Connect with us

Published

on

“It’s a nightmare for everybody involved.”

That’s how former Labour adviser Ayesha Hazarika describes TV election debates.

“The amount of prep is phenomenal,” she told Sky’s Electoral Dysfunction podcast, adding that when she was working with former leader Ed Miliband on the 2015 campaign, preparation for the TV debates took “months and months”.

Former Scottish Conservatives leader Ruth Davidson told the podcast she would get her team to “rip her to shreds” with the most “unfair” and “personal” questions imaginable to ready herself for the live broadcasts.

Tonight, the Sky News Battle For Number 10 Leaders’ Special Event will see Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer face questions from political editor Beth Rigby and members of our audience in Grimsby.

Here we look at how they might be preparing – and the main dos and don’ts.

‘It’s not really about what you say’

Body language expert and business psychologist Paul Boross has years of experience preparing politicians for TV debates in several countries outside the UK.

He says viewers’ lasting impressions are rarely based on what they say.

“People are not listening to every word you’re saying. They’re watching you to get a sense of what kind of person you are,” he says.

“The public get really tired of politicians ‘banging on’ about the same thing. In the context of this election, I’m sure if they hear the word ‘plan’ again, they’ll feel like they’re going to scream.

“People are more concerned with the impression you make. As human beings, that’s the criteria we’re judging them on – whether we like and trust them.”

When preparing for head-to-head debates, the two men’s advisers will have their personal traits vivid in their minds – and look to “polish the good” and “eradicate the bad”, he adds.

What does that mean for Rishi Sunak?

Rishi Sunak during the ITV General Election debate at MediaCity in Salford.
Pic:ITV/PA
Image:
Pic:ITV/PA

Commenting on his performance at the first live TV debate, Mr Boross says: “He kept rising to the bait. He needs to sound in control and not as tetchy.”

He adds: “He also needs to find some sincerity. At the moment he seems a bit like he doesn’t care anymore – like he’s got enough money and he could just leave the country if he wanted to.”

And for Sir Keir Starmer?

Keir Starmer during the ITV General Election debate at MediaCity in Salford.
Pic:ITV/PA
Image:
Pic:ITV/PA

With Labour so far ahead of the Conservatives in the polls, Mr Boross says Sir Keir’s main aim should be to simply “avoid any big mistakes”.

But he adds: “He can seem a bit distant. He has to try and be less prosecutorial – and more human.”

He believes the key to displaying more “lightness” and “humanity” would be to use humour effectively.

Read more
Sunak and Starmer’s body language giveaways
Sunak: I’m not blind to people being frustrated with me
A history of TV debates

Outside of these individual quirks, there are a number of basic dos and don’ts the leaders can work on to prepare for tonight’s debate, according to Mr Boross.

Do…

Use people’s names

Saying a person’s name, whether they are the interviewer or an audience member, will create a “positive psychological impact” and make the interaction feel more “personal and meaningful”, Mr Boross says.

“Hearing your own name makes you feel valued and recognised.

“Good politicians repeat the name immediately when they answer the question – so they remember it initially – then repeat it throughout the conversation.”

Another way to establish a rapport with those in the room and at home is by mirroring the questioner’s language.

“Using the same language pattern as the person who asked you the question shows you’re listening and creates a bond of trust,” Mr Boross adds.

“Really good communicators always listen to what their audience is giving them and feed back in the same form – whereas bad communicators might answer a completely different question and end up alienating them.”

Members of the audience for the first head-to-head leaders debate in Salford. Pic: PA
Image:
Members of the audience for the first head-to-head leaders debate in Salford. Pic:ITV/PA

Keep eye contact

Speaking on Electoral Dysfunction, Ruth Davidson recalled former Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg’s tactic of regularly looking straight at the camera during the 2010 TV debates.

But Mr Boross says doing this too often can “feel a bit too much”.

“Completing ignoring the interviewer in favour of the TV camera would probably backfire,” he says.

Former Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg during a 2010 general election debate. Pic: PA
Image:
Former Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg during a 2010 general election debate. Pic: PA

Instead, leaders should keep their eyes “constantly engaged” with the person speaking to them – and only address the viewer for opening or closing statements.

Using rehearsals to decipher where the camera is and what the TV shot will look like is also worthwhile, he adds.

Expect things to go wrong – and use humour to recover

“Things are always going to go wrong,” Mr Boross says. “So I train everyone to anticipate how things might go wrong.”

This may take the form of an unexpected question, a heckler, or a physical blunder, but both humour and self-deprecation can help “change the tone”.

“Humour can win the day, because it can prick the bubble of pomposity with a bit of humanity,” Mr Boross says.

He uses the example of Green Party leader Carla Denyer, who during the second leaders’ debate waited for Labour’s Angela Rayner and Conservative Penny Mordaunt to stop arguing, before interjecting: “That was terribly dignified, wasn’t it?”

Green leader Carla Denyer (left) waits for Angela Rayner and Penny Mordaunt (right) to stop speaking. Pic: PA
Image:
Green leader Carla Denyer (left) waits for Angela Rayner and Penny Mordaunt (right) to stop speaking. Pic: PA

Don’t…

Talk over others

Talking over an opponent is often viewers’ biggest criticism during political debates – so waiting for others to finish speaking is an important thing to practice, Mr Boross says.

“It really irks people because it’s disrespectful – it smacks of rudeness and it’s childish.

“Psychologically we’re all considering what we’d do in that situation, and what would irritate us. So it’s better to wait and then kill them with your line.”

Speaking out of turn also suggests a lack of confidence, he adds.

Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer during the ITV General Election debate at MediaCity in Salford.
Pic: ITV/PA
Image:
Sir Keir Starmer addresses Rishi Sunak. Pic: ITV/PA

Stick to the podium

Although politicians often use podiums or lecterns to rest their notes on, Mr Boross suggests “getting away” from them as soon as practically possible.

“It hides your open body language, so subliminally people are asking what you’ve got to hide,” he says.

“Tony Blair used to always keep his hands up, which goes back to that Wild West concept of ‘I have no weapons… I have nothing to hide’.”

He adds that practicing moving to the side of the podium will not only make the leaders appear “more open and honest” it also proves they can speak fluently without notes.

Physical positioning is likely to be more important for Mr Sunak, Mr Boross says, whose smaller height means more of him is hidden by the podium.

Former Labour leader and PM Tony Blair during a Sky News debate in 2005. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Former Labour leader and PM Tony Blair during a Sky News debate in 2005. Pic: Reuters

Forget facial expressions

Rehearsing your physical reactions, including facial expressions and body language, is just as important as your answers, according to Mr Boross.

“Your face gives away so much, that if you let it slip, you’re in big trouble,” he warns.

With both leaders sometimes lacking in sincerity, he adds, visualising the people or things that mean most to them while they speak could be a useful tactic.

“I often ask people to think about what they really care about – and talk with that thing or person in their mind’s eye – because then their whole demeanour will change.”

The Battle For Number 10 Leaders Special Event, Wednesday 12 June 7pm-10pm on Sky News – free wherever you get your news.

Freeview channel 233, Sky 501, Virgin 603, BT 313 and streaming on the Sky News website, app and across social channels. It is also available to watch on Sky Showcase.

Continue Reading

Politics

Labour deputy leadership candidate accuses opponent’s team of ‘throwing mud’ and briefing against her

Published

on

By

Labour deputy leadership candidate accuses opponent's team of 'throwing mud' and briefing against her

Lucy Powell has accused Bridget Phillipson’s team of “throwing mud” and briefing against her in the Labour deputy leadership race in a special episode of Sky’s Electoral Dysfunction podcast.

With just days to go until the race is decided, Sky News’ political editor Beth Rigby spoke to the two leadership rivals about allegations of leaks, questions of party unity and their political vision.

Ms Powell told Electoral Dysfunction that through the course of the contest, she had “never leaked or briefed”.

But she said of negative stories about her in the media: “I think some of these things have also come from my opponent’s team as well. And I think they need calling out.

“We are two strong women standing in this contest. We’ve both got different things to bring to the job. I’m not going to get into the business of smearing and briefing against Bridget.

“Having us airing our dirty washing, throwing mud – both in this campaign or indeed after this if I get elected as deputy leader – that is not the game that I’m in.”

Ms Powell was responding to a “Labour source” who told the New Statesman last week: “Lucy was sacked from cabinet because she couldn’t be trusted not to brief or leak.”

Ms Powell said she had spoken directly to Ms Phillipson about allegations of briefings “a little bit”.

Bridget Phillipson (l) and Lucy Powell (r) spoke to Sky News' Beth Rigby in a special Electoral Dysfunction double-header. Pics: Reuters
Image:
Bridget Phillipson (l) and Lucy Powell (r) spoke to Sky News’ Beth Rigby in a special Electoral Dysfunction double-header. Pics: Reuters

Phillipson denies leaks

But asked separately if her team had briefed against Ms Powell, Ms Phillipson told Rigby: “Not to my knowledge.”

And Ms Phillipson said she had not spoken “directly” to her opponent about the claims of negative briefings, despite Ms Powell saying the pair had talked about it.

“I don’t know if there’s been any discussion between the teams,” she added.

On the race itself, the education secretary said it would be “destabilising” if Ms Powell is elected, as she is no longer in the cabinet.

“I think there is a risk that comes of airing too much disagreement in public at a time when we need to focus on taking the fight to our opponents.

“I know Lucy would reject that, but I think that is for me a key choice that members are facing.”

She added: “It’s about the principle of having that rule outside of government that risks being the problem. I think I’ll be able to get more done in government.”

👉 Click here to listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app 👈

Insider vs outsider

But Ms Powell, who was recently sacked by Sir Keir Starmer as leader of the Commons, said she could “provide a stronger, more independent voice”.

“The party is withering on the vine at the same time, and people have got big jobs in government to do.

“Politics is moving really, really fast. Government is very, very slow. And I think having a full-time political deputy leader right now is the political injection we need.”

The result of the contest will be announced on Saturday 25 October.

The deputy leader has the potential to be a powerful and influential figure as the link between members and the parliamentary Labour Party, and will have a key role in election campaigns. They can’t be sacked by Sir Keir as they have their own mandate.

The contest was triggered by the resignation of Angela Rayner following a row over her tax affairs. She was also the deputy prime minister but this position was filled by David Lammy in a wider cabinet reshuffle.

Continue Reading

Politics

UK tax authority doubles crypto warning letters in crackdown on unpaid gains

Published

on

By

UK tax authority doubles crypto warning letters in crackdown on unpaid gains

UK tax authority doubles crypto warning letters in crackdown on unpaid gains

HMRC sent nearly 65,000 warning letters to crypto investors last year, more than double the previous year, as the UK steps up efforts to trace undeclared capital gains.

Continue Reading

Politics

‘Additional resources’ offered by govt to reverse ban on Maccabi Tel Aviv fans at Villa game

Published

on

By

'Additional resources' offered by govt to reverse ban on Maccabi Tel Aviv fans at Villa game

The government says it is exploring what “additional resources and support are required” to allow “all fans” to attend Maccabi Tel Aviv’s match against Aston Villa next month.

Supporters of the Israeli side have been told they are not allowed to attend November’s game in Birmingham after a decision by Birmingham’s Safety Advisory Group (SAG).

The group – made up of local stakeholders, including representatives from the council, police and event organisers – said the decision was due to a high risk of violence based on “current intelligence and previous incidents”.

Politics live: MPs react to Maccabi Tel Aviv fan ban

The decision has been criticised across the political spectrum, with Sir Keir Starmer describing it as a “wrong decision” while Tory opposition leader Kemi Badenoch called it a “national disgrace”.

In a statement on Friday night, a government spokesperson said: “No one should be stopped from watching a football game simply because of who they are.

“The government is working with policing and other partners to do everything in our power to ensure this game can safely go ahead, with all fans present.

“We are exploring what additional resources and support are required so all fans can attend.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Birmingham residents react to the Maccabi fan ban

Meanwhile, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood said: “Antisemitism is a stain on our society that shames us all. Every football fan, whoever they are, should be able to watch their team in safety.

“This government is doing everything in our power to ensure all fans can safely attend the game.”

The prime minister’s spokesman previously said Sir Keir would “do everything in his power to give Jewish communities the security they deserve”.

Read more:
Why are fans banned – and has this happened before?
How this raises questions about one of the UK’s biggest cities

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Badenoch: Fan ban a ‘national disgrace’

The Home Office offered to provide more police for the event, while Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy and Communities Secretary Steve Reed also intervened.

However, senior police insisted the ban was necessary and cited clashes and hate crime offences committed when the Israeli team travelled to Amsterdam to play Ajax last year.

The Aston Villa vs Maccabi Tel Aviv match – set to take place on Thursday 6 November – is a Europa League fixture.

UEFA, which runs the tournament, had urged UK authorities to ensure away fans could attend.

Continue Reading

Trending