Connect with us

Published

on

Don’t bet on a Big Apple casino opening any time soon.

State regulators said they won’t decide on new casino licenses in the New York City area until late 2025 — a delay critics say deals the local economy a bad hand.

The footdragging means pushes out the over-under on the earliest a gaming facility could open in the metro area to some time in 2026.

“It’s absurd that it’s going to take 3 years to put shovels in the ground,” Queens Borough President Donovan Richards said, referring to a timetable laid out by the state Gaming Commission during a public meeting Monday.

The city could use the jobs associated with the licenses to boost the post-COVID-19 recovery, he added.

“We’re trying to rebuild the New York economy. People are looking for good jobs and upward mobility. I hope they have a change of heart.”

Talk about awarding as many as three casino licenses in the downstate region have already been going on for three years.

Gaming industry insiders were left confused over the footdragging.

“People are shaking their heads. What’s taking so long?” a source to one casino bidder said. “There doesn’t seem to be any urgency.”

By comparison, state cannabis regulators have issued 89 licenses for pot dispensaries over roughly the same time period.

But Gaming Commission Executive Director Robert Williams insisted the timetable is “ahead of schedule” because Gov. Kathy Hochul and the state legislature have not anticipated revenues from casinos to help bankroll the MTA until 2026.

A winning bidder must pay an upfront $500 million license fee for the privilege of operating a casino.

Williams noted that the City Council has yet to approve a zoning amendment to make it easier for casinos to find a location in the five boroughs.

The proposed casinos — The Related Companies/Wynn proposal for Hudson Yards, Mets owner Steve Cohen’s bid by Citi Field, the Thor Equities consortium in Coney Island and Bally’s at Ferry Point in The Bronx — would have to first be approved under the city’s lengthy Uniformed Land Use Review Procedure, the commission said.

“I have been informally advised that navigating the [land use] process will extend through the second quarter of 2025,” Williams said.

He said bidders will also have to undergo a separate state environmental scrutiny— under the State Environmental Quality Review Act.

In order for Cohen’s and Bally”s proposals to proceed, they also need approval from the state legislature to redesignate the properties from parkland to commercial use.

These reviews won’t be completed until early 2025, Williams said.

The Community Advisory Committees would then vote to support or reject a casino by late summer of 2025, allowing the state to collect licenses fees “nearly one year prior” to the deadline submission to the state and MTA, Williams said.

The committees, created by law, consist of the mayor, borough presidents and local state and city lawmakers who represent neighborhoods where a casino is proposed.

Resorts World’s slots parlor at Aqueduct race track and the MGM slots parlor at Yonkers raceway have the infrastructure in place to more easily build out and offer card table games in 2026, if they are awarded licenses.

But other bidders would have to build a new casino facility from scratch, meaning their doors are unlikely to open for business until 2027 or later, industry sources estimate.

Continue Reading

World

China dominates renewables – and this project shows why

Published

on

By

Continue Reading

Technology

CEO of Southeast Asia’s largest bank warns investors: ‘Buckle up, we’re in for a volatile ride’

Published

on

By

CEO of Southeast Asia's largest bank warns investors: 'Buckle up, we're in for a volatile ride'

Tan Su Shan is the CEO and director of DBS Group.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

With valuations in the U.S. stock market becoming increasingly stretched, the chief executive of Southeast Asia’s largest bank is warning investors to expect turbulence ahead.

“We’ve seen a lot of volatility in the markets. It could be equities, it could be rates, it could be foreign exchange,” DBS CEO Tan Su Shan told CNBC, adding that she expects that volatility to continue.

Tan, who took over the helm of DBS from longtime CEO Piyush Gupta in March, said that investors were particularly worried about the lofty valuations of artificial intelligence stocks, especially the so-called “Magnificent Seven.”

The Magnificent Seven — Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla — are some of the major U.S. tech and growth stocks that have driven much of Wall Street’s gains in recent years.

“You’ve got trillions of dollars tied up in seven stocks, for example. So it’s inevitable, with that kind of concentration, that there will be a worry about. ‘You know, when will this bubble burst?'”

Earlier this week, at the Global Financial Leaders’ Investment Summit in Hong Kong,  it was likely there would be a 10%-20% drawdown over the next 12 to 24 months.

Morgan Stanley CEO Ted Pick said at the same summit that investors should welcome periodic pullbacks, calling them healthy developments rather than signs of crisis.

Tan agreed. “Frankly, a correction will be healthy,” she said.

Recent examples include Advanced Micro Devices and Palantir, both of which posted stronger-than-expected quarterly results on Tuesday, yet their shares — and the wider Nasdaq — fell.

Her remarks follow similar warnings by the International Monetary Fund and central bank chiefs Jerome Powell and Andrew Bailey, who have all cautioned about inflated stock prices.

Singapore as diversification play

Tan advised investors to diversify rather than concentrate holdings in one market. “Whether it’s in your portfolio, in your supply chain, or in your demand distribution, just diversify.”

Tan, who has over 35 years of experience in banking and wealth management, noted that Asia could attract more investment from the U.S.—and that it’s not a bad thing.

Singling out Singapore and the country’s central bank’s efforts to boost interest in the local markets, Tan described the city-state as a “diversifier market.”

“We’ve got rule of law. We’re a transparent, open financial system and stable politically. We’re a good place to invest…. So I don’t think we’re a bad place to think about diversifying your investments.”

Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

hide content

Continue Reading

Entertainment

New film ‘proves beyond shadow of a doubt’ that Elgin Marbles were stolen, director claims

Published

on

By

New film 'proves beyond shadow of a doubt' that Elgin Marbles were stolen, director claims

A new documentary proves “beyond any shadow of a doubt” that the Elgin Marbles were stolen, according to its director.

David Wilkinson claims The Marbles settles one of the most divisive debates in cultural heritage: whether 19th-century diplomat Lord Elgin legally acquired the Parthenon Sculptures, better known as the Elgin Marbles.

The film revisits how the sculptures were removed from the Parthenon in Athens while Greece was under Ottoman rule – and ended up in London.

It argues that Lord Elgin did not legally acquire the artefacts – and instead, it amounts to “the greatest heist in art history”.

Reuters file pic
Image:
Reuters file pic

Actor Brian Cox, historian Dominic Selwood and solicitor Mark Stephens are among those who appear in the documentary.

The British government bought the sculptures from Lord Elgin and installed them into the trusteeship of the British Museum, where they have remained for 200 years.

“He needed the money from the British government to pay for all the bribes he’d given to members of the Ottoman Empire,” Wilkinson says of the transaction.

More on Elgin Marbles

“Lord Elgin did sell them … but the question becomes, did Lord Elgin actually have the right to purchase them?”

PA file pic
Image:
PA file pic

Classical archaeologist Mario Trabucco della Torretta dismisses Wilkinson’s claims.

“The allegation of bribery to obtain the Marbles is just wrong in historical terms,” he told Sky News.

Torretta was the key architect behind a joint letter that included former prime minister Liz Truss, historian Dr David Starkey and Sir John Redwood – alleging the British Museum is part of a “covert” and “accelerating campaign” to return the Elgin Marbles to Greece.

Responding to Wilkinson’s claims of bribery, he added: “The only reference to ‘presents’ comes years after the start of the removals … do people presume that they run a ‘bribe now, pay later’ scheme back then in Constantinople?”

One of the most contentious points in the debate is the legitimacy of an Ottoman permission document known as a “firman”, which is claimed to have authorised Lord Elgin removing the items from Greece.

There is only an Italian text referred to as a translation of this document.

David Wilkinson
Image:
David Wilkinson

Wilkinson said: “It was normal practice at the time that a copy would be kept in what was then Constantinople, and another copy would have been sent off to Athens.

“There would be a record in Istanbul and the Turks have gone through it in great detail over many decades and they can find nothing.”

Speaking to Sky News in 2024, Dr Zeynep Boz – head of combatting illicit trafficking for Turkey’s culture ministry – said there is no proof of the firman in the Ottoman archive.

“Despite extensive archival research, no such firman has been found. It is even difficult to call this document a translation when the original is not available,” she said at the time.

Torretta offers an explanation: “Burning the Ottoman governor’s archive was one of the first acts of the Greek revolution.”

Reuters file pic
Image:
Reuters file pic

While the arguments are not new, The Marbles also examines how other institutions have handled similar restitution cases.

In the film, Cox says if the marbles would have gone back to Athens already if they had found their way to Edinburgh and not London.

Back in 2023, the National Museum of Scotland returned The House Of Ni’isjoohl memorial pole to Canada.

Meanwhile, Glasgow’s Kevingrove Art Gallery Museum returned a shirt to the South Dakota Cultural Heritage Center in the US.

And when it comes to the Parthenon Sculptures – Germany’s Heidelberg University and The Vatican have both returned fragments to Greece.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Dec 2024: Elgin Marbles ‘belong in the UK’

The British Museum Act 1963 prevents treasures being legally given away by the British Museum.

The government has repeatedly it has no plans to change existing policy on restitution, and that it is up to the trustees of the museum to decide.

A spokesperson for the British Museum repeated a statement given to Sky News in July: “Discussions with Greece about a Parthenon Partnership are ongoing and constructive.”

The documentary scrutinises the ethics of foreign national treasures that were taken and are now housed in Western museums, but as it stands the institutional and governmental answers don’t appear to be changing.

The Marbles is in UK and Irish cinemas from today.

Continue Reading

Trending