Connect with us

Published

on

Why would the most notoriously cash-strapped man in America waste money on frivolous lawsuits?

On Monday, Donald Trumpwhose lawyers recently announced that he cant come up with the money to post a $454 million bond in his civil fraud casefired off yet another suit against a news organization that reported facts he didnt like. The targets this time are ABC News and its anchor George Stephanopoulos, who Trump alleges defamed him by stating that Trump had been found liable for raping E. Jean Carroll.

The case looks like a sure loser. Trump was technically found liable under New York law for sexual abuse, not for rape, but the judge in the civil case ruled that, by forcibly penetrating Carrolls vagina with his fingers, Mr. Trump in fact did rape Ms. Carroll as that term commonly is used and understood. But no matter. The Stephanopoulos suit slots into a well-worn groove for Trump, who for years has lodged periodic lawsuits against alleged purveyors of fake news about him. Targets have included The Washington Post, The New York Times, CNN, Bob Woodward, and a Wisconsin TV station that ran an attack ad against him during the 2020 campaign. Trump has even gone after the board of the Pulitzer Prizes for awarding Pulitzers to the Post and the Times for their coverage of his connections to Russia.

Filing these suits has been costly for Trumpor rather, for donors to his campaign and affiliated political action committees, who have footed millions of dollars in legal fees. Not one of Trumps media lawsuits has ever succeeded, nor is one ever likely to, given both the underlying facts and the towering bar a president or former president faces in proving defamation. In one case against The New York Times, a judge found Trumps argument so flimsy that he ordered Trump to pay the Times legal fees. In other cases, such as the one involving the Wisconsin station, the suit was quietly withdrawn a few months after it was filed.

David A. Graham: Trumps money problems are very real and very bad

So why does he keep doing it? On a basic level, this appears to be just Trump being Trumppeevish, headstrong, and narcissistic. For decades, his love-hate relationship with reporters has tended to flare into legal action, as it did in 2006 when he sued the writer Tim OBrien over a few pages in a book that questioned Trumps personal wealth. As Trump told me in an interview in 2016, he knew he couldnt win that suit (he didnt) but brought it anyway to score a few points. I spent a couple of bucks on legal fees, and [OBriens publisher] spent a whole lot more, he said then. I did it to make his life miserable, which Im happy about.

But Trumps quixotic legal crusades are not as irrational as they appear. Suing the press serves as a branding exercise and a fundraising tool. The lawsuits show his supporters that Trump is taking the fight to those lying journalistsso wont you contribute a few dollars to the cause? They thus have become an end unto themselves, part of an infinite loop: sue, publicize the suit, solicit and collect donations, sue again. The cases may be weak on the legal merits, but they further his narrative of being persecuted by the radical left media, Brett Kappel, a campaign-finance lawyer who has researched Trumps legal actions against the press, told me.

This narrative has been a fixture of Trumps fundraising pitches for years. A few weeks after his inauguration, in 2017, one of his fundraising committees sent out an email urging donors to do your part to fight back against the medias attacks and deceptions by sending contributions that would help cut through the noise of news reports. Even before Trump filed a lawsuit against CNN in August 2022 (for describing his election lies as the Big Lie), his campaign was using the nonexistent suit to drum up contributions. Im calling on my best and most dedicated supporters to add their names to stand with me in my impending LAWSUIT against Fake News CNN, read a fundraising email. A second email sent out under Trumps name a few hours later struck a sterner tone: Im going to look over the names of the first 45 Patriots who added their names to publicly stand with their President AGAINST CNN.

When Trump got around to filing the suit two months later, the appeals began anew. I am SUING the Corrupt News Network (CNN) for DEFAMING and SLANDERING my name, the campaign email read, in a chaotic typographical style reminiscent of a ransom note. Theyve called me a LIAR, and so far, Ive been proven RIGHT about EVERYTHING. Remember, when they come after ME, they are really coming after YOU Im calling on YOU to rush in a donation of ANY AMOUNT RIGHT NOW to make a statement that you PROUDLY stand with me. The suit was dismissed last year by a federal judge appointed by Trump. Trump is appealing.

Of course, the cost of suing news organizations is a pittance compared with what Trumps donors are spending on his criminal defense. But it isnt cheap. According to Federal Election Commission records culled by Kappel, the Trump-controlled Save America PAC shelled out nearly $500,000 to the firm that sued the Pulitzer Prize board on Trumps behalf in 2022. It paid $211,000 last year to another law firm that handled Trumps litigation against CNN, among other matters, and an additional $203,000 to the firm handling the appeal.

The biggest recipient, by far, has been the attorney Charles Harder, the defamation specialist who represented Hulk Hogan in his successful suit against Gawker Media in 2016. From early 2018 to May 2021, according to FEC records, Harder took $4.4 million in fees from Trump-affiliated organizations. At one point in 2020, Harders Beverly Hills firm received more money than any other firm doing work for Trump.

From the January/February 2024 issue: Is journalism ready?

Harders work on Trumps behalf didnt produce anything close to his career-making Hogan verdict, which resulted in a $140 million award that drove Gawker into bankruptcy. Harder took the lead in Trumps effort to suppress publication of Michael Wolffs book Fire and Fury in 2018; he sent cease-and-desist letters to Wolff and his publisher, Henry Holt and Co., before the books release, claiming that it contained libelous passages. The book was released as scheduled and became a best seller, and Trump didnt sue. In 2020, Harder handled Trumps lawsuit against the Times, alleging that an opinion piece by the former Times editor Max Frankel was defamatory. A judge dismissed that suit in 2021. (Harder, who no longer represents Trump, declined to comment for this story.)

Whether Trumps beat-the-press strategy is a net financial winner, once all the donations are collected and the attorney fees are subtracted, is hard to say. But Trumps filing of another hopeless lawsuit this week suggests that the math may be in his favor. Why bother paying lawyers millions of dollars to sue and appeal if the return on investment is less than zero? Trump may be petty and irrational, but he has never been accused of neglecting his own financial interests. (A Trump spokesperson didnt return a request for comment.)

At the moment, of course, Trump has much bigger headaches. As of this writing, hes days away from having his assets seized to satisfy that civil-fraud judgment. His overall fundraising has lagged President Joe Bidens. And he is burning through his supporters money to pay for his criminal defense. Despite all that, he still finds a way to keep filing lawsuits against the media. You almost have to admire the commitment.

Continue Reading

Politics

75% of VASPs registered in the EU will not be able to comply with MiCA

Published

on

By

75% of VASPs registered in the EU will not be able to comply with MiCA

75% of VASPs registered in the EU will not be able to comply with MiCA

Opinion by: Slava Demchuk, co-founder and CEO of AMLBot

All virtual asset service providers (VASPs) registered in the EU before 2025 must comply with Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) requirements this year. Not all will be able to do so. 

The MiCA regulation is, in essence, a good legal framework for the crypto industry, but it also has some disadvantages, especially for crypto startups and small businesses. 

Looking at the case of Estonia and its implementation of crypto licenses in 2017, it is possible to predict that around 75% of VASPs will need to cease their operations in the EU. 

What happened in Estonia with crypto licenses? 

In 2017, Estonia was one of the first EU member states to introduce a crypto licensing process. Getting a crypto license (a VASP registration) was easy and fast. No physical presence, share capital requirement, or proof of having sound Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) systems in place were required. The result? By 2019, Estonia had issued around 2,000 crypto licenses. 

Starting in 2019, however, Estonia adopted several amendments to the law, incorporating requirements similar to MiCA. As a consequence, the majority of licensed crypto companies were not able to comply with new requirements and lost their licenses. Today, Estonia has only around 45 licensed crypto businesses.

Current situation in the EU with VASP registration

Similar situations will occur in countries with light VASP registration requirements, such as Poland and the Czech Republic. There are around 1,600 VASPs registered in Poland, owing to the easy and fast process of registering in the country before the MiCA implementation. With minimal requirements, one can open a company and receive a VASP registration in these countries within a few weeks. 

These licensing processes completely changed in 2025 when MiCA entered fully into force. All the registered VASPs must comply with new requirements, which will be the same regardless of their country of incorporation; otherwise, they will be required to cease their business. 

Recent: 10 stablecoin issuers approved under EU’s MiCA — Tether is left out

Most of them will not be able to comply, based on previous experience, such as when 1,900 companies lost their VASP registrations in Estonia. Those license losses occurred as a result of several key factors: 

  • Their size: Many registered VASPs were one-to-three-person companies that provided essential exchange in p2p platforms or over-the-counter. They will not have enough resources to comply with strict MiCA requirements.

  • The cost: Acquiring a MiCA license is expensive. It was previously possible to receive VASP registration in Poland or the Czech Republic for 2,000-4,000 euros. The price for a MiCA license is much more than that, typically around 30,000-80,000 euros, depending on the business model and country of incorporation.

  • The requirements: Companies that apply for a MiCA license must prove they have many complex processes in place, including but not limited to AML/KYC, data protection and cyber resilience. Therefore, the company must hire many specialists and build many processes. Based on the number of VASPs registered in Poland, those 1,600 VASPs will need to find 1,600 AML/compliance officers (one per VASP) by July 2025 — when all VASPs in Poland shall comply with MiCA — that have relevant knowledge, expertise and pass the fit-and-proper test. This will be nearly impossible.

In addition, MiCA has high share capital requirements ranging from 50,000 to 150,000 euros, depending on the services a company provides. Many currently registered VASPs are startups or small companies whose revenue will not be able to cover all the costs needed to build the processes mentioned above and satisfy the share capital requirements. 

Where does that leave the small businesses and the startups? They will not be equipped to comply with MiCA.

Opinion by: Slava Demchuk, co-founder and CEO of AMLBot.

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Continue Reading

Environment

BETA Technologies completes demonstration eCTOL flights across 6 airports in Utah [Video]

Published

on

By

BETA Technologies completes demonstration eCTOL flights across 6 airports in Utah [Video]

Mere weeks after signing an agreement with Utah Aerospace and Defense to bring Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) to the state, eVTOL and eCTOL developer BETA Technologies demonstrated the capabilities of its aircraft through a series of successful flights over the course of three days.

BETA Technologies is a fully integrated electric aircraft and systems developer based in Vermont. It’s been three years since the young company debuted its first electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft, the ALIA–250.

That BETA vessel has since been renamed the ALIA VTOL and completed a piloted test flight transitioning mid-air about a year ago. We also got a closer look at its five-passenger interior this past October.

In addition to the ALIA VTOL, BETA has also been developing an electric conventional takeoff and landing (eCTOL) plane called the ALIA CTOL. It has flown tens of thousands of test miles en route to evaluation flights for FAA certification. As we’ve reported in the past, that aircraft is targeting full approval for commercial operations by 2025.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

BETA has completed its first bonafide production build of the eCTOL in South Burlington. Following a Special Airworthiness Certificate from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the production-ready aircraft took to the skies for a test flight last November, piloted by its founder and CEO.

Most recently, BETA signed an agreement with 47G (Utah Aerospace and Defense) to establish AAM operations in the state, to work alongside the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) and the Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity (GOEO) to identify locations to install multimodal charging infrastructure and identify priority routes for eVTOL and eCTOL rides.

To garner excitement for its technology, BETA recently completed three days’ worth of ALIA eCTOL demonstration flights around Utah to showcase the quiet, efficient mobility potential of its aircraft.

Beta Utah
The ALIA eVTOL above Utah / Source: BETA Technologies

BETA’s eCTOL technology shines above Utah

BETA Technologies shared details of its successful eCTOL flight demonstrations, including the aircraft traveling to six different Utah airports covering over 350 miles. Those visits included Salt Lake City Airport, Provo Airport, Heber City Airport, Logan-Cache Valley Airport, Ogden Airport, and Vernal Airport.

BETA shared that its all-electric flight technology is not only quieter and more sustainable but also cuts the travel distance to those airports by two-thirds compared to relative drive times. 47G and UDOT hosted the flight demonstrations alongside BETA Technologies as the former works to bring commercial operations to the state. Carlos Braceras, Executive Director of UDOT, spoke about BETA’s eCTOL technology and what it means for the future of mobility in Utah:

We move people—and the things they need—using more than just roads. These demonstrations are more than just a technology showcase — they represent a fundamental shift in how we think about mobility. Utah’s population grows and we face increasing demands on our ground transportation system, we know that advanced air mobility offers innovative new solutions to address our evolving mobility needs.

The BETA ALIA can transport up to five passengers at a time or up to 1,250 pounds of cargo. Looking ahead, BETA and its new partners in Utah will align to establish a statewide electric charging network for both aircraft and electric vehicles, create pilot training programs, and develop a model to forecast flight operations.

The agreement with BETA is part of a broader effort from 47G to integrate advanced air mobility into Utah’s transportation sector by the 2034 Winter Olympic Games, which will be held in Salt Lake City. Chris Metts, 47G Project Alta Executive Director, also spoke:

By integrating cutting-edge electric aircraft into our mobility ecosystem, we are ensuring the highest standards of safety, advancing medical response capabilities and driving technological innovation that will create lasting benefits for communities across the state. Utah is attracting investment, accelerating the development of critical infrastructure and enabling the deployment of aircraft that make our transportation system safe and truly multimodal.

The Utah Department of Transportation posted video footage of the BETA eCTOL flight demonstrations; you can view it below:

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Binance token rises following report that Trump family has discussed stake in the crypto exchange

Published

on

By

Binance token rises following report that Trump family has discussed stake in the crypto exchange

The Binance logo is seen displayed on a smartphone screen.

Sopa Images | Lightrocket | Getty Images

Binance’s BNB token bucked the wider crypto downturn on Thursday, jumping 4% following a Wall Street Journal report that the Trump family has held talks to secure a financial interest in the U.S. arm of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange.

Such a deal would notably link the Trumps to a firm that pleaded guilty to breaking anti-money laundering laws in 2023.

According to the Journal, Binance first approached Trump allies last year, pitching a deal that could help the embattled exchange regain its footing in the U.S. At the same time, its founder, Changpeng Zhao — better known as CZ — has been angling for a presidential pardon after serving four months in prison for violating anti-money laundering laws.

A spokesperson for Binance.US said the company declined to comment.

Read more CNBC tech news

The structure of any potential Trump stake remains uncertain, but the Journal’s sources said one possibility being considered is routing it through World Liberty Financial, a crypto venture backed by the First Family. World Liberty funnels 75% of profits to Trump-related entities. It’s also unclear whether the arrangement is directly tied to a potential pardon for CZ.

The news comes as Binance fights to rebuild credibility after its $4.3 billion regulatory settlement. If a deal goes through, it could mark a dramatic comeback for Binance.US — just as Trump moves to roll back regulations that have weighed on the crypto industry.

Steve Witkoff, a real estate investor and longtime Trump associate now working as his top negotiator in the Middle East, has reportedly been involved in the talks, according to the Journal, citing unnamed sources familiar with the matter.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from CNBC.

Read the full Wall Street Journal story here: Trump Family Has Held Deal Talks With Binance Following Crypto Exchange’s Guilty Plea

Trump signs executive order to establish U.S. strategic bitcoin reserve

Continue Reading

Trending