired pieces of Americana, everything began to change. First, the European revolutions of 1848 spurred awave of German immigration to the United States. Unsurprisingly, more Germans meant more beer, which provided a ready challenger to contest cider’s heavyweight title as America’s alcoholic beverage of choice. Around the same time, the Industrial Revolution led to America’s first greaturbanization pushand German immigrants themselves were part of this trend, choosing to settle in Upper Midwest cities like Milwaukee.

This provided a natural competitive advantage for beer over cider, as grains like barley and wheat were cheaper to grow, easier to haul into urban environs, and less perishable than the apple. “Beer was made in breweries, which are like factoriesthey’re modern,” asWilliam Kerrigan, author ofJohnny Appleseed and the American Orchard: A Cultural History, pointed out. “Beer seemed cleaner and a more efficient, modern drink.” Prohibition Enters the Picture

As cider declined in prominence, the bucolic rural apple orchard became less important to the American lifestyle. But while the apple was already declining across the nation’s cultural landscape, it was the U.S. government that delivered the coup de grce to this noble fruit.

With Prohibition’s advent in 1920, not only alcohol but also the ingredients that made alcohol became public enemy No. 1. As Smithsonian Magazine recounts, FBI agents took tochopping down acres and acres of backwoods apple orchards, “effectively erasing cider…from American life.”

Even if they escaped the G-men’s axes, orchard owners had little incentive to maintain their orchards in the absence of cider. “[Prohibition] caused orchards to stop growing cider apples altogether, dealing our cider traditionand the apples themselvesa death blow,”writes Jonathan Frochtzwajg of Modern Farmer.

Whether at the foot of an ax, or via the headwinds of the temperance-induced gutting of the apple’s highest and best economic use as a progenitor of cider, the American apple would never be the same. “Among the causes that contributed to the demise of cider in the United States, without question the Temperance Movement belongs near the top of the list,”according to David R. Williams of George Mason University.

By the time Prohibition ended nearly 14 years later, America’s cider and apple culture had been decimated. Part of this is attributable to the fact that mechanized urban breweries were betterpositioned to weather Prohibition, given that the factory setting allowed for a more ready transition to other product lines like soft drinks or selling ice during the country’s dry spell.

An additional factor is inherent to the apple itself. Barley and wheat grow as annual crops, which allows their production to be curtailed or ramped up on relatively short notice, thereby allowing breweries tospring back into action quickly once Prohibition ended. In contrast, planting a new orchardmeans committing to a 25-year investmentone which, quite literally, takes at least three to six years to bear fruit. “When prohibition ended in the 1930s, there was neither the desire nor the means to resuscitate the cider industry,” notes Williams.

To the extent the apple maintains its titular banner today as America’smost popular fruit, it is only in the form of those aforementioned, depressingly bland grocery store varietals. These homogeneously boring modern apples are a poor substitute for their pre-Prohibition ancestors. By the 1990s, commercial orchards weregrowing fewer than 100 types of apples, with a mere 11 varietals constituting 90 percent of grocery sales. Over 10,000 apple varieties are believed to have goneextinct since Prohibition. Apples Bounce Back

Were the story to end there, we would likely be forever condemned to a never-ending conveyor belt of Galas and Granny Smiths in the produce aisle. But just as the apple’s fall came at the very moment it reached its apex, its resurrection began only once it hit its nadir. For while the government nearly killed the apple, the free market is saving it.

As America’s modern craft cider boom took hold in recent decades, cidermakers began scouring the countryside for those unique, flavorful, spectacularly named apple varietals of yesteryear. Often called “spitter apples” since they are less sweet than the standard grocery tore offerings, thousands of heirloom apple varietals thought to be lost are being rediscovered, and saved, by American cidermakers.

Stories abound of Appalachian appleenthusiasts who havesaved thousands of “lost” apple varieties and now work closely with craft cidermakers. Famed cidermaker Diane Flynt of Foggy Ridge Cider, whom many consider the founder of today’s craft cider movement, hascredited cider’s modern rise as being built “on the backs of these old fashioned apples…. If I didn’t have these apples, my cider wouldn’t taste very good.”

Flynt, who won a James Beard Award in 2018, recently took things even further by shuttering Foggy Ridge toconcentrate solely on apple growing. Other Virginia cideries, like Blue Bee Cider and Albemarle Ciderworks havehelped save the Hewes Crab applea favorite of both Washington and Jefferson. The Hewes Crab was presumed to be extinct before asolitary tree was discovered near Williamsburg in the 1990s. Other heirlooms are similarly enjoying arenaissance, such as the Arkansas Black, another beloved cider-making apple.

Slowly but surely, the epicnames are reentering the American lexicon: Bitter Buckingham, White Winter Jon, Royal Lemon, Candy Stripe, and Black Winesap. For that, we can thank Adam Smith’s invisible handwhich, a hundred years later, has finally stayed the hand of the government’s apple ax.

American ’76 Recipe

A patriotic spin on the French 75, this libation celebrates cider’s irreplaceable role in the American story.

3 ounces of craft cider

2 ounces of bourbon

an ounce of lemon juice

an ounce of maple syrup

Heirloom apple slice

Shake bourbon, lemon juice, and maple syrup in a shaker filled with ice. Double-strain into a rocks glass containing fresh ice; top with cider and give a quick stir. Garnish with a slice of your favorite heirloom apple varietaland save the Red Delicious for the fruit salad.

Recipe adapted fromGive Me Liberty and Give Me a Drink! by Jarrett Dieterle.

Continue Reading

Sports

Stanton: Could rejoin Yankees when first eligible

Published

on

By

Stanton: Could rejoin Yankees when first eligible

NEW YORK — One day after he took live batting practice, a significant step in his return from the injured list, New York Yankees designated hitter Giancarlo Stanton confirmed Wednesday he could return to the team’s lineup by the end of the month.

Stanton participated in batting practice on the field at Yankee Stadium on Tuesday, the first time he has seen live pitching this year after he was shut down with elbow tendinitis in both arms at the beginning of spring training. He saw 10 pitches, hitting a ground ball to shortstop and working a full-count walk in his two plate appearances against right-hander Jake Cousins.

The Yankees moved Stanton from the 15-day to the 60-day injured list last week, pushing his earliest possible return date to May 27. It was a procedural move for New York. The Yankees needed a 40-man roster spot to claim Bryan De La Cruz off waivers, and Stanton was not in line to return before the end of the month.

Stanton, 35, said he expects to go on a rehab assignment. He said he did not have a target date for starting one and didn’t know how long it would last. Yankees manager Aaron Boone said Stanton likely won’t need a long rehab assignment because he doesn’t play a position on defense.

“It depends on what kind of arms I get available [for live batting practice sessions],” Stanton said, “and how I feel in those at-bats.”

Stanton, who also took batting practice on the field Wednesday, has taken rounds of injections to address the pain in his elbows and reiterated that he will have to play through pain whenever he returns.

“If I’m out there, I’m good enough to play,” Stanton said, “and there’s no levels of anything else.”

Stanton’s elbow troubles go back to last season; he played through the World Series with the pain, slugging seven home runs in 14 postseason games. But he said he stopped swinging a bat entirely in January because of severe pain in the elbows and didn’t start taking swings again until March. At one point, Stanton said, season-ending surgery was possible, but that was tabled.

“I know when G’s in there, he’s ready to go,” Boone said. “He’s not going to be in there if he doesn’t feel like he can be really productive, so I know when that time comes, when he’s ready to do that, we should be in a good spot.

“And hopefully we’ve done some things, the latter part of the winter and into the spring, that will set him up to be able to physically do it and withstand it. But also understanding he’ll probably deal with some things.”

Continue Reading

Sports

Jays’ Scherzer: Thumb ‘felt good’ vs. live hitters

Published

on

By

Jays' Scherzer: Thumb 'felt good' vs. live hitters

ANAHEIM, Calif. — Max Scherzer took what the Toronto Blue Jays hope is a significant step Wednesday in his return from a right thumb injury when he threw to hitters for the first time since going on the injured list in March.

“I thought his stuff was really good,” Blue Jays manager John Schneider said before Wednesday night’s game against the Los Angeles Angels. “Afterward, he said he felt good, so that’s a really good step in the right direction.”

Scherzer, a three-time Cy Young Award winner who signed a one-year, $15.5 million deal with Toronto in February, threw 20 pitches. Barring a setback, Schneider said he would repeat the workout but with more pitches over the weekend.

“It felt good,” Scherzer, 40, said. “I’ve gotten all the inflammation out, so I can finally grip the ball again and not blow out my shoulder. But I’m not celebrating this until I’m back starting in a major league game.”

Scherzer has received two cortisone injections to relieve inflammation in the thumb this season. He was transferred to the 60-day injured list earlier this week and is not eligible to be activated until May 29.

He went 2-4 with a 3.95 ERA in nine starts for Texas last season, starting the year on the injured list while recovering from lower back surgery. He said Tuesday that his problematic right thumb, which also affected his 2022 and 2023 seasons, was just as big of an issue in 2024.

“This is what knocked me out in 2023, and [I had it] all of last year,” Scherzer said. “It wasn’t so much the back injury, it was this thumb injury giving me all the fits in the world. I thought I addressed it. I thought I had done all the grip-strength work, but I came into spring training, and it popped back out.”

Scherzer left his debut start with the Blue Jays against Baltimore on March 29 after three innings because of soreness in his right lat muscle. He said after the game that his thumb issue was to blame for that soreness.

Continue Reading

Technology

Apple says Epic Games contempt ruling could cost ‘substantial sums’

Published

on

By

Apple says Epic Games contempt ruling could cost 'substantial sums'

An Apple store in Walnut Creek, California, U.S., on April 30, 2025.

Paul Morris | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Apple is asking a court to pause a recent decision in its case against Epic Games and allow the iPhone maker to once again charge a commission on in-app transactions that link out for payment.

Last month, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland found that Apple had violated her original court order from the Epic trial, originally decided in 2021, that forced Apple to make limited changes to its linking out policy under California law.

Judge Rogers’ new ruling is more expansive, ordering Apple to immediately stop imposing its commissions on purchases made for iPhone apps through web links inside its apps, among other changes.

Apple is now looking to get a stay on that order, as well as another one from the case that prevents it from restricting app developers from choosing the language or placement of those links, until the entire decision can be appealed. Apple says that required changes in their current form will cost the company “substantial sums.”

“This is the latest chapter in Epic’s largely unsuccessful effort to use competition law to change how Apple runs the App Store,” Apple said in the emergency motion for a stay. The motion cites a previous order in the case that found that new linking policies would cost Apple “hundreds of millions to billions” of dollars annually.

If Apple succeeds, it will allow the company to roll back changes that have already started to shift the economics of app development. Developers including Amazon and Spotify have been able to update their apps to avoid Apple’s commissions and direct customers to their own website for payment.

Prior to the ruling, Amazon’s Kindle app told users they could not purchase a book in the iPhone app. After a recent update, the app now shows an orange “Get Book” button that links to Amazon’s website.

Epic also plans to introduce new software to allow app and game developers to easily link to their websites to take payments.  

“This forces Apple to compete,” Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney said shortly after last month’s decision. “This is what we wanted all along.”

Apple said in the filing that “non-party developers are already seizing upon the Order to reduce consumer choice (and damage Apple’s business) by, among other things, impeding the use of” in-app purchases.

Rogers made a criminal referral in the case, saying that Apple misled the court and that a company vice president “outright lied” about when and why Apple decided to charge 27% for external payments. The real decision, the judge said, took place in meetings involving Apple CEO Tim Cook.

Wednesday’s filing from Apple doesn’t address Rogers’ accusations that the company misled the judge, but it does argue that the ruling was punitive. Apple’s lawyers also claimed that civil contempt sanctions can only coerce compliance with an existing order, not punish non-compliance.

Apple said earlier this week in a court filing it would appeal the contempt ruling.

“We’ve complied with the court’s order and we’re going to appeal,” Cook told investors on the company’s quarterly earnings call last week.

WATCH: Apple says it strongly disagrees with Epic Games decision

Apple on Epic Games decision: We strongly disagree and will appeal

Continue Reading

Trending