Connect with us

Published

on

America isn’t alone in its moral panic over sex trafficking, as an Argentinian case against a self-help center called the Buenos Aires Yoga School (BAYS) suggests. Prosecutors are trying the school’s 85-year-old founder, Juan Percowicz, and a number of its members, alleging that the school was really a cult engaged in brainwashing and sex trafficking.

Authorities raided the group’s headquarters and the houses of 50 members two summers ago, accusing the group of being a front for an international sex slavery ring. Seventeen people, including Percowicz, were arrested and jailed on suspicion of human trafficking for sexual exploitation and money laundering.

It wasn’t the first time the Buenos Aires Yoga School faced criminal allegations; a similar case was brought in the 1990s. But after an intense investigation that involved raids and wiretapswhich human rights groups said were civil liberties violations and some chalked up to anti-Semitismthat earlier case was closed with nary a conviction.

And it’s looking like the newer case may face a similar fate. Last week, the Argentinian Court of Cassationthe country’s highest criminal courtupheld a lower court’s ruling from last December that the case would not be elevated to a trial.

I don’t pretend to have some special insight into what’s going on with BAYS. But in light of a recent New York Times article leaning heavily into prosecutors’ arguments, I think it’s worth bringing up some of the evidence that challenges the official narrative here and highlighting how the case mirrors many of the “sex trafficking busts” we’ve seen in the U.S.

Want more on sex, technology, bodily autonomy, law, and online culture? Subscribe to Sex & Tech from Reason and Elizabeth Nolan Brown. Email(Required) EmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Submit

Δ ‘Human Trafficking Without Victims of Trafficking’

“Cults exist here, but we’ve never seen one that operated at this level,” Ricardo Juri, the investigator who oversaw the 2022 raids, told the Times.

“Prosecutors say the organization exploited and drugged some of its female members, forcing them to sell their bodies and generating hundreds of thousands of dollars monthly from clients in Argentina and the United States,” the newspaper reports.

Times writer Ana Lankes suggests the trouble with the earlier case was that “Argentina did not yet have laws on human trafficking or money laundering” and that “the country’s justice system was still being overhauled after the end of the military dictatorship”or at least that’s what the prosecutors today argue. According to authorities, this is a case of bad guys who got away before but are now finally being brought to justice.

The government says at least seven women were forced into prostitution by BAYS. “But the women in the case have denied ever having sex in exchange for money, or being victims of any crime,” Lankes points out.

“This is a case of human trafficking without victims of trafficking,” Percowicz’s lawyer, Jorge Daniel Pirozzo, told the Times. Red Walls = Brothel?

A paper published last year in The Journal of CESNUR (the Center for Studies on New Religions) casts doubt on the government’s narrative about BAYS and details questionable tactics used in investigations of it. The paper”The Great Cult Scare in Argentina and the Buenos Aires Yoga School” by Italian sociologist Massimo Introvignelooks at both the 2022 raids and the earlier case against BAYS.

As part of the 2022 raids, “a man was badly beaten by the police for no reason (it came out later they had mistaken him for somebody else),” and doors were busted in despite residents offering to open them, writes Introvigne. “All in all, twenty persons were arrested and warrants for arrest were issued against another eight.”

But police found scant evidence of the alleged international prostitution ring they were seeking or of an alleged sex museum linked to the group.

At the apartment of “a well-known female musician,” where they were told this “museum of sex” existed, “all they found was a small painting depicting three naked persons united in an embrace,” notes Introvigne. “They noted an abundance of the color red in the decoration of the apartment, and put in their notes it was reminiscent of a brothel.”

As in so many American “sex trafficking” busts, this was all turned into a big show for the media:

The painting was duly put on display for the media, together with some old and ruined commercial pornographic VHS videos found elsewhere in the building. The inhabitants claimed they were part of the inventory of a nearby shop that had been flooded with water. They had purchased the whole inventory to help the owner, who was their friend, and had forgotten the videos, most of them not pornographic, stored somewhere in the buildingand who would watch in 2022 pornographic VHS of the 1980s anyway.

By March 2023, “all those detained had also been liberated by a Court of Appeal after almost three months spent in jail, in conditions they described as horrible,” according to the CESNUR paper. An All-Too-Familiar Tale

Was BAYS a cult? Some former members or family of members report strange antics, including extreme reverence of the group’s leader, members partaking in orgies, and forcing new members to do housework for established members. But even if such statements are true (and I have no idea), it doesn’t necessarily mean anything illegal or exploitative was going on. One person’s “cult” can be another’s spiritual salvation, life coaching service, or kink activity.

The BAYS situation reminds me somewhat of the U.S. case against members of the self-help group NXIVM, a prosecution that included charges against actress Allison Mack. Prosecutors broke the case in a big, sensationalist manner, calling NXIVM a sex cult guilty of human trafficking. But the reality of the case was much more nuanced (and interesting) and nothing like the narrative that initially made headlines. There was certainly evidence that NXIVM’s leader may have been cruel, manipulative, and an egomaniac, and there were indications that he started a relationship with someone when she was under 18. And there were women upset with how the group’s secretive side-group DOS operatedas well as a number of women who still defend it to this day. But whatever was going on, it was not the simplistic black-and-white narrative that prosecutors portrayed, and it clearly involved authorities trying to slot a range of behaviorsome potentially illegal, some merely unsavory, and some that simply read as odd to many peopleinto a trendy criminal category. A surefire way to get attention to a case these days is to label it sex trafficking or human trafficking.

The BAYS situation also recalls oh-so-many lower profile U.S. “sex trafficking stings” conducted at massage parlors or during boondoggles like “Operation Cross Country” and their ilk. As part of these stings, adult sex workers are often described to and in the media as “victims,” even if none of them actually say they are being victimized.

In the BAYS raids, none of the female “victims” said they were being trafficked, and none said they sold sex for money (which is broadly legal in Argentina). But under Argentina’s anti-trafficking law, “if a trafficked prostitute denies that she is a prostitute…this is further evidence she is trafficked and somebody is abusing her vulnerability,” according to the CESNUR article.

“There is an express mention of the lack of legal relevance of the consent of the [alleged victim],” Argentinian lawyer Marisa Tarantino told the group Human Rights Without Frontiers. “If in a particular case the prosecution agencies detect an activity that they classify as a form of ‘prostitution’, even if it is exercised by adult and autonomous persons, these will be objectively considered victims and those who make the activity possible or benefit from it in any way, even if it is occasional,will be liable to prosecution.” Coming Up in the Yoga School Case

The case against Percowicz and the other remaining defendants “is currently working its way through the courts. No trial date has been set yet,” the Times reports.

And no trial may happen. The Times piece was published right around the same time that Argentina’s highest criminal court upheld a lower court ruling rejecting the government’s request that the case go to trial.

“This is not the end of the case, since it returns to the judge of first instance, but is clearly a setback for the prosecutors,” write Introvigne (author of the CESNUR article) and Maria Varde in the religious liberty and human rights magazine Bitter Winter.

Introvigne and Varde also call the Times piece “a sensationalist attack” that parrots prosecutors’ arguments.

They note that “the main reason the elevation to trial has been annulled is that it ignored the opinion by independent experts, including those of the Forensic Medical Corps of the Supreme Court, who examined the [women prosecutors say are victims] and concluded that they are psychologically normal and believable.” The court did not find persuasive the prosecutors’ claim that the women were brainwashed into denying their victimhooda bit of rhetoric that U.S. authorities also conveniently deploy to wave away sex workers or others whom they’ve deemed victims denying that they’re actually being trafficked.

Introvigne notes that brainwashing theories of this sort have generally been debunked, but “there is an international lobby of so-called anti-human trafficking agencies, not less powerful in the United States than in Argentina,” which wants to bring them back into vogue. More Sex & Tech News

Elon Musk has dismissed his lawsuit against OpenAI.

Four more states have joined the Department of Justice’s antitrust suit against Apple. (More about the case here.)

Apple’s Siri is getting an AI makeover.

New York is the latest state to pass a bill demanding age verification for social media. New York just passed the "Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation (SAFE) for Kids act" that will require social media companies to use commercially reasonable methods to determine user age" https://t.co/QjFGUdbTRP pic.twitter.com/4qTzUlrshJ

— Sharon Polsky MAPP (@PolskySays) June 10, 2024

The tech industry group NetChoice is suing over Mississippi’s age verification law.

An interesting argument against the idea that technology should liberate us from routine housework and day-to-day chores. Today’s Image Phoenix | 2018 (ENB/Reason)

Continue Reading

Politics

Farage has ‘grabbed the mic’ to dominate media agenda, says Harman

Published

on

By

Farage has 'grabbed the mic' to dominate media agenda, says Harman

Nigel Farage has successfully exploited the Commons recess to “grab the mic” and “dominate” the agenda, Harriet Harman has said.

Speaking on Sky News’ Electoral Dysfunction podcast, the Labour peer said that the Reform UK leader has been able to “get his voice heard” while government was not in “full swing”.

👉 Listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app 👈

Mr Farage used a speech this week to set himself, rather than Kemi Badenoch’s Tories, up as the main opposition to Sir Keir Starmer at the next election.

The prime minister responded on Thursday with a speech attacking the Clacton MP.

Baroness Harman said: “It’s slightly different between opposition and government because in government, the ministers have to be there the whole time.

“They’ve got to be putting legislation through and they kind of hold the mic.

More from Politics

“They can dominate the news media with the announcements they’re making and with the bills they’re introducing, and it’s quite hard for the opposition to get a hearing whilst the government is in full swing.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Big cuts’ to fund other Reform UK policies

“What we used to do when we were in opposition before 1997 is that as soon as there was a bank holiday and the House was not sitting, as soon as the half-term or the summer recess, we would be on an absolute war footing and dominate the airwaves because that was our opportunity.

“And I think that’s a bit of what Farage has done this week,” Harman added.

“Basically, Farage can dominate the media agenda.”

She went on: “He’s kind of stepped forward, and he’s using this moment of the House not sitting in order to actually get his voice heard.

“It’s sensible for the opposition to take the opportunity of when the House is not sitting to kind of grab the mic and that is what Nigel Farage has done.”

But Baroness Harman said it “doesn’t seem to be what Kemi Badenoch’s doing”.

She explained that the embattled leader “doesn’t seem to be grabbing the mic like Nigel Farage has” during recess, and added that “there’s greater opportunity for the opposition”.

Continue Reading

Politics

UK to build weapons factories and buy thousands of missiles in £6bn push to rearm

Published

on

By

UK to build weapons factories and buy thousands of missiles in £1.5bn push to rearm

The UK will buy up to 7,000 long-range missiles, rockets and drones and build at least six weapons factories in a £6bn push to rearm at a time of growing threats.

The plan, announced by the government over the weekend, will form part of Sir Keir Starmer’s long-awaited Strategic Defence Review, which will be published on Monday.

However, it lacks key details, including when the first arms plant will be built, when the first missile will be made, or even what kind of missiles, drones and rockets will be purchased.

The government is yet to appoint a new senior leader to take on the job of “national armaments director”, who will oversee the whole effort.

Andy Start, the incumbent head of Defence Equipment and Support – the branch of defence charged with buying kit – is still doing the beefed-up role of national armaments director as a sluggish process to recruit someone externally rumbles on.

Keir Starmer and  Volodymyr Zelenskyy speak to the press as they attend a presentation of Ukrainian military drones.
Pic: Reuters
Image:
Sir Keir Starmer and Volodymyr Zelenskyy at a presentation of Ukrainian military drones. Pic: Reuters

Revealing some of its content ahead of time, the Ministry of Defence said the defence review will recommend an “always on” production capacity for munitions, drawing on lessons learned from Ukraine, which has demonstrated the vital importance of large production lines.

It will also call for an increase in stockpiles of munitions – something that is vitally needed for the army, Royal Navy and Royal Air Force to be able to keep fighting beyond a few days.

Some £1.5bn will be invested in the new factories, the government said. It said this additional funding will lift total expenditure on munitions to £6bn this parliament.

Sky News will launch a new podcast series on 10 June based around a wargame that simulates an attack by Russia against the UK to test Britain’s defences

“The hard-fought lessons from [Vladimir] Putin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine show a military is only as strong as the industry that stands behind them,” John Healey, the defence secretary, said in a statement released on Saturday night.

“We are strengthening the UK’s industrial base to better deter our adversaries and make the UK secure at home and strong abroad.”

Army Commandos load a 105MM Howitzer in Norway.
Pic: Ministry of Defence Crown Copyright/PA
Image:
Army Commandos load a 105mm Howitzer in Norway. Pic: Ministry of Defence/PA

The UK used to have a far more resilient defence industry during the Cold War, with the capacity to manufacture missiles and other weapons and ammunition at speed and at scale.

However, much of that depth, which costs money to sustain, was lost following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, when successive governments switched funding priorities away from defence and into areas such as health, welfare and economic growth.

Even after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and a huge increase in demand from Kyiv for munitions from its allies, production lines at UK factories were slow to expand.

A reaper drone in the Middle East as part of Operation Shader. Pic: Ministry of Defence
Image:
A reaper drone in the Middle East. Pic: Ministry of Defence

Sky News visited a plant run by the defence company Thales in Belfast last year that makes N-LAW anti-tank missiles used in Ukraine. Its staff at the time only worked weekday shifts between 7am and 4pm.

Under this new initiative, the government said the UK will build at least six new “munitions and energetics” factories.

Energetic materials include explosives, propellants and pyrotechnics, which are required in the manufacturing of weapons.

There were no details, however, on whether these will be national factories or built in partnership with defence companies, or a timeline for this to happen.

There was also no information on where they would be located or what kind of weapons they would make.

King Charles  visiting HMS Prince of Wales as the Royal Navy finalises preparations for a major global deployment to the Indo-Pacific this spring.
Pic: PO Phot Rory Arnold/Ministry of Defence/PA
Image:
King Charles visits HMS Prince of Wales. Pic: PO Phot Rory Arnold/Ministry of Defence/PA

In addition, it was announced that the UK will buy “up to 7,000 UK-built long-range weapons for the UK Armed Forces”, though again without specifying what.

It is understood these weapons will include a mix of missiles, rockets and drones.

Sources within the defence industry criticised the lack of detail, which is so often the case with announcements by the Ministry of Defence.

The sources said small and medium-sized companies in particular are struggling to survive as they await clarity from the Ministry of Defence over a range of different contracts.

One source described a sense of “paralysis”.

The prime minister launched the defence review last July, almost a year ago. But there had been a sense of drift within the Ministry of Defence beforehand, in the run-up to last year’s general election.

The source said: “While the government’s intentions are laudable, the lack of detail in this announcement is indicative of how we treat defence in this country.

“Headline figures, unmatched by clear intent and delivery timelines which ultimately leave industry no closer to knowing what, or when, the MOD want their bombs and bullets.

“After nearly 18 months of decision and spending paralysis, what we need now is a clear demand signal from the Ministry of Defence that allows industry to start scaling production, not grand gestures with nothing to back it up.”

As well as rearming the nation, the government said the investment in new factories and weapons would create around 1,800 jobs across the UK.

Continue Reading

Politics

Prison officers should be armed with lethal weapons to crack down on Islamist terrorists, Tories say

Published

on

By

Prison officers should be armed with lethal weapons to crack down on Islamist terrorists, Tories say

Prison officers should be armed with lethal weapons to crack down on Islamist terrorists in jail, the shadow justice secretary has said.

Highly trained teams should also be equipped with tasers, stun grenades and baton rounds to tackle dangerous criminals in high-security jails, Robert Jenrick said.

The plan is taken from a series of recommendations by counter-extremism expert and former prison governor Ian Acheson.

It comes after a prison officer at high-security prison Long Lartin in Worcestershire was stabbed on Friday morning with a weapon Sky News understands was brought in from outside the prison.

It also follows several attacks on prison officers in jails.

In April this year, the Manchester Arena bomb plotter, Hashem Abedi, allegedly assaulted prison staff by throwing hot oil on them and then launching a stabbing attack, injuring three officers.

At Belmarsh prison, Southport killer Axel Rudakubana has been accused of throwing boiling water over an officer through the hatch in his cell door earlier this month.

A prison wall. Pic: PA
Image:
File pic: PA

Mr Jenrick said: “Islamist gangs and violent prisoners in our jails are out of control.

It’s a national security emergency, but the government is dithering. If they don’t act soon, there is a very real risk that a prison officer is kidnapped or murdered in the line of duty, or that a terrorist attack is directed from inside prison.”

He said he commissioned Mr Acheson to conduct a rapid review into measures the government could adopt.

The measures include removing all radical Islamist imams working in prisons, immediately rolling out high-collar stab vests to frontline officers, and mandating the quarterly release of data on religious conversions in prison and faith-based incidents.

It also recommended legislating to overturn the De Silva ruling to strip back judicial interference in operational decisions by governors to isolate extremists.

Mr Jenrick added: “We have to stop pussy-footing around Islamist extremists and violent offenders in jails.

“That means arming specialist prison officer teams with tasers and stun grenades, as well as giving them access to lethal weapons in exceptional circumstances.

“If prison governors can’t easily keep terrorist influencers and radicalising inmates apart from the mainstream prisoners they target, then we don’t control our prisons – they do. We must take back control and restore order by giving officers the powers and protection they need.”

Mr Acheson said: “Too often what goes wrong behind the walls of our high security jails passes unnoticed, as does the bravery of the men and women in uniform who deal every day with terrorists and other highly dangerous offenders.

“Robert Jenrick is right – the threat to officer safety is now intolerable and must be met decisively by the government.

“The balance inside too many of our prisons has shifted away from control by the state to mere containment and the price is soaring levels of staff assaults and wrecked rehabilitation. Broken officers can’t help fix broken people – or protect the public from violent extremism.”

A Ministry of Justice source said: “The government considers the introduction of lethal weapons into prisons would put prison officers at greater risk.”

They added: “The last government added just 500 cells to our prison estate, and left our jails in total crisis. In 14 years, they closed 1,600 cells in the high-security estate, staff assaults soared, and experienced officers left in droves. Now the arsonists are pretending to be firefighters.

“This government is cleaning up the mess the last government left behind. We are building new prisons, with 2,400 new cells opened since we took office. And we take a zero-tolerance approach to violence and extremism inside.”

Continue Reading

Trending