Both parties have promised to cut net migration levels – the number of people coming from overseas minus the number leaving – but neither has said by how much.
Immigration has become one of the main issues of the times in the UK – and not just for the Conservatives, as it would be traditionally, but also for Labour.
Sky News looks at Labour and the Conservatives’ immigration policies.
Illegal immigration
More from Politics
Small boats
Both parties have vowed to “stop the boats”, in reference to the vessels, such as RIBS and dinghies, that cross the English Channel with people aiming to gain entry to the UK without a visa.
Advertisement
2024 has seen the highest number of crossings so far, with 10,448 up to 28 May, while the next highest to that date was in 2022 with 9,326.
Conservatives
The Tory party has increased cooperation with France, with the aim of intercepting small boats in the Channel before they reach UK waters.
It signed an agreement with the EU to tackle smuggler gangs, and signed agreements with different countries to increase removals and act as a deterrent.
The Rwanda policy would act as a major deterrent to asylum seekers coming to the UK in the first place, they have said.
Labour
Labour says it wants to spend money currently being spent on the Rwanda scheme on enforcement activity instead.
One of the first policies it announced during this election campaign was to establish a new Border Security Command to prosecute gangs operating small boat routes.
They would also increase security cooperation with the EU and give police more powers to search suspected people smugglers and monitor their financial accounts.
The party said it wants to negotiate a deal with the EU to return asylum seekers to EU countries.
Rwanda
This is where the Conservatives and Labour differ the most on immigration.
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
The Tory party has said its Rwanda policy, which has so far cost £310m, will deter people from coming to the UK by small boat to claim asylum.
In April, the controversial Safety of Rwanda bill became law so those who arrive in the UK illegally from a safe country will be sent to the African nation where they can apply for asylum.
If successful, they could be granted refugee status and be allowed to stay in Rwanda, and if not they could apply to settle in Rwanda on other grounds or seek asylum in another safe third country.
But no asylum seeker would be able to apply to return to the UK.
No flights have yet to take off and Rishi Sunak admitted none would before the general election.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:48
‘Uncertain times call for bold action’
Labour
Sir Keir Starmer said he would cancel the policy and no flights would take off if they won the election.
Labour’s shadow home secretary, Yvette Cooper, has not ruled out processing asylum seekers in other countries.
Sir Keir said last year he would look at an offshore scheme where migrants are processed in a third country “usually en route to their country of destination”.
Asylum backlog
There is a large backlog of unprocessed asylum claims that built up between 2018 and 2022, but that did start to fall in 2023.
Conservatives
The Conservatives increased the number of caseworkers in the Home Office and introduced processes to streamline processing claims.
They placed asylum seekers on a large barge to stop the sizeable hotel bills building up by housing them there.
The Rwanda policy is aimed at clearing that backlog and ensuring it does not grow.
Labour
The Labour Party would hire 1,000 more caseworkers to create a “Returns and Enforcement Unit” to address the 40% fall in asylum removals since 2010.
They would employ civil servants in the UK and abroad, with overseas officials negotiating returns agreements.
The plans would be financed by savings made by clearing the backlog and ending the use of hotels to house asylum seekers.
A fast-track asylum casework system for safe countries would also be introduced so cases are processed “within weeks”.
Image: Asylum seekers were placed on the Bibby Stockholm barge. Pic: PA
Legal immigration
Work migration
The Skilled Worker visa is the largest work migration route in the UK, with people having to be sponsored for a job and meet certain skill and salary requirements.
Conservatives
The rules for who qualifies for the Skilled Worker visa changed in April, with the minimum salary threshold rising substantially to £38,700 or the going rate for that role – whichever is higher.
Social care workers are also no longer allowed to bring dependants on their visa.
A list of jobs for which someone can be sponsored with a reduced minimum salary has been made shorter, and the minimum income to sponsor someone for a spouse/partner visa has risen from £18,600 to £29,000.
Image: Social care workers can no longer bring their dependents to the UK
Labour
Sir Keir Starmer announced on 2 June a plan to bring down net migration by training more UK workers and protect working conditions.
He would pass laws to ban employers who are reliant on recruiting skilled workers from overseas as a default from doing so.
Labour would also bring in laws to train more UK workers so companies would not have to hire from overseas.
The party has said it has “no plans” to change the ban on health and care workers bringing their families to the UK.
Student migration
International students and their families contributed to the largest increase in net migration since 2019.
After graduating, international students can live and work in the UK for two years, or three if they are a PhD graduate, by switching to a Graduate Visa.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
In January 2024, the government banned most students, apart from postgraduate research courses, from bringing their family members with them to the UK.
A review of the Graduate Visa scheme, which allows overseas students to stay in the UK for up to three years after completing a degree, found it should remain as it is key to funding British universities.
The government has not changed the rules since the review was published in May.
Labour
The shadow home secretary has said Labour would retain the ban on family members.
It has not commented on the Graduate Visa review.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:09
No love for Tories or Labour
What do the other parties say on immigration?
SNP
The SNP called Labour’s plans to cut net migration “cruel” and said neither a Labour or Tory government would put Scotland first and are blaming migrants “for all our problems” instead of Westminster.
They have called for a “fair and human asylum and refugee system where people have the right to work and to contribute to society”.
The Green Party
The Greens want “a world without borders” and believe migration is “not a criminal offence under any circumstances”.
Liberal Democrats
The Lib Dems have accused the Conservatives of breaking the immigration system, and want to invest in officers, training and technology to tackle smuggling, trafficking and modern slavery.
They want to give the power to grant visas to other departments and provide safe and legal routes for refugees.
The crypto community is missing the opportunity to reimagine rather than transpose rulemaking for financial services. More technologists must join the regulatory conversation.
Whitehall officials tried to convince Michael Gove to go to court to cover up the grooming scandal in 2011, Sky News can reveal.
Dominic Cummings, who was working for Lord Gove at the time, has told Sky News that officials in the Department for Education (DfE) wanted to help efforts by Rotherham Council to stop a national newspaper from exposing the scandal.
In an interview with Sky News, Mr Cummings said that officials wanted a “total cover-up”.
The revelation shines a light on the institutional reluctance of some key officials in central government to publicly highlight the grooming gang scandal.
In 2011, Rotherham Council approached the Department for Education asking for help following inquiries by The Times. The paper’s then chief reporter, the late Andrew Norfolk, was asking about sexual abuse and trafficking of children in Rotherham.
The council went to Lord Gove’s Department for Education for help. Officials considered the request and then recommended to Lord Gove’s office that the minister back a judicial review which might, if successful, stop The Times publishing the story.
Lord Gove rejected the request on the advice of Mr Cummings. Sources have independently confirmed Mr Cummings’ account.
Image: Education Secretary Michael Gove in 2011. Pic: PA
Mr Cummings told Sky News: “Officials came to me in the Department of Education and said: ‘There’s this Times journalist who wants to write the story about these gangs. The local authority wants to judicially review it and stop The Times publishing the story’.
“So I went to Michael Gove and said: ‘This council is trying to actually stop this and they’re going to use judicial review. You should tell the council that far from siding with the council to stop The Times you will write to the judge and hand over a whole bunch of documents and actually blow up the council’s JR (judicial review).’
“Some officials wanted a total cover-up and were on the side of the council…
“They wanted to help the local council do the cover-up and stop The Times’ reporting, but other officials, including in the DfE private office, said this is completely outrageous and we should blow it up. Gove did, the judicial review got blown up, Norfolk stories ran.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:18
Grooming gangs victim speaks out
The judicial review wanted by officials would have asked a judge to decide about the lawfulness of The Times’ publication plans and the consequences that would flow from this information entering the public domain.
A second source told Sky News that the advice from officials was to side with Rotherham Council and its attempts to stop publication of details it did not want in the public domain.
One of the motivations cited for stopping publication would be to prevent the identities of abused children entering the public domain.
There was also a fear that publication could set back the existing attempts to halt the scandal, although incidents of abuse continued for many years after these cases.
Sources suggested that there is also a natural risk aversion amongst officials to publicity of this sort.
Mr Cummings, who ran the Vote Leave Brexit campaign and was Boris Johnson’s right-hand man in Downing Street, has long pushed for a national inquiry into grooming gangs to expose failures at the heart of government.
He said the inquiry, announced today, “will be a total s**tshow for Whitehall because it will reveal how much Whitehall worked to try and cover up the whole thing.”
He also described Mr Johnson, with whom he has a long-standing animus, as a “moron’ for saying that money spent on inquiries into historic child sexual abuse had been “spaffed up the wall”.
Asked by Sky News political correspondent Liz Bates why he had not pushed for a public inquiry himself when he worked in Number 10 in 2019-20, Mr Cummings said Brexit and then COVID had taken precedence.
“There are a million things that I wanted to do but in 2019 we were dealing with the constitutional crisis,” he said.
The Department for Education and Rotherham Council have been approached for comment.