Connect with us

Published

on

Sponsored Content by H.E.L Group May 3 2024 Reviewed by Aimee Molineux

Microorganisms massively impact our everyday lives, with microbial cells in our bodies existing at a ratio of approximately one microbial cell for every human cell.

Image Credit: H.E.L Group

This has led to a boom in research over the past 15 years, delivering significant insights into the mix of microorganisms inhabiting the human gastrointestinal (GI) tract, their effect on health and disease, and the relationship between humans and microbes.

Research has revealed that gut microbiome (GM) varies significantly between individuals, largely depending on their diet and health status, posing a challenge for data comparison.

In vivo analysis is the preferred technique for analyzing GM. However, this method is often unfeasible, costly, time-consuming, and resource-intensive.

In vitro simulation represents a powerful alternative to in vivo analysis, and there has been a concentrated effort to standardize methodologies to guarantee reproducibility.

This article discusses recommendations for recreating the digestive process using bioreactors. Appropriate choice of system and simulation

The broad differences in gastrointestinal tract conditions mean several parameters must be accounted for, including stomach pH and colon oxygenation.

Recreating this environment with a single reactor is almost impossible. However, multi-reactor systems provide individual control of each vessel, enabling the modification of the internal physicochemical conditions and the simulation of different parts of the GI.

Tubing can connect the vessels, while peristaltic pumps can move the content between bioreactors, recreating emptying and filling processes and avoiding potential contamination.

Another consideration when designing an experiment is whether to use static or semi-dynamic models. While the former is more cost-effective and straightforward, static models can oversimplify a system. Semi-dynamic simulations recreate more realistic conditions, particularly the gastric phase, and can account for gradual acidification and fluid dynamics. Implementation of standardized digestion simulation protocols

The diversity in digestion models and parameters presents a challenge when comparing results between studies.

Collaborative frameworks, such as INFOGEST, have encouraged the creation of simulation protocols to recreate realistic scenarios informed by research results and increase the reproducibility of experiments.

Such protocols provide structured approaches to simulating gastric, intestinal, and oral digestion phases, utilizing specific substrate ratios to digestive fluids.

Enzyme activity, the rate at which an enzyme transforms a substrate or generates a product, is a vital parameter to control. Recommended values should be provided in standardized protocols and are especially important for certain enzymes, including tripsine. Control of environmental parameters

Bioreactors provide ideal conditions for microbial cultures using a combination of probes for measuring conditions.

Automation systems monitor these measurements in real-time and initiate corrective measures to address fluctuations. For instance, pH may be regulated with an acid or base solution or by injecting gases such as CO2.

An in-depth understanding of the simulated conditions is fundamental to ensure that the process is an accurate representation.

Important physicochemical parameters include temperature, pH, and dissolved oxygen. Other peculiarities of the GI must also be included, particularly the addition of simulated fluids, including gastric acid, saliva, and bile salts, as well as representative enzymes, such as pepsin and lipases, that are added at precise times. Choice of appropriate biological agents

The biological agents used in the simulation, such as enzymes, microbial communities, and artificial fluids, shape the experiment’s result.

Starting with the microbial inoculum, it is important to recognize that synthetic communities are easier to control and tend to produce more consistent outcomes. Nevertheless, it is well established that microbial diversity varies between individuals. However, the different taxa's functions are believed to be conserved. Therefore, natural microbial communities better represent the complexity of the human gut microbiome when conducting studies.

Image Credit: H.E.L Group

Enzymatic mixes, such as amylases, proteases, and lipases, are used throughout simulations at various points to replicate processes in each compartment of the GI tract.

All organisms, from bacteria to mammals, produce enzymes to aid digestion. However, their reaction and activity will vary under the same physicochemical conditions. As a result, human-derived enzymes produce the best results.

In cases where such enzymes are not viable due to limited availability or high costs, porcine and bovine are preferred substitutes. Incorporation of realistic physical conditions

Temperature is a critical parameter for life, and it is essential that it is controlled in the simulations. However, many other physical factors also need to be considered and replicated for the system to be reproducible.

The human body mixes content as it passes through the digestive system. Chewing in the oral cavity shreds solid contents, providing a higher surface area before entering the body, and peristaltic movements of the smooth muscle within the GI tract increase the mixing of the food bolus. The reactors are, therefore, equipped with means such as stirrers to ensure that the conditions in the vessel are similar to those in the GI.

In the digestive system, peristaltic muscle contractions also push the bolus down, and an effective way to replicate this during the simulations is by using peristaltic pumps to transfer the content of bioreactors. Science in the golden age of the gut microbiome

In this golden age of gut microbiome research, recent advances in gastrointestinal tract simulation can help researchers understand the complex microbial ecosystems within the human body and their profound impact on human health, disease, and behavior.

Image Credit: H.E.L Group

However, more controlled studies are required to ensure reproducible and reliable data. The methodologies discussed in this article are crucial for the effective in vitro simulation of the gastrointestinal tract. The article aims to equip researchers, clinicians, and enthusiasts with the tools needed to lead the way in this dynamic field.

The aim of the golden age is to go beyond scientific discoveries and apply them to human health. These methodologies help explore and expand existing knowledge around the role of the microorganisms associated with human health and disease, leading to a healthier future. About H.E.L Group

H.E.L develops and manufactures innovative scientific instruments and software designed to optimize the efficiency, safety and productivity of key processes in chemistry and biology applications.

The H.E.L team of 70 includes highly skilled process and software engineers, based at their extensive research and manufacturing facilities in the UK, as well as sales and support offices around the world.

H.E.L has a long history of solving complex challenges for customers. Since 1987, the Company has worked with businesses and laboratories globally, providing proprietary automated solutions for the pharma, biotechnology, chemical, battery and petrochemical sectors.

We continue to extend the reach of our products and service to support and enable R&D and process optimization further across Europe, the US, China and India.

H.E.L is accredited with ISO 9001 : 2015.

Sponsored Content Policy: News-Medical.net publishes articles and related content that may be derived from sources where we have existing commercial relationships, provided such content adds value to the core editorial ethos of News-Medical.Net which is to educate and inform site visitors interested in medical research, science, medical devices and treatments.

Continue Reading

US

Donald Trump sending ‘top of the line’ weapons to support NATO in Ukraine war

Published

on

By

Donald Trump sending 'top of the line' weapons to support NATO in Ukraine war

Donald Trump has agreed to send “top of the line weapons” to NATO to support Ukraine – and threatened Russia with “severe” tariffs if it doesn’t agree to end the war.

Speaking with NATO secretary-general Mark Rutte during a meeting at the White House, the US president said: “We’ve made a deal today where we are going to be sending them weapons, and they’re going to be paying for them.

“This is billions of dollars worth of military equipment which is going to be purchased from the United States, going to NATO, and that’s going to be quickly distributed to the battlefield.”

Follow the latest here

Donald Trump and NATO secretary general Mark Rutte in the White House. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Pic: Reuters

Weapons being sent include surface-to-air Patriot missile systems and batteries, which Ukraine has asked for to defend itself from Russian air strikes.

Mr Trump also said he was “very unhappy” with Russia, and threatened “severe tariffs” of “about 100%” if there isn’t a deal to end the war in Ukraine within 50 days.

The White House added that the US would put “secondary sanctions” on countries that buy oil from Russia if an agreement was not reached.

Later on Monday, Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy thanked Mr Trump and said he was “grateful” for the US president’s “readiness to help protect our people’s lives”.

Analysis: Will Trump’s shift in tone make a difference?

As ever, there is confusion and key questions are left unanswered, but Donald Trump’s announcement on Ukraine and Russia today remains hugely significant.

His shift in tone and policy on Ukraine is stark. And his shift in tone (and perhaps policy) on Russia is huge.

Read Mark’s analysis here.

After criticising Vladimir Putin’s “desire to drag it out”, he said he appreciated “preparing a new decision on Patriots for Ukraine” – and added Kyiv is “working on major defence agreements with America”.

It comes after weeks of frustration from Mr Trump over Mr Putin’s refusal to agree to an end to the conflict, with the Russian leader telling the US president he would “not back down” from Moscow’s goals in Ukraine at the start of the month.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump threatens Russia with ‘severe’ tariffs’

During the briefing on Monday, Mr Trump said he had held calls with Mr Putin where he would think “that was a nice phone call”, but then “missiles are launched into Kyiv or some other city, and that happens three or four times”.

“I don’t want to say he’s an assassin, but he’s a tough guy,” he added.

Earlier this year, Mr Trump told Mr Zelenskyy “you’re gambling with World War Three” in a fiery White House meeting, and suggested Ukraine started the war against Russia as he sought to negotiate an end to the conflict.

After Mr Trump’s briefing, Russian senator Konstantin Kosachev said on Telegram: “If this is all that Trump had in mind to say about Ukraine today, then all the steam has gone out.”

Read more:
Trump announces 30% tariff on EU imports

Trump threatens to revoke US comedian’s citizenship
Two women killed after shooting at US church

Follow The World
Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

Meanwhile, Mr Zelenskyy met with US special envoy Keith Kellogg in Kyiv, where they “discussed the path to peace” by “strengthening Ukraine’s air defence, joint production, and procurement of defence weapons in collaboration with Europe”.

He thanked both the envoy for the visit and Mr Trump “for the important signals of support and the positive decisions for both our countries”.

Continue Reading

US

Trump is clearly fed up with Putin – but will his shift in tone force Russia to the negotiating table?

Published

on

By

Trump is clearly fed up with Putin - but will his shift in tone force Russia to the negotiating table?

As ever, there is confusion and key questions are left unanswered, but Donald Trump’s announcement on Ukraine and Russia today remains hugely significant.

His shift in tone and policy on Ukraine is stark. And his shift in tone (and perhaps policy) on Russia is huge.

Ever since Mr Trump returned to the White House he has flatly refused to side with Ukraine over the Russian invasion.

He has variously blamed Ukraine for the invasion and blamed Joe Biden for the invasion, but has never been willing to accept that Russia is the aggressor and that Ukraine has a legitimate right to defend itself.

Today, all that changed. In a clear signal that he is fed up with Vladimir Putin and now fully recognises the need to help Ukraine defend itself, he announced the US will dramatically increase weapons supplies to Kyiv.

Donald Trump meets with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in the White House. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Pic: Reuters

But, in keeping with his transactional nature and in a reflection of the need to keep his isolationist “America-First” base on side, he has framed this policy shift as a multi-billion dollar “deal” in which America gains financially.

American weapons are to be “sold” to NATO partners in Europe who will then either transfer them to Ukraine or use them to bolster their own stockpiles as they transfer their own existing stocks to Kyiv.

“We’ve made a deal today,” the president said in the Oval Office. “We are going to be sending them weapons, and they are paying for them. We are manufacturing, they are going to be paying for it. Our meeting last month was very successful… these are wealthy nations.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What will Trump’s weapons deal mean for Ukraine?

This appears to be a clever framing of the “deal”. Firstly, America has always benefited financially by supplying weapons to Ukraine because much of the investment has been in American factories, American jobs and American supply chains.

While the details are not entirely clear, the difference now appears to be that the weapons would be bought by the Europeans or by NATO as an alliance.

The Americans are the biggest contributor to NATO, and so if the alliance is buying the weapons, America too will be paying, in part, for the weapons it is selling.

However, if the weapons are being bought by individual NATO members to replenish their own stocks, then it may be the case that the US is not paying.

NATO officials referred all questions on this issue to the White House, which has not yet provided clarity to Sky News.

It is also not yet clear what type of weapons will be made available and whether it will include offensive, as well defensive, munitions.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Will Trump’s deal make a difference?

A key element of the package will likely be Patriot missile batteries, 10 to 15 of which are believed to be currently in Europe.

Under this deal, it is understood that some of them will be added to the six or so batteries believed to be presently in Ukraine. New ones would then be purchased from US manufacturers to backfill European stocks. A similar arrangement may be used for other weapons.

Follow The World
Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

The president also issued the Russian leader with an ultimatum, saying that Putin had 50 days to make a peace deal or else face 100% “secondary tariffs”. It’s thought this refers to a plan to tariff, or sanction, third countries that supply Russia with weapons and buy Russian oil.

This, the Americans hope, will force those countries to apply pressure on Russia.

But the 50-day kicking of the can down the road also gives Russia space to prevaricate. So, a few words of caution: first, the Russians are masters of prevarication. Second, Trump tends to let deadlines slip. And third, we all know Trump can flip-flop on his position repeatedly.

Read more:
BBC breached editorial guidelines over Gaza documentary
Air India plane suffered ‘no mechanical fault’ before crash

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Trump sides with the Ukrainian cause’

Maybe the most revealing aspect of all this came when a reporter asked Mr Trump: “How far are you willing to go if Putin sends more bombs in the coming days?”

“Don’t ask me questions like that…”

Mr Trump doesn’t really know what to do if Mr Putin continues to take him for a ride.

Mr Biden, before him, supplied Ukraine with the weapons to continue fighting.

If Mr Trump wants to end this, he may need to provide Ukraine with enough weapons to win.

But that would prolong, or even escalate, a war he wants to end now.

There’s the predicament.

Continue Reading

Technology

Nvidia says U.S. government will allow it to resume H20 AI chip sales to China

Published

on

By

Nvidia says U.S. government will allow it to resume H20 AI chip sales to China

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang attends a roundtable discussion at the Viva Technology conference dedicated to innovation and startups at Porte de Versailles exhibition center in Paris on June 11, 2025.

Sarah Meyssonnier | Reuters

Nvidia announced Tuesday that it hopes to resume sales of its H20 general processing units to clients in China, saying that the U.S. government had assured the company would be granted licenses.

Nvidia’s sales of the H20 chips, which had been designed specifically to keep them out of export controls on China, were halted in April.

“The U.S. government has assured NVIDIA that licenses will be granted, and NVIDIA hopes to start deliveries soon,” the company said in a statement.

This comes against the backdrop of a preliminary trade deal between Washington and Beijing last month that sought China to resume rare earth exports and the U.S. to relax tech export controls.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang in recent months has ramped up his lobbying against export controls, arguing that they inhibited American tech leadership. In May, Huang said chip restrictions had already cut Nvidia’s China market share nearly in half.

Huang also announced a new “fully compliant” GPU, NVIDIA RTX PRO, saying it was ideal for smart factories and logistics.

The potential change in U.S. stance follows a meeting between Huang and U.S. President Donald Trump last week.

In his meeting with Trump and U.S. policymakers, Huang had reaffirmed Nvidia’s support for the administration’s job creation and onshoring efforts, as well as the aim for America to lead in global AI, the company said.

Meanwhile, in Beijing, it was confirmed that Huang has met with government and industry officials to discuss the benefits of AI and ways for researchers to advance safe and secure AI for the benefit of all. 

Continue Reading

Trending