
Cyberattack on UnitedHealth firm forces doctors to dig into personal savings to stay afloat
More Videos
Published
1 year agoon
By
adminOmar Marques | Lightrocket | Getty Images
On a Sunday in early March, Dr. Angeli Maun Akey noticed something peculiar while making payroll for her private practice in Gainesville, Florida: She was missing $19,000.
Akey owns and operates a primary care practice that serves around 3,500 patients in the area, many of whom suffer from chronic diseases. She opened in 2000 and manages a staff of nearly 20 people. Over the last two decades, Akey said, her practice and patients have been like an extension of her family.
“There’s no better life,” she told CNBC in an interview.
When Akey first noticed the discrepancy in her cash flow, she thought the funds had been embezzled, something she said she’s experienced three times since graduating from medical school. But after searching online, Akey realized she had a much bigger problem.
The health-care technology company Change Healthcare had been breached in a cyberattack.
Change Healthcare offers payment and revenue cycle management tools, and other solutions such as electronic prescription software. On Feb. 21, UnitedHealth Group, which owns Change Healthcare, discovered that hackers compromised part of the unit’s information technology systems.
UnitedHealth said in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that it isolated and disconnected the impacted systems “immediately upon detection” of the threat. In its first-quarter earnings report in April, UnitedHealth said the total cost of the cyberattack could be as much as $1.6 billion for the full year. The company’s stock is down nearly 8% year to date.
The disruption has caused severe fallout across the U.S. health-care system, as many doctors such as Akey were temporarily left without a way to get paid for their services.
Akey said the outages from the cyberattack reduced her practice’s cash flow by more than 80% for six weeks. As of early April, she said, she had amassed more than $130,000 worth of insurance claims that she had not been able to get reimbursed for.
Making payroll quickly became a major concern, and Akey said she stopped paying her own salary to help support her staff. Her bank offered her a loan to keep her practice afloat, but it came with an 11% interest rate. Akey said she felt it was too high.
She turned to her patients for help, asking for voluntary $45 advances that would be repaid.
“I’ve had patients for like a quarter century, so a lot of them have been like, ‘No, no, I need to give you more.’ So there’s $100 checks, $200 checks, $500 checks, $2,000 checks,” Akey said. “They have had 0% responsibility for this situation, and they’re fronting the money to keep us going.”
Earlier this month, Akey liquidated her retirement investments as an extra precaution. She said she was feeling frustrated and vulnerable, especially as rumors were swirling about the possibility that a second breach had occurred. UnitedHealth told CNBC earlier this month that there is “no evidence of any new cyber incident at Change Healthcare.”
“I just decided I can’t do this again,” Akey said.
UnitedHealth said in an April 22 press release that it has been working to bring systems back online, and that Change Healthcare has made “continued strong progress.” Medical claims across the U.S. are flowing at “near-normal levels,” and payment processing by the company is at more than 85% of pre-incident levels, the release said.
“We know this attack has caused concern and been disruptive for consumers and providers and we are committed to doing everything possible to help and provide support to anyone who may need it,” UnitedHealth CEO Andrew Witty said in the release.
Akey said payments have begun flowing back into her practice, though levels are still down between 30% and 40% from where they normally are.
She said the restarted payments have lifted a “humongous weight” off her back, but the road ahead will be difficult. Even so, she thinks her practice will be able to pull through, and she will be able to restore her retirement investments some time in the next few months.
“We love our patients, and that’s why I’m fighting so hard,” Akey said.
A quiet health-care giant
UnitedHealth Group Inc. headquarters stands in Minnetonka, Minnesota, U.S.
Mike Bradley | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Change Healthcare is not a household name for most Americans and even many health-care workers. Much of the company’s technology helps facilitate billing, payments, benefits evaluations and information exchanges behind the scenes.
Change Healthcare is the largest U.S. clearinghouse for medical insurance claims. A clearinghouse is like a middleman for the transactions between providers — such as doctors, hospitals and pharmacies — and payers — such as insurance companies, Medicare and Medicaid.
A clearinghouse helps deliver the right bills to the correct payers. It’s just one of the ways Change Healthcare touches cash flow within the health-care sector.
The company operates on an enormous scale. Change Healthcare processes more than 15 billion billing transactions annually, and 1 in 3 patient records passes through its systems, according to its website. That means Change Healthcare’s reach extends beyond UnitedHealth’s already sizable customer base.
Money stopped flowing when the company’s systems were disrupted due to the cyberattack, and a major source of revenue for thousands of providers across the U.S. screeched to a halt.
It’s caused a lot of sleepless nights for Dr. Barbara McAneny.
McAneny founded a multidisciplinary private practice with another physician in New Mexico in 1987. The practice now supports a staff of 280 people and offers a range of services, including cancer care. She also served as the president of the American Medical Association, or AMA, a research and advocacy group that represents physicians, from 2018 to 2020.
McAneny said she had tried to prepare for the possibility of a cyberattack, so the practice had contingency plans and funds stashed away to cover payroll and other expenses. However, she said she had “no idea” how she could have prepared for a breach of this magnitude. The practice felt the effects immediately.
“The cash flow for the practice went to zero that day,” McAneny told CNBC in an interview.
She said the practice’s partner physicians stopped taking a salary, and they told employees that they couldn’t approve overtime pay. Expenses became a real concern, but her “major fear” was whether the practice could continue purchasing chemotherapy for the cancer patients who rely on it for treatment.
McAneny’s practice buys chemotherapy from group purchasing organizations, or GPOs. It continued to place orders in the weeks following the cyberattack. But while Change Healthcare was down, there was no money to pay for the treatment. By April 10, the practice owed more than $6 million for chemotherapy alone.
“If the flow of chemotherapy stops from the GPOs that supply our chemotherapy, people will die,” she said.
McAneny said she lived in fear that supply would dry up. The thought had been waking her up in a cold sweat at night.
By mid-April, money started trickling back into McAneny’s practice, and it began chipping away at its $15 million claims backlog. She said claims started moving substantially in the last couple of weeks but that the practice’s cash flow is still only around 70% to 80% of what it normally is.
McAneny said the practice is “significantly in debt,” which will take several months to resolve. She said she is very worried about late fees. Even so, signs of progress have come as a relief.
“I might actually sleep through the night,” she said.
Funding assistance

Early in March, UnitedHealth launched a temporary funding assistance program to help support providers that have experienced cash flow disruptions due to the cyberattack. There are no fees, interest or other costs on top of the payments, and providers have 45 days to repay the funds once standard payment operations resume.
Eligible providers will get funds weekly, and the amount they get is based on the difference between their historical weekly claims or payment volume before the breach vs. after, according to the website.
UnitedHealth said it only has “partial visibility” into most providers’ histories and may be “unable to see the full impact of their needs.” Providers could see a gap in their funding amounts and, if they do, they are encouraged to submit a temporary assistance inquiry form through the website for additional support.
But for doctors such as Akey, the program has been a source of frustration. As of Thursday, Akey said she had been approved for around $31,000 worth of funding. She called the total “woefully inadequate” and said it amounts to less than two weeks of help.
Akey said Tuesday she was not aware she could have applied for additional funding support, despite reading the website and making repeated attempts to contact UnitedHealth.
Sarah Carlson, who owns and operates a marriage and family therapy practice in Boulder, Colorado, had a similar experience with the funding program.
Carlson’s practice amassed a $75,000 claims backlog by early April because of the cyberattack, she told CNBC. She said she had been fronting her employees her own money to make payroll, and after a couple of sleepless nights, she decided to temporarily stop accepting some new clients.
Carlson applied for UnitedHealth’s funding assistance program, but she said the payments up to that point had been negligible. One week, she said, she received just $10.
“It was comical. Literally, I think I laughed,” Carlson said in an interview.
UnitedHealth told CNBC that Carlson had not applied for additional funding. Carlson said she thought she had done so by filling out a new form, separate from her initial application, with information about the total amount of claims she was owed.
McAneny said that as of mid-April she had around $28,000 from UnitedHealth sitting in an account, which is only enough to cover the cost of about two drugs.
“It was useless to me,” she said.
McAneny has since applied for and received additional funding. She said she is using that money to help pay off the chemotherapy bills.
UnitedHealth told CNBC in a statement Tuesday: “We have issued more than $6.5 billion in assistance to providers and we continue to encourage any provider to reach out and our goals has always been to help get the word out to as many providers as possible here.”
A controversial merger
Sheldon Cooper | Sopa Images | Lightrocket | Getty Images
UnitedHealth’s ownership of Change Healthcare has raised eyebrows from the outset.
The company has two major business units: Optum and UnitedHealthcare. Optum offers a range of pharmacy services and consulting services and provides medical care for around 103 million consumers, while UnitedHealthcare provides insurance coverage and benefit services to more than 55 million people globally, according to the company’s website.
UnitedHealth’s reach is already substantial, so when it announced that Optum and Change Healthcare had agreed to combine in January 2021, it alarmed organizations such as the AMA.
The AMA sent a letter to the U.S. Department of Justice in April 2021 arguing the $13 billion deal would have “significant anticompetitive effects” on doctors, hospitals and insurers. The group urged the DOJ to look at the merger.
The DOJ sued to block the deal the following year, arguing that UnitedHealth’s proposed acquisition would harm competition in the sector. The suit was unsuccessful, and Optum announced that it completed its combination with Change Healthcare in October 2022.
In UnitedHealth’s quarterly call with investors in April, CEO Andrew Witty said the company’s ownership of Change Healthcare is “important for the country.” He said the cyberattack likely would have happened either way, but if UnitedHealth did not own the company, Change Healthcare would not have had the resources or support necessary to bring its systems back online.
“We’re going to bring it back much stronger than it was before,” Witty said.
The AMA has also been outspoken about the cybersecurity breach. In a letter to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in March, for instance, the organization said it is concerned about the “undue financial hardships facing physician practices” if the cyberattack was not resolved quickly. The AMA said it is particularly concerned about small, rural and less-resourced practices, according to the letter.
In late February, the DOJ launched an antitrust investigation into UnitedHealth, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal. The investigation is exploring issues such as its doctor group acquisitions and the relationships between Optum and UnitedHealthcare, the report said. UnitedHealth declined to comment on the matter during its investor call.
The DOJ declined to comment.
‘It’s a mess’
UnitedHealth Group signage is displayed on a monitor on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange.
Michael Nagle | Bloomberg | Getty Images
There’s no quick fix for providers affected by the breach. Switching to another clearinghouse can take weeks to months, and submitting claims manually creates mountains of extra work for practices that are often already overwhelmed with administrative and clerical tasks. Some payers don’t even accept paper claims anymore.
“It’s not been fun,” said Dr. Tyler Kisling, who with his wife owns and operates an orthodontic and pediatric dentistry practice in California.
Kisling said the pair have taken out around $20,000 from their personal savings to help keep things afloat since the cyberattack. The breach has created a lot of stress, Kisling said, and he’s resorted to printing out paper calendars to help keep track of bills and due dates.
The company that operates their practice’s patient management software has worked to get set up with another clearinghouse, but as of April 19, Kisling said it was still not running. The workaround has been to fill out all of the practice’s claims by hand, put them in envelopes and mail them off to insurers. Kisling said the task has been like a new full-time job.
Payments are just starting to trickle in, and Kisling said he thinks it is largely because the practice took steps to mail in claims. There’s still a long road ahead.
“I just don’t know how much longer it’s going to take to catch up with all the backlog,” he said.
McAneny said her practice switched to another clearinghouse during the breach but that they all have different peculiarities that can be difficult to work out. She said she had 5,000 rejected claims in a week, which meant the practice had to go through each one to determine what needed to be fixed.
“The comma goes here, or the date of birth goes over there or whatever they want,” she said.
McAneny said it’s been a “huge amount” of work. Her billing staff has been working a lot of overtime.
Dr. Purvi Parikh, an allergist and immunologist with a private practice in New York City, said her practice reconnected with Change Healthcare after seven weeks of outages. It was a welcome sign of progress, especially because Parikh and the other doctors who own the practice had been covering payroll and expenses out of pocket.
But figuring out how to file seven weeks’ worth of claims has been draining for Parikh’s staff and the practice’s already diminished resources.
“It’s such a waste of everyone’s time,” she told CNBC in an interview. “We spend hours and hours, or even days, trying to figure out where to get money from, how to now resubmit through a new clearinghouse, and then resubmit again back through Change Healthcare. It’s a mess.”

UnitedHealth told CNBC that it has been working to communicate with providers, government officials, health systems, trade associations and customers about the breach from the outset.
The company said it has provided updates through Change Healthcare’s product website, and it launched a separate website about its response to the cyberattack that has received millions of page views. UnitedHealth said it also launched a multimillion-dollar social media and digital campaign to raise awareness about its funding assistance program.
Additionally, UnitedHealth has hosted calls with security executives, providers, customers and advocacy groups that have been attended by thousands, the company said.
Nevertheless, some providers said getting information about the breach has been challenging.
As of mid-April, Parikh hadn’t been able to get anyone from Change Healthcare on the phone. She said she was getting all her information directly from her billing company. There has been “zero communication” from UnitedHealth, Optum or Change Healthcare, she said.
Kisling said his office received no formal notification about the breach, and that he heard about it in the media. His office manager had to call one of the practice’s software vendors to ask what was happening.
“We all just kind of had to figure it out on our own,” he said.
Many doctors have been leaning on one another to share information and tips about how to handle the breach. On platforms such as Doximity, which is a medical website used by more than 80% of U.S. physicians, doctors have been “exchanging notes” about how they’ve managed, said Dr. Amit Phull, the chief physician experience officer at Doximity.
Phull said there were a lot of people posting about the breach who didn’t know what to do. Initial feelings of “bewilderment” quickly progressed to anxiety, fear and anger, he said.
Providers are left with questions
Igor Golovniov | Sopa Images | Lightrocket | Getty Images
UnitedHealth said in late February that the ransomware group Blackcat was behind the cyberattack. Blackcat, which also goes by the names Noberus and ALPHV, steals sensitive data from institutions and threatens to publish it unless a ransom is paid, according to a December release from the DOJ.
The company said its investigation into the breach is ongoing, and it could be months before the company can identify and notify affected individuals. UnitedHealth is working with law enforcement officials, cybersecurity experts and regulators to assess the breach, according to its website.
On April 22, UnitedHealth told CNBC that it paid a ransom in an effort to protect patient data. It did not specify the amount. The company also confirmed that files containing protected health information and personally identifiable information were compromised.
Providers have been left with questions about what happens next.
“How are they going to keep this from happening in the future?” said John Bieda Jr., who owns and operates a marriage and family therapy practice in California.
Bieda said he founded his practice with funds he inherited from his parents after they died. He told CNBC he is very proud of what he has built, and he wishes his father were around to see it. But he said his experience with the Change Healthcare breach has left him feeling lost, and at times like he does not want to own his own company anymore.
As of Friday, Bieda said he had around $109,000 of claims outstanding. He has taken $241,000 out of his retirement accounts to keep the practice afloat.
“I have been on the verge of tears significantly,” Bieda said. “It just is devastating.”
McAneny said many providers have opened lines of credit due to the breach, which raises questions about how UnitedHealth will address problems around interest, late fees and damage to credit ratings.
“They’ve caused a lot of harm to a lot of practices,” McAneny said. “How are they going to make up for the losses that we have had?”
Don’t miss these exclusives from CNBC PRO
You may like
Technology
DoorDash CEO Tony Xu is taking on the role of industry consolidator in food delivery
Published
13 hours agoon
May 31, 2025By
admin
Tony Xu, co-founder and CEO of DoorDash Inc., smiles during the Wall Street Journal Tech Live conference in Laguna Beach, California, on Oct. 22, 2019.
Martina Albertazzi | Bloomberg | Getty Images
During the depths of the Covid pandemic, with restaurants around the country facing an existential crisis, DoorDash CEO Tony Xu had an unconventional proposal. He wanted to cut commissions.
Chief Business Officer Keith Yandell worried that such a move would result in a massive hit to profits ahead of the company’s planned IPO. But Xu made a persuasive case.
“If restaurants don’t thrive, we cannot,” Yandell told CNBC in a recent interview, recalling Xu’s perspective at the time. “We need to take a leadership position.”
The company ended up sacrificing over $100 million in fees, Xu later said.
Since starting DoorDash on the campus of Stanford University in 2013, the now 40-year-old CEO has navigated the notoriously cutthroat and low-margin business of food delivery, building a company that Wall Street today values at close to $90 billion. The stock has emerged as a tech darling this year, jumping 23%, while the Nasdaq is still down for the year largely on tariff concerns.
More than four years after its IPO, net profits remain slim. But that’s not getting in the way of Xu’s mission to become an industry consolidator, using a combination of cash and new debt to fuel an acquisition spree at a time when big tech deals remain scarce. Earlier this month, DoorDash scooped up British food delivery startup Deliveroo for about $3.9 billion and restaurant technology company SevenRooms for $1.2 billion.
“What we’ve delivered for a customer yesterday probably isn’t good enough for what we will deliver for them today,” Xu told CNBC’s “Squawk Box” after the deals were announced.
This week DoorDash announced the pricing of $2.5 billion in convertible debt, and said the proceeds could be used in part for acquisitions.
Doordash food delivery service in New York City on Feb. 13, 2025.
Danielle DeVries | CNBC
The San Francisco-based company has a history with scooping up competitors to grow market share. In 2019, it bought food delivery competitor Caviar for $410 million from Square, now known as Block. About two years later, DoorDash said it was paying $8.1 billion for international delivery platform Wolt. The deal was its last big transaction until this month.
When DoorDash entered the food delivery market, it had to face off against the likes of GrubHub and Seamless, which later joined forces. That combined entity was bought late last year by restaurant owner Wonder Group. In 2014, Uber launched Uber Eats, which is now DoorDash’s biggest competitor in the U.S.
“It’s a very competitive market, and I think merchants do have choice,” Xu said in the CNBC interview. “What we’re focused on is always trying to innovate and bring new products to match increasing standards and expectations from customers.”
DoorDash didn’t make Xu available for an interview for this story, but provided a statement about the company’s acquisition strategy.
“We’re very picky, very patient, and conscious that, for most companies, deals don’t work out in hindsight,” the company said. “When we see an opportunity that brings value to customers, expands our potential to empower local economies around the world, and has a path to strong long-term returns on capital, we tend to push our chips in.”
Taking on the suburbs
DoorDash differentiated itself early on by cornering suburban markets that had fewer delivery options, while other players attacked city centers. When Covid shut down restaurant dining in early 2020, DoorDash capitalized on the booming demand for deliveries. Revenue more than tripled that year, and grew 69% in 2021.
Colleagues and early investors credit a customer-first focus for much of Xu’s success. Gokul Rajaram, who joined DoorDash through its Caviar acquisition, described Xu as “the best operational leader in the U.S.” after Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.
Restaurants haven’t universally viewed DoorDash as an ally. Commissions can reach as high as 30%, which is a hefty cut to fork over. Many restaurants have reluctantly paid the high fees because of DoorDash’s dominant market share, which reached an estimated 67%. In 2021, the company introduced three tiers of pricing, with a basic option at 15% for more price-sensitive businesses.
DoorDash needs the high fees in order to stay in the black. The company’s contribution profit as a percentage of total marketplace volume hovers below 5%.

Colleagues who have known Xu for decades say the food delivery entrepreneur hasn’t changed much since the early days of the company.
Yandell said Xu once took advice from his young daughter, who complained about a routing issue while accompanying him on food delivery orders. All employees, including Xu, are required to complete orders and handle support calls every year as part of the company’s WeDash program.
In a part of the country known for the pomp of its wealthy founders, Xu has a very different reputation.
Early workers recall memories of Xu pulling up in a dilapidated green 2001 Honda Accord to team events, or participating in company knockout basketball games referred to as “knockys,” next to the animal hospital in Palo Alto, which DoorDash briefly called its headquarters. Xu also personally approved every offer for the company’s first 4,000 employees.
Xu spends many mornings answering customer service complaints. He often drops his kids off at school and, after tucking them in at night, hops on calls with international regions, colleagues say. Xu is an avid Gold State Warriors basketball fan but has a soft spot for the Chicago Bulls, having spent many years in Illinois. Once or twice a week, Xu squeezes in a morning run, and will often do so while traveling to explore different neighborhoods and stores.
Xu was born in China and moved with his family to Champaign, Illinois, in 1989. Growing up, he played basketball and mowed lawns to save up for a Nintendo. He told Stanford’s View From the Top podcast in 2021 that the experience, and watching his parents hustle, taught him how to “earn your way into better things.”
His “characteristics became the company’s values,” said Alfred Lin, an early DoorDash investor and partner at venture firm Sequoia.
Xu often attributes his entrepreneurial spirit to his parents. His mother worked as a doctor in China, and juggled three jobs in the U.S. for over a decade, saving up enough to eventually open a medical clinic. His father worked as a waiter while pursuing a Ph.D. Xu said on the podcast that watching his mom gave him a deep understanding of what it takes to run a small business, which came in handy in DoorDash’s early years as he was trying to convert restaurants into customers.
‘Ten times harder’
Employees say Xu has a reputation for detecting hidden talents among his colleagues. Jessica Lachs, the company’s chief analytics officer, was working as a general manager assisting with DoorDash’s Los Angeles launch when Xu guided her toward her passion for data.
“He believes in leaning into the things you’re really good at, rather than trying to be mediocre at a lot of things,” she said.
After Toby Espinosa, DoorDash’s ads vice president, lost a deal with a major fast food company during his early years at the startup, Xu told him to work “10 times harder” and become an expert in his field. A few years later, the company secured the partnership, Espinosa said.
Grit and struggle defined the early years of DoorDash. The founding team of four managed deliveries around Stanford and Palo Alto though a Google Voice number directed to their cellphones.
DoorDash emerged out of a Stanford business school course known as Startup Garage, taught by Professor Stefanos Zenios. The class requires students to present a business idea, test it, and then pitch it to investors.
Zenios said Xu stood out with his data-driven approach and natural leadership qualities. The team tested two different ideas, including a platform that helped small businesses better track the effectiveness of their marketing, he recalls. Zenios called the idea to target suburban areas a “brilliant insight.”
Xu and his team entered Y Combinator in the summer of 2013. The three-month startup accelerator program is known for spawning companies like Airbnb, Stripe and Reddit. Every session culminates with a demo day in front of some of Silicon Valley’s biggest investors.
The DoorDash idea excited Paul Buchheit, creator of Gmail and a partner at Y Combinator. But like many other potential investors, Buchheit was skeptical about the economic model.
“You had a talented team of founders working on what I thought was an idea that had potential,” he said. “That’s basically the formula for a good startup.”
On pitch day, the company failed to lure any venture firms, but Buchheit later participated as a seed investor.
Shortly after demo day, DoorDash encountered Saar Gur of Charles River Ventures. Gur had been looking for a food delivery platform to back and was conducting due diligence on another company when a friend led him to DoorDash.
By the end of their first meeting, they were “finishing each other’s sentences,” Gur said.
Sequoia’s Lin initially passed on DoorDash after the Y Combinator pitch, but kept in touch with the team. Lin said he wanted to see data that showed the platform could penetrate beyond Stanford and Palo Alto, and retain customers. He ended up leading two institutional rounds, attaining a 20% stake for Sequoia at the time of the IPO.
“Tony always believed that his company would succeed, or they’ll find a way to succeed,” Lin said.
A food delivery messenger is seen in Manhattan.
Luiz C. Ribeiro | New York Daily News | Tribune News Service | Getty Images
Shortly after its Y Combinator stint, DoorDash hit an early roadblock. Following a Stanford football game, a rush of orders bombarded its delivery system causing massive delays, Xu told Y Combinator’s CEO Garry Tan in an interview this year.
The founders refunded the orders and spent the night baking cookies, then driving them to customers early the next morning.
Oren’s Hummus co-owner Mistie Boulton said DoorDash still takes that approach. The team comes to meet with her every quarter and she serves as a beta tester for new products.
The restaurant, which started in Palo Alto and has since expanded to a half-dozen locations across the Bay Area, was one of DoorDash’s first clients, latching onto the opportunity to reach more customers beyond its small establishment that frequently had lines snaking out the door.
“We just fell in love with the idea,” Boulton said. “The number one thing that encouraged and enticed me to want to work with them was Xu’s passion. He really is one of those people that you can count on.”
Wall Street is now counting on Xu’s ability to execute big deals, even with the company having this month surpassed $10 billion in delivery orders worldwide.
The acquisition of Deliveroo, based in London, marks a renewed effort by DoorDash to expand its presence overseas, following the purchase of Finland’s Wolt three years ago.
The cash deal for SevenRooms, a New York City-based data platform for restaurants and hotels to manage booking information, takes DoorDash into an entirely new category. Xu told CNBC that DoorDash is a “multi-product company now that’s operating on a global scale.”
Following the acquisition announcements, which coincided with a disappointing earnings report in March, analysts at Piper Sandler reiterated their hold recommendation on the stock.
One reason for concern, they said, was that “integrating multiple acquisitions at once may create some noise near-term.”
WATCH: DoorDash CEO Tony Xu: Deliveroo & SevenRooms deals make us a multi-product company on a global scale

Technology
Tesla shares set to wrap strong May as Elon Musk ends time with Trump’s DOGE
Published
1 day agoon
May 30, 2025By
admin
Elon Musk is interviewed on CNBC from the Tesla headquarters in Texas.
CNBC
Shares of the Elon Musk-led automaker Tesla have rallied in May despite recent poor car sales numbers for the company in China and Europe, as the billionaire CEO promised to focus more on his businesses than politics.
Tesla shares are on track for an increase of more than 20% for the month.
The stock is still down about 12% for the year. Apple is down about 21% year-to-date, the worst of all the megacaps.
The bounceback in May comes as President Donald Trump marks the end of Musk’s time as a “special government employee” at the helm of the Department of Government Efficiency.
“This will be his last day, but not really, because he will, always, be with us, helping all the way,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “Elon is terrific!”
Musk said on the most recent Tesla earnings call that his time spent running DOGE would drop significantly by the end of May, but that he plans to spend a “day or two per week” on government work until the end of Trump’s term.
Musk also planned to keep his office at the White House.
Tesla year to date stock chart
The New York Times reported Friday that while Musk was campaigning for Trump last year, he had been taking drugs “well beyond occasional use” and was “facing an increasingly turbulent family life.”
The Times noted it was unclear if that habit carried over to his time in the White House, when he was also juggling Tesla and the other companies in his business empire — including SpaceX and X owner xAI, his artificial intelligence company.
Tesla’s European sales dropped by half, year-over-year for April.
Tesla sales in China, another massive market for battery electric vehicles, were down by about 25% year over year in the first eight weeks of the current quarter.
The carmaker has faced protests in reaction to Musk’s ties with Trump, and his endorsement of Germany’s far-right extremist party AfD.
Pension fund leaders recently called out Tesla’s board in a letter, demanding that they rein in Musk, and require him to work a minimum of 40 hours a week on Tesla to fix what they called the current “crisis.”
Read more CNBC tech news
Musk and Tesla have tried to re-focus on the company’s prospects in autonomous vehicle tech, humanoid robotics and artificial intelligence.
Bloomberg reported this week that Tesla plans to launch its long-delayed and much anticipated autonomous vehicle ride-hailing service in Austin, Texas, on June 12th.
Tesla has not confirmed that start date, but has been promising to launch a robotaxi ride-hailing service in Austin before the end of June.
Musk told CNBC’s David Faber in a recent interview that Tesla would start with a small fleet of Model Y Tesla vehicles equipped with the company’s newest, Unsupervised Full Self Driving hardware and software.
Musk has been promising investors a robotaxi vehicle for years, and the company has ceded ground to Waymo in the U.S. The Alphabet-owned robotaxi venture recently surpassed 10 million paid, driverless ridehailing trips.
Shares of Tesla have also benefitted from the company’s stronger position, relative to other U.S. automakers when it comes to weathering tariffs.
Tesla operates two massive vehicle assembly plants domestically, one in Fremont, California and another in Austin, Texas, and has more North American-made parts in its cars than most of its competitors.
Technology
China calls out Trump for ‘abuse’ of semiconductor export controls
Published
1 day agoon
May 30, 2025By
admin
Chinese President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Donald Trump.
Dan Kitwoodnicholas Kamm | Afp | Getty Images
China is calling out the U.S. for “discriminatory restrictions” in its use of export controls in the chip industry, after the Trump administration accused the world’s second-largest economy of violating a preliminary trade deal between the two countries.
“Recently, China has repeatedly raised concerns with the U.S. regarding its abuse of export control measures in the semiconductor sector and other related practices,” China U.S. embassy spokesperson Liu Pengyu told NBC News.
It’s the latest escalation in the simmering trade war between the U.S. and China, particularly as it pertains to artificial intelligence and the infrastructure needed to develop the most advanced technologies.
China’s response comes after President Donald Trump said early Friday in a social media post that China had violated a trade agreement. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CNBC in an interview that the “Chinese are slow rolling its compliance.”
On May 12, the U.S. and China agreed to a 90-day suspension on most tariffs imposed by either side. That agreement followed an economic and trade meeting between the two countries in Geneva, Switzerland.
“China once again urges the U.S. to immediately correct its erroneous actions, cease discriminatory restrictions against China and jointly uphold the consensus reached at the high-level talks in Geneva,” the embassy spokesperson said.
The statement didn’t specify any actions taken by the U.S. Earlier this month, China said the U.S. was “abusing” export controls after the U.S. banned American companies from importing or even using Huawei’s AI chips.
The U.S. has limited exports of some chips and chip technology to China as part of a national defense strategy dating back to the first Trump administration.
In 2019, President Trump cut off Huawei’s access to U.S. technology, which forced it to essentially exit the smartphone business for a few years before it could develop its own chips without use of U.S intellectual property or infrastructure. In 2022, the Biden administration first moved to cut off Chinese access to the fastest AI chips made by Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices.
The restrictions have intensified of late, and earlier this week, chip software makers, including Synopsys and Cadence Design Systems, said they had received letters from the U.S. Commerce Department telling them to stop selling to China.
Nvidia, which makes the most advanced semiconductors for AI applications, has vocally opposed the U.S. export controls, saying that they would merely force China to develop its own chip ecosystem instead of building around U.S. standards.
Nvidia was told earlier this year that it could no longer sell its H20 chip to China, a restriction that the company said this week would cause it to miss out on about $8 billion in sales in the current quarter. The H20 chip was specifically designed by Nvidia to comply with 2022 restrictions, but the Trump administration said in April that the company needed an export license. Nvidia said it was left with $4.5 billion in inventory it couldn’t reuse.
“The U.S. has based its policy on the assumption that China cannot make AI chips,” Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang told investors on the company’s earnings call. “That assumption was always questionable, and now it’s clearly wrong.”
The Trump administration did rescind an expansive chip export control rule that was implemented by the Biden administration called the “AI diffusion rule,” which would have placed export caps on most countries. A new and simpler rule is expected in the coming months.

Trending
-
Sports3 years ago
‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year ago
Story injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years ago
Game 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years ago
MLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years ago
Japan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years ago
Game-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business3 years ago
Bank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway