Connect with us

Published

on

Civic leaders say the city is making a losing bet with a planned $12 billion casino for Hudson Yards sacrificing promised housing for a flashy gaming complex.

Manhattan’s Community Board 4 sent a scathing letter to Related Companies/Wynn Resorts over the planned facility, saying the developer hasn’t fulfilled a 2009 pledge to build apartment’s on the West Side.

“MCB4 remains mystified how the Department and Commission of City Planning could review and consider such a plan which erases years of sound city planning and community efforts to replace it with such an anti-urban and anti-New York vision,” the board said in the April 1 letter.

The ambitious casino proposal features an 80-story tower overlooking the Hudson River that would house a gaming facility and hotel.

Office buildings, apartment towers and a spacious 5.6-acre park would surround the gleaming skyscraper.

MCB4 must note it cannot support the proposed projects drastic shift from residential to commercial use designed around casino use, board members said in the 12-page letter to Andrew Rosen, Related Companies’ chief operating officer of Hudson Yards and Department of City Planning Director Dan Garodnick.

“MCB4 raises the following question to both the Related Companies and the City of New York. Why should communities around the City of New York work with the real estate industry and the City government to respond and agree to zoning changes with detailed site plans and Points of Agreement when such plans and agreements can be discarded at a later date?”

CB4 said the existing plan for Hudson Yards Special District, which was “exhaustively negotiated” in 2009, is mostly residential, calling for 5,700 apartments and one commercial building integrated into the neighborhood with open public open space that connects to the Highline Park surrounding the site.

The proposed casino project slashes the number of planned apartments to 1,507.

“Now, the applicant, Related Companies, solely in pursuit of casino dollars as a means to fund the platform over the WRY [Western Rail Yards], proposes to amend that plan out of existence in favor of 2 oversize commercial towers, one of a hotel with 1,750 keys, sitting on the equivalent of a 20-story base containing a casino,” said the CB4 letter, signed by chairwoman Jessica Chait and co-land use chairs Jean Daniel-Noland and Paul Devlin.

“Streets connecting the community will be eliminated… The result will be an inward looking, protected enclave for an inward focused casino, disconnected from the surrounding community.”

In the very least, the developers should consider shrinking the casino project to one hotel with the balance of the project dedicated to apartment buildings instead of office towers, CB4 board members said.

A Related Companies spokesman said, We are looking forward to continuing to work with the Community Board as this process moves forward and we are specifically excited to unveil our full community benefits package which is centered around investment in this neighborhood.

“We are proud that our project on the Western Yards will deliver on all of the pledges made in the original zoning including affordable housing, 5.6 acres of green open space, and a public school.

The housing eliminated to make way for the casino project was planned to be market rate or luxury units — though CB4 officials said Related Companies has tapped real estate tax exemptions in the past to generate “20% to 25%” affordable housing in its developments.

Neighborhood support will be crucial in determining which bidders win the right for up to three state casino licenses to be awarded n the New York City/downstate region.

State gaming regulators are expected to award licenses by the end of 2025.

Any casino bid must get sign off from the state Gaming Facility Location Board.

The review board in a particular area where a casino is being proposed includes the local council member, state senator and assemblyman, borough president and the mayor and governor.

Sign up for our Metro Daily newsletter!

Please provide a valid email address.

By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Never miss a story.

The Wynn proposal and a few other projects must also first go through the rigorous and lengthy Uniformed Land Use Review Procedure, starting with the community board through the City Council, because they have to win approval to change their zoning use to accommodate a casino.

Aside from the Hudson Yards proposal, other casino projects include Mets owner Steve Cohens bid for a project near Citi Field, the Thor Equities consortium in Coney Island, Ballys at Ferry Point in The Bronx, and the Silverstein Properties in Hell’s Kitchen.

The Cohen and Bally’s proposals also need a state law approved to convert use of their properties from parkland to commercial use.

Other community boards have expressed opposition to casinos in their backyards, including Brooklyn Board 13 covering Coney Island.

Meanwhile, Las Vegas Sands has pitched a casino at the old Nassau Coliseum site in Uniondale, which has the support of Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman and the local legislature — but faces some local opposition, notably from neighboring Hofstra University.

Continue Reading

Politics

Starmer condemned for telling MP ‘she talks rubbish’

Published

on

By

Starmer condemned for telling MP 'she talks rubbish'

Sir Keir Starmer should have reassured and explained his immigration policy to a senior Welsh MP rather than telling her “you’re rubbish”, Labour peer Harriet Harman said.

Speaking to Beth Rigby on the Electoral Dysfunction podcast, Harriet Harman criticised the prime minister for telling Plaid Cymru Westminster leader Liz Saville Roberts during PMQs “she talks rubbish” after she called him out for using “island of strangers” in his immigration speech on Monday.

Baroness Harman said: “He should have actually explained ‘look, this is what we’re getting at. We’re it’s a communitarian message, it’s about neighbourliness, it’s about integration’.

“And he should have done that and reassured her and explained rather than just slapping her down.

“I just think to call across the chamber, ‘you’re rubbish’ – I think a prime minister has the opportunity to be a bit more magisterial in that.”

She said she has “been that woman standing there asking the prime minister a heartfelt and serious question, and had the prime minister say, ‘you’re rubbish'”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Starmer’s speech divides opinion

Baroness Harman added: “I kind of went ‘ouch’ at that point, because I’ve been in that situation myself.

More on Harriet Harman

“I think people do want an explanation and he’s got an explanation and he should have done that rather than hit at the messenger.”

After Sir Keir used the phrase “island of strangers” while announcing a crackdown on immigration, fellow Labour MPs, businesses and industry reacted angrily.

The rhetoric was likened by some critics to Enoch Powell’s rivers of blood speech.

Ahead of PMQs on Wednesday, Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden tried to move the debate away from Sir Keir’s controversial remarks.

“I think we should focus on the policy,” he told Sky News.

“Immigration has contributed a huge amount to the UK, it will in the future, I think the public want a sense of rules around it, that is what the prime minister was speaking about.”

He said the row was “overblown” and he might use the “island of strangers” phrase “depending on the context”.

Continue Reading

Politics

MPs on farming committee call on Rachel Reeves to delay family farm tax

Published

on

By

MPs on farming committee call on Rachel Reeves to delay family farm tax

The UK’s food security and the future of farming lies in Rachel Reeves’ hands, a leading MP has said as a committee called on the government to delay farm inheritance tax changes.

The environment, food and rural affairs (EFRA) committee has released a report calling on the government to delay the reforms for a year until April 2027.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced in the October budget farmers would no longer be allowed to claim inheritance tax relief for farms worth more than £1m from April 2026.

The move prompted multiple protests in Westminster by farmers who said it will threaten the future of thousands of multi-generational family farms.

The EFRA committee, made up of seven Labour MPs and four Lib Dem and Tory MPs, said a pause in the implementation would “allow for better formulation of tax policy and provide the government with an opportunity to convey a positive long-term vision for farming”.

A delay would also protect vulnerable farmers who would have “more time to seek appropriate professional advice”, the MPs said.

farmers protest in central london over inheritance tax - SN screengrab
Image:
There have been multiple protests

The MPs raised concerns the change was announced “without adequate consultation, impact assessment or affordability assessment”, leaving the impact on farms and food security “disputed and unclear”.

More on Inheritance Tax

They said it risks producing “unintended consequences” and threatens to “affect the most vulnerable”.

The MPs have called on the government to consider alternative reforms.

Read more:
Food prices could rise due to inheritance tax rise

Typical family farm ‘would have to spend 159% of its profits for a decade to pay’ tax

Chair of the EFRA Committee Alistair Carmichael said the government should pause and reconsider the farmers' inheritance tax changes
Image:
Chair of the EFRA Committee Alistair Carmichael said the government should pause and reconsider the farmers’ inheritance tax changes

Alistair Carmichael, the Lib Dem chair of the committee, told Sky News: “There is a need for inheritance tax to be reformed.

“The use of land purchase by the super rich as a means of sheltering their wealth is something which is not in the public interest or farmers.

“But this is not the way to go about reform.

“The risk is you see farmers selling out, they will sell out to people who are not going to use land for food production then we risk losing food security – we’ve seen how foolish relying on exports is after Putin’s invasion.”

Jeremy Clarkson arrives in central London to join the farmers protest over the changes to inheritance tax (IHT) rules in the recent budget with introduce new taxes on farms worth more than ..1 million. Picture date: Tuesday November 19, 2024. PA Photo. Farmers have reacted over the inheritance tax changes for farming businesses, which limit the 100% relief for farms to only the first ..1 million of combined agricultural and business property. For anything above that, landowners will pay a 20% tax rate, rather than the standard 40% rate of inheritance tax (IHT) applied to other land and property. PA Photo. Photo credit should read: Aaron Chown/PA Wire
Image:
Celebrities such as Jeremy Clarkson have drawn attention to the outrage

He added “as an outsider looking in”, the way in which the Treasury handled the inheritance tax announcement, after Labour said in opposition they would not change it, “has created a real problem of political authority” for Environment Secretary Steve Reed.

“It’s a problem the Treasury themselves can solve,” he said.

“Their own backbenchers increasingly think they should solve this and our report today gives them an opportunity to do that if they choose to take it.

“It really is up to the Chancellor of the Exchequer. It is over to her now.”

The committee report says before the autumn budget 70% of farmers felt optimistic about their futures, but that fell to 12% after the budget.

The survey, by the Farmers Guardian in March, also found 84% of farmers felt their mental health has been affected by the announcement.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Key points from the budget

Farmers said the government announcing the closure of applications to this year’s sustainable farming incentive with just hours to go, was also a cause.

The committee said there are other ways to achieve reform, and called on the government to publish its evaluation and rationale for not following alternative policy measures.

They also said the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has a pattern of “poor communication and last-minute decision-making following rumours and departmental leaks”.

Continue Reading

Politics

Ukrainian man charged over fires at properties and car linked to Sir Keir Starmer

Published

on

By

Ukrainian man charged over fires at properties and car linked to Sir Keir Starmer

A 21-year-old man has been charged with three counts of arson with intent to endanger life after fires at two properties and a car linked to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer.

Roman Lavrynovych, a Ukrainian national from Sydenham, southeast London, is due to appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Friday, the Metropolitan Police said.

The force said officers from the Met’s Counter Terrorism Command led the investigation because of the connections to the prime minister.

Sir Keir Starmer house
Metropolitan Police
Fire Pic: LNP
Image:
Pic: LNP

Emergency services were called to a fire in the early hours of Monday at a house in Kentish Town, north London, where Sir Keir lived with his family before becoming prime minister.

Damage was caused to the property’s entrance but nobody was hurt.

A car was also set alight in the same street last Thursday.

A forensics officer is seen in Kentish Town, north London. Police are investigating a fire at Sir Keir Starmer's house in north London. Picture date: Monday May 12, 2025.
Image:
Forensic workers at a house in Kentish Town owned by the prime minister. Pic: PA


There was another blaze at the front door of a house converted into flats in Islington, also linked to the prime minister, on Sunday.

One person was taken to safety via an internal staircase by crews wearing breathing apparatus, London Fire Brigade said.

The head of the Crown Prosecution Service counter terrorism division, Bethan David, said: “These charges relate to two fires at residential addresses in Islington on Sunday May 11 and in Kentish Town on Monday May 12, as well as a car fire in Kentish Town on Thursday May 8.

“The Crown Prosecution Service reminds all concerned that criminal proceedings against this defendant are now active and that he has the right to a fair trial.”

Continue Reading

Trending