Connect with us

Published

on

In January, as the 2024 primary season got under way, Representative Ro Khanna stood in the middle of a spacious New Hampshire living room and marveled at the dozens of Democrats who had crammed in. What enthusiasm for President Biden! Khanna said as the crowd cheered. The California progressive wasnt in the land of would-be presidents to promote himselfat least not directly. He came here to boost his partys flagging 81-year-old incumbent.

Khanna represents Silicon Valley, but hes lost count of how many times hes been to New Hampshire; a local Democrat introduced him to the room as the fifth member of our congressional delegation. He told me he initially felt sheepish about coming back after he stumped here for Bernie Sanders four years ago, worried that people would assume he wanted to run for president. Hes gotten over that.

I spent a day driving across the state with Khanna as he made the case for Joe Biden as a write-in candidate. Before voters and the cameras, Khanna was a loyal surrogate, hailing Biden as a champion for the middle class, the climate, and abortion rights, while insisting that the president still has plenty of support. Back in the car, however, his worries and frustrations spilled out. Khanna is 47, three decades younger than the two men set to be on the ballot in November. Hes waitingnot altogether patientlyfor the decks to clear, for the Biden and Sanders generation to finally retire. We havent been driving a clear message, Khanna told me. We have to have a better message on the economy, and we have to have a better message on immigration.

The proximate cause of Khannas distress was the bipartisan southern-border compromise that was then emerging from the Senateand which, at the behest of former President Donald Trump, Republicans promptly killed. Khanna wasnt a fan of the deal. He had wanted Biden to give a rousing speech about why immigration matters to America; instead, the president was about to give Republicans almost everything they wanted. Youve got no affirmative case, Khanna told me. Theres nothing. Theres a void. Whats missing, he said, is an aspirational vision.

Heres Khannas. He wants to marry the forward-looking spirit of the companies founded in and around his districtGoogle, Apple, Teslawith the traditional middle-class values of his suburban upbringing in Bucks County, Pennsylvania. And he wants to inspire a new economic patriotism to rebuild Americas industrial base with climate-friendly technologya project that he hopes will bring manufacturing jobs back to the Rust Belt, and working-class voters back to the Democratic Party.

A representative from Americas tech capital is an unlikely avatar of nostalgia, but Khanna speaks with as much longing for the countrys past, and his own, as any politician. He sees himself as a bridge between the nations faded industrial might and its digital future, appealing to a set of often-warring constituencies: progressives and pragmatists, tech capitalists and the working class, climate activists and coal country.

Khanna got his start in politics working for Barack Obama, who clearly serves as a model: a progressive who proposed transformative change without alienating too much of the country. The divide that Khanna wants to cross extends beyond the factions of the Democratic Party; its geographic, economic, cultural, technological, generational. And its wider than the one Obama faced. The nation that embraced the former presidents message is now even more polarized and dug-in.

Sometimes Khannas project seems naive, as though hes trying to be everything to everybody at a time when nobody agrees on anything. But he believes that to defeat Trump and build a coalition that can survive beyond November, Democrats must offer an agenda that can excite the voters who have soured on the president and their party. Khanna wants to run for president on his vision one dayas soon as 2028but his more urgent quest is trying to get his party to adopt it now. Do I think I have a compelling economic vision for this country, for the party? Yes, he said. Do I mind if the president steals all of it? Absolutely not.Congressman Ro Khanna of California greets a student at Council Rock North High School, in Newtown, Pennsylvania, where he also went to school.

If you recognize Khanna, youve probably seen him on cable news; he told meand this was a point of pridethat he goes on Fox News more than nearly any other House Democrat. Early in his presidency, Biden was so impressed with Khannas cable appearances that he asked Ron Klain, his chief of staff at the time, to schedule more TV hits for Khanna. Well, Mr. President, Klain replied, I think he does a pretty good job getting on TV all by himself.

Khannas willingness to engage the right has gained him an audience that many Democrats have ignoredand the unofficial title of Congresss ambassador of Silicon Valley. He frequently visits rural districts where GOP members of Congress seek investments from lucrative tech giants. (Khanna isnt shy about getting tech executives on the phone. I joke sometimes that Im going to try to discover the limits of Ros Rolodex, Representative Mike Gallagher, a Wisconsin Republican who serves with Khanna on the House select committee on China, told me.)

McKay Coppins: The Kyrsten Sinema theory of American politics

Khanna is also more willing than other progressives to work on legislation with Republicans, having co-sponsored bills with staunch Trump supporters and lawmakers who voted to overturn the 2020 election. Two months after the January 6 assault on the Capitol, Khanna appeared on Fox News alongside Representative Matt Gaetz of Florida and bragged about their legislation to reduce money in politics and end U.S. involvement in forever wars.

Khanna has a risk tolerance that I think is rare for most members, Gallagher, who is resigning from the House this month, told me. He recounted a meeting that he and Khanna had with Elon Musk last year, in which Khanna got the billionaire to host a live event with them on his social-media platform. Im not sure how many Democratic members would be able to do that, Gallagher said. Or be willing to.

Khanna occupies an ideological space to the left of Biden but just to the right of progressives like Sanders and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, who identify as democratic socialists. He supports Medicare for All, tuition-free public college, and tax increases on high earners. But he also made plenty of money as a lawyer representing tech firms, and Khanna is not about to say that billionaires should not exist, as Sanders has. He defines himself as a progressive capitalist, and he believes progressives should frame wealth as a feature, not a bug, of the American system. The progressive movement has to talk about a vision of production, a vision of wealth generation, Khanna said.

The policy that best exemplifies this is Khannas push for federal investment in manufacturing technologies such as green steel and clean aluminum, which he sees as a way of reindustrializing the Rust Belt while minimizing carbon emissions and air pollution. After months of negotiations with environmental groups, labor unions, and manufacturers, Khanna is planning a trip later this spring to Johnstown, Pennsylvania, to unveil legislation that would spend billions to build steel plants in former industry hubs. (The bill will have at least one Republican co-sponsor from the region, he told me.) He thinks it will capture the imaginationa favorite Khanna-ismof voters longing for America to reclaim its status from China as the worlds great manufacturer.

Were living in a time of big ideas, of big moments, Khanna told me. And I think we need a big vision to meet the times. Hes worried, though, that Bidens ambitions are only getting smaller. After two years of sweeping legislative accomplishmentsa $1.9 trillion COVID-relief bill, $1.2 trillion for infrastructure, the most significant climate bill in American historyBiden has, in the face of a more hotile Congress, scaled back his domestic-policy goals. Among the objectives that the president dwelled on longest during his recent State of the Union address were fighting junk fees and restoring the number of chips in a snack bagnot exactly the stuff that captures imaginations.Ro Khanna speaks to students at Council Rock North High School.

No issue has tested Khannas ability to satisfy all of his partys factions more than Israels military campaign in Gaza. Khanna called for a cease-fire seven weeks after the Hamas attackmuch later than some of his progressive colleagues, and much earlier than Biden, who resisted that demand until last week, when the U.S. allowed a United Nations resolution backing a one-month cease-fire to pass.

Seven weeks was too long for many of Khannas supporters. One of his top political staffers resigned in protest in mid-October, and when demonstrators staged a sit-in at his office near the Capitol, one of Khannas interns joined them on the floor. By November, even his mother, Jyotsna, was getting on his case. I wanted him to declare much sooner, she told me.

Khanna is still not as critical of Israel as some on the left; he doesnt describe its campaign in Gaza as genocide or ethnic cleansing. But as Palestinian casualties have increased, hes called more forcefully for Biden to demand that the Netanyahu government halt its shelling of Gaza. We have a lot of levers that we havent used, Khanna told me.

In February, Khanna traveled to Michigan, trying to persuade the states large Arab American population to support Biden despite his own reservations about the presidents approach to Israel. A few days after Khannas visit, more than 100,000 Michigan Democratsabout 13 percent of the primary electoratemarked uncommitted on their ballot in protest of Bidens Israel policy. Khanna urged the Biden campaign to take their message seriously. The party cant afford to have the war still going on during the Democratic convention, he told me. Youd have mass protests.

The presidents advisers insist that the White House has no problem with Khannas critiques. They see him as exerting pressure in the right wayrespectfully, not causticallyand serving as a conduit to younger, more progressive voters Biden needs to turn out in November. The fact that Ro sees some issues differently than the president makes him an effective surrogate, Klain told me. That gives him credibility.

Some progressives see Khanna differently, not as a bridge between generations but as an ambitious politician cozying up to power brokers. He walks a fine line, one official with a prominent left-leaning group told me on condition of anonymity to avoid criticizing an ally. For now, Khannas close ties with the Democratic establishmentBiden and Obama in particularare politically useful. But soon, the official noted, many progressive voters will want a sharp break with the two men, and Khannas proximity to his partys past could cost him.Ro Khanna signs a copy of his book Dignity in a Digital Age for Gretchen Raab, his ninth-grade English teacher, at Jake’s Eatery, in Newtown, Pennsylvania.

Khanna wasnt visiting early presidential-primary states solely to promote Biden. In between events in New Hampshire, Khanna met privately with leaders of the states largest labor union and a Democratic candidate for governor, people whose endorsements he might seek in a few years. Democratic activists alluded to his candidacy in 2028 as if it were a certainty. Khanna isnt about to announce a campaign more than four years outWho knows what the future holds? is his stock reply to questions about his plansbut he does nothing to dispel the assumptions that hell run.

When I asked party activists which Democrats they were excited to see more of after this election, some of them mentioned Khanna. More often, however, they cited bigger names with bigger jobs, such as Governors Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan, Gavin Newsom of California, and Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania, as well as Vice President Kamala Harris and Pete Buttigieg, the transportation secretary. In New Hampshire, a few Democrats even mentioned Representative Hakeem Jeffries of New York, the House minority leader. As a compelling speaker, Khanna would hold his own on a primary-debate stage, but could he make it into the top tier of candidates?

Damon Linker: Democrats should pick a new presidential candidate now

Only James Garfield went directly from the House to the White House, and that was 143 years ago. But Khanna seems undeterred. As he often notes, his district contains some $10 trillion in market value, giving him a bigger platform than most representatives. There are a lot of very, very high-profile House members that I think have an equivalent impact on the national debate as the Senate, he said. I think the rules of traditional politics have changed.

Among many progressives, the heir to the movement Sanders createdand the dream presidential candidateis AOC. She occupies her own space, says Joseph Geevarghese, the executive director of Our Revolution, the political group started by veterans of Sanderss 2016 campaign. Ro is not quite there yet, but he could be.Ro Khanna listens to his former social-studies teacher Derek Longo.

As Khanna tries to make a national name for himself, voters will hear as much about Bucks County, Pennsylvania, as they do about California. Khanna remains nostalgic for the America that welcomed his parents from India in the 1970s. After graduating from the University of Michigan, his father became a chemical engineer and settled in Pennsylvania. Aside from two years in India, Khanna spent his childhood in a town about 45 minutes north of Philadelphia that offered him a quintessential middle-class upbringingLittle League baseball, Eagles football games, well-funded public schools. Khanna was one of just a few Indian American students in a large, almost entirely white high school, but he doesnt remember experiencing any discrimination. My faith in the country comes from here, Khanna told me.

He insisted on giving me a tour of the county, now one of Americas most closely watched political bellwethers. His staff had arranged for him to speak at his alma mater, where he took an hours worth of questions from some of the schools more politically informed students. They asked about steel manufacturing, the threat of China invading Taiwan, and how he reconciles his support for aid to Ukraine with his votes against defense spending. The exchanges were more substantive than many congressional hearings.

A couple of students pressed him on why the nations leaders, and in particular its two likely presidential nominees, were so old. Theres a lot of frustration with the gerontocracy, he acknowledged. Theres a need for a new generation. Im hopeful that will happen in the next cycle, that we will see very, very talented new voices emerge.

None of the people I met in Bucks County who knew Khanna as a teenager was surprised that hed ended up in Congress. Two of his teachers presented him with papers and clippings from his school days that they had kept for more than 30 years. We met Gretchen Raab, who taught Khannas ninth-grade English class, at a local diner, where she recalled thinking that he would become the first Indian American president. (Khanna seemed embarrassed by this disclosure, but only slightly.)

Khanna was civically engaged by the time he started high school, which he attributes at least partly to his family history. His maternal grandfather was active in Mahatma Gandhis independence movement, serving time in jail before becoming a member of the Indian Parliament. Khanna joined his schools political-science club and once played then-Senator Joe Biden during a mock foreign-policy debate. His opposition to U.S. military adventurism started around this time: Raab raved about the op-ed that Khanna sent, as part of a class assignment in 1991, to the local newspaper arguing that President George H. W. Bush should not invade Iraq.

As an undergraduate at the University of Chicago, hanna volunteered for the state-Senate campaign of a lecturer at the law school, a 35-year-old Democrat named Barack Obama. Several years later, when Khanna was contemplating his own first run for office in 2001, he emailed Obama, who advised him to avoid running in a big state. (Obama had just lost a congressional primary in Illinois.) Khanna ignored him and moved to California, where he challenged a 12-term incumbent in a 2004 House race. Like Obama, Khanna got crushed. He would go on to work for Obamas administration before finally winning a seat in Congress on his third try, in 2016.

After Khanna finished talking with the students, he and I squeezed into desk chairs inside a small classroom and spoke with Derek Longo, one of Khannas history teachers. Longo described how a long-ago visit to the American cemetery in Normandy made him want to teach history. Khanna asked him what he thought about the rise of Trump.

Perhaps Khanna was expecting his teacher to talk about the threat Trump poses to democracy. Instead, he revealed something Khanna didnt know: Longo voted twice for Trump. He praised Trumps business background and told us that he worries about urban crime. In 2017, his daughter and son were struck by a driver under the influence of heroin as they were standing on a sidewalk in New Jersey. Longos son spent months in intensive care, and his daughter, who was seven months pregnant, didnt survive. Under state law, prosecutors couldnt charge the driver with a double homicide because Longos granddaughter wasnt born. The driver pleaded guilty to a lesser charge of vehicular homicide. Hes due to be released from prison next year.

The tragedy hardened Longos views on crime and abortion. I could not vote for President Biden, he said. Khanna sat quietly as Longo spoke. One of the challenges we have as a country is we have a wrong stereotypical view of the Trump voter, Khanna said to us after the conversation had moved on. The Trump voter includes possibly the teacher you most respect.

Longo spoke highly of Khanna, praising his slogan of progressive capitalism and his push to use technology to create economic opportunity. He even said he might be able to vote for Khanna one day. A Trump-Khanna voter! Khanna marveled.

That moment of exhilaration had faded by the time we got back to the car. Khanna conceded that Longo wouldnt consider voting for him if he hadnt been a former student. Yet he was exactly the kind of voter, Khanna said, that Democrats need to figure out how to reachthe Trump supporters who might respond to a progressive economic plan. That someone like Longo, so turned off by the Democrats now in power, will listen to his messageand even consider voting for himseemed like an affirmation of Khannas vision. That he still wasnt sold on his cherished former student, however, might be a sign of its limits.

Continue Reading

Politics

Chemical castration for sex offenders under new plans to reduce prison population

Published

on

By

Sex offenders could face chemical castration under plans in sentencing review

Sex offenders could face chemical castration and thousands of offenders will be released after serving a third of their jail term, under plans proposed in a sentencing policy review set to be accepted by ministers.

The independent review, led by the former justice secretary David Gauke, was commissioned by the government amid an overcrowding crisis in prisons in England and Wales.

It has made a series of recommendations with the aim of reducing the prison population by 9,800 people by 2028.

The key proposal, which it is understood the government will implement, is a “progression model” – which would see offenders who behave well in jail only serve a third of their term in custody, before being released.

The measure will apply to people serving standard determinate sentences, which is the most common type of jail term, being served by the majority of offenders.

It will be based on sentence length, rather than offence type. That means sex offenders and domestic abusers serving sentences of under four years, could all be eligible for early release.

The policy will mean inmates serve only a third of their sentence in prison, a third on licence in the community, with the remaining portion under no probation supervision at all.

If the offender committed further offences in the “at risk” – or final – stages of their sentence, once out of prison, they would be sent back to jail to serve the remainder of the original sentence, plus time inside jail for the new offence.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Is government ‘prepared to be unpopular’ over prisons?

Chemical castration trial could be extended

The government will also further the use of medication to suppress the sexual drive of sex offenders, which is currently being piloted in southwest England.

The review recommended that chemical castration “may assist in management of suitable sex offenders both in prison and in the community”.

Ministers are to announce plans for a nationwide rollout, and will first expand the use of the medication to 20 prisons across England.

The justice secretary is also considering whether to make castration mandatory. It’s currently voluntary.

Mr Gauke, the chair of the independent sentencing review, told Sky News that “drugs that reduce sexual desire” will not be “appropriate for every sexual offender”.

“I’m not going to claim it’s the answer for everything,” the former justice secretary said. “This is about reducing the risk of re-offending in future.

“There are some sex offenders who want to reduce their desires and if we can explore this, I think that is something that’s worthwhile.”

However, Mr Gauke stressed that the government needs to focus on “reducing crime overall”.

TUESDAY MAY 14 File photo dated 29/04/13 of a general view of a Prison. Dangerous criminals including a domestic abuser who posed a risk to children have been freed from jail early as part of a Government bid to cut overcrowding, a watchdog has warned. Issue date: Tuesday May 14, 2024.
Image:
Prisons in England and Wales are facing an overcrowding crisis. File pic: PA

Domestic abuse commissioner criticises plans

Under his recommendations, violent offenders who are serving sentences of four years or more could be released on licence after spending half of their sentence behind bars. This could be extended if they do not comply with prison rules. These prisoners would then be supervised in the community until 80% of their sentence.

In response to the review, the police have warned: “Out of prison should not mean out of control.”

“If we are going to have fewer people in prison, we need to ensure that we collectively have the resources and powers to manage the risk offenders pose outside of prison,” said Chief Constable Sacha Hatchett at the National Police Chiefs Council.

The domestic abuse commissioner for England and Wales, Nicole Jacobs, said adopting the measures would amount to “watering down” the criminal justice system.

“By adopting these measures the government will be sending a clear message to domestic abusers that they can now offend with little consequence,” she said.

In a set of proposals considered to be the biggest overhaul of sentencing power laws since the 1990s, judges could be given more flexibility to punish lower level offenders with bans on football or driving.

The review has also recommended that short sentences should only be used in “exceptional circumstances”, suggesting they are “associated with higher proven reoffending” and “fall short in providing meaningful rehabilitation to offenders”.

The Howard League for Penal Reform has welcomed the proposals as a “good start”.

“This is a vital review that makes the case for change by focusing on the evidence on what will reduce reoffending and prevent more people becoming victims of crime,” said chief executive Andrea Coomber.

David Gauke’s review has called on the government to “invest” in a probation service that is “under significant strain”, as its proposals recommend a larger number of offenders should be punished and supervised in the community.

“Tagging can be a useful way to monitor offenders and identify escalating risks,” it said.

The government is set to invest a further £700m in the probation service and introduce a mass expansion of tagging technology, where tens of thousands of criminals will be monitored at any one time, creating a “prison outside of a prison”, with the help of US tech companies.

‘Overriding concerns’

The Victims Commissioner, Baroness Newlove, has expressed an “overriding concern” about the ability of an “already stretched probation service” to “withstand the additional pressure” of managing a larger number of people outside of prison.

The policy review also makes recommendations around offenders that are recalled to prison after breaching their licence conditions.

Currently, around 15% of those behind bars are there because they have been recalled. Mostly, it’s for breaching of licence conditions, rather than further offences.

The review recommends a “tighter threshold” for recall so that it is “only used to address consistent non-compliance”, with licence conditions – which can include missing a probation appointment.

Read more:
Minister refuses to rule out ‘supermax’ prisons
Victim watchdog questions offenders’ early release

Last week the government announced plans that will see offenders serving one to four-year sentences held for a fixed 28-day period if they are returned to jail.

The review suggests increasing that limit to 56 days, in order to “allow sufficient time for planning around appropriate conditions for safe re-release into community supervision”.

The government is expected to accept the review’s key measures, and implement them with a sentencing bill before parliament.

The plans will likely require legislation and only be before the courts by the spring of 2026.

Continue Reading

US

Donald Trump ambushes South African president at White House meeting by playing video alleging ‘genocide’

Published

on

By

Donald Trump ambushes South African president at White House meeting by playing video alleging 'genocide'

Donald Trump has ambushed South Africa’s president during a White House meeting by playing a video purportedly showing evidence of a “genocide” of white farmers in the African country.

The US president, who was hosting leader Cyril Ramaphosa in the Oval Office, said the footage showed the graves of more than a thousand white farmers and “it’s a terrible sight… I’ve never seen anything like it. Those people are all killed”.

After an initial friendly chat where Mr Trump complimented South African golfers in the room, a montage of clips was played as Mr Ramaphosa sat quietly and mostly expressionless. He later said: “I’d like to know where that is because this [the alleged burial site in the video] I’ve never seen”.

Donald Trump meets Cyril Ramaphosa in the Oval Office. Pic: AP
Image:
Donald Trump met Cyril Ramaphosa in the Oval Office. Pic: AP

The lights were dimmed in the Oval Office as the clips were shown, including of South African officials allegedly calling for violence against white farmers.

The scene in the heart of the White House administration was reminiscent of Mr Trump’s ambush of Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in February.

But later, as he left after around three hours at the White House, Mr Ramaphosa insisted his meeting with Mr Trump went “very well”.

And he told a news conference: “There is just no genocide in South Africa.”

The White House’s official account on X posted the footage that was shown in the Oval Office, saying it was “proof of persecution in South Africa”.

South Africa has rejected the allegation that white people are disproportionately targeted by crime.

The clips included one of communist politician Julius Malema playing a controversial anti-apartheid song that includes lyrics about killing a farmer.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Watch the full video

Mr Trump accused South Africa of failing to address the killing of white farmers.

“We have many people that feel they’re being persecuted, and they’re coming to the United States. So we take from many… locations, if we feel there’s persecution or genocide going on,” the US president said, referring specifically to white farmers.

He added: “People are fleeing South Africa for their own safety. Their land is being confiscated and in many cases they’re being killed.”

Alluding to people in the clips, Mr Trump said: “These are people that are officials and they’re saying… kill the white farmer and take their land.”

The US president then displayed printed copies of news articles that he said showed white South Africans who had been killed, saying “death, death” as he flipped through them.

He added of one article: “Here’s burial sites all over the place, these are all white farmers that are being buried.”

President Donald Trump meets South Africa's President Cyril Ramaphosa in the Oval Office. Pic: AP
Image:
Mr Trump held up news articles. Pic: AP

South African leader rejects allegations

Mr Ramaphosa pushed back against Mr Trump’s accusations, by responding: “What you saw, the speeches that were being made, that is not government policy. We have a multi-party democracy in South Africa that allows people to express themselves, political parties to adhere to various policies.

“And in many cases, or in some cases, those policies do not go along with government policy.

“Our government policy is completely, completely against what he [a person in the video montage] was saying, even in the parliament. And they are a small minority party which is allowed to exist in terms of our constitution.”

Read more from Sky News:
Ex-Ukrainian politician living abroad shot dead on school run
The soldiers faced with ‘raining bullets’ from violent gangs

An uncomfortable meeting where facts were dismissed as a difference in opinion

The screens, the visuals and President Trump’s foreshadowing mentions of a “bloodbath” all point to one thing – this ambush was planned.

As the yells of anguish and violent rhetoric echoed in the Oval Office, President Ramaphosa craned his neck with a stern expression to watch the “evidence” of a repeatedly disproven “white genocide” in his country.

He interjected only to question the location of the videos – to which Mr Trump replied, almost with a “duh” tone of voice, “South Africa” – and then pushed on to direct his team to verify them.

That was the singular point of outright defiance from South Africa’s leader in an uncomfortable meeting where facts were dismissed as a difference in opinion and outdated videos were played as breaking news.

For the rest of the meeting, Nelson Mandela’s former chief negotiator kept calm and played the charm offensive – appealing to Mr Trump’s ego at every sharp turn while maintaining that black South Africans are disproportionately impacted by the country’s harrowing murder rate.

The charm and calm may seem like dull knives in this sword fight but are necessary for peacekeeping in a meeting where £6bn in trade hangs in the balance.

South Africa has the most to lose in the deteriorating bilateral relations.

In just five months, the Trump administration has cut off vital humanitarian aid, including HIV assistance of which South Africa is the biggest beneficiary; expelled South Africa’s ambassador; and offered white South Africans refugee status as millions of black Africans suffer across the continent.

The potential futility of Mr Ramaphosa’s strategy came into vision as cameras panned to the back of the Oval Office at the end of the meeting to show a stony-faced Elon Musk.

The false claims of white genocide Musk has championed on X are now a powder keg in US-South African relations, as he works to get Starlink licensed in his home country. A business strategy that even South Africa’s iconic negotiator may not be able to contend with.

Mr Ramaphosa also said of the behaviour alleged by Mr Trump: “We are completely opposed to that.”

The South African leader said there was crime in his country, and the majority of victims were black. Mr Trump cut him off and said: “The farmers are not black.” The South African president responded: “These are concerns we are willing to talk to you about.”

President Trump and President Ramaphosa look towards a screen where videos were played. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Mr Trump and Mr Ramaphosa looked towards a screen where a video was played. Pic: Reuters

A video was played during the White House meeting. Pic: AP
Image:
The video was shown during the White House meeting. Pic: AP

Follow the World
Follow the World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

In February, Mr Trump issued an executive order which cut all funding to South Africa over some of its domestic and foreign policies. He also expelled South Africa’s ambassador and offered refuge to white minority Afrikaners based on racial discrimination claims which Pretoria says are baseless.

Experts in South Africa have said there is no evidence of white people being targeted, although farmers of all races are victims of violent home invasions in a country that suffers from a very high crime rate.

Continue Reading

US

Lights, camera, ambush: Why Trump is making South Africa genocide claims

Published

on

By

Lights, camera, ambush: Why Trump is making South Africa genocide claims

👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈

In yet another dramatic encounter in the Oval Office, Donald Trump ambushed South Africa’s president in a choreographed showdown on Wednesday.

But why is the president accusing South Africa of genocide?

On Trump100 US correspondents Mark Stone and Martha Kelner react to the exchange and Cyril Ramaphosa’s response. They debunk the far-right claims that thousands of white farmers are being killed in South Africa, despite what Mr Trump says.

Plus, we hear from an advocate for Afrikaners who says the US president may have been persuaded to welcome white South African refugees after speaking to his friends on the golf course.

If you’ve got a question you’d like the Trump100 team to answer, you can email it to trump100@sky.uk.

Don’t forget, you can also watch all episodes on our YouTube channel.

Continue Reading

Trending