Connect with us

Published

on

When Humza Yousaf resigned as Scotland’s first minister, questions were raised over what his pension would be.

Some on social media have claimed the 39-year-old is entitled to £52,000 per year for the rest of his life – and payments will begin immediately.

There’s just one problem: this isn’t true.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Yousaf signs resignation letter

While such a pension scheme used to be in place, it was scrapped in 2009.

So what will he receive… and when?

When he reaches the Scottish Parliamentary Pension Scheme retirement age – which is currently 65 – Mr Yousaf will be entitled to up to around £2,600 per year for the period he served as first minister.

The former SNP leader is also entitled to further retirement payments from his time as an MSP and as a Holyrood minister.

More on Humza Yousaf

A law introduced in 1999 said that “any person who has held the office of first minister or presiding officer shall, on ceasing to hold that office”, be entitled to a pension.

It added that “the annual amount of a pension payable under this article shall be equal to one half of the salary”.

But 10 years later, new legislation was passed that meant that anyone who became first minister after 2009 was no longer entitled to that type of pension.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘I’m sad my time is ending’

The first minister of Scotland is currently paid £176,780 per year – but £72,196 of that amount is for their work as an MSP and would not be included in such a calculation.

If the old rules were still in place today, Mr Yousaf would have been entitled to a pension of £52,292, which is half of £104,584 – his additional pay for being leader.

But Mr Yousaf was elected first minister on 19 March 2023, so is not covered by the previous law. Instead, that part of his pension entitlement will be based only on his time in office up to his resignation on 7 May.

MSPs have two pension options which mean they can contribute either a higher or a lower proportion of their salaries each year.

If an MSP contributes the higher rate, they are entitled to one-fortieth of their final annual salary as a pension. If they contribute the lower rate, they are entitled to one-fiftieth of their final salary as a pension.

? Listen above then tap here to follow the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts ?

Because Mr Yousaf served for just over a year as first minister, he will be entitled to a pension of either one-fortieth or one-fiftieth of £104,584. That would equate to around £2,600 or £2,100 per year, depending on which option he chose.

He will also be entitled to a pension for the years he serves as an MSP. Mr Yousaf was elected as a regional Glasgow MSP in 2011 and in 2016 became the Glasgow Pollok MSP, an office he still holds.

If he were to step down today after 13 years in Holyrood – assuming he had been paying the higher contribution for that entire period – he would be entitled to a little under £23,500 per year, which is added to his first minister pension.

Read more from Sky News:
SNP finance probe heading to prosecutors ‘within weeks’
The 25th anniversary of the Scottish parliament

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

Mr Yousaf is also entitled to further pension payments from his various ministerial roles.

He served as a minister for five years and nine months in the Scottish parliament and then as a Scottish secretary of state for four years and nine months. Combined, these entitle Mr Yousaf to another pension pot of a little over £7,200.

By the calculations on current figures, and assuming he has contributed the higher rate for all of his time as an MSP, Mr Yousaf is currently entitled to around £33,300 in yearly pension payments when he retires at, or beyond, age 65.

Continue Reading

Politics

Pressure mounts on PM to raise Israel’s Gaza offensive with Trump

Published

on

By

Pressure mounts on PM to raise Israel's Gaza offensive with Trump

Sir Keir Starmer is under mounting pressure to raise Israel’s bombardment of Gaza with Donald Trump during his UK state visit, after a UN Commission said a genocide was taking place.

Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey used the president’s arrival on Tuesday night to call for action on the escalating situation, as Israeli forces advance in Gaza City.

Sky News analysis has found thousands of families remain in the city’s crowded tent camps, despite a ground offensive beginning yesterday.

Sir Ed, who is boycotting the state dinner being held for Mr Trump, said Sir Keir must “press” the president now.

He said: “What is happening in Gaza is a genocide. And the president of the United States, who wants a Nobel Peace Prize, is doing nothing to stop it.”

Displaced Palestinians flee northern Gaza. Pic: AP
Image:
Displaced Palestinians flee northern Gaza. Pic: AP

On Tuesday, a United Nations Commission agreed Israel was committing genocide in Gaza – the first time such an explosive allegation has been made publicly by a UN body.

Israel‘s foreign ministry said it “categorically rejects this distorted and false report” and called for the commission to be abolished.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Is Israel committing genocide?

‘We cannot be bystanders’

Reports suggest the situation will be a talking point between Sir Keir and Mr Trump during his visit.

It comes before the UK is due to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly later this month, along with allies including Canada and France.

In a late night statement, Canada’s foreign ministry described the Gaza City offensive as “horrific”.

Lib Dem leader Sir Ed added: “We have long said that Hamas is genocidal and condemned them for their actions.

“Now, I think we have to say that what the Netanyahu government is doing amounts to genocide.”

Labour MP Rosena Allin-Khan, a former shadow minister, also called on her party leader to make discussing the situation in Gaza with Mr Trump a “top priority”.

Speaking to Sky News’ Politics Hub With Sophy Ridge, she said: “We say ‘never again’ when we look at Bosnia and Rwanda, but here we are again, and it’s been livestreamed, and we’ve all seen it.

“We cannot be bystanders to a genocide.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘We cannot be bystanders’

UN report pulls no punches

The accusation of genocide is made by the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

It alleges Israel has been “killing Palestinians or forcing them to live in inhumane conditions that led to death; causing serious bodily or mental harm, including through torture, displacement and sexual crime; deliberately imposing inhumane conditions, and fourthly, imposing measures intending to prevent births”.

Read more from Sky News:
Zelenskyy makes demand of Trump
Trump sues New York Times

Follow the World
Follow the World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

Earlier this month, the International Association of Genocide Scholars also passed a resolution stating that Israel’s conduct passed the threshold of committing genocide.

However, a report from the British government said it had “not concluded” that Israel intended to “destroy in whole or in part a national, ethnic, racial or religious group”.

Nearly 65,000 people are now believed to have died, according to figures collated by Gaza’s Hamas-run health ministry. It does not distinguish between civilians and combatants in its count.

Continue Reading

Politics

No 10 insists migrant returns deal isn’t a ‘shambles’ after court blocks man’s removal

Published

on

By

No 10 insists migrant returns deal isn't a 'shambles' after court blocks man's removal

Downing Street has insisted its migrant returns scheme with France is not a “shambles” after the High Court blocked a man’s deportation.

Having seen the previous Conservative government’s Rwanda scheme run into trouble with the courts, the Labour administration’s alternative suffered its own setback on Tuesday.

An Eritrean man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was due to be on a flight to France this morning.

He brought a legal claim against the Home Office, with lawyers acting on his behalf saying the case “concerns a trafficking claim”.

They also said he had a gunshot wound to his leg, and would be left destitute if he was deported.

The Home Office said it was reasonable to expect him to have claimed asylum in France before he reached the UK in August, but the ruling went in his favour.

Mr Justice Sheldon granted the man a “brief period of interim relief”.

While the judge said there did not appear to be a “real risk” he would face destitution in France, the trafficking claim required further interrogation.

He said the case should return to court “as soon as is reasonably practical in light of the further representations the claimant […] will make on his trafficking decision”.

A Number 10 spokesperson downplayed the development, insisting removals under the deal with France will start “imminently” and ministers are not powerless in the face of the courts.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘One in, one out’ deal: What do we know?

‘We told you so’

The pilot scheme was announced to much fanfare in July, after Emmanuel Macron made a state visit to the UK.

Sir Keir Starmer had hoped the agreement – which would see the UK send asylum seekers who have crossed the Channel back over to France in exchange for migrants with links to Britain – would prove more resilient to court challenges than the Tories’ Rwanda plan.

He wants the number of migrants being returned to France to gradually increase over the course of the scheme, to deter them from coming in small boats.

The pilot came into force last month and is in place until June 2026.

Tory leader Kemi Badenoch was quick to say “we told you so” following Tuesday’s court decision, while Reform UK’s Nigel Farage criticised the government’s plan.

Mr Farage – who has said he would deport anyone who arrives in Britain illegally – said: “Even if the policy worked, one in, one out, and with another one in, still means plus one for everyone that crosses the Channel.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Migrant deal with France has ‘started’

The small boats crisis represents one of the biggest challenges for the new home secretary, Shabana Mahmood, following her promotion in Sir Keir’s recent reshuffle.

Speaking to Sky News’ Politics Hub With Sophy Ridge, Labour peer Maurice Glasman backed her to deliver.

Describing the former justice secretary as “very tough”, he said: “She’s completely for real. I’ve known her for over 10 years – she really wants to see law and order restored.”

Continue Reading

Politics

UK to strengthen ties with US on crypto matters: Report

Published

on

By

UK to strengthen ties with US on crypto matters: Report

UK to strengthen ties with US on crypto matters: Report

The UK has discussed adopting a more crypto-friendly approach with the US in a bid to boost industry innovation and attract more investment to Britain.

Continue Reading

Trending