Connect with us

Published

on

One evening last December, Tieqiao Zhang felt severe stomach pain.

This story also ran on NPR. It can be republished for free.

After it subsided later that night, he thought it might be food poisoning. When the pain returned the next morning, Zhang realized the source of his pain might not be as simple as bad food.

He didnt want to wait for an appointment with his regular doctor, but he also wasnt sure if the pain warranted emergency care, he said.

Zhang, 50, opted to visit Parkland Healths Urgent Care Emergency Center, a clinic near his home in Dallas where hed been treated in the past. Its on the campus of Parkland, the citys largest public hospital, which has a separate emergency room.

He believed the clinic was an urgent care center, he said.

A CT scan revealed that Zhang had a kidney stone. A physician told him it would pass naturally within a few days, and Zhang was sent home with a prescription for painkillers, he said.

Five days later, Zhangs stomach pain worsened. Worried and unable to get an immediate appointment with a urologist, Zhang once again visited the Urgent Care Emergency Center and again was advised to wait and see, he said.

Two weeks later, Zhang passed the kidney stone.

Then the bills came.

The Patient: Tieqiao Zhang, 50, who is insured by BlueCross and BlueShield of Texas through his employer.

Medical Services: Two diagnostic visits, including lab tests and CT scans.

Service Provider: Parkland Health & Hospital System. The hospital is part of the Dallas County Hospital District.

Total Bills: The in-network hospital charged $19,543 for the two visits. BlueCross and BlueShield of Texas paid $13,070.96. Zhang owed $1,000 to Parkland a $500 emergency room copay for each of his two visits.

What Gives: Parklands Urgent Care Emergency Center is whats called a freestanding emergency department.

The number of freestanding emergency rooms in the United States grew tenfold from 2001 to 2016, drawing attention for sending patients eye-popping bills. Most states allow them to operate, either by regulation or lack thereof. Some states, including Texas, have taken steps to regulate the centers, such as requiring posted notices identifying the facility as a freestanding emergency department.

Urgent care centers are a more familiar option for many patients. Research shows that, on average, urgent care visits can be about 10 times cheaper than a low-acuity or less severe visit to an ER.

But the difference between an urgent care clinic and a freestanding emergency room can be tough to discern. Email Sign-Up

Subscribe to KFF Health News' free Morning Briefing. Your Email Address Sign Up

Generally, to bill as an emergency department, facilities must meet specific requirements, such as maintaining certain staff, not refusing patients, and remaining open around the clock.

The freestanding emergency department at Parkland is 40 yards away from its main emergency room and operates under the same license, according to Michael Malaise, the spokesperson for Parkland Health. It is closed on nights and Sundays.

(Parklands president and chief executive officer, Frederick Cerise, is a member of KFFs board of trustees. KFF Health News is an editorially independent program of KFF.) The hospital is very transparent about the centers status as an emergency room, Malaise told KFF Health News in a statement.

Malaise provided photographs of posted notices stating, This facility is a freestanding emergency medical care facility, and warning that patients would be charged emergency room fees and could also be charged a facility fee. He said the notices were posted in the exam rooms, lobby, and halls at the time of Zhangs visits.

Zhangs health plan required a $500 emergency room copay for each of the two visits for his kidney stone.

When Zhang visited the center in 2021 for a different health issue, he was charged only $30, his plans copay for urgent care, he said. (A review of his insurance documents showed Parkland also used emergency department billing codes then. BCBS of Texas did not respond to questions about that visit.)

One reason I went to the urgent care instead of emergency room, although they are just next door, is the copayment, he said.

The list of services that Parklands freestanding emergency room offers resembles that of urgent care centers including, for some centers, diagnosing a kidney stone, said Ateev Mehrotra, a health care policy professor at Harvard Medical School.

Having choices leaves patients on their own to decipher not only the severity of their ailment, but also what type of facility they are visiting all while dealing with a health concern. Self-triage is a very difficult thing, Mehrotra said.

Zhang said he did not recall seeing posted notices identifying the center as a freestanding emergency department during his visits, nor did the front desk staff mention a $500 copay. Plus, he knew Parkland also had an emergency room, and that was not the building he visited, he said.

The name is misleading, Zhang said. Its like being tricked. In severe pain and uncertain of its cause, Tieqiao Zhang of Dallas says he didnt want to wait for an appointment with his regular doctor, but he also wasnt sure if he needed emergency care. He visited a clinic on the campus of Dallas largest public hospital and was charged 10 times what he expected.(Laura Buckman for KFF Health News)

Parkland opened the center in 2015 to reduce the number of patients in its main emergency room, which is the busiest in the country, Malaise said. He added that the Urgent Care Emergency Center, which is staffed with emergency room providers, is an extension of our main emergency room and is clearly marked in multiple places as such.

Malaise first told KFF Health News that the facility isnt a freestanding ER, noting that it is located in a hospital building on the campus. Days later, he said the center is held out to the public as a freestanding emergency medical care facility within the definition provided by Texas law.

The Urgent Care Emergency Center name is intended to prevent first responders and others facing life-threatening emergencies from visiting the center rather than the main emergency room, Malaise said.

If you have ideas for a better name, certainly you can send that along for us to consider, he said.

Putting the term urgent in the clinics name while charging emergency room prices is disingenuous, said Benjamin Ukert, an assistant professor of health economics and policy at Texas A&M University.

When Ukert reviewed Zhangs bills at the request of KFF Health News, he said his first reaction was, Wow, I am glad that he only got charged $500; it could have been way worse for instance, if the facility had been out-of-network.

The Resolution: Zhang said he paid $400 of the $1,000 he owes in total to avoid collections while he continues to dispute the amount.

Zhang said he first reached out to his insurer, thinking his bills were wrong, before he reached out to Parkland several times by phone and email. He said customer service representatives told him that, for billing purposes, Parkland doesnt differentiate its Urgent Care Emergency Clinic from its emergency department. More from Bill of the Month He Fell Ill on a Cruise. Before He Boarded the Rescue Boat, They Handed Him the Bill. May 22, 2024 Sign Here? Financial Agreements May Leave Doctors in the Drivers Seat Apr 30, 2024 A Moms $97,000 Question: How Was Her Babys Air-Ambulance Ride Not Medically Necessary? Mar 25, 2024 More from the series

BlueCross and BlueShield of Texas did not respond to KFF Health News when asked for comment.

Zhag said he also reached out to a county commissioners office in Dallas, which never responded, and to the Texas Department of Health, which said it doesnt have jurisdiction over billing matters. He said the staff for his state representative, Morgan Meyer, contacted the hospital on his behalf, but later told him the hospital would not change his bill.

As of mid-May, his balance stood at $600, or $300 for each visit.

The Takeaway: Lawmakers in Texas and around the country have tried to increase price transparency at freestanding emergency rooms, including by requiring them to hand out disclosures about billing practices.

But experts said the burden still falls disproportionately on patients to navigate the growing menu of options for care.

Its up to the patient to walk into the right building, said Mehrotra, the Harvard professor. It doesnt help that most providers are opaque about their billing practices, he said.

Mehrotra said that some freestanding emergency departments in Texas use confusing names like complete care, which mask the facilities capabilities and billing structure.

Ukert said states could do more to untangle the confusion patients face at such centers, like banning the use of the term urgent care to describe facilities that bill like emergency departments.

Bill of the Month is a crowdsourced investigation by KFF Health News and NPR that dissects and explains medical bills. Do you have an interesting medical bill you want to share with us? Tell us about it!

Emily Siner reported the audio story.

Renuka Rayasam: rrayasam@kff.org, @renurayasam Related Topics Health Care Costs States Bill Of The Month Hospitals Investigation Texas Contact Us Submit a Story Tip

Continue Reading

Sports

Wetzel: The NFL’s Bill Belichick skepticism is being validated in Chapel Hill

Published

on

By

Wetzel: The NFL's Bill Belichick skepticism is being validated in Chapel Hill

For decades, Bill Belichick lorded over the NFL as few ever have. A bully in a hoodie, he led his New England empire to six Super Bowl titles and 17 AFC East crowns and through countless controversies.

From success to scandal, from fashion choices to news conference one-liners, he was always top of mind in the NFL.

He still is, actually.

“I don’t think there is a conversation these days where what is happening with Bill doesn’t get mentioned within the first five minutes,” one NFC player personnel director said.

Train wrecks cause craned necks, and Belichick’s early tenure at the University of North Carolina qualifies as one.

Snubbed by the league he once dominated, Belichick headed to the college ranks this year expecting success. Instead, he has thus far produced a stumbling, embarrassing soap opera of a season. The Tar Heels are 2-3 and desperately lack talent after losing 39 players from last year’s team and bringing in more than 40 transfers. They head to Cal on Friday as 10.5-point underdogs.

The jokes are frequent. So too is the schadenfreude. Most notably, though, the scene in Chapel Hill provides validation for NFL teams, which, after Belichick and the Patriots parted ways after the 2023 season, uniformly passed on hiring him.

Monday saw Belichick’s weekly UNC news conference attended by the school’s chancellor and athletic director, an attempt to show a united front against speculation about a possible firing and/or resignation.

“Reports about my looking for a buyout or trying to leave here is categorically false,” Belichick said. “There’s zero truth to any of that. I’m glad I’m here.”

Where he really had wanted to be was in the NFL. Multiple sources say that as he limped through his final season in New England — a listless 4-13 campaign — the legendary coach began to view life after Foxborough not with dread but with a measure of excitement.

Armed with perhaps the greatest coaching résumé of all time, he expected another NFL team to quickly hire him. He had, after all, spent decades beating them all.

Seven franchises (Atlanta, Carolina, Las Vegas, the Los Angeles Chargers, Seattle, Tennessee and Washington) would have openings. At least four more (Chicago, Dallas and both New York teams) could have reasonably fired their guy just to get to Belichick. Even Philadelphia seemed to be a possibility.

Instead, only Atlanta interviewed Belichick, and the Falcons then chose Raheem Morris.

The belief around the league, according to sources at the time, wasn’t so much that the now-73-year-old might have lost something as a coach.

Far more troubling was that Belichick was stuck in his ways and would not cede control over player personnel decisions, which doomed the end of his time in New England. The trend in the NFL was to have the front office operate with a measure of independence. Could Belichick’s famously controlling ways allow that?

Essentially, the man famous for the phrase “Do your job” wouldn’t do just one job — coach the team. Personality overwhelmed potential. His budding feud with Patriots owner Robert Kraft only added to concerns.

It’s not that all those franchises made good decisions. Las Vegas and Tennessee have already replaced the coaches they chose instead of Belichick. The New York Jets limped through another year before a regime change, only to maybe get worse.

If Belichick were rolling in Chapel Hill as he anticipated, maybe the how-do-you-like-me-now vibes would be swinging the other way. He isn’t, though. Against three Power 4 opponents, his team has been outscored 120-33.

There is no shortage of media stories about disappointed players, disaffected parents and general chaos. A coach who once demanded discipline runs a team without it. A leader who once decried distractions is now in the tabloids. Debates rage about how perhaps the Patriots’ success really was all about Tom Brady.

Belichick and UNC general manager Michael Lombardi clearly didn’t fully understand how college football worked. They dubbed the Tar Heels the NFL’s 33rd team, but roster construction, especially through the transfer portal, has thus far failed.

Flush with money, attention and Belichick’s pipeline-to-the-pros credibility, UNC brought in 70 new players. It should be at least decent. Instead, some NFL scouts call it one of the worst rosters in the ACC.

The duo told multiple sources their plan last fall and brushed off suggestions that college is unique — despite longtime NFL head coaches Herm Edwards (Arizona State) and Lovie Smith (Illinois) trying similar tacks in recent years without much success. Going the other direction, college legends from Urban Meyer to Steve Spurrier have often flamed out quickly in the NFL, and even Nick Saban retreated from the Miami Dolphins to Alabama after two seasons.

This is what the NFL has seized on. This is what diminished interest in Belichick originally, a headstrong run of bad personnel decisions. Only now it’s in the college portal, not the professional draft.

Maybe Belichick can still coach, but not with the roster he’s constructed.

“It’s a learning curve,” Belichick admitted Monday. “We’re all in it together. But we’re making a lot of progress, and the process will eventually produce the results we want like they have everywhere else I’ve been.”

“Everywhere else he’s been” is watching closely, a league still fascinated by him, just not for the reasons that Belichick likely hoped.

Continue Reading

Science

Vast Space to Launch Haven-1, the World’s First Private Space Station in 2026

Published

on

By

Vast Space’s Haven-1, a single-module orbital lab, will launch in 2026 via SpaceX’s Falcon 9. Designed for four astronauts on short missions, it features life-support systems tested with NASA and a domed observation window, marking a milestone in private space habitats.

Continue Reading

Politics

‘Additional resources’ offered by govt to reverse ban on Maccabi Tel Aviv fans at Villa game

Published

on

By

'Additional resources' offered by govt to reverse ban on Maccabi Tel Aviv fans at Villa game

The government says it is exploring what “additional resources and support are required” to allow “all fans” to attend Maccabi Tel Aviv’s match against Aston Villa next month.

Supporters of the Israeli side have been told they are not allowed to attend November’s game in Birmingham after a decision by Birmingham’s Safety Advisory Group (SAG).

The group – made up of local stakeholders, including representatives from the council, police and event organisers – said the decision was due to a high risk of violence based on “current intelligence and previous incidents”.

Politics live: MPs react to Maccabi Tel Aviv fan ban

The decision has been criticised across the political spectrum, with Sir Keir Starmer describing it as a “wrong decision” while Tory opposition leader Kemi Badenoch called it a “national disgrace”.

In a statement on Friday night, a government spokesperson said: “No one should be stopped from watching a football game simply because of who they are.

“The government is working with policing and other partners to do everything in our power to ensure this game can safely go ahead, with all fans present.

“We are exploring what additional resources and support are required so all fans can attend.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Birmingham residents react to the Maccabi fan ban

Meanwhile, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood said: “Antisemitism is a stain on our society that shames us all. Every football fan, whoever they are, should be able to watch their team in safety.

“This government is doing everything in our power to ensure all fans can safely attend the game.”

The prime minister’s spokesman previously said Sir Keir would “do everything in his power to give Jewish communities the security they deserve”.

Read more:
Why are fans banned – and has this happened before?
How this raises questions about one of the UK’s biggest cities

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Badenoch: Fan ban a ‘national disgrace’

The Home Office offered to provide more police for the event, while Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy and Communities Secretary Steve Reed also intervened.

However, senior police insisted the ban was necessary and cited clashes and hate crime offences committed when the Israeli team travelled to Amsterdam to play Ajax last year.

The Aston Villa vs Maccabi Tel Aviv match – set to take place on Thursday 6 November – is a Europa League fixture.

UEFA, which runs the tournament, had urged UK authorities to ensure away fans could attend.

Continue Reading

Trending