The Isle of Arran’s majestic scenery masks a national scandal it has been the victim of for almost a decade.
Two new ferries were ordered in 2015 to replace a fleet of failing vessels that have been serving Scotland’s remote islands every single day for 40 years. Construction began eight years ago.
The elephant in the room is that they have not carried a single passenger so far. Not one.
A botched design process plagued the original 2018 delivery date resulting in the shipyard collapsing into administration.
It was bought by the Scottish government which has been lumbered with obscene cost overruns ever since.
Image: The ferries saga has plagued the SNP politically for years
The original contract, which was accused of being rigged, was supposed to cost £97m but mismanagement and a string of blunders, including installing the wrong cables on an entire vessel, means the final costs are likely to rob the public purse of £400m.
The cash-cow project has been described as one of the biggest procurement disasters in the history of Scottish devolution.
More on Scotland
Related Topics:
Islanders live in dread of their ageing ferries breaking down or being unable to cope with regular bouts of poor weather.
Image: Pensioners Ena and Raymond Burke have lived on Arran for nearly 40 years.
‘Our whole life is just worrying about the ferry’
Advertisement
Pensioners Ena and Raymond Burke have lived on Arran for nearly 40 years.
Raymond, 78, is battling an aggressive form of cancer and has to travel to hospital in Glasgow for specialist treatment.
The couple have told Sky News the unreliable service means they are being forced to leave the island up to four days before each appointment to avoid problems.
Ena believes the “constant worry” about the ferries is making Raymond’s medical ordeal worse.
She told Sky News: “When you live on an island the ferry rules your life. It puts huge pressure on us.
“You find yourself sitting there crying, thinking I can’t go through this anymore. I can’t face this journey across. I can’t face the fact I don’t know whether the boat is going to sail.
“Our whole life is just worrying about the ferry.”
Image: David Henderson has been a farmer on Arran for 49 years.
‘We are counting the cost financially and mentally’
David Henderson has been a farmer on Arran for 49 years.
He is in the middle of lambing season and complains that delays to the new ferries are leaving him out of pocket.
He said: “When we are trying to get cattle to the market [on the mainland], you are constantly worried about whether the ferries are going to set sail.
“It’s a constant topic of conversation. We are working with a boat that is 40 years old and they are just not reliable enough.
“If we’d got the new boats when they were supposed to come, hopefully they’d have been a better boat. We are counting the cost financially and mentally.”
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
Former first minister Nicola Sturgeon repeatedly defended the decision to take the yard into public ownership, insisting it saved jobs and safeguarded shipbuilding on the Clydeside from wipe-out.
But the ferries saga has plagued the SNPpolitically for years.
The second of the two under-fire ferries, named the MV Glen Rosa, entered the water for the first time in recent days but it will be late 2025 before it is likely to be in service.
At its launch on Tuesday, Sky News questioned Scottish government minister Mairi McAllan.
She said: “There is no doubt the projects have been beset with some difficulties and legacy challenges. The launch of the Glen Rosa is an important part of our plan to deliver six new ferries by 2026.
“I understand the challenge with the resilience of the network but nonetheless we are celebrating with the workforce of Ferugson Marine shipyard and the community about this majestic boat.”
Image: The 40-year-old ferry due to be replaced
Meanwhile, the head of a Scottish government ferry company has told Sky News he will not quit despite the price tag bulging to four times the original cost.
Caledonian Maritime Assets LTD (CMAL) owns the ferries, ports and harbours as well as being responsible for procuring new vessels.
‘We are where we are,’ admits ferry chief
Kevin Hobbs, managing director, told Sky News: “This has not been the best procurement the company has ever been involved in. However, we are where we are and the main focus now is to get both of these ferries into service.”
Asked if he should be considering his position given his own role in the debacle, he said: “No I don’t think so. This contract was signed before I even started. I inherited it.”
Four other ferries have been ordered by the Scottish government to replace other ageing vessels. They are being built in Turkey and being delivered on time and on budget.
The question is whether the long-term casualty of this chaos could be the future of the once world-renowned Scottish shipyards.
Regardless of the hard work of innocent staff, will this be the final nail in the coffin for a shipyard that has become synonymous with expensive and as-yet undelivered boats – and crucially has no more orders on its books?
Sir Keir Starmer has announced the UK has officially recognised Palestine as a state.
“Today, to revive the hope of peace for the Palestinians and Israelis, and a two state solution, the United Kingdom formally recognises the State of Palestine,” the prime minister said on X, alongside a longer video statement.
“In the face of the growing horror in the Middle East, we are acting to keep alive the possibility of peace and a two-state solution.
“That means a safe and secure Israel alongside a viable Palestinian state. At the moment, we have neither.”
X
This content is provided by X, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable X cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to X cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow X cookies for this session only.
Canada and Australia also officially recognised Palestinian statehood on Sunday, ahead of a conference of the UN General Assembly in New York this week.
It is a significant moment in the history of Britain’s involvement in the region, and comes as the death toll from the Israeli war on Gaza continues to rise and conditions for the people trapped become even more desperate.
Image: An updated map of the region the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office website
In recognising Palestine as a state, the UK does so based on 1967 borders to be finalised as part of future negotiations. It would be led by a “reformed Palestinian Authority”.
The UK also acknowledges “all legal rights and obligations of statehood” for Palestine.
An updated map on the UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office website now has the West Bank and Gaza labelled as ‘Palestine’ rather than the ‘Occupied Palestinian Territories’. This change has been rolled out across the website.
Image: Protesters in Tel Aviv calling for the release of hostages. Pic: AP
Sir Keir calls on Hamas to release the hostages
The prime minister repeated his calls for the the Israeli hostages – held in captivity since the brutal attacks on Israel on 7 October, 2023 – to be released by Hamas.
“I have met British families of the hostages. I see the torture that they endure each and every day. Pain that strikes deep in people’s hearts across Israel and here in the United Kingdom.
“The hostages must be released immediately and we will keep fighting to bring them home.”
Sir Keir was also clear to emphasise that recognition of Palestine was “not a reward for Hamas”, saying that the terror group “can have no future, no role in government, no role in security” in a future state.
“I have directed work to sanction other Hamas figures in the coming weeks,” he added.
Image: Huge amounts of Gaza have been razed to the ground. Pic: Reuters
Starmer calls on Israel to end Gaza offensives
Sir Keir also repeated his criticism of Israel, which for nearly two years has waged a brutal war on the densely-populated Gaza Strip.
“The Israeli government’s relentless and increasing bombardment of Gaza, the offensive of recent weeks, the starvation and devastation are utterly intolerable.”
The death toll in Gaza since the IDF launched its offensive following the 7 October attacks has now risen above 65,000 people, according to Hamas-run health authorities.
“This death and destruction horrifies all of us. It must end,” he said.
Image: A pro-Palestinian march in London earlier this year. Pic: PA
British people ‘desperately want to see’ peace
Sir Keir also said: “Ordinary people, Israeli and Palestinian, deserve to live in peace. To try to rebuild their lives free from violence and suffering.
“That’s what the British people desperately want to see.”
But he warned that the possibility of a Palestinian state was in danger of vanishing forever.
“With the actions of Hamas, the Israeli government escalating the conflict, and settlement building being accelerated in the West Bank, the hope of a two-state solution is fading, but we cannot let that light go out.
“That is why we are building consensus with leaders in the region and beyond, around our framework for peace.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
15:16
What changed in UK’s Gaza policy?
Sir Keir said this is a “practical plan” to bring people together behind a “common vision” that moves from a ceasefire in Gaza to negotiations on a two-state solution.
Today, Sir Keir Starmer will deliver on his pledge to recognise a Palestinian state – after setting out a series of conditions in July which there was little prospect Israel could meet, including agreeing a ceasefire with Hamas.
The prime minister will say it recognises the “inalienable right” of the Palestinian people and what he feels is a moral responsibility to keep a two-state solution alive, amid the devastation of the war and concern about settlement expansion in the West Bank.
This will be formally put forward by the British government at a conference of the UN General Assembly in New York this week, after a diplomatic push led by Emmanuel Macron. Canada and Australia are also expected to recognise it, although may call for Hamas to disarm.
But Labour has always said it’s a move they would make as part of a peace process, which looks further away than ever.
What does it mean?
The move has been heavily criticised and leaves a number of questions not only about what it will achieve – but about whether it will have the opposite effect on the conflict.
David Lammy as foreign secretary conceded when the pledge was announced that “it will not change the position on the ground” which can only come through negotiations.
After all, 147 of the 193 member states of the United Nations recognise it already. Palestine has permanent observer status at the UN – speaking rights, but not voting rights – where it’s represented by the Palestinian Authority. Any move to full status would have to be agreed by the Security Council where the US has a veto.
Sir Keir has made clear he doesn’t accept Hamas – which he calls a “brutal terrorist organisation” – as a government in Gaza. The borders of such a state, wrangled over for decades during multiple rounds of negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians, are also not agreed.
Recognition is opposed by the Trump administration, as the US president made clear in London last week. US secretary of state Marco Rubio has said it would “embolden Hamas” and be symbolic only.
In Britain there is cynicism too. Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, has accused the prime minister of a “desperate and insincere attempt to placate his backbenchers”. He heads to the party’s conference in Liverpool next week with a further slump in his approval ratings to -42%, around where Rishi Sunak’s was after his D-Day blunder.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:28
Could recognition of Palestine change the West Bank?
Other Labour MPs oppose the recognition move. The Labour Friends of Israel group has said: “It is important to recognise that Israel is not the only party to this conflict… Hamas could end this conflict tomorrow by releasing the hostages and laying down its arms.”
The move is also opposed by the families of the hostages in Gaza, of which 20 are believed to be alive – for not imposing their release as a condition on Hamas.
Ilay David, the brother of Evyatar David, who recently appeared emaciated in a Hamas video, said: “We want to meet with Starmer but he refuses to meet with us… Giving this recognition is like saying to Hamas: ‘It is OK you can keep starving the hostages, you can keep using them as human shields’. This kind of recognition gives Hamas power to be stubborn in negotiations. That is the last thing we need right now.”
Sir Ephraim Mirvis, the UK’s Chief Rabbi has said the “unconditional” recognition of the state “is not contingent upon a functioning or democratic Palestinian government, nor even upon the most basic commitment to a peaceful future”.
Image: Sir Keir Starmer welcomed Mahmoud Abbas, president of the Palestinian Authority, to 10 Downing Street earlier this month
What happens next?
Sir Keir met 89-year-old Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority, in London this month and they agreed Hamas should not be involved in the governance of Gaza.
Efforts to set up a transitional government have been discussed between the US and Gulf states. But Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, said last week there was nothing “ready for signature”.
The UK government is expected to announce further sanctions on Hamas figures this week. But the Israeli government has already responded with fury to the prospect of recognition and it’s reported that retaliation could include further annexations in the West Bank.
The UK government sees this as an important diplomatic move with allies, when nothing else is moving the dial. But it can only be made once, and even supporters in government acknowledge that on the ground in Gaza it won’t immediately change very much.
Image: One of three Russian MiG-31 fighter jets in images shared by Sweden’s armed forces. Pic: Swedish Armed Forces
The three incursions into NATO airspace fuelled concerns about the potential expansion of Russia‘s three-year war in Ukraine and have been seen as an attempt by Moscow to test the military alliance’s response.
The incident over Poland prompted its prime minister, Donald Tusk, to warn that his country was the closest to “open conflict” it had been since the Second World War, while the UK announced it would provide Warsaw with extra air cover.
Two RAF Typhoons, supported by an RAF Voyager air-to-air refuelling plane, took off from RAF Coningsby, in Lincolnshire, on Friday night to defend Poland’s skies before returning safely early on Saturday morning.
Image: A Gerbera drone landed in a field in the Olesno region of Poland
Defence Secretary John Healey said the mission sends a clear signal that “NATO airspace will be defended”.
More on Raf
Related Topics:
“I’m proud of the outstanding British pilots and air crew who took part in this successful operation to defend our allies from reckless Russian aggression.”
He said the mission was “especially poignant” coming as the UK marks the 85th anniversary of the Battle of Britain – when Polish pilots came to the aid of the UK – this weekend.
The head of the RAF, Air Chief Marshal Harv Smyth, said: “This sortie marks the RAF’s first operational mission on Eastern Sentry, reinforcing the UK’s steadfast commitment to NATO and its allies.
“We remain agile, integrated, and ready to project airpower at range.”