Connect with us

Published

on

Prohibition’s 14-year span in the early 20th century caused a boozy brain drain as droves of American bartenders shuttered their watering holes and moved abroad. With them went America’s Golden Age of Cocktails. Reason’s Peter Suderman in 2017 brilliantly laid out the backstory behind how the federal governmentalmost killed the cocktail. But the government’s anti-alcohol tantrum also nearly killed off another product further up the alcohol supply chainthe humble apple. America’s Apple Exceptionalism

Today, the produce section of your average American grocery store is dominated by a small handful of commercial apples. A mere 510 varietalssuch as the ubiquitous Red and Golden Delicious, Gala, Granny Smith, and Honeycrisprule the country’s apple market. In my humble opinion, other than the flavorful Honeycrisp (developed via cross-breeding at the University of Minnesota in the 1960s), these varietals are largely bland, flavorless, and uninspiring.

It wasn’t always this way. In the 18th and 19th centuries, America was home to well over10,000 apple varieties, more than any othernation on earth. The names were as wide-ranging and extraordinary as the species diversity, with monikers like Yarlington Mill, Spitzenburg, Northern Spy, and Winter Banana.

America’s apple exceptionalism camelong before the Department of Agriculture doled out millions of dollars in annual grants to farmers, and even before land grant colleges were established to advance the nation’s agricultural knowledge. Instead, it was almost entirely a bottom-up, grassroots groundswell that solidified the country’s apple hegemony, with nearlyevery farm in early America containing an apple orchardand nearly every American (nine out of 10)living on a farm.

To understand the story of the apple, one must first understand the story of cider. Nowadays called “hard cider,” cider’s American bona fides ironically far outstripthat of apple piewith alcoholic cider’s roots tracing back to the very birth of our nation. Heralded by some as the “fuel of the revolution,” cider was not only allegedly passed out to both colonial and British troops duringlulls in the action at the Battle of Concord, but it helped propel George Washington’sfirst election to the Virginia House of Burgesses by ensuring his voters were well-lubricated. John Adams drank a gill of ciderfor breakfast before his daily five-mile walks, Thomas Jefferson made cider at hisMonticello orchards, and Ben Franklin famouslyquipped: “He that drinks his cyder alone, let him catch his horse alone.”

Given its role as cider’s irreplaceable ingredient, the apple rose hand in hand with cider as a sine qua non of early American life. Needless to say, cider is only as good as the apples that go into it, which is why the nearly endless variety of apples found in 18th and 19th century America produced some of the most unique and flavorful ciders the world has ever known. In the words of cicerone Michael Agnew, these early apples were “cultivated for their tannins and acidity, [and] produced complex quaffs with flavors that rivaled fine wine, quite unlike the sweetened, alco-pop or non-alcoholic juice-in-a-jug that passes for cider today.”

Early Americans consumed anaverage of 35 gallons of cider per year, in part because it wasmuch safer to imbibe than water. “Up until Prohibition, an apple grown in America was far less likely to be eaten than to wind up in a barrel of cider,” as author Michael Pollannoted. “In rural areas cider took the place of not only wine and beer but of coffee and tea, juice, and even water.”

Proverbs 27 intones: “If you care for your orchard, you’ll enjoy its fruit.” But America didn’t care for its orchards. At the very moment cider, and the apple, were becoming hard-wired pieces of Americana, everything began to change. First, the European revolutions of 1848 spurred awave of German immigration to the United States. Unsurprisingly, more Germans meant more beer, which provided a ready challenger to contest cider’s heavyweight title as America’s alcoholic beverage of choice. Around the same time, the Industrial Revolution led to America’s first greaturbanization pushand German immigrants themselves were part of this trend, choosing to settle in Upper Midwest cities like Milwaukee.

This provided a natural competitive advantage for beer over cider, as grains like barley and wheat were cheaper to grow, easier to haul into urban environs, and less perishable than the apple. “Beer was made in breweries, which are like factoriesthey’re modern,” asWilliam Kerrigan, author ofJohnny Appleseed and the American Orchard: A Cultural History, pointed out. “Beer seemed cleaner and a more efficient, modern drink.” Prohibition Enters the Picture

As cider declined in prominence, the bucolic rural apple orchard became less important to the American lifestyle. But while the apple was already declining across the nation’s cultural landscape, it was the U.S. government that delivered the coup de grce to this noble fruit.

With Prohibition’s advent in 1920, not only alcohol but also the ingredients that made alcohol became public enemy No. 1. As Smithsonian Magazine recounts, FBI agents took tochopping down acres and acres of backwoods apple orchards, “effectively erasing cider…from American life.”

Even if they escaped the G-men’s axes, orchard owners had little incentive to maintain their orchards in the absence of cider. “[Prohibition] caused orchards to stop growing cider apples altogether, dealing our cider traditionand the apples themselvesa death blow,”writes Jonathan Frochtzwajg of Modern Farmer.

Whether at the foot of an ax, or via the headwinds of the temperance-induced gutting of the apple’s highest and best economic use as a progenitor of cider, the American apple would never be the same. “Among the causes that contributed to the demise of cider in the United States, without question the Temperance Movement belongs near the top of the list,”according to David R. Williams of George Mason University.

By the time Prohibition ended nearly 14 years later, America’s cider and apple culture had been decimated. Part of this is attributable to the fact that mechanized urban breweries were betterpositioned to weather Prohibition, given that the factory setting allowed for a more ready transition to other product lines like soft drinks or selling ice during the country’s dry spell.

An additional factor is inherent to the apple itself. Barley and wheat grow as annual crops, which allows their production to be curtailed or ramped up on relatively short notice, thereby allowing breweries tospring back into action quickly once Prohibition ended. In contrast, planting a new orchardmeans committing to a 25-year investmentone which, quite literally, takes at least three to six years to bear fruit. “When prohibition ended in the 1930s, there was neither the desire nor the means to resuscitate the cider industry,” notes Williams.

To the extent the apple maintains its titular banner today as America’smost popular fruit, it is only in the form of those aforementioned, depressingly bland grocery store varietals. These homogeneously boring modern apples are a poor substitute for their pre-Prohibition ancestors. By the 1990s, commercial orchards weregrowing fewer than 100 types of apples, with a mere 11 varietals constituting 90 percent of grocery sales. Over 10,000 apple varieties are believed to have goneextinct since Prohibition. Apples Bounce Back

Were the story to end there, we would likely be forever condemned to a never-ending conveyor belt of Galas and Granny Smiths in the produce aisle. But just as the apple’s fall came at the very moment it reached its apex, its resurrection began only once it hit its nadir. For while the government nearly killed the apple, the free market is saving it.

As America’s modern craft cider boom took hold in recent decades, cidermakers began scouring the countryside for those unique, flavorful, spectacularly named apple varietals of yesteryear. Often called “spitter apples” since they are less sweet than the standard grocery tore offerings, thousands of heirloom apple varietals thought to be lost are being rediscovered, and saved, by American cidermakers.

Stories abound of Appalachian appleenthusiasts who havesaved thousands of “lost” apple varieties and now work closely with craft cidermakers. Famed cidermaker Diane Flynt of Foggy Ridge Cider, whom many consider the founder of today’s craft cider movement, hascredited cider’s modern rise as being built “on the backs of these old fashioned apples…. If I didn’t have these apples, my cider wouldn’t taste very good.”

Flynt, who won a James Beard Award in 2018, recently took things even further by shuttering Foggy Ridge toconcentrate solely on apple growing. Other Virginia cideries, like Blue Bee Cider and Albemarle Ciderworks havehelped save the Hewes Crab applea favorite of both Washington and Jefferson. The Hewes Crab was presumed to be extinct before asolitary tree was discovered near Williamsburg in the 1990s. Other heirlooms are similarly enjoying arenaissance, such as the Arkansas Black, another beloved cider-making apple.

Slowly but surely, the epicnames are reentering the American lexicon: Bitter Buckingham, White Winter Jon, Royal Lemon, Candy Stripe, and Black Winesap. For that, we can thank Adam Smith’s invisible handwhich, a hundred years later, has finally stayed the hand of the government’s apple ax.

American ’76 Recipe

A patriotic spin on the French 75, this libation celebrates cider’s irreplaceable role in the American story.

3 ounces of craft cider

2 ounces of bourbon

an ounce of lemon juice

an ounce of maple syrup

Heirloom apple slice

Shake bourbon, lemon juice, and maple syrup in a shaker filled with ice. Double-strain into a rocks glass containing fresh ice; top with cider and give a quick stir. Garnish with a slice of your favorite heirloom apple varietaland save the Red Delicious for the fruit salad.

Recipe adapted fromGive Me Liberty and Give Me a Drink! by Jarrett Dieterle.

Continue Reading

Politics

‘More people should be given this chance’: The probation centres transforming offenders’ lives

Published

on

By

'More people should be given this chance': The probation centres transforming offenders' lives

The combination of full prisons and tight public finances has forced the government to urgently rethink its approach.

Top of the agenda for an overhaul are short sentences, which look set to give way to more community rehabilitation.

The cost argument is clear – prison is expensive. It’s around £60,000 per person per year compared to community sentences at roughly £4,500 a year.

But it’s not just saving money that is driving the change.

Research shows short custodial terms, especially for first-time offenders, can do more harm than good, compounding criminal behaviour rather than acting as a deterrent.

Charlie describes herself as a former "junkie shoplifter"
Image:
Charlie describes herself as a former ‘junkie shoplifter’

This is certainly the case for Charlie, who describes herself as a former “junkie, shoplifter from Leeds” and spoke to Sky News at Preston probation centre.

She was first sent down as a teenager and has been in and out of prison ever since. She says her experience behind bars exacerbated her drug use.

More on Prisons

Charlie in February 2023
Image:
Charlie in February 2023


“In prison, I would never get clean. It’s easy, to be honest, I used to take them in myself,” she says. “I was just in a cycle of getting released, homeless, and going straight back into trap houses, drug houses, and that cycle needs to be broken.”

Eventually, she turned her life around after a court offered her drug treatment at a rehab facility.

She says that after decades of addiction and criminality, one judge’s decision was the turning point.

👉 Click here to listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app 👈

“That was the moment that changed my life and I just want more judges to give more people that chance.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

How to watch Sophy Ridge’s special programme live from Preston Prison

Also at Preston probation centre, but on the other side of the process, is probation officer Bex, who is also sceptical about short sentences.

“They disrupt people’s lives,” she says. “So, people might lose housing because they’ve gone to prison… they come out homeless and may return to drug use and reoffending.”

Read more from Sky News:
Care homes face ban on overseas recruitment
Woman reveals impact of little-known disorder

Charlie with Becks at the probation centre in Preston 
grab from Liz Bates VT for use in correspondent piece
Image:
Bex works with offenders to turn their lives around

Bex has seen first-hand the value of alternative routes out of crime.

“A lot of the people we work with have had really disjointed lives. It takes a long time for them to trust someone, and there’s some really brilliant work that goes on every single day here that changes lives.”

It’s people like Bex and Charlie, and places like Preston probation centre, that are at the heart of the government’s change in direction.

:: Watch special programme on prisons on Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge at 7pm

Continue Reading

Politics

Inside the UK’s broken prison system where tinkering around the edges will no longer work

Published

on

By

Inside the UK's broken prison system where tinkering around the edges will no longer work

“As far as I’m concerned, there’s only three ways to spend the taxpayers’ hard-earned when it comes to prisons. More walls, more bars and more guards.”

Prison reform is one of the hardest sells in government.

Hospitals, schools, defence – these are all things you would put on an election leaflet.

Even the less glamorous end of the spectrum – potholes and bin collections – are vote winners.

But prisons? Let’s face it, the governor’s quote from the Shawshank Redemption reflects public polling pretty accurately.

Right now, however, reform is unavoidable because the system is at breaking point.

It’s a phrase that is frequently used so carelessly that it’s been diluted into cliche. But in this instance, it is absolutely correct.

More on Crime

Without some kind of intervention, the prison system is at breaking point.

It will break.

Inside Preston Prison

Ahead of the government’s Sentencing Review, expected to recommend more non-custodial sentences, I’ve been talking to staff and inmates at Preston Prison, a Category B men’s prison originally built in 1790.

Overcrowding is at 156% here, according to the Howard League.

Sophy Ridge talking outside Preston Prison
Image:
Sophy Ridge talking outside Preston Prison

One prisoner I interviewed, in for burglary, was, until a few hours before, sharing his cell with his son.

It was his son’s first time in jail – but not his. He had been out of prison since he was a teenager. More than 30 years – in and out of prison.

His family didn’t like it, he said, and now he has, in his own words, dragged his son into it.

Sophie is a prison officer and one of those people who would be utterly brilliant doing absolutely anything, and is exactly the kind of person we should all want working in prisons.

She said the worst thing about the job is seeing young men, at 18, 19, in jail for the first time. Shellshocked. Mental health all over the place. Scared.

And then seeing them again a couple of years later.

And then again.

The same faces. The officers get to know them after a while, which in a way is nice but also terrible.

Sophy Ridge talking to one of the officers who works within Preston Prison
Image:
Sophy Ridge talking to one of the officers who works within Preston Prison

The £18bn spectre of reoffending

We know the stats about reoffending, but it floored me how the system is failing. It’s the same people. Again and again.

The Sentencing Review, which we’re just days away from, will almost certainly recommend fewer people go to prison, introducing more non-custodial or community sentencing and scrapping short sentences that don’t rehabilitate but instead just start people off on the reoffending merry-go-round, like some kind of sick ride.

But they’ll do it on the grounds of cost (reoffending costs £18bn a year, a prison place costs £60,000 a year, community sentences around £4,500 per person).

They’ll do it because prisons are full (one of Keir Starmer’s first acts was being forced to let prisoners out early because there was no space).

If the government wants to be brave, however, it should do it on the grounds of reform, because prison is not working and because there must be a better way.

Inside Preston Prison, Sky News saw firsthand a system truly at breaking point - picture of a prison officer's back with HMP Preston written on it.
Image:
Inside Preston Prison, Sky News saw first-hand a system truly at breaking point

A cold, hard look

I’ve visited prisons before, as part of my job, but this was different.

Before it felt like a PR exercise, I was taken to one room in a pristine modern prison where prisoners were learning rehabilitation skills.

This time, I felt like I really got under the skin of Preston Prison.

It’s important to say that this is a good prison, run by a thoughtful governor with staff that truly care.

But it’s still bloody hard.

“You have to be able to switch off,” one officer told me, “Because the things you see….”

Staff are stretched and many are inexperienced because of high turnover.

After a while, I understood something that had been nagging me. Why have I been given this access? Why are people being so open with me? This isn’t what usually happens with prisons and journalists.

Read more from Sky News:
Hospital accused of ‘covering up’ suspended surgeon concerns
Thunderstorms forecast for large part of UK
BAFTA TV Awards: Nine stand-out moments

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Probation centres answer to UK crime?

That’s when I understood.

They want people to know. They want people to know that yes, they do an incredible job and prisons aren’t perfect, but they’re not as bad as you think.

But that’s despite the government, not because of it.

Sometimes the worst thing you can do on limited resources is to work so hard you push yourself to the brink, so the system itself doesn’t break, because then people think ‘well maybe we can continue like this after all… maybe it’s okay’.

But things aren’t okay. When people say the system is at breaking point – this time it isn’t a cliche.

They really mean it.

:: Watch special programme on prisons on Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge at 7pm

Continue Reading

US

US and China agree to slash tariffs on each other

Published

on

By

US and China agree to slash tariffs on each other

The US and China, the world’s largest and second-largest economies, have agreed to slash tariffs on each other as they seek to end their trade war.

Speaking after talks with Chinese officials in Geneva, US treasury secretary Scott Bessent told reporters the two sides had reached a deal for a 90-day pause on measures.

US trade representative Jamieson Greer said so-called reciprocal tariffs were now at 10% each.

In real terms, it meant the US is reducing its 145% tariff to 30% on Chinese goods, as a tariff of around 20% had been in effect from previous administrations.

China has agreed to reduce its 125% retaliatory tariffs to 10% on US goods.

Money blog: Life as a divorce lawyer

Tariffs, taxes on imports of more than 100%, had been imposed on both sides. China was the only country exempt from a 90 pause on the “retaliatory” tariffs above the base 10% levies applied by America.

Major retailers had been warning President Donald Trump of empty shelves as US importers pause shipments.

Follow The World
Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

Mr Bessent said after a weekend of negotiations in Switzerland, the countries had a mechanism for continued talks.

It’s the second major trade announcement made by the US in the last week, after a deal was secured with the UK on Thursday.

The move signals a willingness from the Americans to make deals on tariffs.

Welcomed news

The news was received positively by Asian stock markets on Monday as major indexes were up.

In China, the Shanghai Composite stock index rose 0.8%, the Shenzhen Component gained 1.7%, and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index was up nearly 3%.

In countries across Asia, benchmark stock indexes also rose. Korea’s Kospi grew 1.1%, Japan’s Nikkei was up 0.8% while India’s Nifty 50 index of most valuable companies gained more than 3%.

US stocks look poised to rise on the open, based on after-hours trading. Wall Street’s tech-heavy Nasdaq is expected to rise by 3.3%, and the S&P 500 index of companies relied on to be stable and profitable by 2.5%.

What next?

As with the other counties subject to 90-day pauses, a permanent deal will need to be reached, but confidence across the world is likely to have been boosted.

Businesses now need a clear timetable and roadmap for future negotiations under the newly announced economic and trade consultation mechanism, said Andrew Wilson, the deputy secretary general of the International Chamber of Commerce.

“The credibility of that process for resolving underlying frictions in the Sino-US economic relationship will be mission-critical in terms of restoring business confidence.”

Continue Reading

Trending