Five EVs that lease for under $300/month
Last February there were nine EVs that leased for an average monthly cost of under $400 before tax and license. Since then, factory incentives have become even more attractive, and now four of those nine are leasing for under $300/month. A fifth EV, one that leased for over $400/month back then, has plunged into the sub-$300 club after a $120/month cut in cost.
Under $300/month is notable because many people spend more than that on gas, and, depending on where you get your electricity from, switching to an EV could offset most or all of the cost of the lease.
Have EV leases bottomed yet? Maybe. There are signs of it in a few of these offers, but at this point only time can tell. In any case, these five electrics have some of the best lease terms we’ve seen in years, perhaps ideal for drivers yearning to start their electric transition with minimal financial commitment.
1. 2024 Hyundai Kona Electric SEL – $234/month
At $199/month for 24 months and $1029 to start, the Hyundai Kona Electric has an average monthly lease cost that’s 35% less than when the second-generation models first reached our shores earlier this year. In well-equipped SEL trim (MSRP $38,050), the redesigned front-drive five-passenger crossover carries 25.5 cubic feet behind its rear seats, travels 261 miles on a full charge and scoots from zero to 60mph in 6.7 seconds.
Curiously, the Kona Electric in SE trim (MSRP $34,050) leases for $28/month more than the SEL despite being $4000 cheaper on a purchase. So those willing to settle for the base model’s relatively mild 8.7-second 0-60 time and below-average 200-mile range in an effort to save a bit of money should consider buying rather than leasing, especially since Hyundai’s rebate on a purchase matches the $7500 incentive that contributes to the amazing lease rates.
Hyundai dealers don’t stock many of these gems. By our observation, it seems that the Kona Electric makes up less than 5% of a given dealership’s EV inventory, so huge discounts, like the car itself, are a bit rare. Let us help you find a Hyundai Kona Electric in your area.
2. Subaru Solterra Premium – $241/month (2023), $329/month (2024)
I thought about striking this one off the list since the 2023 Solterra seems to be completely sold out. It remains on the list since there are some incredible dealer discounts on 2024 models that could drive the average monthly lease cost of a 2024 to well below $300/month. Most notably, Heritage Subaru Catonsville in Maryland, Diehl Subaru in Ohio, and Diablo Subaru of Walnut Creek in California are discounting in-stock 2024 Solterras in Premium trim by $6500 or more, which should translate into a $70/month reduction from the factory lease terms, resulting in an effective monthly lease cost of $250 to $260 per month. Judging by the market reaction to a no-down, $241/month factory lease offer that quickly cleaned out 2023 models from dealer inventories in April, $260/month is a pretty good deal for a current-year all-wheel-drive five-passenger crossover that goes 227 miles on a charge, hustles from zero to 60mph in 6.5 seconds, and carries 29 cubic feet of cargo behind its rear seats.
By our count, Solterra availability has at least tripled in the last two months as an influx of 2024 models arrived at dealerships, which might be part of the reason for some of the enticing discounts we found. Find a great deal on a Subaru Solterra near you.
3. 2024 Hyundai Ioniq 6 SE RWD – $264/month
Maybe it’s not the cheapest lease on this list, but its incredible 361-mile range arguably makes the Hyundai Ioniq 6 SE in rear-wheel-drive configuration the best value of the bunch. Capable of sprinting to 60mph in just 6.2 seconds, the five-passenger sedan clearly manages to achieve its range without sacrificing performance. A slippery albeit somewhat polarizing exterior design likely factors into its efficiency, leaving a smaller than average 11.2 cubic foot trunk as perhaps the only evidence of compromise.
The factory lease terms of $189/month for a short 24 months with $1999 due at signing before tax and license is quite attractive for an EV with best-in-class range that’s only on its second year in the US. In fact, Hyundai’s Ioniq 6 factory incentives over the past couple of months seem to have been working so well that advertised dealer-advertised discounts currently range from modest to nonexistent, even on higher trim levels. That being said, popular car shopping websites indicate that discounts of about $1500 can be achieved in some areas. Look for a Hyundai Ioniq 6 deal near you.
4. 2024 Toyota bZ4X XLE – $266/month (AWD in NY), $267/month (FWD in CA)
Unfortunately you’ll probably have to wait If you want a Toyota bZ4X because last month’s factory lease offers on the were spectacular, with average monthly lease costs starting from $191/month for a 2023 and $227/month for a 2024. In-stock inventory was depleted in less than two weeks, so now dealers are just taking reservations for in-transit and allocated vehicles that barely entered the build phase.
Today, shopping for a bZ4X almost feels like we’ve traveled back in time, circa 2021, when dealer markups and mandatory accessories were the norm rather than the exception. One dealership in the Los Angeles area that was peddling their inventory of 2024 models for nearly $3000 under MSRP in April is now listing a $1990 upcharge for dealer-installed accessories on each bZ4X that is in transit or still being built. And guess what? Six out of seven are reserved. This could indicate that Toyota’s factory lease terms on the bZ4X may have bottomed last month, given that dealers can secure deposits despite a $37/month hike in lease cost. It won’t be a complete surprise if bZ4X leases gradually ratchet up in cost from here until equilibrium is achieved between supply and demand.
As it stands, Toyota’s California lease offer of $189/month for 36 months with $2999 due at signing before tax and license is a true bargain for a front-drive five-passenger crossover that hauls 27.7 cubic feet of cargo behind its rear seats, travels 252 miles on a full charge, and does zero to sixty in a tick over seven seconds. New Yorkers get an even better offer – $159/month for 36 months, $3999 due at signing – for an all-wheel-drive with a 228-mile range and 0-60 time of 6.5 seconds. Great deals, assuming minimal dealer markups and add-ons.
Shoppers who don’t enjoy negotiating with dealers that have the upper hand should seriously consider the Subaru Solterra, which is pretty much a carbon copy of an all-wheel-drive bZ4x but with immediate availability and attractive retailer discounts. For die-hard Toyota loyalists and those that just can’t live without the additional 24 miles of range of a front-drive bZ4X, we can help find a fair deal on a Toyota bZ4X in your area.
5. 2024 Nissan LEAF S – $294/month (Northeast, DE, VA, MD), $315/mo (elsewhere)
At $189/month for 36 months with $3,959 to start, the average monthly lease cost for the Nissan LEAF S is dipping to just under $300/month for the first time in over two years. However, that still seems a bit expensive for the aging front-drive, five-passenger hatchback with 24 cubic feet of cargo space behind its rear seats since it only travels 149 miles on a full charge and takes 7.4 seconds to achieve 60mph from standstill.
Some dealers seem to be compensating for these shortcomings by substantially undercutting the factory lease terms, particularly on the West Coast. Nissan of Portland in Oregon and Concord Nissan in the San Francisco area are advertising 36-month leases with effective monthly costs of $193 and $228, respectively for a LEAF S. Southern California dealers Nissan of Van Nuys, Nissan of Tustin, Nissan of Costa Mesa, and Nissan of Mission Hills have 18-month leases that with effective monthly costs between $237 and $246, which is incredibly attractive considering the short commitment. Look for Nissan LEAF deals near you.
As always, check our Electric Vehicle Best Price Guide and Electric Vehicle Best Lease Guide for the best deals on EVs in the US.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
The BP logo is displayed outside a petrol station that also offers electric vehicle recharging, on Feb. 27, 2025, in Somerset, England.
Anna Barclay | Getty Images News | Getty Images
BP shares jumped on Wednesday after activist investor Elliott went public with a stake of more than 5% in the struggling British oil major, which has pivoted back to oil in a bid to restore investor confidence.
BP shares were last seen up 4.75% at 9:44 a.m. London time. The London-listed stock price is down around 5% year-to-date.
Hedge fund Elliott Management has built its holding in the British oil major to 5.006%, according to a regulatory filing disclosed late Tuesday. BP’s other large shareholders include BlackRock, Vanguard and Norway’s sovereign wealth fund.
Elliott was first reported to have assumed a position in the oil and gas company back in February, driving a share rally amid expectations that its involvement could pressure BP to shift gears from its green strategy and back toward its core oil and gas businesses.
Within weeks, BP, which has been lagging domestic peer Shell and transatlantic rivals and posted a steep drop in fourth-quarter profit, announced plans to ramp up fossil fuel investments to $10 billion through 2027. This marked a sharp strategic departure for the company, which five years ago became one of the first energy giants to announce plans to cut emissions to net zero “by 2050 or sooner.” As part of that push, the company pledged to slash emissions by up to 40% by 2030 and to ramp up investment in renewables projects.
The oil major scaled back this emissions target to 20% to 30% in February 2023, saying at the time that it needed to keep investing in oil and gas to meet global demand.
Since switching gears, BP’s CEO Murray Auchincloss and outgoing Chair Helge Lund — who is expected to depart the company in 2026 — retained their posts but were penalized with reduced support during BP’s board re-election vote earlier this month amid pressure from both revenue and climate-focused investors.
BP’s strategic reset back to the company’s oil and gas activities took place just as crude prices began to plunge amid volatility triggered by U.S. tariffs and Washington’s trade spat with China, the world’s largest crude importer.
Energy analysts have broadly welcomed the strategic reset, and BP CEO Murray Auchincloss has since said the pivot attracted “significant interest” in the firm’s non-core assets.
The energy firm nevertheless remains firmly in the spotlight as a potential takeover target, with the likes of Shell and U.S. oil giants Exxon Mobil and Chevron touted as possible suitors.
BP is scheduled to report first-quarter earnings on Tuesday. The company has said it anticipates lower reported upstream production and higher net debt in the first quarter than in the final three months of 2024.
Tesla’s earnings report dropped today, and news isn’t great. But instead of recognizing his failures that have led to Tesla’s downturn, CEO Elon Musk lashed out with conspiracy theories while also hypocritically failing to acknowledge that his company was only profitable this quarter due to regulatory credits.
The numbers are in on Tesla’s dismal quarter, with sales, profits and margins tanking significantly for the company despite a rising global EV market.
You’d expect a drop in car sales to be top of mind for a car company, but instead of talking about this, CEO Elon Musk opened the call by talking about his ineffective advisory role to a former reality TV host.
Musk is heading up the self-styled “Department of Government Efficiency,” an advisory group that is focused on reducing redundancy in government. The office is not an actual government department and has a redundant mission to the Government Accountability Office, which is an actual government department focused on reducing government waste.
Musk originally claimed that the department would be able to save $2 trillion for the US government, which is actually impossible because federal discretionary spending is $1.7 trillion, which is a (gets out abacus) smaller number than $2 trillion.
He has, of course, failed at this task that anyone with any level of competence would have known was impossible before setting it out for themselves, and now projects that the department will save $150 billion next year, less than a tenth of his original estimate. But even that projection is likely an overstatement, given that most of the supposed savings that DOGE has found are not actual savings at all.
On top of this, the US government’s deficit has grown to the second-highest level on record – with the first happening in 2020, the last time Mr. Trump squatted in the White House. Which means the government isn’t saving money, it is in fact borrowing and spending more of it than ever before.
So, Musk’s tenure in the advisory board has been an unmitigated failure by any realistic account.
But if you listened to Tesla’s call, you wouldn’t have known this, as Musk was quite boastful of his efforts – starting a Tesla conference call with an irrelevant rant about his fake government department, instead of with Tesla business.
He claimed that he has made “a lot of progress in addressing waste and fraud” and that the job is “mostly done,” which is not correct by his own metrics. Musk stated that his purpose is “trying to bring in the insane deficit that is leading our country, the United States, to destruction,” and as we covered above, that deficit has only increased.
But he also went on to spew some rather insane conspiracy theories about the reasons behind his company’s recent failures, all of which of course put the blame on someone else, rather than himself. The buck stops anywhere but here, I guess.
His primary assertion was that the “blowback from the time I’ve been spending in government” (which, again, is an advisory role, not an actual government position) has come mainly from protesters that were “receiving fraudulent money” and are now angry that the government money spigot has been turned off.
Which, of course, he’s provided no evidence for… and he’s provided no evidence for it because it’s false.
Besides, that’s not how protests work. But incorrect claims that protests do work that way are often used by opponents of free speech, with the motivation of putting a chilling effect public participation. Fitting behavior for an enemy of the First Amendment like Elon Musk.
Meanwhile, this assertion also comes from a person who tried and failed to bribe voters to win an election. Perhaps his admiration of Tesla protesters is aspirational – he wishes his ideas were good enough to inspire that sort of grassroots political effort that money, demonstrably, cannot buy.
But this hypocrisy extends beyond Musk’s hatred of free expression, and strikes at the heart of the business he is the titular leader of, Tesla, the organization that has made him into the richest man in the world. Because not only is it not true that Tesla protests are driven by his ineffective government actions (they are, in fact, driven by him doing Nazi stuff all the time), it’s also objectively true that Musk’s companies are a large recipient of government money.
And that’s particularly relevant today, to the very earnings call where Musk made his ridiculous assertion, because in Q1 2025, Tesla only turned a profit due to government credits. Without them, it would have lost money.
Tesla only profitable in Q1 due to regulatory credits
Per today’s earnings report, Tesla earned $595 million in regulatory credits in Q1. But its total net income for the quarter was $409 million.
This means that without those regulatory credits, Tesla would have posted a -$189 million loss in Q1. It was saved not just by credit sales, but credit sales which increased year over year – in the year-ago quarter, Tesla made $442 million in regulatory credits, despite having higher sales in Q1 2024 than in Q1 2025. So not only were credits higher, but credits per vehicle were higher.
This is a common feature of Tesla earnings, and we even said in our earnings preview that we expected it. While Tesla had a bad quarter, nobody expected it to become actually unprofitable, because there was always the possibility of increasing regulatory credit sales to eke out a profitable quarter.
And this has been the case many times in Tesla’s past, as well. In earlier times, Tesla’s first few profitable quarters were decried by the company’s opponents as an accounting trick, suggesting that regulatory credit sales weren’t “real” profits, and that the cars should have to stand on their own.
This is a silly thing to say – businesses do business in the environment that exists, and every business has an incentive structure that includes subsidies and externalities. If we were to selectively write off certain profits for certain businesses, we could make a tortured case that any business isn’t profitable.
Plus, these opponents didn’t extend the same treatment to the oil industry, which is subsidized to the tune of $760 billion per year in the US alone in unpriced externalities, yet that is somehow never mentioned during their earnings calls.
Musk has even claimed, probably correctly, that if all subsidies were eliminated both for EVs and for oil & gas, that EVs would come out ahead compared to the status quo (more recently, Musk has become one of the biggest funders of anti-EV forces, allying himself with a bought-and-paid oil stooge who is giving even more preferential treatment to the oil industry).
But, setting aside the debate over whether credits are valid profits (they are), for years now we’ve been well beyond Tesla’s reliance on credits. The company has produced significant profits, regardless of credit sales, for some time now.
At least, until today. That’s no longer true – Tesla did rely on credits to become profitable in Q1. And Musk starting the call with a ridiculous rant about government handouts not only shows his hypocrisy and projection on this matter, but his detachment from reality itself. He is, truly, too stuck in the impenetrable echo chamber of his self-congratulating twitter feed to realize what an embarrassment he’s being in public – to the point of inventing shadow enemies to explain the very real, very simple explanation that people aren’t buying his company’s cars because he sucks so much.
Charge your electric vehicle at home using rooftop solar panels. Find a reliable and competitively priced solar installer near you on EnergySage, for free. They have pre-vetted installers competing for your business, ensuring high-quality solutions and 20-30% savings. It’s free, with no sales calls until you choose an installer. Compare personalized solar quotes online and receive guidance from unbiased Energy Advisers. Get started here. – ad*
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
No matter how badly a fleet wants to electrify their operations and take advantage of reduced fuel costs and TCO, the fact remains that there are substantial up-front obstacles to commercial EV adoption … or are there? We’ve got fleet financing expert Guy O’Brien here to help walk us through it on today’s fiscally responsible episode of Quick Charge!
This conversation was motivated by the recent uncertainty surrounding EVs and EV infrastructure at the Federal level, and how that turmoil is leading some to believe they should wait to electrify. The truth? There’s never been a better time to make the switch!
Source Links
Prefer listening to your podcasts? Audio-only versions of Quick Charge are now available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, TuneIn, and our RSS feed for Overcast and other podcast players.
New episodes of Quick Charge are recorded, usually, Monday through Thursday (and sometimes Sunday). We’ll be posting bonus audio content from time to time as well, so be sure to follow and subscribe so you don’t miss a minute of Electrek’s high-voltage daily news.
Got news? Let us know!
Drop us a line at tips@electrek.co. You can also rate us on Apple Podcasts and Spotify, or recommend us in Overcast to help more people discover the show.
If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
-
Sports2 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports1 year agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years agoGame-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business3 years agoBank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway