As this was classed as an England and Wales project by the UK government, Wales did not receive any funding via the Barnett Formula.
That’s the term for how the Welsh government gets its money. So the more money spent on health in England, for example, the greater the funds received by Wales.
The party says the additional funding would be used to improve Welsh public transport and reverse cuts to local bus services.
Plaid Cymru wants to see an increase in windfall tax and the devolution of the Crown Estate to Wales.
Advertisement
There was a call, too, to rejoin the customs union and single market and for Wales to compete at the Eurovision Song Contest in its own right.
Mr ap Iorwerth said there was a “genuine sense that this election feels different”.
“More people than ever are left utterly uninspired,” he said.
He said Plaid Cymru was the only party calling for a change in how Wales receives its funding, including “scrapping” the Barnett Formula in favour of “a needs-based model”.
He said the party’s call for fair funding was not “driven by ideology, it’s driven by principle”.
Mr ap Iorwerth urged the next UK government to show they are “serious about Wales”.
He said he was “proud” of the party’s offer, which he said was “in Wales’s interests”.
Speaking to Sky News after the manifesto launch, Mr ap Iorwerth refused to be drawn on the number of seats Plaid are aiming for.
“It’s always about maximising the Welsh voice and in simple terms the more Welsh MPs from Plaid Cymru that are in Westminster, the less chance there is that we will be sidelined,” he said.
“The number of MPs in Wales has been slashed from 40 to 32. That’s a 20% cut in the number of MPs from Wales. The number of notional Plaid Cymru seats went down from four to two just by a direction of boundary changes.”
The return on Donald Trump to the G7 was always going to be unpredictable. That it is happening against the backdrop of an escalating conflict in the Middle East makes it even more so.
Expectations had already been low, with the Canadian hosts cautioning against the normal joint communique at the end of the summit, mindful that this group of leaders would struggle to find consensus.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney carefully laid down an agenda that was uncontroversial in a bid to avoid any blow-ups between President Trump and allies, who of late have been divided like never before – be it over tariffs and trade, Russia and Ukraine, or, more recently Israel’s conduct in Gaza.
But discussions around critical minerals and global supply chains will undoubtedly drop down the agenda as leaders convene at a precarious moment. Keir Starmer, on his way over to Canada for a bi-lateral meeting in Ottawa with PM Carney before travelling onto the G7 summit in Kananaskis, underscored the gravity of the situation as he again spoke of de-escalation, while also confirmed that the UK was deploying more British fighter jets to the region amid threats from Tehran that it will attack UK bases if London helps defend Israel against airstrikes.
Image: Canadian PM Mark Carney is greeted by President Donald Trump at the White House in May. Pic: AP
Really this is a G7 agenda scrambled as world leaders scramble to de-escalate the worst fighting between Tel Aviv and Tehran in decades. President Trump has for months been urging Israel not to strike Iran as he worked towards a diplomatic deal to halt uranium enrichment. Further talks had been due on Sunday – but are now not expected to go ahead.
All eyes will be on Trump in the coming days, to see if the US – Israel’s closest ally – will call on Israel to rein in its assault. The US has so far not participated in any joint attacks with Tel Aviv, but is moving warships and other military assets to the Middle East.
Sir Keir, who has managed to strike the first trade deal with Trump, will want to leverage his “good relationship” with the US leader at the G7 to press for de-escalation in the Middle East, while he also hopes to use the summit to further discuss the further the interests of Ukraine with Trump and raise again the prospects of Russian sanctions.
More on G7 Summit
Related Topics:
“We’ve got President Zelenskyy coming so that provides a good opportunity for us to discuss again as a group,” the PM told me on the flight over to Canada. “My long-standing view is, we need to get Russia to the table for an unconditional ceasefire. That’s not been really straightforward. But we do need to be clear about what we need to get to the table and that if that doesn’t happen, sanctions will undoubtedly be part of the discussion at the G7.”
Image: Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer (R) is greeted by Mark Carney as he arrives in Ottawa ahead of the G7
But that the leaders are not planning for a joint communique – a document outlining what the leaders have agreed – tells you a lot. When they last gathered with Trump in Canada for the G7 back in 2018, the US president rather spectacularly fell out with Justin Trudeau when the former Canadian president threatened to retaliate against US tariffs and refused to sign the G7 agreement.
Spotify
This content is provided by Spotify, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spotify cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spotify cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spotify cookies for this session only.
Since then, Trump has spoken of his desire to turn Canada into the 51st state of the US, a suggestion that helped catapult the Liberal Party beyond their Conservative rivals and back into power in the recent Canadian elections, as Mark Carney stood on a ticket of confronting Trump’s aggression.
With so much disagreement between the US and allies, it is hard to see where progress might be made over the next couple of days. But what these leaders will agree on is the need to take down the temperature in the Middle East and for all the unpredictability around these relationships, what is certain is a sense of urgency around Iran and Israel that could find these increasingly disparate allies on common ground.