Connect with us

Published

on

Labour has launched the process to select a general election candidate to replace Jeremy Corbyn in the London seat of Islington North.

The former Labour leader has had the party whip suspended since 2020 over his response to a report into antisemitism, meaning he currently sits as an independent MP.

Last year he was effectively blocked from standing for Labour after the party’s ruling National Executive Committee (NEC) backed a motion to prevent him from being endorsed for the seat he has represented for more than 40 years.

The veteran MP was first elected to represent Islington North in 1983 and has won it at each of the last 10 elections, often by a comfortable margin.

Mr Corbyn, who remains a Labour member, has still not said whether he plans to run as an independent. Doing so could result in him being suspended from the party he has been part of for 50 years.

Applications to be selected to run for Labour in the seat opened on Wednesday, with candidates expected to be shortlisted next week.

The hustings will take place online, with Labour dismissing suggestions this is unusual. The result is expected to be announced on 1 June, according to reports.

More on Jeremy Corbyn

Momentum, a grass-roots group set up in the wake of Mr Corbyn’s leadership election victory back in 2015, hit out at the decision to bar Mr Corbyn from standing – pointing to his support among local Labour members.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Labour ‘lost our way’ but ‘has changed’

Momentum chair Kate Dove said: “Jeremy Corbyn has loyally represented the people of Islington North for over 40 years and remains a Labour member of more than 50 years.

“His own local party voted unanimously to express support for Jeremy and assert their right to choose their own parliamentary candidate.

“Labour members in Islington North should decide if they want Jeremy to continue as their Labour candidate, not Keir Starmer’s Westminster clique. Democracy demands it.”

Mr Corbyn has not commented on the selection process opening.

Keir Starmer defending serving in Jeremy Corbyn's cabinet. Pic: PA
Image:
Sir Keir Starmer served in Corbyn’s shadow cabinet when he was leader. Pic: PA

He has previously called the ban on him standing a “shameful attack on party democracy” and hinted he could stand as an independent, saying: “I have spent my life fighting for a fairer society on behalf of the people of Islington North, and I have no intention of stopping now.”

Mr Corbyn was suspended from the parliamentary party in October 2020 over his reaction to a report by the EHRC which was critical of the party’s handling of antisemitism complaints under his leadership.

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

Immediately after its publication, Mr Corbyn claimed “the scale of the problem” of Labour antisemitism allegations was “dramatically overstated for political reasons by our opponents”.

Sir Keir Starmer, who served in Mr Corbyn’s shadow cabinet, has insisted there is no way back into the party for his predecessor, arguing that allowing him to stand at the next election would lead to Labour’s chances of winning power being “significantly diminished”.

Continue Reading

Politics

Roger Ver moves to dismiss US tax evasion charges as ‘unconstitutional’

Published

on

By

Roger Ver moves to dismiss US tax evasion charges as ‘unconstitutional’

Roger Ver argued that the IRS’ exit tax for renounced US citizens with over $2 million in assets is unconstitutional and “impermissibly vague.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Russia sentences Hydra market founder to life in prison

Published

on

By

Russia sentences Hydra market founder to life in prison

Hydra market founder Stanislav Moiseev and 15 of his accomplices were jailed for between 8 and 23 years for their involvement in the darknet market and crypto mixer.

Continue Reading

Politics

‘It doesn’t matter’: Reform deputy dismisses court records that say MP kicked his girlfriend

Published

on

By

'It doesn't matter': Reform deputy dismisses court records that say MP kicked his girlfriend

Richard Tice has been challenged for appearing to cast doubt on court documents that detailed how one of the party’s MPs was jailed for repeatedly kicking his girlfriend.

The Reform UK deputy leader defended James McMurdock, who was jailed 18 years ago for repeatedly kicking his girlfriend, saying the UK is a “Christian nation” that believes in “redemption”.

Speaking to the Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge, Mr Tice said he did not believe Mr McMurdock, the party’s MP for South Basildon and East Thurrock, should be “doomed as a sinner forever”.

Mr McMurdock, a former investment banker, was convicted of assaulting his then girlfriend in 2006 while drunk outside a nightclub.

He spent 21 days in a young offenders’ institution after admitting to the attack.

Before he was elected as an MP, the investment banker had not publicly disclosed the conviction and when it emerged in July he had been jailed for attacking his girlfriend when he was 19 years old, he downplayed the incident as a “teenage indiscretion”.

Politics latest: No 10 defends crackdown on junk food adverts

More on Reform Uk

But further details of what happened during the incident emerged after The Times applied to the court for information from the official record, which showed he received the custodial sentence for “kicking” the victim “around four times”.

James McMurdock arrives at the House of Commons.
Pic: PA
Image:
James McMurdock. Pic: PA

Mr Tice said his colleague was an example of someone who “had a bad issue at a very young age but has gone full circle”.

He said the UK was a “great Christian nation” and added: “Are you seriously saying that if someone makes a bad mistake in life, aged 19, that there’s no redemption they are doomed as a sinner forever? No.”

He went on: “The whole point of Christianity is a sense of if you’ve done something wrong, you pay your price. And at the end of that sentence, whatever it is, then, in a sense you’ve done your bit, you served your punishment, whatever it is.

“Isn’t it remarkable that an individual had I, you know, had a bad issue at a very young age but has gone full circle.

“Doesn’t it show, actually, to other young people that bad stuff can happen – you can make bad judgements, you can get things badly wrong. But many years later, actually you can you can do really well.

“He had a great job and end up as a member of parliament. I think that’s a good thing.”

MPs do not have to disclose previous convictions to the public when standing, with only people in prison at the time of the election for a sentence of more than a year barred.

McMurdock’s victim’s mother brought the incident to light a week after his election, saying he “left marks on her body” and “it took two security guards to pull him off her”.

When the allegations were revealed, McMurdock said the pair had argued and he had pushed her.

Challenged on whether there had been a “major discrepancy” between Mr McMurdock’s version of events and what had been reported, Mr Tice replied that his “understanding” of the incident was “different” to what The Times said had happened.

Pressed on what he believed happened, Mr Tice replied: “It actually doesn’t matter.”

“I’m trusting James,” he said.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘He wasn’t vetted’, says Farage of MP

“He’s bang on the money and I think that what he says is right. He was there. The court wasn’t there. The Times weren’t there.

“The law is the law. The law ruled that he had transgressed and he was punished. He served his punishment.”

When the allegations emerged, Mr McMurdock told Sky News the incident was “the biggest regret of my life”.

He said: “While I absolutely deny the horrific details in this tale, there is one truth in it that I cannot, nor will not deny or hide from.

Read more:
Is Reform UK winning the ‘bro vote’?

‘Mind-boggling’ Brexit rules hit British food exports by £3bn a year

“A generous person might call it a teenage indiscretion but I do not expect everyone to be so kind.

“Nearly 20 years ago, at 19 years of age, at the end of a night out together, we argued and I pushed her. She fell over and she was hurt. Despite being 38 now and having lived a whole life again I still feel deeply ashamed and apologetic.

“Despite us both being very drunk, I handed myself into the police immediately and admitted my fault. I was charged for what I did, not for what has been claimed, and I faced the consequences then and paid for my action in full.

“This is the biggest regret of my life and I wish I could go back in time and fix things.”

Continue Reading

Trending