Connect with us

Published

on

Last year, a man in his mid-20s named Dexter Reed was charged with three counts of aggravated unlawful use of a weapon and one count of possession of a firearm with a revoked Firearms Owners Identification Card, which is required in the state of Illinois before you can possess a weapon or ammunition. Because no one really spends time in jail in Illinois anymore, Reed was free on pretrial release for these felony charges as recently as this past March.

It goes without saying that at that point, any functioning member of society who somehow found himself charged with these crimes would try to lay low for a bit. Maybe theyd keep their illegal guns at home, for example. But Dexter Reed did not choose that approach because hes not a functioning member of society. Instead, in March, Reed went for a drive in an SUV wearing a ski mask and carrying a firearm.

Thats when police say they noticed that Reed was breaking yet another law: he wasnt wearing a seatbelt. Instead of cooperating with the traffic stop, this is what happened. Im going to show two angles of this incident from police body cams. The second body cam is from an officer who was shot as this unfolded. Watch:

Its clear from this footage that Dexter Reed is wearing a ski mask and hes not cooperating with the officers. They tell him to unlock the door and stop rolling up the windows, and he refuses for quite some time. Then the officers see something that clearly puts them in fear of their life. They back up, and shots begin ringing out. One officer is hit in the wrist, and he survives.

According to the Chicago Sun Times : Alderman Brian Hopkins, chairman of the City Councils Public Safety Committee, said hes been told 26-year-old Reed fired 11 shots through his car window in what Hopkins called an attempt to kill police officers. An empty gun was recovered at the scene, Hopkins said. He fired 11 rounds at these police officers before he was eventually killed.

As of now, police are still investigating this shooting. But Chicagos Civilian Office of Police Accountability has determined that the evidence appears to confirm that Reed fired the first shot. And the video by itself shows that pretty clearly. WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show

One social media user on Twitter, the account Expose Them, synced up footage from two of the body cams that Chicago police have released. The top bodycam is the one I just showed of the officer who got hit. The other bodycam is from a third officer on the scene. You can see that the first officer gets hit before the other officers fire:

The footage is pretty clear evidence that the officers defended themselves. They should end the discussion entirely. But that hasnt happened, because even before these body cams were released, professional agitators engaged in a concerted effort to turn Dexter Reed into a martyr.

A former Chicago mayoral candidate and BLM activist named JaMal Green began posting on social media this weekend that the footage would show an execution. He also warned about possible riots, which of course is exactly what JaMal Green wants to happen.

And Greens strategy appears to be working, at least so far.

This week crowds turned up outside a police station to heckle officers and make some of the most strained arguments imaginable. Watch:

So theyre saying the cops couldnt possibly have known whether he was breaking the seat belt law, because he was driving with heavily tinted windows, which is also against the law.

Apparently in BLM circles this is seen as a sort of checkmate, even though theyve just provided an additional reason why police would have wanted to pull this guy over.

And then they argue that theres no need for armed officers to enforce seat belt laws. Well, apparently there is, especially in a city like Chicago because you never know when someone whos not wearing a seatbelt might be out of jail on a felony gun charge, still packing heat and wearing a ski mask and ready to shoot at you for no reason.

All of that is irrelevant anyway. Even if they had no reason to pull him over which they did it still obviously doesnt justify him shooting at the cops. You dont get to shoot at the cops if you disagree with their reason for stopping you. Ive been pulled over for seatbelt violations before. I found it annoying. I never considered murder as a response.

But the push to portray Dexter Reed as a victim continues anyway, because none of this is really about the facts. Alleged academics are getting involved, too. An English professor at Amherst named Frank Leon Roberts wrote on social media:

His name was Dexter Reed. Murdered in broad daylight by the Chicago Police Department. 96 shots in 41 seconds. 26 years old. His crime: not having his seatbelt on. This is America. Defund and abolish the police.

A few hours after the professor wrote that tweet, he deleted it and erased his entire Twitter account, maybe because it was a little too ridiculous even by the standards of Amherst. But it wasnt too absurd for the corporate press. Theyve also done everything they can to portray the police as the aggressors here.

Heres how the Washington Post covered Dexter Reeds traffic stop, for example. The headline reads: Police fire 96 shots in 41 seconds, killing Black man during traffic stop.

So theres nothing in there about what Dexter Reed did during the traffic stop. Theres no mention of the fact he opened fire on police officers. In fact, if you read the story, you wont find any mention of Dexter Reed shooting his handgun until the eighth paragraph of the story. Thats not an exaggeration. They just ignore it until eight paragraphs in.

Instead, heres what the Washington Post talks about first. This is from the beginning of their article. Its as emotional and over-the-top as they possibly could have done it:

Dexter Reeds mother remembers the last time she saw her son alive. . He was just riding around in his car, Dexters mother, Nicole Banks, [said] on Tuesday, as she broke down in tears. They killed him.

This is the footage theyre referencing:

So Reeds mother is out at press conferences crying and fainting on camera. Im sure she is legitimately distraught given that her child was killed. But as always, there is no self-analysis, no moment of honest reflection where she wonders how she raised a child who would throw his life away for no reason during a traffic stop. Instead she blames the cops and the lawsuit, Im sure, will be close behind. And the Washington Post decides to lead with this, instead of an accurate description of what happened during the traffic stop.

Its hard to think of a more deliberately dishonest way to frame the actions of an attempted cop-killer. And just for good measure, the Post puts a giant photo of Dexter Reed at some graduation ceremony from 5five years ago at the top of the article. They leave off his mug shot from his felony firearms arrest. This is the way it always goes with BLM martyrs. You never see graduation photos of anyone who makes the news for any reason unless its a black guy killed by the cops.

On Twitter, a writer named Daniel Friedman pointed out the history of this tactic. It began after Michael Brown was shot ten years ago after fighting with a cop and trying to take his gun. Media outlets went on Browns Facebook, and then they used unflattering photos of Brown flashing gang signs in their coverage.

As Friedman writes, Black Twitter reacted angrily. They said that the media was using images of Brown that stereotyped him. There was a trending hashtag #if they gunned me down of college students or professionals posting pictures of themselves looking like thugs in solidarity with Brown.

So the media relented and swapped out the thug photos for graduation photos. And theyve been doing that ever since.

In this case, the Washington Post wasnt alone in whitewashing Reeds actions. CNN ran a similar headline that made no mention of Dexter Reed shooting at officers : 96 shots fired in a fatal traffic stop. Heres what the bodycam footage shows. The AP reprted , Deadly Chicago traffic stop where police fired 96 shots raises serious questions about use of force.

Its almost comical when you picture the editors carefully trying to construct these headlines so that they dont mention the elephant in the room. Its like imagining someone trying to describe the maiden voyage of the Titanic without saying anything about the whole iceberg thing.

But Id be remiss if I mocked the medias ridiculous coverage of this episode without mentioning the Daily Mail . They chose to portray Dexter Reed as an aspiring broadcaster. So hes not an attempted cop killer hes the next Tom Brokaw apparently :

On Tuesday, Chicago Police released footage of the March 21 encounter which showed them firing 96 shots at Reed, even as he lay motionless on the ground outside his vehicle. The aspiring broadcasters death has reignited conversations around excessive police force against black people, though officers maintain Reed opened fire first.

At least they get around to suggesting that the officers were defending themselves. So theres that. Its easy to laugh at how absurd this is, but theres a point to it. BLM and their allies in the media are desperate to find a new George Floyd before the election. They know Democrats stand a very real chance of losing power in November. So theyre using the same tactics they did four years ago.

George Floyd, we were told, wasnt a home invader, thief and drug addict. They told us he was a Gentle giant trying to Get his life back on track. Now were expected to believe that Dexter Reed is also some misunderstood pillar of the local community, instead of the degenerate he is. The plan is to cause riots, terrify everyone into voting the way they want, and force a national reckoning on race to promote more of their mediocre allies into positions of power. And they plan to accomplish all of that by lying about a dead thug.

This is a strategy were seeing more and more often as the election approaches. Last October, for example, the media tried to incite riots over the shooting death of Leonard Cure a man who tried to kill a police officer on camera during a traffic stop. Theres no dispute about this. Its on tape. Watch:

After seeing that footage, here was the Washington Post headline : Deputy fatally shoots man who served 16 years for wrongful conviction. The article begins: Leonard Cure, who was exonerated in 2020, was killed by a Georgia sheriffs deputy during a traffic stop Monday The deputy used a Taser and a baton before shooting Cure.

The Post didnt get around to mentioning that Cure tried to murder the deputy until 14 paragraphs into the story. And even then, they describe it as carefully as they can. They say Cure was forcefully grappling with the deputy and pushing the deputys head back with his hand. Thats the Posts way of saying that he was trying to choke the officer to death. And of course, Ben Crump came out and declared that Cure had been shot simply for being black.

That effort didnt catch on in quite the way the media and BLM activists had hoped. So now theyre trying again. And they will continue to try until one of two things happen. Either they get the riots they want and terrorize millions of people into voting for Democrats out of fear or, for once, normal, sane people stand up and say whats obvious. And thats the fact that Dexter Reed and Leonard Cure and all of these BLM heroes are the dregs of society. They are not role models and they are not victims. They are, in fact, the cause of many serious problems that cities like Chicago are experiencing right now. Thats the only message that can put an end to these riots before they start, and avert a repeat of the pillaging we saw in 2020. It happens to be a message that most Americans believe, even if theyre afraid to say it. But as unpleasant as it may be, its time we started saying it.

Continue Reading

World

Two bridges collapse in Russia – as seven people killed and dozens injured

Published

on

By

Two bridges collapse in Russia - as seven people killed and dozens injured

Seven people have been killed and dozens are injured after two bridges collapsed in Russia overnight.

A train derailed after a bridge collapsed on to it in the Bryansk region, killing the driver and six others.

Some 69 people were injured in the crash, with the train travelling from Moscow to Klimov at the time.

Earlier, local authorities blamed “illegal interference” for the incident.

Later, a bridge collapsed in Russia’s Kursk region while a freight train was passing over it.

Local officials said one of the train’s drivers was injured in the crash.

When a bridge collapsed in the Kursk region, part of the train fell down onto the road, and a fire started. Pic: RIA/Telegram
Image:
The scene of the train crash in Kursk region. Pic: RIA/Telegram

Russia’s Baza Telegram channel, which often publishes information from sources in the security services and law
enforcement, reported, without providing evidence, that the bridge in Bryansk was blown up, according to initial information.

More from World

There was no immediate comment from Ukraine.

Since the start of the war that Russia launched more than three years ago, there have been continued cross-border shelling, drone strikes, and covert raids by Ukrainian forces into the Bryansk, Kursk and Belgorod regions that border Ukraine.

Photo: Official Telegram channel of the Moscow Interregional Transport Prosecutor's Office
Image:
Pic: Moscow Transport Prosecutor’s Office

Bryansk regional governor Alexander Bogomaz said: “Everything is being done to provide all necessary assistance to the victims.”

Emergency workers are at the scene of the train derailment, attempting to pull survivors from the wreckage.

Russia’s federal road transportation agency said the destroyed bridge passed above the railway tracks where the train was travelling.

Images from the scene show passenger cars ripped apart and lying amid fallen concrete from the collapsed bridge.

Other footage on social media appeared to be taken from inside vehicles which narrowly avoided driving onto the bridge before it collapsed.

Continue Reading

World

At least 21 killed in Gaza as they went to receive aid, Red Cross hospital says

Published

on

By

At least 21 killed in Gaza as they went to receive aid, Red Cross hospital says

At least 21 people have been killed in Gaza as they went to receive aid from an Israeli-backed foundation, according to a nearby hospital run by the Red Cross.

The hospital, which received the bodies, said another 175 people had been wounded in the incident in Rafah on Sunday morning.

The Associated Press also reports seeing dozens of people being treated at the hospital.

Witnesses have said those killed and injured were struck by gunfire which broke out at a roundabout near the distribution site.

The area is controlled by Israeli forces.

Ibrahim Abu Saoud, an eyewitness, said Israeli forces opened fire at people moving toward the aid distribution centre.

“There were many martyrs, including women,” the 40-year-old man said. “We were about 300 meters (yards) away from the military.”

Abu Saoud said he saw many people with gunshot wounds, including a young man who he said had died at the scene. “We weren’t able to help him,” he said.

The Gazans had been trying to receive aid from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation – an American organisation backed by both the US and Israeli governments.

It operates as part of a controversial aid system which Israel and the US claims is aimed at preventing Hamas from siphoning off assistance.

Israel has not provided any evidence of systematic diversion, and the UN denies it has occurred.

Earlier, Hamas-linked media had also reported more than 20 deaths in Rafah, saying they were as a result of an Israeli strike on an aid distribution point. Israel is yet to comment.

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation’s distribution of aid has been marred by chaos, and multiple witnesses have said Israeli troops fired on crowds near the delivery sites.

UN agencies and major aid groups have refused to work with the new system, saying it violates humanitarian principles because it allows Israel to control who receives aid and forces people to relocate to distribution sites, risking yet more mass displacement in the territory.

Before Sunday, at least six people had been killed and more than 50 wounded, according to local health officials.

The foundation says the private security contractors guarding its sites did not fire on the crowds, while the Israeli military has acknowledged firing warning shots.

The foundation did not immediately respond to a request for comment following the hospital’s claims.

In an earlier statement, it said it distributed 16 truckloads of aid early on Sunday “without incident”. It dismissed what it referred to as “false reporting about deaths, mass injuries and chaos”.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the full version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Continue Reading

UK

UK to build weapons factories and buy thousands of missiles in £1.5bn push to rearm

Published

on

By

UK to build weapons factories and buy thousands of missiles in £1.5bn push to rearm

The UK will buy up to 7,000 long-range missiles, rockets and drones and build at least six weapons factories in a £1.5bn push to rearm at a time of growing threats.

The plan, announced by the government over the weekend, will form part of Sir Keir Starmer’s long-awaited Strategic Defence Review, which will be published on Monday.

However, it lacks key details, including when the first arms plant will be built, when the first missile will be made, or even what kind of missiles, drones and rockets will be purchased.

The government is yet to appoint a new senior leader to take on the job of “national armaments director”, who will oversee the whole effort.

Andy Start, the incumbent head of Defence Equipment and Support – the branch of defence charged with buying kit – is still doing the beefed-up role of national armaments director as a sluggish process to recruit someone externally rumbles on.

Keir Starmer and  Volodymyr Zelenskyy speak to the press as they attend a presentation of Ukrainian military drones.
Pic: Reuters
Image:
Sir Keir Starmer and Volodymyr Zelenskyy at a presentation of Ukrainian military drones. Pic: Reuters

Revealing some of its content ahead of time, the Ministry of Defence said the defence review will recommend an “always on” production capacity for munitions, drawing on lessons learned from Ukraine, which has demonstrated the vital importance of large production lines.

It will also call for an increase in stockpiles of munitions – something that is vitally needed for the army, Royal Navy and Royal Air Force to be able to keep fighting beyond a few days.

Sky News will launch a new podcast series on 10 June based around a wargame that simulates an attack by Russia against the UK to test Britain’s defences

“The hard-fought lessons from [Vladimir] Putin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine show a military is only as strong as the industry that stands behind them,” John Healey, the defence secretary, said in a statement released on Saturday night.

“We are strengthening the UK’s industrial base to better deter our adversaries and make the UK secure at home and strong abroad.”

Army Commandos load a 105MM Howitzer in Norway.
Pic: Ministry of Defence Crown Copyright/PA
Image:
Army Commandos load a 105mm Howitzer in Norway. Pic: Ministry of Defence/PA

The UK used to have a far more resilient defence industry during the Cold War, with the capacity to manufacture missiles and other weapons and ammunition at speed and at scale.

However, much of that depth, which costs money to sustain, was lost following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, when successive governments switched funding priorities away from defence and into areas such as health, welfare and economic growth.

Even after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and a huge increase in demand from Kyiv for munitions from its allies, production lines at UK factories were slow to expand.

A reaper drone in the Middle East as part of Operation Shader. Pic: Ministry of Defence
Image:
A reaper drone in the Middle East. Pic: Ministry of Defence

Sky News visited a plant run by the defence company Thales in Belfast last year that makes N-LAW anti-tank missiles used in Ukraine. Its staff at the time only worked weekday shifts between 7am and 4pm.

Under this new initiative, the government said the UK will build at least six new “munitions and energetics” factories.

Energetic materials include explosives, propellants and pyrotechnics, which are required in the manufacturing of weapons.

There were no details, however, on whether these will be national factories or built in partnership with defence companies, or a timeline for this to happen.

There was also no information on where they would be located or what kind of weapons they would make.

King Charles  visiting HMS Prince of Wales as the Royal Navy finalises preparations for a major global deployment to the Indo-Pacific this spring.
Pic: PO Phot Rory Arnold/Ministry of Defence/PA
Image:
King Charles visits HMS Prince of Wales. Pic: PO Phot Rory Arnold/Ministry of Defence/PA

In addition, it was announced that the UK will buy “up to 7,000 UK-built long-range weapons for the UK Armed Forces”, though again without specifying what.

It is understood these weapons will include a mix of missiles, rockets and drones.

Sources within the defence industry criticised the lack of detail, which is so often the case with announcements by the Ministry of Defence.

The sources said small and medium-sized companies in particular are struggling to survive as they await clarity from the Ministry of Defence over a range of different contracts.

One source described a sense of “paralysis”.

The prime minister launched the defence review last July, almost a year ago. But there had been a sense of drift within the Ministry of Defence beforehand, in the run-up to last year’s general election.

The source said: “While the government’s intentions are laudable, the lack of detail in this announcement is indicative of how we treat defence in this country.

“Headline figures, unmatched by clear intent and delivery timelines which ultimately leave industry no closer to knowing what, or when, the MOD want their bombs and bullets.

“After nearly 18 months of decision and spending paralysis, what we need now is a clear demand signal from the Ministry of Defence that allows industry to start scaling production, not grand gestures with nothing to back it up.”

As well as rearming the nation, the government said the £1.5bn investment in new factories and weapons would create around 1,800 jobs across the UK.

Continue Reading

Trending