Connect with us

Published

on

Boeing has paid Alaska Airlines roughly $160 million as an “initial payment” for “financial damages” resulting from the flight that experienced a midair door blowout at 16,000 feet earlier this year.

Alaska Airlines, which was operating the Boeing plane at the time the fuselage blew off, said in a regulatory filing that it lost “approximately $160 million” in its first quarter in pretax profit, “primarily comprising lost revenues, costs due to irregular operations and costs to restore our fleet to operating service,” Fox earlier reported.

The filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission added that the $160 million cash was “equivalent” to what the airline lost from the “terrifying” incident on Jan.5.

However, Boeing is “expected” to provide “additional compensation” in the future, per the documents, though it wasn’t immediately when or how much more the airplane manufacturer would be handing over — or when.

When asked for comment, a spokesperson for Boeing pointed to CFO Brian West’s comments at the Bank of America Industrial Conference on March 20, where he said that the company, in the wake of Jan. 5, “acknowledges that we need to improve upon safety and quality and conformance.”

Representatives for Alaska Airlines did not immediately respond to The Post’s request for comment.

Meanwhile, Boeing has been dealing with a full-blown safety and reputational crisis as a result of the massive cabin panel blowout just minutes after Flight 1282 took off from Portland, Ore., causing the cabin to depressurize and the gaping hole in the airliner to suck out one passenger’s cell phone and another teen traveler’s shirt.

Boeing is now under a May 28 deadline from the Federal Aviation Administration to develop “a comprehensive action plan to address its systemic quality-control issues.

The federal agency has also already delayed certification of Boeings MAX 10 models the largest in its family of 737 MAX aircraft and barred the plane maker from expanding production of its best-selling 737 MAX narrowbody jets in the wake of the Jan. 5 door blowout.

The delivery delays have had a ripple effect through the airline industry, with United Airlines even asking pilots to take voluntary unpaid leave next month.

Because of an anticipated shortage of airplanes, our forecasted block hours for 2024 have been reduced and we are offering our pilots voluntary programs for the month of May to reduce excess staffing, United said in a statement sent to The Post.

Block hours the key industry measure for aircraft use include the time from the moment the aircraft door closes at departure to the moment the planes door opens again at arrival on a given flight.

The voluntary pilot leave programs could possibly extend into summer and fall.

It wasnt immediately clear what incentives, if any, United was giving pilots to take a month-long leave from work.

We dont have any further specifics to share at this time, a United spokesperson told The Post on Tuesday.

After initial news of Boeing’s delays broke in February, Uniteds chief financial officer Mike Leskinen saidthe carrier was deeply disappointed with Boeing over delays in the delivery of its new MAX 10aircraftspecifically as it threw a wrench into the Chicago-based airlines growth projections.

The CFO added that the delays have raised questions about the carriers ability to expand its domestic capacity by almost 30% by 2026 under its United Next plan.

United was counting on an upgraded fleet that would include 277 MAX 10 jets.

As the airline awaits those aircrafts, it has also slashed its 2024 forecast for MAX 8 delivery from Boeing from 43 to 37, and said it expects to receive 15 fewer MAX 9s this year.

Continue Reading

World

China dominates renewables – and this project shows why

Published

on

By

Continue Reading

Technology

CEO of Southeast Asia’s largest bank warns investors: ‘Buckle up, we’re in for a volatile ride’

Published

on

By

CEO of Southeast Asia's largest bank warns investors: 'Buckle up, we're in for a volatile ride'

Tan Su Shan is the CEO and director of DBS Group.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

With valuations in the U.S. stock market becoming increasingly stretched, the chief executive of Southeast Asia’s largest bank is warning investors to expect turbulence ahead.

“We’ve seen a lot of volatility in the markets. It could be equities, it could be rates, it could be foreign exchange,” DBS CEO Tan Su Shan told CNBC, adding that she expects that volatility to continue.

Tan, who took over the helm of DBS from longtime CEO Piyush Gupta in March, said that investors were particularly worried about the lofty valuations of artificial intelligence stocks, especially the so-called “Magnificent Seven.”

The Magnificent Seven — Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla — are some of the major U.S. tech and growth stocks that have driven much of Wall Street’s gains in recent years.

“You’ve got trillions of dollars tied up in seven stocks, for example. So it’s inevitable, with that kind of concentration, that there will be a worry about. ‘You know, when will this bubble burst?'”

Earlier this week, at the Global Financial Leaders’ Investment Summit in Hong Kong,  it was likely there would be a 10%-20% drawdown over the next 12 to 24 months.

Morgan Stanley CEO Ted Pick said at the same summit that investors should welcome periodic pullbacks, calling them healthy developments rather than signs of crisis.

Tan agreed. “Frankly, a correction will be healthy,” she said.

Recent examples include Advanced Micro Devices and Palantir, both of which posted stronger-than-expected quarterly results on Tuesday, yet their shares — and the wider Nasdaq — fell.

Her remarks follow similar warnings by the International Monetary Fund and central bank chiefs Jerome Powell and Andrew Bailey, who have all cautioned about inflated stock prices.

Singapore as diversification play

Tan advised investors to diversify rather than concentrate holdings in one market. “Whether it’s in your portfolio, in your supply chain, or in your demand distribution, just diversify.”

Tan, who has over 35 years of experience in banking and wealth management, noted that Asia could attract more investment from the U.S.—and that it’s not a bad thing.

Singling out Singapore and the country’s central bank’s efforts to boost interest in the local markets, Tan described the city-state as a “diversifier market.”

“We’ve got rule of law. We’re a transparent, open financial system and stable politically. We’re a good place to invest…. So I don’t think we’re a bad place to think about diversifying your investments.”

Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

hide content

Continue Reading

Entertainment

New film ‘proves beyond shadow of a doubt’ that Elgin Marbles were stolen, director claims

Published

on

By

New film 'proves beyond shadow of a doubt' that Elgin Marbles were stolen, director claims

A new documentary proves “beyond any shadow of a doubt” that the Elgin Marbles were stolen, according to its director.

David Wilkinson claims The Marbles settles one of the most divisive debates in cultural heritage: whether 19th-century diplomat Lord Elgin legally acquired the Parthenon Sculptures, better known as the Elgin Marbles.

The film revisits how the sculptures were removed from the Parthenon in Athens while Greece was under Ottoman rule – and ended up in London.

It argues that Lord Elgin did not legally acquire the artefacts – and instead, it amounts to “the greatest heist in art history”.

Reuters file pic
Image:
Reuters file pic

Actor Brian Cox, historian Dominic Selwood and solicitor Mark Stephens are among those who appear in the documentary.

The British government bought the sculptures from Lord Elgin and installed them into the trusteeship of the British Museum, where they have remained for 200 years.

“He needed the money from the British government to pay for all the bribes he’d given to members of the Ottoman Empire,” Wilkinson says of the transaction.

More on Elgin Marbles

“Lord Elgin did sell them … but the question becomes, did Lord Elgin actually have the right to purchase them?”

PA file pic
Image:
PA file pic

Classical archaeologist Mario Trabucco della Torretta dismisses Wilkinson’s claims.

“The allegation of bribery to obtain the Marbles is just wrong in historical terms,” he told Sky News.

Torretta was the key architect behind a joint letter that included former prime minister Liz Truss, historian Dr David Starkey and Sir John Redwood – alleging the British Museum is part of a “covert” and “accelerating campaign” to return the Elgin Marbles to Greece.

Responding to Wilkinson’s claims of bribery, he added: “The only reference to ‘presents’ comes years after the start of the removals … do people presume that they run a ‘bribe now, pay later’ scheme back then in Constantinople?”

One of the most contentious points in the debate is the legitimacy of an Ottoman permission document known as a “firman”, which is claimed to have authorised Lord Elgin removing the items from Greece.

There is only an Italian text referred to as a translation of this document.

David Wilkinson
Image:
David Wilkinson

Wilkinson said: “It was normal practice at the time that a copy would be kept in what was then Constantinople, and another copy would have been sent off to Athens.

“There would be a record in Istanbul and the Turks have gone through it in great detail over many decades and they can find nothing.”

Speaking to Sky News in 2024, Dr Zeynep Boz – head of combatting illicit trafficking for Turkey’s culture ministry – said there is no proof of the firman in the Ottoman archive.

“Despite extensive archival research, no such firman has been found. It is even difficult to call this document a translation when the original is not available,” she said at the time.

Torretta offers an explanation: “Burning the Ottoman governor’s archive was one of the first acts of the Greek revolution.”

Reuters file pic
Image:
Reuters file pic

While the arguments are not new, The Marbles also examines how other institutions have handled similar restitution cases.

In the film, Cox says if the marbles would have gone back to Athens already if they had found their way to Edinburgh and not London.

Back in 2023, the National Museum of Scotland returned The House Of Ni’isjoohl memorial pole to Canada.

Meanwhile, Glasgow’s Kevingrove Art Gallery Museum returned a shirt to the South Dakota Cultural Heritage Center in the US.

And when it comes to the Parthenon Sculptures – Germany’s Heidelberg University and The Vatican have both returned fragments to Greece.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Dec 2024: Elgin Marbles ‘belong in the UK’

The British Museum Act 1963 prevents treasures being legally given away by the British Museum.

The government has repeatedly it has no plans to change existing policy on restitution, and that it is up to the trustees of the museum to decide.

A spokesperson for the British Museum repeated a statement given to Sky News in July: “Discussions with Greece about a Parthenon Partnership are ongoing and constructive.”

The documentary scrutinises the ethics of foreign national treasures that were taken and are now housed in Western museums, but as it stands the institutional and governmental answers don’t appear to be changing.

The Marbles is in UK and Irish cinemas from today.

Continue Reading

Trending