Connect with us

Published

on

Politics can shape the future of football at the best of times, but after the past five years it’s arguably as important as ever to gauge how Westminster will approach the national sport.

With some clubs facing extinction, attempts at a breakaway league, the rise of the women’s game and state ownership, there are many ways the sport could move up the next government’s agenda.

The most pressing matter will be the landmark Football Governance Bill, which was introduced by the Tory government but broadly enjoys cross-party support.

As football finance expert Kieran Maguire told Sky News, there is an argument football is “so embedded in the fabric of the country that it needs protecting” – which is what this bill aims to do.

“A football club is a monopoly supplier, if you support Wolverhampton and they go out of business, it’s simply not the case that you can just go and support West Bromwich Albion,” he said.

“Because of that intensity, it needs protection – from owners, from changing the identity of club.”

As the England men’s team kicks off its Euro 2024 campaign on Sunday, many eyes will shift between football and politics over the next three weeks.

So how would one affect the other; how could Labour’s plans affect fans and what questions remain?

An independent regulator

Bury FC’s collapse in the summer of 2019 prompted the Conservatives to include a fan-led review of football governance in their general election manifesto that year.

The recommendation was to create an independent regulator to ensure financial resilience across leagues and fans are consulted on club heritage matters – more on this later.

While the bill was brought before MPs in March this year, parliament ran out of time to complete its progress into law when the general election was called, meaning it will fall to the next government.

Sir Keir Starmer is an Arsenal fan and Labour have committed to “establish an independent regulator” in its manifesto.

Sir Keir Starmer watching Arsenal play at Manchester City this season. Pic: PA
Image:
Sir Keir Starmer watching Arsenal play at Manchester City this season. Pic: PA

Jon Tonge, a Bury fan and politics professor at the University of Liverpool, told Sky News he senses the next government “may come under pressure” to soften regulations.

“You’ve got the behemoth that is the Premier League saying these proposals amount to over-governance and it’s possible a Labour government might water down these proposals,” he said.

Sharing the wealth

One of the immediate issues for the new regulator to tackle could be the stand-off between the Premier League and the English Football League (EFL), which runs the three divisions below.

England’s top flight says it gives £1.6bn to the wider game every three years – 16% of its total revenue – including non-league football and grassroots.

The Premier League currently gives about £340m a year in funding to the EFL and new plans by the board would increase this to roughly £500m a year over six years, according to Sky Sports News.

The Premier League may have to increase payments to the wider game. Pic: PA
Image:
The Premier League may have to increase payments to the wider game. Pic: PA

But at a meeting in March, Premier League clubs rejected the board’s plan, insisting they first want to reform the financial system governing them before thinking about parting with more money.

Top-flight clubs spent more than £400m on agent fees alone in the 12 months to 1 February, an increase of nearly £100m from the previous campaign.

If a deal cannot be agreed, a backstop would give the regulator powers to impose an agreement between the Premier League and the EFL.

In the meantime, clubs such as former Premier League mainstay Bolton Wanderers, Bury, Wigan Atheltic and Derby County have entered administration over the past five years.

Tests for ownership

Something fans have been crying out for are more stringent tests and checks on prospective owners of their football clubs, partly as a way to guard against the financial challenges already outlined.

To that end, the regulator would operate a strengthened owners and directors’ test with statutory powers.

Read more:
‘Historic moment for fans’: Legislation to create football regulator
Regulator could be good news for clubs lower down the pyramid

It would have access to agencies and branches of government, enabling the regulator to carry out enhanced due diligence on adequacy and source of funds.

Owners and directors deemed unsuitable will be subject to a removal direction giving them a period of time to leave the role and placing them under restrictions on the control they can exert.

While there are many factors for the regulator to consider when it comes to the suitability of club owners, the elephant in the room is likely to remain where it is.

State ownership

The UAE’s purchase of Manchester City more than 15 years ago marked one of the most controversial chapters in the Premier League’s history – the introduction of state ownership.

A Qatari group failed to take over Manchester United last year, while Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund took over Newcastle United in 2021.

Manchester City owner Sheikh Mansour. Pic: PA
Image:
Manchester City owner Sheikh Mansour. Pic: PA

It raises questions around sportswashing, with countries with poor human rights records owning beloved community assets in the world’s most valuable league.

But it’s unlikely a Labour government would address state ownership, according to football finance expert Kieran Maguire.

“The bill will not address state ownership, it very much makes it clear the government doesn’t want to get involved in moral or ethical decisions,” he said.

Prof Tonge agrees.

“State ownership is not going to disappear, it’s actually likely to increase,” he said.

“I think Labour would be reluctant to ban it, first of all because the horse has already bolted – if you’ve allowed it for one, how could you stop others following suit?”

The bill itself states in Section 37 (2) the regulator must take into account government “trade and foreign policy objectives” when making decisions on the suitability of new and existing owners.

Newcastle United chairman Yasir Al-Rumayyan. Pic: PA
Image:
Newcastle United chairman Yasir Al-Rumayyan. Pic: PA

Women’s football

Missing entirely from the Football Governance Bill is the women’s game.

The Lionesses won England’s first international trophy since 1966 when they won the Euros in 2022 and made it to the World Cup final the following year.

This season, the Women’s Super League has continued to shatter several attendance records, with Arsenal topping 60,000 tickets sold on two occasions.

Attendances have boomed in the Women's Super League this season. Pic: PA
Image:
Attendances have boomed in the Women’s Super League this season. Pic: PA

But its success comes despite a stark contrast in funding compared to the men’s game.

Premier League clubs enjoy around £88m each year in investment into their academies for young talent, whereas the FA’s budget for women’s academies is just £3.25m per year.

The top flight says it is investing £21m into women’s and girls’ football between 2022 and 2025.

Kelly Simmons, former director of the women’s professional game at the FA and consultant for Run Communications’ women’s sport division, says funding would “transform the game overnight”.

“The game is growing at an incredible rate and I said at the FA I think women’s football will be the second biggest sport here in my lifetime after the men’s game,” she told Sky News.

“And yet it’s absent a lot of the time in big discussions that go on with football stakeholders.”

The ban on women’s football was only lifted in 1971 in the UK and Ms Simmons believes it may be time to consider reparation payments for the time lost.

The Lionesses have enjoyed success in recent years. Pic: PA
Image:
The Lionesses have enjoyed success in recent years. Pic: PA

“There’s just not enough cash in the women’s game and the answer would be to include them in solidarity payments from the Premier League,” she said.

“All football would benefit from that… it’s opening up football to half the population that has previously been excluded.”

Super League

Meanwhile, in the pursuit of even greater revenue streams at the top of the men’s game, the idea for the European Super League was born in 2021.

Manchester United, Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool, Manchester City and Tottenham Hotspur were going to join the likes of Barcelona, Real Madrid and Juventus in a hugely lucrative new league.

SUPER
Image:
The Super League was highly unpopular with fans

Backed by an initial £3bn debt-financed loan from US investment bank JP Morgan, the 15 founding clubs were in line to receive an “infrastructure grant” of up to £300m just for signing up.

Free from the threat of relegation or failure to qualify, the founding 15 would have been guaranteed a spot in the league each season regardless of their results.

The move was deeply unpopular and the fan backlash in England was so fierce each of England’s contingent pulled out.

Some in Europe have refused to totally let go of the idea, but Labour’s manifesto is unambiguous on the matter.

“We will never allow a closed league of select clubs to be siphoned off from the English football pyramid,” it states.

FA Cup replays

While a new government is likely to greenlight powers to ban new leagues, it probably won’t get involved in changes to longstanding competitions such as scrapping replays in the FA Cup.

Manchester United's Bruno Fernandes lifts the FA Cup after the side won the Wembley final. Pic: PA
Image:
The FA Cup is set for a change. Pic: PA

“I think it would be a backwards step, because we’d be allowing an operational issue to be impacted by the regulator,” Mr Maguire says.

“FIFA and UEFA have specific rules over government interference and that would play into the hands of those who are opposed to the introduction of a regulator.”

FIFA has previously suspended national associations over undue government interference, meaning their clubs and national teams are unable to compete in FIFA or UEFA events.

Heritage

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

The loss of FA Cup replays may be mourned by some fans as a blow to the country’s football heritage, but they’ll likely have a greater say in their club affairs.

Labour’s manifesto states: “Labour is committed to making Britain the best place in the world to be a football fan.

“We will reform football governance to protect football clubs across our communities and to give fans a greater say in the way they are run.”

Travel costs

Costs associated with matchdays have priced some fans out, with rising ticket prices and increasingly expensive train travel forcing some to miss out on games.

Going to support your team away from home – as tens of thousands do each weekend – can cost north of £100 if travelling by rail, sometimes for a service that may be delayed or overbooked.

In April, Labour announced plans to renationalise the railways if the party wins the general election.

An Azuma rail LNER train at Kings Cross Station, London. File pic
Image:
Pic: PA

The party said the taxpayer would save £2.2bn each year – but would that mean cheaper fares?

Shadow transport secretary Louise Haigh admitted there is no agreement to reinvest those savings into the railway, meaning that money could be given to other priorities in health or education, for example.

Read more:
Sky Sports extends deal with Women’s Super League
Former banker to lead women’s football revolution

She said it is Labour’s ambition to make fares more affordable.

“I can’t today set out that we will lower fares, not least because they are incredibly complex and regulation needs reform as well,” Ms Haigh added.

Continue Reading

UK

Hainault sword attacker Marcus Monzo found guilty of murdering boy, 14, and three attempted murders

Published

on

By

Hainault sword attacker Marcus Monzo found guilty of murdering boy, 14, and three attempted murders

A man has been found guilty of murdering a 14-year-old boy with a samurai sword as he walked to school in east London.

Marcus Arduini Monzo, 37, nearly decapitated Daniel Anjorin and attacked five others during a 20-minute rampage in Hainault on 30 April last year.

Prosecutors said he skinned and deboned his pet cat Wizard before trying “to kill as many people as he could” while under the influence of cannabis.

Monzo, a Spanish-Brazilian national from Newham in east London, admitted two charges of possessing an offensive weapon relating to two swords, which he said he bought for display purposes.

He claimed he had no memory of carrying out the attacks denied Daniel’s murder along with four charges of attempted murder, wounding with intent, aggravated burglary and possession of a bladed article.

He was cleared of one count of attempted murder – instead found guilty of wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm – and convicted of all other charges following a trial at the Old Bailey.

Daniel Anjorin was attacked in Hainault, northeast London, and suffered fatal wounds on 30 April last year. Pic: Metropolitan Police.
Image:
Daniel Anjorin, 14, died in April last year. Pic: Metropolitan Police

The court heard Monzo was a “talented martial artist” and the jury was shown footage of him unboxing a samurai sword on 4 April last year.

In the four-minute video clip, he calls the weapon “freaking sexy” as he lunges towards the camera and makes different moves.

Marcus Monzo
Image:
Marcus Monzo with a samurai sword in footage shown during the trial

The court was also shown CCTV footage from the morning of 30 April, with audible screams in one clip as Monzo drove his grey Ford Transit van at speed into pedestrian Donato Iwule.

Mr Iwule told jurors: “I thought I was dying” and “I saw blood coming out of my neck”, after he was struck with a sword before running away.

Witnesses described how Monzo was running around “like a maniac” and “looked a bit mad, like there was nothing there”.

Daniel, who had left home at around 7am wearing headphones and school sports clothes, suffered “a near-decapitation” when Monzo attacked him with the weapon from behind, prosecutor Tom Little KC told the jury.

 Handout footage from a doorbell camera of police officers tasering a sword-wielding man in Hainault, north east London, after a 14-year-old boy died after being stabbed following an attack on members of the public and two police officers. Pic: PA
Image:
Monzo was tasered by police. Pic: PA

PC Yasmin Mechem-Whitfield chased the armed attacker through alleyways before Monzo struck her three times with the 60cm blade using “extreme force”, the court heard.

He then entered a nearby house through the back door and walked upstairs before attacking sleeping couple Sindy Arias and Henry De Los Rios Polania, who he asked: “Do you believe in God?”

Mr Little said their lives were only spared because their four-year-old daughter, who was sleeping nearby, woke up and started to cry.

Monzo, who had been cornered by police, also struck Inspector Moloy Campbell once with the sword before he was finally disarmed and arrested after trying to climb onto a garage to escape.

Doorbell footage shows the moment officers shout: “Don’t move, don’t f****** move”, after he was brought to the ground by three separate taser discharges.

Monzo told police he had “many personalities”, including a “professional assassin”, and compared the events to The Hunger Games film franchise.

He wept while giving evidence as he said he did not intend to harm anybody and told jurors he had no memory of what happened.

He told how he had previously used psychedelic drugs and smoked cannabis “three or four times a week” before the attack, but denied doing so on the day.

Prosecutors said he likely suffered from a psychotic disorder with “schizophrenic-like symptoms”, including “delusional beliefs” that both he and his family were in “mortal danger”.

But Mr Little said his psychotic state was self-induced and did not meet the threshold for diminished responsibility.

Continue Reading

UK

Thousands of Eurostar passengers facing cancellations and severe delays after cable theft

Published

on

By

Thousands of Eurostar passengers facing cancellations and severe delays after cable theft

Thousands of Eurostar passengers have been suffering severe delays and last-minute cancellations due to cable theft – a day after two track fatalities caused disruption.

The latest delays come after 600 metres of copper cables were stolen overnight in the city of Lille in northern France, according to reports in the country.

Eurostar said this was forcing it to run services on alternative routes, causing extended journey times.

The company said in a statement that “full repairs are now completed” and trains resumed as normal as of 1pm UK time.

It added that “some delays can still be expected until the end of the day”.

The statement continued: “Customers have been contacted directly with updates and available options, and Eurostar is advising those due to travel today to postpone their journey with free exchanges and refunds available.

“We’re very sorry for the continued disruption and the impact this is having on our customers. Our teams are working hard to support customers in the stations.”

Money blog: Your Eurostar rights explained

Eurostar said services between Brussels/Paris and London had been experiencing disruption since the beginning of the day.

Its services were already disrupted because many trains and staff members were out of position after two fatalities on rail lines in France on Tuesday.

At least five services on its London-Paris route were cancelled on Wednesday, and seven others were delayed by around an hour.

Pic: PA
Image:
Passengers at St Pancras International station in London. Pic: PA

The operator said it was handing out water to passengers on delayed trains, and it has teams at stations to provide assistance.

Affected passengers are able to change their travel plans free of charge or request a full refund.

Images show large crowds of stranded passengers at St Pancras International station in London today.

In a post on X, Eurostar said the cable theft meant trains were likely to be “subject to severe delays and last-minute cancellations”, adding: “We advise you to cancel or postpone your trip.”

Nigel Hardman, 57, took an Avanti West Coast train from Blackpool to London Euston at 5.30am, only for him and his family to find out en route that their Eurostar trip to Paris had been cancelled.

The delays have meant they have decided to board a train to Brussels instead of Paris, meaning they have lost out on about £700 on hotel costs and connecting trains.

Delayed passengers at St Pancras. Pic: PA
Image:
Delayed passengers at St Pancras. Pic: PA

Mr Hardman, a plumber from Blackpool, said: “There’s no availability on trains to Paris – they’re all booked up. We’re going to go to Brussels and stay there, then shoot down to Strasbourg, where we were supposed to be. I only found out on an email at about 3.30am this morning, why couldn’t they have told us last night?

“And when we got here, we were in the queue for an hour before we found out the other trains to Paris were all booked up. Everyone was useless until one really organised guy was telling it to us straight. It’s going to cost us about £700 extra which is really frustrating. And it’s just a nightmare start to our trip.”

Eurostar passenger Elizabeth Romijn, 75, a yoga teacher from the Netherlands said she is used to issues with the train service, but described Wednesday’s disruption as “very chaotic”.

She was planning to make her way home, catching the train to Brussels today after visiting friends in Guildford, Sussex and has decided to wait in the station to see if she can board a train.

SHARE WITH SKY NEWS

You can share your story, pictures or video with us using our app, private messaging or email.

:: Your Report on Sky News apps

:: WhatsApp

:: Email

By sending us your video footage/ photographs/ audio you agree we can broadcast, publish and edit the material.

Ms Romijn said: “My plan is to just wait. Maybe I should go and be more proactive and go to ask one of the staff but nobody seems to know anything. And it’s quite horrible long queues.

“On the email they said, don’t go, go cancel your travel or take a voucher or something – but I thought I’m going to travel anyway. I’m just going to wait and if it’s cancelled, then I go back to Guildford where I’ve been visiting my friends.”

Read more from Sky News:
UK to buy nuclear-carrying fighter jets
Man dies after being struck by lightning on honeymoon
King and Trump won’t hold private meeting

Passengers at St Pancras International station .
Pic: PA
Image:
Passengers at St Pancras International station .
Pic: PA

Eurostar had said in a statement following the deaths on Tuesday: “We are deeply sorry to confirm that there were two separate fatalities on the LGV Nord high-speed line between Lille and Paris yesterday.

“Our thoughts are with the families and friends of those who lost their lives.

“The line was closed for much of the afternoon and evening, resulting in significant disruption to Eurostar services, including cancellations on routes to and from Paris.

“Trains on the London-Brussels-Amsterdam route continued to run with delays.

“This morning, disruption continues due to the knock-on impact of displaced trains and crew.

“Further to this, services have been further affected by an incident of cable theft on the same line near Lille.”

Continue Reading

UK

Rayner refuses to repeat chancellor’s pledge on tax hikes

Published

on

By

Rayner refuses to repeat chancellor's pledge on tax hikes

Angela Rayner has refused to repeat Rachel Reeves’ pledge that taxes will not be increased at the next budget.

Standing in for Sir Keir Starmer at PMQs, the deputy prime minister was pressed on warnings from economists that tax rises are looking increasingly inevitable in the autumn to fund the chancellor’s spending plans.

Politics Live: Deputy PM vows to take on Labour welfare rebels

The Tories want a commitment that this will not be the case in order to support the government’s welfare bill, which is under threat from a growing and significant rebellion of Labour MPs.

Shadow chancellor Mel stride, standing in for Tory leader Kemi Badenoch, said even if the planned benefit cuts go through, “almost every respected economist now says tax rises are all but inevitable in the autumn”.

He said Ms Reeves promised after her last budget that this will not be the case and asked Ms Rayner to give “certainty” to businesses and repeat that pledge.

Ms Rayner said the question was “a bit rich” given the Tories raised taxes to record highs before the last election, adding: “I take no lectures”.

More on Uk Economy

Mr Stride pressed her on analysis from the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) that local authorities will have to raise council tax to the maximum level allowed to pay for local services.

Angela Rayner
Image:
Angela Rayner

He said: “The IFS says that the spending review will mean the biggest council tax increases in a generation.

“A £7bn tax rise and yet the chancellor and the prime minister have repeatedly claimed that the government will not raise taxes on working people. So can I ask… why doesn’t she think the council tax is paid by working people?”

Ms Rayner again attacked the Tories’ record, saying he had “absolute nerve” as council tax “rose every single year under that government”.

She said Labour was “delivering money for local government, when they had austerity, put taxes up and ruined the British economy”.

Ms Reeves unveiled her spending review earlier this month, which outlined how much day-to-day funding government departments will get over the next three years, along with capital spending for longer-term projects.

The chancellor has insisted her plans are fully funded, but Paul Johnson, director of the IFS, has said she has left herself such little headroom that “any move in the wrong direction” for the economy would “almost certainly spark more tax rises”.

Any tax hikes would likely spark a backlash given Ms Reeves’ said last November that there would be no more tax hikes during this government’s term, following her decision to raise employer National Insurance in the autumn budget.

The government is facing further trouble as a key part of the spending review was a package of reforms aimed at shaving £5bn off the welfare budget by 2030.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sky’s Tamara Cohen explains.

However, an unprecedented rebellion of over 100 MPs is threatening that legislation, which is due to be voted on next Tuesday.

Ms Rayner today insisted the vote will go ahead.

She said: “I’ll tell the right honourable member why we’re pressing ahead with our reforms.

“That is because we’re investing £1 billion into tailored employment support, a right to try to help more people back into work and ending reassessments for the most severely disabled who will never be able to work.

“We won’t walk away and stand by and abandon millions of people trapped in the failing system left behind by him and his colleagues.”

Continue Reading

Trending