They may not be as numerous as Muslim voters, and there are no rebel candidates stealing them away from Labour over conflicts abroad, but Punjabis are a specific electorate with their own concerns, and some of their communities happen to be highly concentrated in key target seats for Sir Keir Starmer’s party.
The Sikh Federation UK estimates their community could have an impact in up to 80 constituencies, and so we’ve taken our parliamentary people’s bench to two seats in South East England, to find out what Sikh voters are looking for in the next government.
First, we visit a Punjabi sporting event – the ancient game of Kabaddi.
Described as Sikh sumo wrestling, and played in teams, it originated as a military training exercise on how to take captives and win ground.
In a circular arena, teams of well-stacked men send players to “raid” the opposition territory and touch their opponents without being pinned down or shoved out of the circle.
The event is taking place in the constituency of Ealing Southall, known as The Little Punjab.
Image: Dabinderjit Singh from the Sikh Federation UK
Fuel, shopping and rent
Sikhs make up 30% of the population here but spectators come to the event from across the country – and sharing their thoughts, seated on our parliamentary bench at the edge of the kabaddi pitch, they expressed views similar to those we’ve heard elsewhere.
Advertisement
“Fuel, shopping, rents, it just goes up and up,” says Kabaddi referee Sucha Singh Thind. “Every government comes in. They promise a lot of things, ‘we do this, we do that’, but nothing happens in the end.”
Image: Kabaddi referee Sucha Singh Thind
Southall resident Arshpreet Singh Randhawa adds: “The current cost of living as we all know is through the roof and it is becoming extremely difficult to live and sustain, evident that with the amount of homeless on the streets.”
Ealing Southall is a safe Labour seat, but our next stop, Gravesham in Kent, is more of a knife edge.
Home to the largest Gurdwara in the UK, it is currently held by the Conservatives, but is a Labour target.
Image: Residents in Southall
Here, 8% of the electorate is Sikh, and with a recent survey showing they are inclined to vote Labour and are also likely to turn out in large numbers, they could tip the balance over who wins here.
Accountability for the past
Outside their place of worship, a giant banner commemorates the 40th anniversary of the Sikh massacre at the Golden Temple at Amritsar in India.
Classified documents released in 2014 raised questions over the involvement of the British government and the SAS in events leading up to the killings. Sikhs at the Gurdwara in Gravesend said they want politicians to commit to a public inquiry into British actions.
Image: Sky’s parlimentary bench outside a Sikh temple in South East England
Dabinderjit Singh, from the Sikh Federation UK, says: “We’re marking the 40th anniversary of 1984, and I remember 10 years ago when those papers came out, we just thought, why did our government advise on attacking a holy place?
“It’s something that changed my life and changed the lives of many people.”
Even younger Sikhs at the Gurdwara, who weren’t born in 1984, tell us this is an important issue for them.
Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour committed to a judge-led inquiry, but it’s not clear what Labour will do under Sir Keir.
It’s not a manifesto pledge, however, his deputy Angela Rayner tweeted on 1 June.
X
This content is provided by X, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable X cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to X cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow X cookies for this session only.
“We mark the 40th anniversary of the rain of the Golden Temple,” she wrote, adding that Labour stands with the Sikh community in calling for an inquiry into the historic role Britain played.
The latest survey of Sikh voting intentions shows 43% Labour and 20% for the Conservatives. But many are still undecided.
Mr Singh adds: “The surveys we’ve done suggest 85% of Sikhs actually come out and vote. There are probably one million Sikh voters.
“Sikhs exist in every single constituency in the UK. And on top of that, we have towns and cities where there are 20 to 25 thousand Sikhs, and therefore the Sikh vote really matters on the 4th of July.”
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
Another issue, raised by several worshipers, is tackling hate crime specific to Sikhs.
Jagjit Singh Dhaliwal, a volunteer at the Gurdwara, says: “Whereas Islamophobia, antisemitism are widely recognised for specific hate crime, nothing exists for the Sikhs, but because of our dress we can become targets for hate crime exactly the same as Muslims do.
“That needs to be recognised so we can start taking some action to eradicate that.”
Image: Jagijit Singh Dhaliwal says the government should be tackling hate crime against his community
Again, the community have expectations that Labour may address things that the Conservatives have not, but there is nothing down in print in Labour’s manifesto.
The Sikhs pride themselves on being humble, shrewd and community-minded – organising outreach projects and free food for the homeless in every Gurdwara in the country.
“We represent the nation very well. We hold its core values and as a community we are very close-knit,” says student Rickvir Singh Randhawa.
Their wish list from politicians is not hugely expensive and, with Labour’s Muslim votes potentially depleted in certain areas over their stance on the events in Gaza, Sikhs believe their vote could become even more crucial in certain constituencies.
Securities exchange Cboe BZX is seeking permission from US regulators to incorporate staking into Fidelity’s Ether exchange-traded fund (ETF), according to a March 11 filing.
The filing marks Cboe’s latest attempt to support staking for the Ether (ETH) funds traded on its US exchange.
Cboe’s proposed rule change would allow Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) to “stake, or cause to be staked, all or a portion of the Trust’s ether through one or more trusted staking providers,” the filing said.
The Fidelity Ethereum Fund is among the most popular Ether ETFs, with nearly $1 billion in assets under management, according to data from VettaFi.
In February, Cboe asked permission to add staking to another Ether ETF, the 21Shares Core Ethereum ETF.
Staking Ether enhances returns and involves posting ETH as collateral with a validator in exchange for rewards.
As of March 11, staking Ether yields approximately 3.3% APR, denominated in ETH, according to Staking Rewards.
Other popular cryptocurrencies, including Solana (SOL), also feature staking mechanisms.
The US Securities and Exchange Commission must still approve Cboe’s proposed rule changes before staking can commence.
In February, the SEC acknowledged more than a dozen exchange filings related to cryptocurrency ETFs, according to records.
The SEC’s acknowledgments highlight how the agency has softened its stance on crypto since US President Donald Trump started his second term on Jan. 20.
In addition to staking, the filings, submitted by Cboe and other exchanges, addressed proposed rule changes concerning options, in-kind redemptions and new types of altcoin funds.
Cboe has also asked permission to list Canary and WisdomTree’s proposed XRP (XRP) ETFs and support in-kind creations and redemptions for Fidelity’s Bitcoin (BTC) and ETH ETFs, among other proposed changes.
A member of the Texas legislature has proposed a bill that could limit the amount local and state authorities invest in cryptocurrency as a reserve asset.
In a bill filed on March 10, Texas Representative Ron Reynolds proposed the state’s comptroller not be allowed to invest more than $250 million of its Economic Stabilization Fund — otherwise known as a “rainy day” fund — in Bitcoin (BTC) or other cryptocurrencies. The legislation also suggested that Texas municipalities or counties could not invest more than $10 million in crypto.
HB 4258, filed by Texas Representative Ron Reynolds. Source: Texas legislature
The proposed bill followed the Texas Senate passing legislation on March 6 to establish a strategic Bitcoin reserve in the state. The SB 21 bill seemingly could allow the Texas comptroller to have no limit on purchasing BTC for a reserve, based on the most recent draft.
The plan for a strategic Bitcoin reserve in Texas was one of many separate bills proposed in US state governments following the inauguration of President Donald Trump and Republican lawmakers winning control of the US House of Representatives and Senate. Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick said in January that the state’s legislative priorities for 2025 would include a proposal to establish a Texas Bitcoin Reserve.
Is there a partisan divide on state and federal crypto plans?
It’s unclear if Rep. Reynolds, a Democrat, intended to support the BTC reserve bill introduced by State Senator Charles Schwertner, a Republican, or propose restrictions in the event the legislation becomes law. If passed and signed by Governor Greg Abbott, the bill would take effect on Sept. 1. Cointelegraph reached out to Rep. Reynolds’ office for comment but did not receive a response at the time of publication.
Though Trump signed an executive order on March 7 to create a federal “Strategic Bitcoin Reserve” and “Digital Asset Stockpile,” many legal experts have questioned the US president’s authority to enact specific policies through EOs. Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis reintroduced legislation on March 11 to codify the proposed BTC reserve into law in the Senate.
Ousted Reform UK MP Rupert Lowe has told Sky News he has not ruled out joining the Conservatives or a new political party, declaring: “I’m keeping my options open.”
Mr Lowe answered a series of questions from Sky News after the latest twist in his feud with Nigel Farage, with a police investigation launched into claims he threatened party chairman Zia Yusuf.
Responding to the police statement, Mr Lowe said he had instructed lawyers, who had made contact with the Met and made them aware of his willingness to co-operate in any necessary investigation.
“My lawyers have not yet received any contact from the police,” he said.
“It is highly unusual for the police to disclose anything to the media at this stage of an investigation.
More on Nigel Farage
Related Topics:
“I remain unaware of the specific allegations, but in any event, I deny any wrongdoing. The allegations are entirely untrue.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:25
Reform UK row explained
Could Lowe join Tories?
Later, Sky News asked the Great Yarmouth MP if he thought there was a way back into Reform UK for him or was this the end – and if he might join the Tories or a new political party.
“This has all happened over a few days,” Mr Lowe replied.
“I have been focused on debunking these false and damaging allegations. Who knows what will happen? I’m keeping my options open.”
In an interview on Monday, Mr Lowe said: “I was a Tory years ago. I think the Tories have got a lot of work to do. I think there’s some extremely good Tory MPs. I get on with a lot of them.”
For the Conservatives, the shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: “He hasn’t applied but obviously we’re a broad and welcoming political party.”
He told Times Radio: “People have been joining the Conservatives from across the political spectrum and we always welcome new joiners.”
Image: Mr Lowe is a former chair of Southampton Football Club. File pic: PA
New splinter group?
And in a move seen as a hint of a new splinter group, another ousted Reform UK politician, former deputy leader Ben Habib, told The Daily Telegraph that Mr Lowe was a “good friend” and he was “constantly in touch with” him.
Sky News also asked Mr Lowe who he blamed for the party’s treatment of him, including throwing him out of the party after he criticised Mr Farage. Was Mr Farage or Mr Yusuf to blame?
“Honestly, all of them,” he said.
“This was a team effort to blacken my name. If it wasn’t for my presence on X, I would have been buried under the false allegations. For that, I have to thank Elon Musk.”
He was asked about Mr Farage quoting Labour minister Mike Kane claiming after a heated Commons clash with Mr Lowe in December: “The anger displayed towards me clearly showed a man not in charge of his own faculties.”
Image: Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said the door was open. Pic: Reuters
In a Sunday Telegraph article, Mr Farage added: “I never saw anything like it in the European Parliament in 2019 when I was the leader of the Brexit Party and Mr Lowe was an MEP colleague.”
In response, Mr Lowe told Sky News: “Reform sources have been briefing that I have dementia. This is the single most appalling thing I have ever seen in politics.
“Anyone who has known someone who has suffered so hideously from dementia will understand just how offensive it is. It shows the type of people we are dealing with.”
In the same article, Mr Farage claimed there had been “too many similar outbursts from Mr Lowe, often involving the use of inappropriate language to the despair of our chief whip, Lee Anderson”.
Mr Lowe hit back, telling Sky News: “More baseless nonsense, spouted out to tarnish my reputation. Their malicious witch-hunt has fallen apart.”
Last year, when Mr Anderson was Conservative Party deputy chairman, he apologised after parliament’s watchdog on bullying and harassment found he told a security guard to “f*** off, everyone opens the door to me”.
He was found to have twice sworn at the security officer and acted in a way that “constituted bullying and also harassment” in breach of parliament’s behaviour policy, an independent expert panel concluded.