Connect with us

Published

on

Wall Street’s biggest bank is lifting Brussels’ bonus cap for its London-based staff, weeks after rival Goldman Sachs fired the starting gun on a post-Brexit era in industry pay.

Sky News can reveal that JP Morgan Chase was in the process of notifying staff on Wednesday that it would preserve some elements of the remuneration packages introduced after the European Union’s cap on variable pay came into force in 2014.

The system prevents material risk-takers (MRTs) working in lenders’ operations in the EU from earning more than twice their fixed pay in variable compensation.

Sources said that JP Morgan, which employs 22,000 people in the UK, including roughly 14,000 in London, had decided to preserve a significant proportion of the fixed pay allowances used to calculate eligible employees’ maximum bonuses.

The US-based banking behemoth has also decided to raise its bonus cap threshold from two times’ fixed pay to a multiple of 10.

That would mean a senior JP Morgan banker or trader in Britain who earned £2m in annual fixed pay would, from this year, be eligible for a bonus of up to £20m, rather than £4m under the EU rules.

A source said that broadly maintaining fixed pay levels was desirable even for senior staff focused on managing monthly household expenses such as mortgages.

Responding to an enquiry from Sky News, a JP Morgan spokesman said: “We believe we have developed one of the most attractive and balanced pay structures in the industry. Fixed pay will remain very competitive, and we will have ample room to reward the highest performers appropriately.”

Sources close to the bank said its analysis suggested that the removal of the EU bonus cap was unlikely to materially impact total annual pay levels during the current financial year.

“Bonuses will continue to be discretionary and driven by performance on a year-to-year basis,” one insider said on Wednesday.

Read more from business:
UK inflation drops to Bank of England’s 2% target

Possible ‘criminal conspiracy’ over Post Office scandal
Nvidia becomes world’s most valuable company

The new structure is understood to be sufficiently flexible to adjust fixed pay levels if the regulatory landscape shifts further.

Sky News revealed details of Goldman Sachs’ plans last month, with the bank opting to increase its cap from 2:1 to 25:1.

Under Goldman’s revised structure, however, its fixed pay allowances are being largely removed, meaning bonuses will invariably be calculated from a lower base than those at JP Morgan.

The move by Wall Street’s two biggest investment banks to recalibrate how they approach pay for their top UK-based staff is expected to trigger an arms race among rivals as they seek to remain competitive.

A JP Morgan insider said the bank believed its revamped pay structure would be attractive both to bankers working for rivals, and those it wanted to lure to Britain from outside the country.

At Goldman, the firm’s boss outside the US said the bonus cap had prevented it from adopting a consistent approach to pay.

Banks argued against the bonus cap for years, saying it did nothing to reduce risk-taking behaviour and that in many cases it achieved the opposite.

Among those who publicly opposed it was Andrew Bailey, the Bank of England governor, who said in 2014 that it was “the wrong policy [and] the debate around it is misguided”.

Because the bonus cap does not impose a limit on overall remuneration, senior industry figures warned that it had placed upward pressure on salaries and allowances not linked to longer-term performance, and which could not be reduced or clawed back if failure or previous misconduct had subsequently emerged.

During his ill-fated stint as chancellor in Liz Truss’s administration, Kwasi Kwarteng moved to scrap the EU bonus cap, saying it would boost the international competitiveness of Britain’s financial services sector.

UK regulators agreed that scrapping the cap would aid financial stability by enabling firms to reduce pay faster during downturns or in scenarios where they needed to conserve capital.

Bosses at lenders such as Deutsche Bank and Santander have also criticised the cap, while Barclays and HSBC have won shareholder approval to remove the two-to-one pay.

Continue Reading

Business

Petrofac administration not a great start to the week for Ed Miliband though relief could come

Published

on

By

Petrofac administration not a great start to the week for Ed Miliband though relief could come

It’s not the start to the week that Ed Miliband, the energy secretary, would have been hoping for: more than 2,000 private sector jobs in Scotland at risk from the collapse of Petrofac, the London-listed oilfield services group.

Its slide into insolvency was triggered by last week’s cancellation of a major contract by its biggest customer, but the failure of a company once valued at more than £6bn has been a long time coming.

Money blog: ‘We protect UK from attack, our salaries can be limitless’

Administrators at Teneo will now attempt to salvage what they can from Petrofac’s wreckage.

“The group’s operations will continue to trade, and options for alternative Restructuring and [sale] solutions are being actively explored with its key creditors,” Petrofac said on Monday morning.

“When appointed, administrators will work alongside Executive Management to preserve value, operational capability and ongoing delivery across the Group’s operating and trading entities.”

For thousands of employees, the future is now uncertain, although people close to the company say they are hopeful that a buyer can be found swiftly for its North Sea operations, with one suggesting that it could even happen in the coming days.

That would be a relief to Mr Miliband, whose energy policy has come under growing scrutiny in recent months amid dire warnings about the future of Britain’s offshore oil industry.

Continue Reading

Business

More than 2,000 jobs at risk as oil and gas company enters administration

Published

on

By

More than 2,000 jobs at risk as oil and gas company enters administration

More than 2,000 Scotland-based jobs are at risk as oil and energy services group Petrofac has applied for administration.

The group’s operations will continue to trade, and options for restructuring of the company and a possible merger or acquisition are being actively explored with its key creditors, the company said on Monday.

People close to the company say they are hopeful a buyer can be found swiftly for its North Sea operations, with one suggesting that it could even happen in the coming days.

Money blog: ‘We protect the UK, our salaries can be limitless’

Administrators will work alongside company management to “preserve value, operational capability and ongoing delivery”, its announcement read.

News of a possible insolvency announcement was first reported by Sky News.

Energy Secretary Ed Miliband and other ministers have been briefed on the situation.

More on Fossil Fuels

Not a great start to the week for Ed Miliband, though relief could come

It’s not the start to the week that Ed Miliband, the energy secretary, would have been hoping for: more than 2,000 private sector jobs in Scotland at risk from the collapse of Petrofac, the London-listed oilfield services group.

Its slide into insolvency was triggered by last week’s cancellation of a major contract by its biggest customer, but the failure of a company once valued at more than £6bn has been a long time coming.

Administrators at Teneo will now attempt to salvage what they can from Petrofac’s wreckage.

For thousands of employees, the future is now uncertain, although people close to the company say they are hopeful that a buyer can be found swiftly for its North Sea operations, with one suggesting that it could even happen in the coming days.

That would be a relief to Mr Miliband, whose energy policy has come under growing scrutiny in recent months amid dire warnings about the future of Britain’s offshore oil industry.

An advisory firm, Kroll, had been engaged by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero to work with ministers and officials on the unfolding crisis for the company.

What is Petrofac?

Petrofac employs about 7,300 people globally, according to a recent stock exchange filing.

It designs, constructs and operates offshore equipment for energy companies.

The company has been valued at more than £6bn but has been struggling with debt.

It also faced a Serious Fraud Office investigation, which resulted in a 2021 conviction for failing to prevent bribery, and the payment of millions of pounds in penalties.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Ed Miliband ‘welcomes’ challenge from Jeremy Clarkson for seat in parliament

Founded in 1981 in Texas, the business has been in talks about a far-reaching financial restructuring for more than a year.

A formal restructuring plan was sanctioned by the High Court in May this year with the aim of writing off much of its debt and injecting new cash into the business.

This was subsequently overturned, prompting talks with creditors about a revised agreement.

Continue Reading

Business

Start-ups warn Reeves over budget tax bombshell

Published

on

By

Start-ups warn Reeves over budget tax bombshell

A lobbying group representing UK start-ups will this week warn Rachel Reeves against a tax raid on limited liability partnerships (LLPs), arguing that it would hit the backers of Britain’s most innovative companies.

Sky News has seen a letter to be sent to the chancellor on Monday, in which the Startup Coalition will argue that imposing employers’ National Insurance Contributions (NICs) on venture capital funds could make UK fund launches “commercially unviable”.

Venture capital firms, along with private equity firms, law firms and accountants were alarmed last week by speculation that Ms Reeves was planning to raise close to £2bn by taxing LLPs in this way.

Treasury officials are said to be in talks about the move ahead of next month’s crucial budget statement.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Has Rachel Reeves changed her tone on budget?

“Combined with last year’s carried interest reforms, this is the second budget where VC risks collateral damage from policies not designed for it – and the combination of these changes could raise VCs’ overall tax burden by around 30%,” Dom Hallas, executive director of the Startup Coalition, will say in the letter.

“Any additional tax on partnership profits directly reduces the working capital available to investment teams.

“For emerging managers, often operating at or below cost in their early funds, these changes could make UK fund launches commercially unviable.

“For more established funds, they would accelerate an existing trend: partners and decision-makers relocating to other jurisdictions.

“Fewer UK partners mean fewer meetings with British founders, fewer term sheets signed here, and less capital flowing into high-growth British companies.”

Read more:
Cutting cash ISA allowance could backfire, MPs warn
Be bold with tax hikes or risk ‘groundhog day’, chancellor told

The group’s intervention risks embarrassing the chancellor, given her pledge on Friday to “supercharge innovation” with a new unit aimed at so-called scale-up companies.

Mr Hallas’s letter will call on the chancellor to protect venture capital fund structures from new taxes “while allowing the government to make changes to the wider LLP regime or similar areas”.

He will also urge her to “differentiate [venture capital] from private equity in the tax system, aligning treatment with its public-interest role in innovation”.

Continue Reading

Trending