Meta, Google leading nearly $1M lobbying fight to kill NY online child safety bills

Published

1 year ago

May 20, 2024

admin

Google and Meta are spearheading a fierce push to kill New York legislation aimed at protecting children online and the controversial lobbying battle is poised to surpass $1 million in spending, The Post has learned.

A group of Big Tech firms, advocacy groups and companies from other sectors have spent $823,235 lobbying Albany lawmakers through mid-March as two high-profile bills the Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation (SAFE) for Kids Act and the New York Child Data Protection Act advance toward votes, according to recent public disclosures.

This is an astonishing amount of money to be spent to kill two reasonable bills, said one longtime Albany insider who requested anonymity to discuss the lobbying push.

The SAFE Act would crack down on addictive recommendation algorithms used by social media apps by requiring them to provide default chronological feeds for users 18 or younger unless they receive parental consent. It would also allow parents to impose time limits on social media use and in-app notifications.

The Child Data Protection Act would block apps from collecting or selling the personal or location data from users under 18 unless they consent. Kids under 13 would need a parents consent.

The disclosure forms show each firms total spending on legislation on the agenda in New York including the online safety bills and do not reveal their stances on specific bills.

The true scope of Big Tech’s spending to derail the legislation is difficult, if not impossible to pin down but it is expected to surpass the $1 million mark when the next round of disclosures surfaces next month, sources said.

This could be considered historic in the sense that the bills are relatively low impact for the state compared with other issues that get a lot of lobbyist attention, said Danny Weiss, a Capitol Hill veteran and chief advocacy officer at Common Sense Media, which supports the bills.

The cannabis industry spent millions of dollars over a period of several years in a bid to get marijuana legalized in New York. In 2022, a group of landlords and their advocates reportedly spent $1.4 million to lobby against passage of new protections for tenants.

They are spending a lot of money to oppose these bills, as if they pose an existential threat to New York, Weiss said of the blitz from Big Tech.

Both bills were endorsed last fall by Democratic New York Gov. Kathy Hochul as well as State Attorney General Letitia James. During a January press conference, Hochul described social media as a silent killer of our childrens generation.

The two bills are expected to move through committee in the state assembly as soon as this week, which would be followed by a floor vote. The state senate is also expected to vote on the bills in the near future.

More than 25 other groups, including Mothers Against Media Addiction and the New York State United Teachers Union, have also expressed support for the bills.

Tech firms have hit back, citing fears that the legislation would stifle freedom of speech, online privacy for teens, limit internet access for migrants and other underserved communities, and essentially disable algorithms that help to crack down on hate speech.

State Sen. Andrew Gounardes, who co-sponsors the bills, said opponents have funded an aggressive whisper campaign in Albany to delay or defeat the legislation.

It certainly makes the job a lot harder, because these companies, with limitless resources, are able to hire armies of lobbyists who just camp out in the capital all day, Gounardes said. Legislators come and go and these folks are whispering in everyones ear.

Facebook and Instagram parent Meta which already faces a massive federal lawsuit over allegations that it has profited even as its apps fuel a teen mental health crisis spent the most on lobbying related to the tech bills and other items on the state agenda, the disclosures showed.

A Meta spokesperson said the company supports federal legislation that would require app stores to get parents approval when kids under 16 download apps, rather than a state-by-state solution.

Teens move interchangeably between many websites and apps, and different laws in different states will mean teens and their parents have inconsistent experiences online, a Meta spokesperson said in a statement.

As we continue working with New York lawmakers, its crucial that we avoid quick fixes and, instead, support legislation that actually empowers parents and supports teens online, the spokesperson added.

Other top spenders include Google and TikTok the latter of which filed a federal lawsuit to block a divestiture bill that would sever its ties to Chinese ownership over national security concerns.

Despite stiff opposition, the legislation appears to be making progress toward approval. The SAFE Act has 94 sponsors in the state assembly, including 81 Democrats and 13 Republicans. In the state senate, it has 25 sponsors, including 21 Democrats and four Republicans.

Gounardes said there is significant bipartisan support for both bills in the Senate.

At this point, I feel reasonably confident that we are going to be able to do something significant for kids on social media this legislative session, the state senator said.

Additionally, tech giants that disclosed lobbying on one or both of the bills include PayPal, Roblox, Snap and Block.

A Roblox spokesperson said the company supports the intent of the two bills but declined to elaborate. A representative for eBay, another firm that showed up on the filings, said the company has not yet taken a position on either bill.

A Block spokesperson confirmed the company has lobbied on the Child Data Protection Act and said it supports the bill with some modifications.

Other key opponents lobbying against the bills include influent trade groups such as Tech:NYC and TechNet.

In a February memo viewed by The Post, Tech:NYC asserted that the two bills have inconsistent age verification policies and argued that common methods used for verification, such as ID or credit card scanning, would fuel data privacy concerns.

We continue to have productive discussions with lawmakers and community groups about these bills, as we all want to find a path forward that protects families, preserves the ability to access useful and supportive information online, and does so without reordering a huge part of our economy, said Julie Samuels, president & CEO of Tech:NYC.

Participants in the PR campaign to kill the bills also include traditional white-shoe lobbying firms as well as so-called astroturf groups, which present themselves as grassroots initiatives but are actually funded by Big Tech money, according to critics.

One such example is a group called New York Inclusive Internet Coalition, which is backed by Tech:NYC and shares the same spokesperson.

A Tech:NYC spokesperson pushed back on claims that it is running an astroturf offensive, asserting that working with local community groups is core to its mission.

Another key proxy is Chamber of Progress, a Big Tech-funded advocacy group that pushes the industrys agenda at the national and state level.

Politics

‘I wish I’d never met him’: Peter Mandelson ‘regrets’ association with Jeffrey Epstein

Published

2 hours ago

May 27, 2025

admin

'I wish I'd never met him': Peter Mandelson 'regrets' association with Jeffrey Epstein

Peter Mandelson, the UK ambassador to the United States, has told Sky News he “regrets” his association with paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

Lord Mandelson‘s links to the late billionaire were exposed in a 2019 report by JP Morgan bank, filed in a New York court.

Epstein killed himself in August of that year while awaiting trial on charges of sex trafficking minors.

He had previously served an 18-month sentence after pleading guilty to procuring a person under the age of 18 for prostitution.

Whilst serving that sentence, the JP Morgan report suggests that Mr Mandelson stayed at Epstein’s Manhattan flat.

Epstein wrote to his private banker on 17 June 2009: “Peter will be staying at 71st over weekend…”

At the time, Lord Mandelson was the Business Secretary in the UK government under then-Prime Minister Gordon Brown. He was appointed UK ambassador to the United States in December 2024.

Sky News asked him if he did, indeed, stay at Epstein’s flat while the disgraced financier was in jail.

He replied: “I’m not answering any questions about him. My knowledge of him is something I regret, I wish I’d never met him in the first place.”

Asked why he had an association with Epstein whilst he was in jail, Lord Mandelson replied: “Why did many people meet him? He was a prolific networker. And I wish I’d never met him in the first place.”

As US ambassador, Lord Mandelson represents Britain’s interests in Washington and has vowed to treat Donald Trump‘s administration with “respect, seriousness and understanding of where they are coming from politically”.

This comes after Lord Mandelson described the US president as a “danger to the world”, for which he apologised earlier this year.

He told the Alain Elkann Interviews podcast in 2019: “What Donald Trump represents and believes is an anathema to mainstream British opinion.”

Mr Mandelson added: “Even those who have a sneaking admiration for Donald Trump because of his personality, nonetheless regard him as reckless, and a danger to the world.”

But in January this year, Lord Mandelson said he now considered his remarks “as ill-judged and wrong”.

World

Palestinians flock to Gaza aid centres despite concerns – as lawyers call for sanctions on Israel

Published

2 hours ago

May 27, 2025

admin

Palestinians flock to Gaza aid centres despite concerns - as lawyers call for sanctions on Israel

Thousands of Palestinians have flocked to aid distribution sites in Gaza with desperation for food overcoming concerns over Israeli-enforced checks at the centres.

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), which is backed by Israel and the US, said on Tuesday it had distributed around 8,000 food boxes, equivalent to about 462,000 meals – just a fraction of what is needed, aid agencies say.

The centres have opened as hundreds of legal professionals in the UK, including lawyers and former judges, accused Israel of “genocide” and “war crimes”.

Crowds including women and children could be seen at one centre in Rafah, southern Gaza, where people received packages including rice, flour, canned beans, pasta, olive oil, biscuits and sugar.

Witnesses in Rafah said Israeli gunfire was heard after desperate people broke fences to reach supplies.

The Israeli military said its forces did not direct aerial gunfire towards the centre, but rather fired warning shots in an area outside the hub.

In a statement, it said control over the situation had been established, with aid distribution to continue as planned.

Many Palestinians stayed away amid fears over Israel’s plan to use biometric screening procedures on those receiving vital food packages.

Israeli officials said one advantage of the new aid system is the chance to screen recipients to exclude anyone they say is connected with Hamas.

Humanitarian groups briefed on the plans say anyone receiving aid will have to submit to facial recognition technology – which many Palestinians fear will end up in Israeli hands to track and possibly target them.

Father-of-seven Abu Ahmed said: “As much as I want to go because I am hungry and my children are hungry, I am afraid.”

He continued: “I am so scared because they said the company [GHF] belongs to Israel and is a mercenary, and also because the resistance [Hamas] said not to go.”

UN boycotts aid foundation

Israel previously said its forces would not be involved in the distribution points but its endorsement of the plan, which resembles Israeli schemes floated previously, has led to many questioning the neutrality of GHF.

The United Nations and major international aid groups have refused to cooperate with the GHF – accusing it of undermining the principle that aid should be distributed based on need.

“Humanitarian assistance must not be politicised or militarised,” said Christian Cardon, chief spokesperson of the International Committee of the Red Cross.

Ex-judges call for sanctions on Israel

Over 800 legal professionals – including former Supreme Court judges – have published an open letter calling for the UK to impose sanctions on Israel.

The letter says “genocide is being perpetrated in Gaza or that, at a minimum, there is a serious risk of genocide”. It continues: “War crimes, crimes against humanity and serious violations of international humanitarian law are being committed.”

Israel has consistently denied these accusations.

As a small flow of aid has arrived in Gaza after Israel’s months-long blockade, Israeli forces have kept up attacks on various targets in the territory.

Some 3,901 Palestinians have been killed since a ceasefire collapsed in mid-March, according to Gaza’s Hamas-run health ministry.

As the GHF centres opened on Monday, Israeli airstrikes killed at least 36 people in a school-turned-shelter that was hit as people slept, according to local health officials.

Israel said it targeted militants operating from the school.

US