Connect with us

Published

on

The government is “working on operationalising” Rwanda flights, a minister has said – amid reports RAF planes could be used for the controversial deportation scheme.

Laura Trott did not deny a story in The Times newspaper which said migrants might have to be flown to the east African nation on RAF Voyagers because the Home Office has failed to find an airline willing to take them.

Politics Live: Rwanda plan back in Commons after more Lords defeats

Asked by Sky News who is going to fly asylum seekers to Rwanda, the Treasury minister pointed to comments on Tuesday made by her colleague Laura Farris, a Home Office minister, who said the government is “operationally close to being ready”.

Ms Trott added: “I think I’m going to say the same thing that she said yesterday to you, which is that we are working on operationalising this, but we’re not going to go into details of how we’re going to do that.”

Asked if RAF Voyagers will be used, she said: “We will be ready for flights to take off in the spring when the legislation passes.”

When it was pointed out that we are now heading towards May, she said: “There are many definitions of spring but we’re hoping to get them up and running as quickly as possible.”

The Voyager is the RAF’s only air-to-air tanker and can also be used as strategic air support.

According to The Times, Rishi Sunak is poised to release a fleet of these jets to be used for the deportation scheme.

The prime minister refused to comment on the report, telling broadcasters on Wednesday: Once on the statute books we will do everything we can do to get flights off to Rwanda.”

A government spokesperson said last night: “We make no apology for pursuing bold solutions to stop illegal migration, dismantle the people smuggling gangs and save lives.

“We have robust operational plans in place to get flights off the ground to Rwanda.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sunak won’t give date for Rwanda flights

The scramble to find aircraft comes as the bill to revive the policy remains wrangled in parliamentary “ping pong” after the House of Lords gave it a fresh beating on Tuesday.

Downing Street wants to get the legislation – which declares Rwanda a safe country and stops appeals from asylum seekers being sent there on safety grounds – on the statute books this week.

The bill was brought forward after the Supreme Court ruled in November that the plan to send people on a one-way flight to Kigali was unlawful.

However, it has faced fierce opposition in the House of Lords, Peers have insisted on amendments which restore the jurisdiction of domestic courts in relation to the safety of Rwanda and enable them to intervene.

Peers also want the bill to have “due regard” for international and key domestic laws, including human rights and modern slavery legislation.

In addition, they have backed a requirement that Rwanda cannot be treated as a safe country until an independent monitoring body has verified that protections contained in the treaty are fully implemented and remain in place.

Their insistence on the safeguards, which MPs in the House of Commons has rejected, has resulted in the bill being stuck in a process dubbed as “ping pong”, when the two chambers battle out the legislation until an agreement on wording can be reached.

Read more:
A win on Rwanda won’t automatically translate into victory for Sunak

The latest government setbacks mean the proposed law will be debated again by MPs on Wednesday before once again being passed back to the Lords.

The Rwanda policy was first announced two years ago by the then prime minster Boris Johnson as a deterrent to Channel crossings.

Mr Sunak is under pressure to get it going before the upcoming general election, having staked his premiership on “stopping the boats”.

Continue Reading

Politics

BIT Mining to pay $10M fine for bribing Japanese politicians in former life

Published

on

By

BIT Mining to pay M fine for bribing Japanese politicians in former life

BIT Mining, previously known as online sports casino 500.com, made around $2.5 million worth of bribes to Japanese officials between 2017 and 2019.

Continue Reading

Politics

Coinbase CEO to meet with Trump to discuss personnel appointments — WSJ

Published

on

By

Coinbase CEO to meet with Trump to discuss personnel appointments — WSJ

Before US Election Day, Brian Armstrong said Coinbase was “prepared to work” with either a Kamala Harris or Donald Trump administration.

Continue Reading

Politics

Row over how many farms will be affected by inheritance tax policy – as PM doubles down ahead of farmers protest

Published

on

By

Row over how many farms will be affected by inheritance tax policy - as PM doubles down ahead of farmers protest

Sir Keir Starmer has insisted the “vast majority of farmers” will not be affected by changes to Inheritance Tax (IHT) ahead of a protest outside parliament on Tuesday.

It follows Chancellor Rachel Reeves announcing a 20% inheritance tax that will apply to farms worth more than £1m from April 2026, where they were previously exempt.

But the prime minister looked to quell fears as he resisted calls to change course.

Speaking from the G20 summit in Brazil, he said: “If you take a typical case of a couple wanting to pass a family farm down to one of their children, which would be a very typical example, with all of the thresholds in place, that’s £3m before any inheritance tax is paid.”

Politics latest: No 10 insists chancellor has been ‘straight’ about her CV

The comments come as thousands of farmers, including celebrity farmer Jeremy Clarkson, are due to descend on Whitehall on Tuesday to protest the change.

And 1,800 more will take part in a “mass lobby” where members of the National Farmers’ Union (NFU) will meet their MPs in parliament to urge them to ask Ms Reeves to reconsider the policy.

Speaking to broadcasters, Sir Keir insisted the government is supportive of farmers, pointing to a £5bn investment announced for them in the budget.

He said: “I’m confident that the vast majority of farms and farmers will not be affected at all by that aspect of the budget.

“They will be affected by the £5bn that we’re putting into farming. And I’m very happy to work with farmers on that.”

Sir Keir’s spokesman made a similar argument earlier on Monday, saying the government expects 73% of farms to not be affected by the change.

Environment, Farming and Rural Affairs Secretary Steve Reed said only about 500 out of the UK’s 209,000 farms would be affected, according to Treasury calculations.

However, that number has been questioned by several farming groups and the Conservatives.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Farming industry is feeling ‘betrayed’ – NFU boss

Government figures ‘misleading’

The NFU said the real number is about two-thirds, with its president Tom Bradshaw calling the government’s figures “misleading” and accusing it of not understanding the sector.

The Country Land and Business Association (CLA) said the policy could affect 70,000 farms.

Conservative shadow farming minister Robbie Moore accused the government last week of “regurgitating” figures that represent “past claimants of agricultural property relief, not combined with business property relief” because he said the Treasury does not have that data.

Read more:
Farmers warn of food price hikes due to inheritance tax policy

Minister downplays risk of empty shelves if farmers strike

Farmers' tractor protest outside the Welsh Labour conference in Llandudno, North Wales
Image:
Welsh farmers carried out a protest outside the Welsh Labour conference in Llandudno, North Wales, over the weekend

Agricultural property relief (APR) currently provides farmers 100% relief from paying inheritance tax on agricultural land or pasture used for rearing livestock or fish, and can include woodland and buildings, such as farmhouses, if they are necessary for that land to function.

Farmers can also claim business property relief (BPR), providing 50% or 100% relief on assets used by a trading business, which for farmers could include land, buildings, plant or machinery used by the business, farm shops and holiday cottages.

APR and BPR can often apply to the same asset, especially farmed land, but APR should be the priority, however BPR can be claimed in addition if APR does not cover the full value (e.g. if the land has development value above its agricultural value).

File pic: iStock
Image:
APR and BPR can apply to farmland, which the Conservatives say has been overlooked by the Treasury in compiling its impact figures. File pic: iStock

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

Mr Moore said the Department for the Environment, Farming and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) and the Treasury have disagreed on how many farms will be impacted “by as much as 40%” due to the lack of data on farmers using BPR.

Lib Dem MP Tim Farron said last week1,400 farmers in Cumbria, where he is an MP, will be affected and will not be able to afford to pay the tax as many are on less than the minimum wage despite being asset rich.

Continue Reading

Trending