The sister of a man who died in the Hillsborough disaster has cast doubt on whether a law aimed at preventing official cover-ups can ever truly work “until they start sending people to prison”.
A new report into calls for a “Hillsborough Law”, published by parliament’s Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR), has recommended the government consider introducing a statutory “duty of candour” for all public bodies.
Campaigners want the new legislation to prevent a repeat of the experiences of families of the 97 fans who were killed in the 1989 Hillsborough disaster from happening again.
In June 2021, two police forces agreed to pay damages to more than 600 survivors of the Hillsborough disaster and the family members of victims following a cover-up of the tragedy.
Louise Brookes, whose brother Andrew Mark Brookes was one of the Hillsborough victims, told Sky News that, while she welcomes the principle of a Hillsborough Law to prevent cover-ups in future, she is concerned at how seriously the duty of candour would be taken.
“You will never get people to tell the truth when it’s not in their best interests when they are protected by their bosses, when it’s the establishment,” she said.
“Until they start sending people to prison, nothing is going to change in this country.”
Pressure for a new law increased this week after the report of the inquiry into the infected blood scandalfound it “could largely have been avoided” and that there was a “pervasive” cover-up to hide the truth.
The JCHR said it heard from witnesses who felt the lessons of Hillsborough “remained unlearnt” and some of the same issues continued to have an impact at other major hearings including the Manchester Arena inquiry.
Advertisement
“People need to understand that these cover-ups traumatise us for life,” Ms Brookes said.
She said victims of a series of scandals have experienced it.
Image: Louise Brookes says people need to go to prison for the law to be effective. Pic: PA
Image: Andrew Mark Brookes (centre)
Ms Brookes continued: “For us, the truth is these lies ruin our lives and have sent some people to their graves.
“Individuals need to find their moral compass.”
Last year, in a response to a report on Hillsborough by the former bishop of Liverpool, the Right Reverend James Jones, the government stopped short of introducing legislation, instead proposing a pledge to put the public interest ahead of its reputation.
But JCHR chairwoman Joanna Cherry KC said: “All of us on the human rights committee have huge respect and admiration for the courage and fortitude of the families of those who died at Hillsborough and the survivors. Just this week we have also seen how the victims of the infected blood scandal had to go through a similar struggle.
“It is shameful that their pain was compounded by the delays and obfuscation they faced in their search for the truth, and the decades they had to wait for justice.
“Even so many years later, lessons still have to be learnt to ensure that these failures are not repeated.”
Image: Infected blood scandal victims and campaigners protest on College Green in Westminster as they call for compensation. Pic: PA
Solicitor Elkan Abrahamson, a director of the Hillsborough Law Now campaign, told Sky News that the public was “fed up with officials lying all the time” and that victims were currently suffering a double injustice.
“There is an impetus from the public for this to be enacted.
“When you ask bereaved families what they want to achieve, almost always the answer is ‘We don’t want this to happen to anyone else’. When they see the government or other public officials covering up what went wrong that almost wounds them psychologically.
“It compounds the trauma they suffered in the first place. It is offensive, not just to the bereaved, but to us as a society.”
In response to the JCHR report, the Cabinet Office pointed to remarks by the Paymaster General John Glen in the Commons on the infected bloody inquiry report this week.
He told MPs that on issues like duty of candour “progress is being made in different ways”.
Police investigating the Horizon Post Office scandal have now identified seven suspects, with more than 45 people classed as “persons of interest”.
A “scaled-up” national team of officers has been in place for over six months as part of Operation Olympos – dedicated to looking at crimes related to the Horizon Post Office scandal.
The number of suspects has increased to seven since before Christmas, as part of a UK-wide investigation involving 100 officers.
Four have now been interviewed under caution.
Hundreds of subpostmasters were wrongfully convicted of stealing after faulty computer software created false accounting shortfalls in Post Office branches between 1999 and 2015.
Commander Stephen Clayman, Gold Command for Operation Olympos, described a “huge shift” in terms of their investigation and “significant progress”.
Image: Commander Stephen Clayman
“We’ve got over four million documents that are going to rise to about six million documents,” he said, “but we’re beginning to methodically work through those and looking at individuals who are associated with certain prosecutions.”
More on Post Office Scandal
Related Topics:
He described a “pool of about 45 people plus” classed as “persons of interest”, with that number “expected to grow”.
He added that officers have questioned “some” in the past and “more recently” and are looking at the offences of perverting the course of justice and perjury.
The “wider pool” of persons of interest is made up of Post Office investigators, lawyers, and “management” across Fujitsu and the Post Office.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
11:28
Post Office knew about faulty IT system
The team of officers will be identifying actions which could amount to criminal offences on both an individual and corporate basis.
Any decisions made on whether to charge will not happen until after the Post Office inquiry findings are “published and reviewed”.
The Operation Olympos officers are part of four teams – a London hub and three regional teams – who have been described as “highly motivated” across England and Wales.
Police Scotland and the Police Service of Northern Ireland are also helping.
Cmdr Clayman said that officers “will be building a robust case” to pass on to the Crown Prosecution Service.
Image: Officer working in one of the four Operation Olympos teams
He also added that, compared to the inquiry, his officers will have to “prove this to the criminal standard…a much, much higher standard”.
He described feeling “optimistic” and “confident” that the teams will have “some successful outcomes”, and said they are “working as hard and as quickly as (they) can”.
Teams are involved in what has been described as a “focused strategy which gets to the heart of the issues”.
Their investigations are being overseen by the National Police Chiefs’ Council and the Metropolitan Police.
Victims have also been told that the police will not be reinvestigating every case but “taking a speculative look at cases” to focus on key people involved and evidence for prosecution.
Operation Olympos is also making use of special software to help process the amount of evidence to sift through material in relation to key events and identified cases.
Of the four suspects interviewed under caution, two were questioned in late 2021, one in late 2024 and the most recent in early 2025.
The government has made an offer to rebel Labour MPs over its controversial welfare reforms, Sky News understands.
More than 120 Labour MPs were poised to vote against the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment (PIP) Bill on Tuesday.
The changes come after a ring-around by cabinet ministers failed to bring rebels on side.
The bill was intended to restrict eligibility for the PIP – the main disability payment in England- and limit the sickness-related element of universal credit, to help shave £5bn off the welfare budget by 2030.
Sky News political editor Beth Rigby has heard that existing PIP claimants will be able to keep their payments, which means 370,000 people will not lose out. This will cost the government at least £1.5bn, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Sky News understands that a senior source has accepted the change, but it will be up to each individual rebel to make a decision on whether to withdraw.
The source said they think the changes are a “good package” with “generous concessions”.
A reasoned amendment signed by 126 Labour MPs argued that disabled people had not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. If passed, this would have killed the bill.
Other concessions offered by the government include allowing existing claimants to keep the health element of Universal Credit.
Sky News understands that some senior rebels are willing to accept the concessions – with one saying that “the concessions will be positively received, and I expect to vote with the government now”.
Other MPs who had not wanted to rebel were also expecting to change their votes.
However, several Labour MPs on the left of the party have gone public to say they will still oppose the government, including Diane Abbott, Richard Burgon, Nadia Whittome and Brian Leishman.
What is PIP?
The biggest shakeup to the system involved changes to PIP – money given to people, including some of whom are in work – who have extra care needs or mobility needs as a result of a disability.
People who claim it are awarded points depending on their ability to do certain activities, such as washing and preparing food, and this influences how much they will receive.
From November 2026, people would have needed to score a minimum of four points in at least one activity to qualify for the daily living element of PIP – instead of fewer points spread across a range of tasks.
This would have impacted existing claimants as well as new ones. The government’s concessions are understood to see this change dropped for existing claimants.
X
This content is provided by X, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable X cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to X cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow X cookies for this session only.
The government intended to freeze the health element of universal credit, claimed by more than two million people, at £97 a week during this parliament, and cut the rate to £50 for new claimants.
Again, it’s understood the government’s concessions mean this change now won’t apply to existing claimants.
Two Metropolitan Police officers committed gross misconduct during the strip search of a 15-year-old schoolgirl wrongly suspected of possessing cannabis, a misconduct hearing has found.
PCs Kristina Linge, Victoria Wray, and Rafal Szmydynski conducted the search of the black girl, known as Child Q, with no appropriate adult present at a school in Hackney, east London, in 2020.
Scotland Yard apologised, and the Children’s Commissioner for England, Dame Rachel de Souza, described the case as “shocking” after details of the incident emerged in 2022.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:01
From March 2022 – Child Q: ‘Black girls should feel safe in school’
PCs Linge, Wray and Szmydynski suspected the girl was in possession of cannabis, but the police watchdog later determined no drugs were found in her bags or outer clothing.
At a police misconduct hearing in London today, Linge and Szmydytnski were found to have committed gross misconduct. They could potentially be dismissed when the sanctions are decided.
Wray was cleared of gross misconduct, but found to have committed misconduct.
The panel found she became involved in a “situation where the decision had been decided already”.
The case of Child Q drew outrage when it first came to light in March 2022 and sparked protests.
Image: In March 2022 crowds waved banners and placards reading ‘protect black kids’ and ‘shame on you’
The officers had been accused of treating Child Q differently due to her race, but Commander Jason Prins, chair of the misconduct panel, said: “We do not draw any inference that race was an effective cause of this incident.”
The panel found concerns about drugs and potential gang involvement were initially raised by school staff.
“Like many cases where stop and search is used, here the subject of the search was identified to police officers by other professionals rather than being by officers in the street,” Commander Prins added.
He said the problem was with the decision to conduct the strip search in the first place, finding it was “unnecessary” and “disproportionate”.
“There should never have been a strip search in these circumstances,” he said, accepting Child Q found it “humiliating and degrading”.
The panel did not find any officer breached professional behaviour standards relating to equality and diversity, or honesty and integrity.
During the misconduct case, the three officers gave evidence, and each said they were not influenced by subconscious bias.
Luke Ponte, for Linge, said they happened to be “three immigrant officers” who were “trying to do their best to their adopted country” as they were seeking to solve a problem.
Mr Ponte said: “These officers must not bear the entire weight of Child Q where there has been wider dysfunction as to how this came about.”
Breaches of the Met’s standards of professional behaviour found to amount to gross misconduct can lead to dismissal or a final written warning, according to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC).
A fourth officer will face a disciplinary meeting at a later date relating to no appropriate adult being present during the search. This is separate from this misconduct hearing, and it’s a lower level of discipline.
Commander Kevin Southworth, on behalf of the force, said in a statement after the verdict: “The experience of Child Q should never have happened and was truly regrettable.
“We have sincerely apologised to Child Q since this incident happened. Again, I am deeply sorry to Child Q and her family for the trauma that we caused her, and the damage this incident caused to the trust and confidence Black communities across London have in our officers.
“While the officers involved did not act correctly, we acknowledge there were organisational failings. Training to our officers around strip search and the type of search carried out on Child Q was inadequate, and our oversight of the power was also severely lacking.
“This left officers, often young in service or junior in rank, making difficult decisions in complex situations with little information, support or clear resources to help their decision-making.
“What happened to Child Q was a catalyst for change, both for the Met and for policing nationally.
“While we should not have needed an incident such as Child Q to check our approach, it has absolutely led us to improving our processes and significantly reducing the number of these types of searches carried out.
“It’s crucial we get this right to ensure the impact on young people is minimised as far as possible.
“Sadly, we know there are children in London being exploited to carry drugs and weapons for others as well as involved in criminality, so these types of searches have to remain within police powers. The work we have done since Child Q means we now have the right safeguards in place.”