Connect with us

Published

on

Chris* had spent more than two years in prison, serving a sentence for grievous bodily harm (GBH.)

To his surprise, he was released just weeks ago – a month early – under a controversial scheme to ease overcrowding in prisons across England and Wales. But he paints a picture of chaos.

Describing it as a “rollercoaster”, he says there was a “mix-up” and “the staff didn’t really know what was going on”.

It started when he was on the phone to his family from inside prison. “They said, ‘we’re going to see you today, you’re getting released’.

“And I said: ‘No I’m not’.”

His family had been given the wrong date. His release wouldn’t happen for another week. And yet the chaos, according to Chris, only continued.

He was selected for early release and told he was a “low risk” to the public, but the early release prisoner scheme comes under continued scrutiny.

The Prison Governors Association today warned the scheme would not have sufficient impact to ease overcrowding, and suggested the prison service could find itself unable to accept prisoners from courts “within weeks” because jails are so full.

Meanwhile, leading domestic abuse charities have shared with Sky News a letter, sent to justice secretary Alex Chalk, raising serious concerns about the scheme.

The end of the custody supervised licence scheme (ECSL) means eligible prisoners can now be released up to 70 days before the end of their sentences.

It allows offenders serving sentences of less than four years to leave prison ahead of time.

The government first launched the measure in October 2023, initially allowing prisoners to be released 18 days early.

Anyone convicted of a sexual, terrorist or serious violent offence is excluded.

But probation staff have consistently raised fears about the extent and pace at which the measure is being expanded, saying the release of prisoners is being sped up without the time for sufficient checks.

A probation worker told Sky News: “Just because they’re not doing a long sentence, that doesn’t mean people are not deemed to be a high risk in the public domain. And we wouldn’t have time to put in place safeguards, or do any checks.”

‘I was very angry and upset’

On the morning Chris was freed, he says there was a knock on his cell door and he was told to head down to reception. Once there, he says he saw other prisoners being released, their discharge grants being handed out.

But when it was his turn, he says he was told his name wasn’t on the list.

“At that point, I was very angry and upset,” he said.

“A week before, they’d told me I was getting released and now they were doing the same thing again.”

Frustrated, he sat in the prison reception for hours, while his family waited outside.

After about three hours, he says a prison worker appeared and apologetically explained that since it was an early release, there was a “mix-up with the systems”.

His case hadn’t been transferred from one computer system to the other.

This is just one man’s story, but it shows the issues with an emergency measure that has been regularly extended with little notice for those handling and processing offenders – finding them accommodation, or providing the necessary support on leaving prison.

The letter sent to the justice secretary from leading women’s charities, including Refuge and Women’s Aid, calls for perpetrators of domestic abuse and stalking to be exempt from the scheme.

“There is a significant disconnect between government rhetoric on VAWG [Violence Against Women And Girls] and announcements such as the expansion of the early release scheme, that will place survivors, and women and girls more broadly, at risk from dangerous offenders of VAWG,” it reads.

“We are prioritising solving a problem about prison overcrowding over the safety of victims,” the domestic abuse commissioner for England and Wales, Nicole Jacobs, told Sky News.

Domestic Abuse Commissioner for England and Wales, Nicole Jacobs, says she has 'genuine fear for victims'
Image:
Nicole Jacobs, the domestic abuse commissioner for England and Wales, says she has ‘genuine fear for victims’

“I have genuine fears for victims,” she said.

These calls follow the publication of a report into HMP Lewes by the Chief Inspector of Prisons.

An inspection found “safe risk management” being undermined by the early release scheme. It cited one example of a prisoner who had their release date brought forward despite deeming him a “risk to children”, with a “history of stalking, domestic abuse, and being subject to a restraining order”.

Chief inspector of prisons Charlie Taylor said the eligibility net for this scheme was “cast fairly wide”.

The chief inspector of prisons Charlie Taylor says the eligibility net for the scheme is 'cast fairly wide'
Image:
Chief inspector of prisons Charlie Taylor

“Inevitably, if you have an early release scheme and the parameters are simply that if you serve less than four years, you’re not a sex offender, a terrorist or a life sentence prisoner… there are some people within that net who will be designated as high risk of harm.”

The overcrowding crisis in prisons extends beyond the early release scheme.

In recent weeks, a number of measures have been triggered by the government to help ease capacity.

Operation Early Dawn, invoked earlier this month, will see defendants in police custody remain there, rather than being transferred to magistrates’ courts for bail hearings, in case there is no space in jail cells to accommodate them.

Police are also being told to consider pausing “non-priority” arrests until there is enough capacity in prisons across England and Wales.

Figures published on Friday showed 87,089 people are currently behind bars in England and Wales.

The number of people that can be held in “safe and decent accommodation” in prison, known as the “certified normal accommodation” or “uncrowded capacity”, is considered by the Ministry of Justice to be 79,615.

Read more
Emergency measure triggered to deal with prison overcrowding in England
Prisoners could be freed more than two months early to ease overcrowding

That means the current overall system is at 109% capacity, or overcrowded.

Chris’s story is symptomatic of a prison system that is overpopulated and under pressure.

He believes it is right that offenders are let out early to relieve capacity, but says he appreciates concerns the public might have.

‘Everyone deserves a second chance’

“I learned a lot,” he said.

“At the end of the day, people learn and obviously people change. Everyone deserves a second chance.”

The government has previously said that the ECSL scheme is about protecting the public, designed to ensure there is enough space to keep putting the most ‘serious’ offenders behind bars.

It maintains there are ‘strict eligibility criteria’ for releasing people, and says the Prison Service retains discretion to prevent the release of any offender where early release presents a higher risk than if they were released at their automatic release date.

Ministers have previously said that any released offender remains subject to probation supervision and stringent licence conditions.

*Chris is a pseudonym we are using to protect his identity.

Continue Reading

UK

Russia accuses British government of being ‘provocative’ after spy ship nears UK

Published

on

By

Russian spy ship on edge of UK waters, warns defence secretary

Russia has accused the British government of “provocative statements” and an “escalation of militaristic hysteria” after the defence secretary warned a Kremlin spy ship was nearing the UK.

At a news conference in Downing Street on Wednesday, John Healey said the Yantar was on the edge of British waters north of Scotland, having entered wider UK waters over the last few weeks.

He said it was the second time this year the ship had been deployed off the UK coast and he claimed it was “designed for gathering intelligence and mapping our undersea cables”.

Russian spy ship the Yantar. Pic: Ministry of Defence
Image:
Russian spy ship the Yantar. Pic: Ministry of Defence

Politics latest: ‘Budget leaks are not acceptable,’ says Reeves

Mr Healey said the ship had “directed lasers” at pilots of surveillance aircraft monitoring its activities – a Russian action he called “deeply dangerous”.

The defence secretary explained: “We deployed a Royal Navy frigate and RAF planes to monitor and track this vessel’s every move, during which the Yantar directed lasers at our pilots.”

He said his message to Moscow and President Vladimir Putin was “we see you, we know what you’re doing, and if the Yantar travels south this week, we are ready”.

More on Defence

Mr Healey also stated the UK government has “military options ready” if the ship sails closer to British shores.

Russia’s response

Responding to Mr Healey’s comments, the Russian embassy to the UK said on social media it noted his “latest provocative statements” and insisted the ship was an “oceanographic research vessel… in international waters”.

The embassy said the British accusations “raise a smile” and Russia’s actions were “not aimed at undermining” the UK’s security.

It hit out at the UK government’s “Russophobic course and the escalation of militaristic hysteria”, which it warned creates “prerequisites for new dangerous situations”, as it urged London to “refrain from destructive steps”.

Read more:
Analysis: A Bond-villain ship prowling our waters

Russian spy ship the Yantar. Pic: MoD/PA
Image:
Russian spy ship the Yantar. Pic: MoD/PA

The defence secretary’s remarks come after a report from MPs warned the UK lacks a plan to defend itself from a military attack, despite the government promising to boost readiness with new arms factories.

At least 13 sites across the UK have been identified for new factories to make munitions and military explosives, with Mr Healey expecting the arms industry to break ground at the first plant next year.

The report, by the Commons Defence Committee, said the UK “lacks a plan for defending the homeland and overseas territories” as it urged the government to launch a “co-ordinated effort to communicate with the public on the level of threat we face”.

‘Assertive retaliation’

Now the government has been cautioned it may need to be “more muscular” in standing up to Russia.

The chair of the Joint Committee on National Security Strategy, Matt Western, said Wednesday’s development “demonstrates once again that Russia presents a genuine and immediate threat to the UK’s security”.

He added that “the UK needed to be more muscular in tackling Russian aggression” and “there is more we can do”.

“More assertive retaliation may be required,” he concluded.

Mr Healey acknowledged the dangers facing the UK, saying the country was in a “new era of threat” that “demands a new era for defence”.

Giving more details on the vessel, he said it was “part of a Russian fleet designed to put and hold our undersea infrastructure and those of our allies at risk”.

Read more from Sky News:
Briton who volunteered as spy for Russia jailed

Rail line blast ‘initiated by Russian secret services’

He said the Yantar wasn’t just part of a naval operation but part of a Russian programme driven by Moscow’s Main Directorate of Deep-Sea Research, or GUGI, which is “designed to have capabilities which can undertake surveillance in peacetime and sabotage in conflict”.

“That is why we’ve been determined, whenever the Yantar comes into British wider waters, we track it, we deter it and we say to Putin we are ready, and we do that alongside allies,” he added.

Asked by Sky News’ political correspondent Rob Powell whether this was the first time that lasers had been used by a Russian vessel against pilots, Mr Healey replied: “This is the first time we’ve had this action from Yantar directed against the British RAF.

“We take it extremely seriously. I’ve changed the Navy’s rules of engagement so that we can follow more closely, monitor more closely, the activities of the Yantar when it’s in our wider waters. We have military options ready.”

Mr Healey added that the last time the Yantar was in UK waters, the British military surfaced a nuclear-powered attack submarine close to the ship “that they did not know was there”.

Continue Reading

UK

Robert Best death: Women in court after man’s body found in Inverclyde field

Published

on

By

Robert Best death: Women in court after man's body found in Inverclyde field

Two women have appeared in court charged with attempting to defeat the ends of justice after a man was found dead in a field in Inverclyde.

The body of Robert Best, 50, was discovered near High Mathernock Farm, Kilmacolm, on the morning of 11 November.

He had been reported missing from Greenock the same day.

Surrounding fields in the area Robert Best's body was discovered
Image:
Surrounding fields in the area Robert Best’s body was discovered

Dorothy Shields, 64, and Nicola Brisland, also known as Nicola Campbell, 41, were arrested and charged in connection with Mr Best’s death.

The pair appeared before Greenock Sheriff Court on Wednesday, where they made no plea to the charge of attempting to defeat the ends of justice.

The suspects, both of Port Glasgow, were granted bail ahead of their next court appearance, which is yet to be confirmed.

Andrew Brodie, 51, and Stephen Shields, 44, have already appeared in court in connection with the case.

More on Scotland

The pair have each been charged with murder and attempting to defeat the ends of justice.

The suspects, both of Greenock, made no plea to the two separate charges last week and were remanded in custody ahead of their next court appearance.

A 45-year-old man previously arrested in connection with assault and a 41-year-old man arrested at the same time as the two women have both been released pending further enquiries.

Read more from Sky News:
Police probe ‘unexplained’ death of 11-year-old girl
Ex-Met officer guilty of more sexual offences

Police Scotland previously said officers investigating Mr Best’s death were carrying out enquiries into a report of a disturbance in Lansbury Street, Greenock, which took place between 11pm on 10 November and 3am on 11 November.

A force spokesperson said: “Enquiries are ongoing.”

Continue Reading

UK

Illegal mountain of waste next to river ‘utterly appalling’, says PM

Published

on

By

Illegal mountain of waste next to river 'utterly appalling', says PM

Sir Keir Starmer has called the pile of fly-tipped illegal waste next to a river in Oxfordshire “utterly appalling” and said “all available powers” will be used to make those responsible cover the cost of the clean-up.

Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said the pile of rubbish in a field beside the River Cherwell in Kidlington is now 150m long and up to 12m high, adding that water is “now lapping against the waste and carrying it into the river”.

Speaking at PMQs, Sir Ed said it is just one of many sites where organised criminal gangs are “illegally dumping their waste onto our countryside and getting away with it”.

“This is a shocking environmental emergency. So will he instruct the Environment Agency to clean it up now?” Sir Ed added.

Sir Keir responded in the House of Commons on Wednesday, calling the scenes “utterly appalling”.

The prime minister said: “A criminal investigation, as he knows, is under way. Specialist officers are tracking down those responsible.

“The Environmental Agency, in answer to this question, will use all available powers to make sure that the perpetrators cover the cost of the clean-up, which must now follow.”

Pic: Sky News
Image:
Pic: Sky News

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

UK’s ‘biggest ecological disaster’

Sir Keir added: “We have boosted the Environment Agency’s budget for tackling waste crime by 50%, giving councils new powers to seize and crush fly-tippers, vehicles and lawbreakers can now face up to five years in jail.”

Earlier this week, Calum Miller, Liberal Democrat MP for Bicester and Woodstock, said recent heavy rainfall brought by Storm Claudia at the weekend had made the situation more urgent, and meant the rubbish was slowly floating towards the river, which eventually flows through Oxford and feeds the Thames.

Calum Miller, Liberal Democrat MP for Bicester and Woodstock
Image:
Calum Miller, Liberal Democrat MP for Bicester and Woodstock

Pic: Sky News
Image:
Pic: Sky News

Mr Miller also told Sky News on Sunday it was the first time he had seen anything on this scale, questioning whether the Environmental Agency had the resources to deal with it.

The cost of removing the waste is estimated to be more than the entire annual budget of the local council, which is about £25m.

Read more from Sky News:
Weather warnings for snow and ice updated
What is the mysterious Yantar ‘spy ship’?

With the site on a floodplain, Mr Miller listed what he saw as the three major environmental risks – waste being washed into the waterways, rain seeping through the waste and carrying toxins into the water and the danger of decomposing chemicals presenting a fire risk.

The site is adjacent to the A34, a busy road running through cities including Oxford and Birmingham.

He said the police had used a helicopter with a heat-seeking camera, and could see that some of the waste was beginning to decompose.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Mountain’ of waste dumped

Mr Miller said he believed the Environment Agency was first made aware of the issue back in July.

He said he believed it was the work of “organised criminal gangs” and raised a “bigger systemic problem around the country”, with “dumps are cropping up in more and more places”.

He added: “My concern is the Environmental Agency lacks the resources to deal with criminal activity on this scale. I’m calling on the government to take action and ensure those who are dealing with such incidents have the powers they need to tackle it at source.”

Anna Burns, the Environment Agency’s director for the Thames area, said on Wednesday: “Most of the tipping happened before we were aware of it. As soon as we were aware, we acted quickly and decisively.”

Ms Burns said: “We are pursuing this as a criminal investigation and currently following a number of leads, and we are laser focused on pursing that investigation.

“And we are working with partners to understand the risks associated with the site.”

She said the agency will pursue the perpetrators to make them pay for the “blight on the landscape” they had caused.

Continue Reading

Trending