On the Alaska governor’s desk, the horned skull of a musk ox, an ice age relic, is proudly displayed, resting on a collage of pictures of the state.

It was hunted by Mike Dunleavy himself on a trip to an island in the Bering Sea, the narrow strait of water which separates the US from Russia, where Vladimir Putin’s plane will cross into American airspace before his first foray onto US soil in almost a decade.

The governor, the state’s most senior politician, proudly tells me that there is another trophy from his hunting trips on show in the nearby airport, a large brown bear hide, encased in glass.

Follow latest updates from Ukraine war

Alaska is a vast wilderness which is sparsely populated. But the quiet is being pierced now by a cacophony of questions over this summit.

Why was Putin invited here? What does he want? What’s he willing to concede? And is Donald Trump about to walk into his trap?

The summit will take place on a military base on the outskirts of Anchorage, Alaska’s biggest city.

It was thrown together at short notice so there were few venue options available, given the security that is required.

Even so, many of the visiting journalists and support staff for politicians are staying in Airbnbs because there are not enough hotel rooms available for everyone.

There is the sense that this is a momentous occasion.

The last time Putin met a US president was in 2021, when he exchanged starkly differing views with Joe Biden in Geneva.

But that was before his invasion of Ukraine in 2022. He’s been a pariah ever since, wanted by the International Criminal Court for alleged war crimes, including the abduction of Ukrainian children.

With this invite, Trump is bringing him back in from the cold.

I ask Governor Dunleavy whether Putin is being rewarded for his invasion of a sovereign nation.

“I don’t think so,” he replies, “I think this is an opportunity for the president to sit down face to face [with Putin].

“And the president is going to ascertain really quickly in a face-to-face meeting whether he’s serious or not for peace. It’s difficult to solve these wars unless you have a discussion with the participants.”

In a green, timber-framed house around the corner, Meg Leonard – a one-time Republican who describes herself as a “never Trumper” – has a different view.

On a tree in her front garden, the Ukrainian flag hangs. She bought it after watching Zelenskyy’s disastrous meeting with Trump in the Oval Office in February on TV.

Read more:
What could Ukraine be asked to give up?
What to expect from pivotal Ukraine summit
Ukrainians are appalled at Trump’s naive and cack-handed diplomacy

Zelenskyy was mocked for not wearing a suit and told by Trump he “didn’t hold the cards” in the situation.

“I think he was denigrating the president of Ukraine and that is not good,” she says.

“Right after that, I ordered the flag and hung it up because I support Ukraine. Putin should not be allowed to take land that is not his.

“I think Donald Trump thinks he’s a strongman and that Putin should capitulate to him.

“I don’t think Putin has any intention of doing that.”

Meg says she is appalled that this meeting is taking place one-on-one, without Ukraine’s president. Trump has said that Vlodymyr Zelenskyy will be invited to any follow-up meeting.

“Trump should not be making decisions for Ukraine,” Meg says, “Zelenskyy should at least have a voice in what is being decided. It is his country and his people.

“Putin’s going to be five miles from here. He’s not welcome by me. He is an international criminal; he should be arrested. He is killing women and children, and people in hospitals.”

But you don’t have to go far in Alaska to find a contrasting view.

In Whittier, a port town mostly home to fishermen, boat operators and tourists, wildlife photographer Tim Colley from New York thinks Trump is an underestimated dealmaker. He’s not concerned about Zelenskyy’s absence from the summit.

“I think Trump truly wants peace,” Tim says, “At some point in time, you’ve got to decide how many more people need to die. Does Zelenskyy want to just keep throwing people into the fire?

“I think these two guys [Trump and Putin] have probably the ultimate egos in the world. I’m not sure Zelenskyy’s got the self-control to tread lightly on those egos.”

There is a symbolism to this meeting taking place in Alaska. The US bought the state from Russia in 1867. It’s an example of how territories can be traded.

Ukraine is nervous that their land may, too, be carved up, without them in the room.

Trump has promised that is not on the table in this initial meeting with Putin, but the US president is famously unpredictable.

When he met with Putin in 2018 in Helsinki, he went against his own intelligence community to side with the Russian president, suggesting there hadn’t been Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

The people of Ukraine, who are enduring a terrifying and intensifying onslaught from Russia, will watch nervously as this summit takes place thousands of miles away without an advocate for them in attendance.

At least 56 people have been killed after flash flooding hit a remote, mountainous village in Indian-controlled Kashmir.

Estimates suggest at least 80 people are still missing in the devastated Himalayan village of Chasoti, in the Jammu and Kashmir region, according to local officials.

Rescue teams have brought 300 people to safety, they added.

Chasoti, around 85 miles (136km) northeast of Jammu, is the last village accessible to vehicles on the route of an annual Hindu pilgrimage to a mountainous shrine, the Machail Mata temple.

The devastating floods swept away the main community kitchen, where more than 200 pilgrims were gathered, as well as dozens of vehicles and motorbikes, officials said.

Abdul Majeed Bichoo, a local resident from a neighbouring village, said he witnessed the bodies of eight people being pulled out from under the mud.

The 75-year-old said Chasoti had become a “sight of complete devastation from all sides”.

“It was heartbreaking and an unbearable sight,” he continued. “I have not seen this kind of destruction of life and property in my life.”

India’s deputy minister for science and technology, Jitendra Singh, said the floods were triggered by torrential rains.

Sudden, intense downpours over small areas – known as cloudbursts – are increasingly common in India’s Himalayan regions, which are prone to flash floods and landslides.

Last week, floodwater crashed through an entire Himalayan village in India’s Uttarakhand state.

Television footage showed pilgrims in Chasoti crying in fear as water flooded the village.

At least 50 of the rescued people were badly injured and were being treated in local hospitals, local official Susheel Kumar Sharma said.

Officials said the Hindu pilgrimage, which began in July and was scheduled to end on 5 September, has been suspended. More rescue teams were on the way to the area, they added.

Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

Read more from Sky News:
Rescue after Uttarkashi floods
What to expect from Ukraine summit
Baby Shark copyright case

Ramesh Kumar, the divisional commissioner of Kishtwar district, told news agency ANI that local police and disaster response officials had reached the scene.

“Army, air force teams have also been activated. Search and rescue operations are underway,” Mr Kumar said.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi said “the situation is being monitored closely” and offered his prayers to “all those affected by the cloudburst and flooding.”

Cloudbursts can cause intense flooding and landslides, and have increased in recent years, partly due to climate change.

Damage from the storms has also been exacerbated by unplanned development in mountain regions.

Israel’s far-right finance minister has announced plans to build a new settlement in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, which he said would “bury” the idea of a Palestinian state.

Palestinians and rights groups said the settlement would effectively cut the West Bank into two separate parts and rob them of any chance to build a Palestinian state.

This comes as several countries, including the UK, said they would recognise a Palestinian state in September, unless Israel meets several conditions, including agreeing to a ceasefire in Gaza.

“This reality finally buries the idea of a Palestinian state, because there is nothing to recognise and no one to recognise,” finance minister Bezalel Smotrich said as he announced the construction plans.

“Anyone in the world who tries today to recognise a Palestinian state will receive an answer from us on the ground.”

The settlement is planned to be built in E1, an open tract of land east of Jerusalem, and includes around 3,500 apartments to expand the existing settlement of Maale Adumim, Mr Smotrich said.

E1 has been eyed for Israeli development for more than two decades, but plans were halted due to pressure from the US during previous administrations.

Read more:
Inside the conflict forcing Palestinians from their homes
The city where what was law now has no place in reality

Now-US President Donald Trump and the US ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, were praised on Thursday by Mr Smotrich as “true friends of Israel as we have never had before”.

Mr Smotrich, himself a Jewish settler, told Sky News’ international correspondent Diana Magnay that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Mr Trump had agreed to the revival of the E1 scheme. There was no confirmation of this claim from either leader.

The E1 plan has not yet received its final approval, which is expected next week.

Foreign Secretary David Lammy has said the UK strongly opposes the plan, calling it a “flagrant breach of international law and must be stopped now”.

Construction of homes ‘within a year’

Peace Now, which tracks settlement activity in the West Bank, said some bureaucratic steps remain before construction could begin, including the approval of Israel’s high planning council.

But if the process moves quickly, infrastructure work could start in the next few months, with the construction of homes to follow in about a year.

“The E1 plan is deadly for the future of Israel and for any chance of achieving a peaceful two-state solution. We are standing at the edge of an abyss, and the government is driving us forward at full speed,” Peace Now said in a statement.

It added that the plan was “guaranteeing many more years of bloodshed”.

Mr Smotrich was also criticised by an Israeli rights group established by former Israel Defence Forces (IDF) soldiers, who accused the far-right politician of encouraging West Bank settlement activity while the world’s attention was on the Gaza war.

As well as official, government-approved settlements, there are also Israeli outposts, which are established without government approval and are considered illegal by Israeli authorities.

But reports suggest the government often turns a blind eye to their creation.

In May, Mr Netanyahu’s government approved 22 new settlements, including the legalisation of outposts that had previously been built without authorisation.

Since the Hamas-led attacks on 7 October 2023 and Israel’s subsequent military bombardment of Gaza, more than 100 Israeli outposts have been established, according to Peace Now.

Settler violence against Palestinians has also increased, according to the UN, with an average of 118 incidents each month – up from 108 in 2023, which was already a record year.

Smotrich’s dreams of West Bank annexation never been closer to reality

Diana Magnay

International correspondent

@DiMagnaySky

Bezalel Smotrich is pumped. His dreams of resettlement and annexation of the West Bank have never been closer to fruition. 

The E1 settlement plan, which would cut the West Bank from East Jerusalem, was first conceived back in 1995 by then prime minister Yitzhak Rabin.

Thirty years later, the extremist settler contingent within the government seems to be on the verge of making it a reality.

The prime minister’s office has yet to confirm Benjamin Netanyahu’s backing, but according to Smotrich, both he and President Trump are on board.

E1 (or T1 as they say they will call it, in honour of Donald Trump) would be another symbolic blow to the very notion of Palestinian statehood, as is every settlement and piece of related infrastructure which Israel builds in the occupied West Bank.

At a time when the UK, France and others all say they will recognise a Palestinian state unless Israel pushes for a ceasefire in Gaza, Netanyahu’s government is doubling down.

Per Smotrich, their response will come through roads, buildings, neighbourhoods, the spread of Jewish life across Palestinian lands in the West Bank – the creation of facts on the ground. 

The UK, France and many others in the international community may not like it, but the real power-broker here, certainly as far as Netanyahu is concerned, is Donald Trump.

He is the president who moved the US embassy to Jerusalem; his ambassador has said there is no such thing as the West Bank.

For the likes of Smotrich, that is all the encouragement they need.

Plans criticised as ‘extension of genocide’

The Palestinian foreign ministry called the settlement plan an extension of the crimes of genocide, displacement and annexation. Israel has long disputed accusations of genocide and rights abuses, saying it is acting in self-defence.

Nabil Abu Rudeineh, the Palestinian president’s spokesperson, called on the US to pressure Israel to stop the building of settlements.

Hamas said the plan was part of Israel’s “colonial, extremist” policies and called on Palestinians to confront it.

Qatar, which has been acting as a mediator between Hamas and Israel in a bid to secure a ceasefire in Gaza, said the move was a flagrant violation of international law.

“The EU rejects any territorial change that is not part of a political agreement between involved parties. So annexation of territory is illegal under international law,” European Commission spokesperson Anitta Hipper said.

Today, an estimated 700,000 Israeli settlers live in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. There is also a growing movement of Israelis wanting to build settlements in Gaza.

Settlers make up around 5% of Israel’s population and 15% of the West Bank’s population, according to data from Peace Now.

Settlements are illegal under international law and have been condemned by the UN. They are, however, authorised by the Israeli government.

According to the Israel Policy Forum, the settlement programme is intended to protect Israel’s security, with settlers acting as the first line of defence “against an invasion”.

Mr Smotrich’s settlement announcement comes after the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand on Mr Smotrich and his fellow far-right cabinet member, Itamar Ben-Gvir, for “repeated incitements of violence against Palestinian civilians” in the West Bank.

Foreign Secretary David Lammy said in June that the ministers had been “encouraging egregious abuses of human rights” for “months”.

Last year, Mr Smotrich, whose National Religious Party largely draws its support from settlers, ordered preparations for the annexation of the West Bank.

His popularity has fallen in recent months, with polls showing that his party would not win a single seat in parliament in elections were held today.