Rishi Sunak has said he expects deportation flights to Rwanda to take off in the spring – despite reports that housing in the country intended for migrants has been sold off.
It came as the prime minister welcomed Rwandan president Paul Kagame to Number 10, where the pair reaffirmed their commitment to the controversial plans to send asylum seekers who arrive in the UK on small boats to the African nation.
In a statement following the talks, a Downing Street spokesperson said the duo discussed how the scheme would “break the business model of criminal gangs risking lives at sea” and said Mr Sunak had updated Mr Kagame on “the next stages of the legislation in parliament”.
“Both leaders looked forward to flights departing to Rwanda in the spring,” the spokesperson added.
Further questions over the viability of the scheme were raised this morning when The Times reported that most of the properties on a new housing estate in Rwanda that had been earmarked for migrants had been sold to local buyers.
The newspaper claimed that “sold” signs had appeared outside houses on the Bwiza Riverside estate in Kigali, the country’s capital, which was visited by Suella Braverman in March 2023 when she was home secretary.
Advertisement
It quoted developer ADHI-Rwanda as saying that 70% of the 163 affordable homes had now been taken by “private people who want to live in them”.
Ms Braverman, who was sacked from her post last year, told LBC that she was “disappointed to read that expectations have fallen and that the Rwandans are now selling off some of those properties”.
She added: “The way the plan should work – and the plan that I put forward to the prime minister – is that we need to have a large number of flights going to Rwanda on a regular basis, with a large number of passengers on them.
“I do believe that we may well get a flight off, a token flight with a low number of passengers on it, to Rwanda – that’s not deterrence.”
Rwanda government spokesperson Yolande Makolo denied the claims and said: ”It is simply not true that 70% of the houses are sold.
“Regardless, Bwiza Riverside Estate is just one of the housing options where migrants will live alongside Rwandans. None of the assigned housing estates were ever meant to be only for migrants. The idea is to integrate migrants into Rwandan communities, not create migrant ghettos.”
Stephen Kinnock, Labour’s shadow immigration minister, said: “The half a billion-pound Rwanda scheme is a failing farce, which will only cover less than one per cent of asylum arrivals.
“Now it seems there will be even less capacity to house those that are removed. The Tories’ so-called plan is unravelling by the day and taxpayers are footing the bill.”
A Home Office spokesperson said: “As the government of Rwanda have made repeatedly clear, they stand ready to host thousands of migrants under the partnership.
“The scheme is uncapped and provisions are in place to provide accommodation as required. We remain focussed on getting flights off the ground as soon as possible.”
The government’s Rwanda bill is due to be put before the Commons next week when MPs return from the Easter recess – and as migrants continue to cross the Channel in small boats. More than 80 made the journey on Monday.
Sir Keir Starmer has insisted the “vast majority of farmers” will not be affected by changes to Inheritance Tax (IHT) ahead of a protest outside parliament on Tuesday.
It follows Chancellor Rachel Reeves announcing a 20% inheritance tax that will apply to farms worth more than £1m from April 2026, where they were previously exempt.
But the prime minister looked to quell fears as he resisted calls to change course.
Speaking from the G20 summit in Brazil, he said: “If you take a typical case of a couple wanting to pass a family farm down to one of their children, which would be a very typical example, with all of the thresholds in place, that’s £3m before any inheritance tax is paid.”
The comments come as thousands of farmers, including celebrity farmer Jeremy Clarkson, are due to descend on Whitehall on Tuesday to protest the change.
And 1,800 more will take part in a “mass lobby” where members of the National Farmers’ Union (NFU) will meet their MPs in parliament to urge them to ask Ms Reeves to reconsider the policy.
Speaking to broadcasters, Sir Keir insisted the government is supportive of farmers, pointing to a £5bn investment announced for them in the budget.
Advertisement
He said: “I’m confident that the vast majority of farms and farmers will not be affected at all by that aspect of the budget.
“They will be affected by the £5bn that we’re putting into farming. And I’m very happy to work with farmers on that.”
Sir Keir’s spokesman made a similar argument earlier on Monday, saying the government expects 73% of farms to not be affected by the change.
Environment, Farming and Rural Affairs Secretary Steve Reed said only about 500 out of the UK’s 209,000 farms would be affected, according to Treasury calculations.
However, that number has been questioned by several farming groups and the Conservatives.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:28
Farming industry is feeling ‘betrayed’ – NFU boss
Government figures ‘misleading’
The NFU said the real number is about two-thirds, with its president Tom Bradshaw calling the government’s figures “misleading” and accusing it of not understanding the sector.
The Country Land and Business Association (CLA) said the policy could affect 70,000 farms.
Conservative shadow farming minister Robbie Moore accused the government last week of “regurgitating” figures that represent “past claimants of agricultural property relief, not combined with business property relief” because he said the Treasury does not have that data.
Agricultural property relief (APR) currently provides farmers 100% relief from paying inheritance tax on agricultural land or pasture used for rearing livestock or fish, and can include woodland and buildings, such as farmhouses, if they are necessary for that land to function.
Farmers can also claim business property relief (BPR), providing 50% or 100% relief on assets used by a trading business, which for farmers could include land, buildings, plant or machinery used by the business, farm shops and holiday cottages.
APR and BPR can often apply to the same asset, especially farmed land, but APR should be the priority, however BPR can be claimed in addition if APR does not cover the full value (e.g. if the land has development value above its agricultural value).
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
Mr Moore said the Department for the Environment, Farming and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) and the Treasury have disagreed on how many farms will be impacted “by as much as 40%” due to the lack of data on farmers using BPR.
Lib Dem MP Tim Farron said last week1,400 farmers in Cumbria, where he is an MP, will be affected and will not be able to afford to pay the tax as many are on less than the minimum wage despite being asset rich.