Connect with us

Published

on

Reform UK has withdrawn support from three of its parliamentary candidates as the racism row engulfing the party continues to grow.

The party led by Nigel Farage is no longer supporting Edward Oakenfull, who is standing in Derbyshire Dales, Robert Lomas, a candidate in Barnsley North, and Leslie Lilley, standing in Southend East and Rochford, after alleged comments made by them emerged in the media.

It comes as party leaders from across the political spectrum have lined up to condemn Reform UK, and told Mr Farage he needs to “get a grip” of his party.

Oakenfull has been suspended after reportedly having written social media posts about the IQ of sub-Saharan Africans – which he told the BBC were “taken out of context”.

Follow live election updates

Meanwhile, Lomas said black people should “get off [their] lazy arses” and stop acting “like savages”, The Times reported.

Lilley, according to the newspaper, described people arriving on small boats as “scum”, adding: “I hope your family get robbed, beaten or attacked.”

More on General Election 2024

As the registration deadline for candidates has passed, all three candidates will remain on the ballot paper, despite no longer being endorsed by Reform UK.

Racism row

The decision to drop these candidates comes amid a vast row about racism in the party after Channel 4 news aired footage filmed undercover that showed Andrew Parker, an activist canvassing for Mr Farage, using the racial slur “P***” to describe the prime minister, describing Islam as a “disgusting cult”, and saying the army should “just shoot” migrants crossing the Channel.

Reform UK was condemned by party leaders across the political spectrum, and Rishi Sunak reacted furiously to the comments, saying Mr Farage had “some questions to answer”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sunak ‘hurt’ over Reform race row

He said: “My two daughters have to see and hear Reform people who campaign for Nigel Farage calling me an effing P***. It hurts and it makes me angry and I think he has some questions to answer.

“And I don’t repeat those words lightly. I do so deliberately because this is too important not to call out clearly for what it is.”

Parker has told Sky News he was a “total fool”, that he has learned his lesson, and there was “no racism” in what he said.

Reform UK has said it has reported Channel 4 to the elections watchdog for alleged “scandalous… interference” over what the party claims was a fake rant planted by the broadcaster.

The broadcaster has rejected the allegations out of hand, saying: “We strongly stand by our rigorous and duly impartial journalism which speaks for itself. We met Mr Parker for the first time at Reform UK party headquarters, where he was a Reform party canvasser.

“We did not pay the Reform UK canvasser or anyone else in this report. Mr Parker was not known to Channel 4 News and was filmed covertly via the undercover operation.”

The Electoral Commission said they were “aware of reports” that Reform UK had asked them to investigate.

But the commission said it had “not received such a letter”, adding that it would “consider [the letter’s] contents” if it did.

A spokesperson for the commission said Channel 4 News was exempt from its regulation as it is a licensed broadcaster.

They said any laws surrounding the potential defamation of candidates would be a matter for the police.

Questions to answer

Mr Farage faced a slew of questions on the row during a BBC Question Time Leaders’ Special on Friday night, during which he said he was “not going to apologise” for the actions of people associated with his party.

Asked why his party “attracts racists and extremists”, the former UKIP leader claimed he had “done more to drive the far right out of British politics than anybody else alive” – claiming he took on the British Nationalist Party (BNP) a decade ago.

He also appeared to throw his predecessor Richard Tice under the bus when read racist and xenophobic comments made by Reform candidates, saying he “inherited a start-up party” and has “no idea” why the people who said those things had been selected.

Mr Farage has today lashed out at the BBC as well, saying he is refusing to appear on the broadcaster’s Sunday morning politics show with Laura Kuenssberg until they apologise for their “dishonest” audience, accusing the broadcaster of having “behaved like a political actor throughout this election”.

But the right-wing firebrand has been condemned by all party leaders.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Leaders have to set the tone’

Sir Keir Starmer told Sky News Mr Farage must “set the tone” for his party, adding: “It’s no good Nigel Farage after the event saying that he doesn’t agree with certain comments.”

The Labour leader went on to insist Mr Farage is “not a spectator” – but is the leader of Reform UK.

He added: “Leaders have to set the tone, set the standards and take the action so that people know in advance what is acceptable and what’s not acceptable.

What Reform attacks say about Nigel Farage’s mindset


Rob Powell Political reporter

Rob Powell

Political correspondent

@robpowellnews

Even by Reform’s standards, the frequency and ferocity of attacks flying out from the party has stepped up today.

We’ve had complaints going into Ofcom, the Electoral Commission and Essex Police.

The BBC boycotted; Channel 4 reported and a former campaigner cut adrift.

This tells you more about Nigel Farage’s mindset than his decision to suspend three candidates over online posts.

So five days from the election, will these seemingly rolling controversies shift many votes?

Much like the row over the Reform leader’s comments on Russia and Putin, that probably depends on how fully signed up you are the party’s agenda.

For the die-hards, talk of an establishment stitch-up will find sympathetic and supportive ears.

But wavering Tories dabbling with Reform may be queasier about all this talk of racism and a big media conspiracy.

One final point.

A fortnight ago, Nigel Farage demanded to be treated as one of the big players in this election citing a poll putting him ahead of the Tories.

But with more coverage comes more scrutiny.

You can construct a fair argument that’s exactly what Reform has been exposed to in the last week.

‘Get a grip’

Labour’s shadow defence secretary told Sky News Mr Farage should “get a grip” of his party amid the racism allegations.

John Healey said: “To some extent, I see him fuelling a row over this Channel 4 film to distract, really, from the fact that there are officials and there are candidates right at the heart of the Reform party, that have been responsible for racist, anti-gay, and other deeply offensive statements.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Farage ‘needs to get a grip’ of Reform

“And it’s for Farage to take action on them. And in the end, the culture and the standards of any political party are set by the leader and Nigel Farage wants to be seen as a leader.

“He needs to get a grip of his own party and he’s failing to do that at the moment.”

Scotland’s first minister, John Swinney, said of Reform’s politics: “I deplore it. I deprecate it. I want nothing to do with it.”

“We will always rail against racist and homophobic comments, and I can’t believe that there’s a single thing Nigel Farage can do to control a problem that he himself has started,” he said.

The SNP leader went on to claim that this is not a case of bad apples, but “an ingrained problem of Reform”.

Read more:
Police ‘urgently assessing’ racist comments by Reform activists
Reform candidates accused of ‘antisemitic’ posts
Reform canvasser says he was ‘a total fool’

He said: “Nigel Farage has set this all up. He has stoked it all. With every word over all these years, he has incited all that intolerance and prejudice in our society.

“I want to have nothing to do with it. And I don’t think there’s anything Nigel Farage can do to stop it, because he created it.”

The leader of the Liberal Democrats, Sir Ed Davey, said his members and candidates “share no values with Mr Farage”.

“He can sort himself out. My job as a Liberal Democrat leader is to tell you what we’re about.”

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

Here is the full list of candidates standing in the Derbyshire Dales constituency:

  • Kelda Boothroyd, Green Party
  • Robert Court, Liberal Democrats
  • Sarah Dines, Conservative Party
  • Rachel Elnaugh-Love, Independent
  • Edward Hudson Oakenfull, formerly Reform UK
  • Helen Wetherall, True and Fair Party
  • John Whitby, Labour Party

Here is the full list of candidates standing in Barnsley North:

  • Penny Baker, Liberal Democrats
  • Tony Devoy, Yorkshire Party
  • Neil Fisher, Independent
  • Tom Heyes, Green Party
  • Dan Jarvis, Labour Party
  • Tamas Kovacs, Conservative Party
  • Robert Lomas, formerly Reform UK
  • Janus Polenceusz, English Democrats

Here is the full list of candidates standing in Southend East and Rochford:

  • Bayo Alaba, Labour Party
  • James Joseph Allen, Liberal Democrats
  • Lee John Clark, Confelicity
  • Simon Cross, Green Party
  • Gavin Haran, Conservative Party
  • Bianca Eleanor Isherwood, Heritage Party
  • Leslie Lilley, formerly Reform UK

Continue Reading

Politics

Starmer needs to publicly say Trump is wrong and give more reassurance over tariffs, Harriet Harman urges

Published

on

By

Starmer needs to publicly say Trump is wrong and give more reassurance over tariffs, Harriet Harman urges

Sir Keir Starmer needs to reassure the public more over tariffs – and tell them Donald Trump is wrong, Harriet Harman has said.

Speaking to Beth Rigby on Sky News’ Electoral Dysfunction podcast, the Labour peer said ministers were avoiding the “elephant in the room, which is that Trump is wrong on this, we don’t agree with him”.

The US president placed 10% tariffs on all UK goods exported to the US, and while other countries were much worse hit, the FTSE 100 fell by about 1,000 after Mr Trump’s “liberation day” announcement last week.

It then kicked off its best day in five years on Thursday after Mr Trump decided to defer the worst of his tariffs for 90 days. Financial markets around the world reacted similarly.

Baroness Harman said there was no need for “gratuitous insults” but that the prime minister needed to “own the narrative” because there is “a danger” if the leader of the country is not saying what is actually happening.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PM reacts to tariffs at liaison committee

A minister under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, Baroness Harman said that when the US put steel tariffs on imported steel in 2002, Mr Blair “did say ‘this is unacceptable, this is wrong, it’s unjustified, it is breaching the World Trade Organisation rules'”.

“He was able to say ‘we do not believe this is how you should be within the world organisation and Bush has got it wrong’,” she added

More from Politics

“I think it feels as if there’s a kind of restricted vocabulary amongst ministers at the moment where they are speaking in code.”

The Labour peer said she also thought Sir Keir should be “being more positive and giving reassurance”.

👉 Click here to listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app 👈

Sir Keir Starmer and Donald Trump shake hands at a news conference at the White House on 27 February. Pic: AP
Image:
Sir Keir Starmer and Donald Trump at the White House in February. Pic: AP

She acknowledged there was “a lot of criticism” in the first six months of Labour’s tenure and the government “didn’t help the economy by rather talking it down”.

There is a danger of being “too pessimistic”, she said, and Sir Keir needs to be “realistic”.

“But I think that giving people reassurances – we’re not going to panic, we’re not going to make mistakes by knee-jerk retaliation,” she said.

“I think the story needs to be told to the country that this is a really difficult problem and Trump has caused it and he is wrong to do this, but we will be okay with this government.

“And I think he’s entitled to say that, and I think people will want to hear that.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Democrats slam DOJ’s ‘grave mistake’ in disbanding crypto crime unit

Published

on

By

Democrats slam DOJ’s ‘grave mistake’ in disbanding crypto crime unit

Democrats slam DOJ’s ‘grave mistake’ in disbanding crypto crime unit

Crypto-critical US Senator Elizabeth Warren has led six Senate Democrats in urging the Department of Justice to reverse its decision to terminate its crypto investigations and prosecutions division.

In an April 10 letter to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, the Senators said the decision to disband the department’s National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team was a “grave mistake” that would support “sanctions evasion, drug trafficking, scams, and child sexual exploitation.”

Senators Richard Durbin, Mazie Hirono, Sheldon Whitehouse, Christopher Coons and Richard Blumenthal signed the letter in addition to Warren.

On April 7, Blanche shuttered the DOJ’s crypto enforcement team, saying in a memo that “The Department of Justice is not a digital assets regulator.”

The senators claim that the decision gave a “free pass to cryptocurrency money launderers” and claimed that crypto mixing services — used to obfuscate blockchain transactions — are “go-to tools for cybercriminals.” 

“It makes no sense for DOJ to announce a hands-off approach to tools that are being used to support such terrible crimes,” the letter said.

Democrats slam DOJ’s ‘grave mistake’ in disbanding crypto crime unit

An excerpt of Democrat’s letter to the DOJ. Source: US Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

The senators also questioned why the Justice Department  had decided not to prosecute a “host of crimes involving digital assets, including violations of the Bank Secrecy Act.”

They claimed that this creates a “systemic vulnerability in the digital assets sector,” which “drug traffickers, terrorists, fraudsters, and adversaries” will exploit on a large scale. 

The lawmakers requested a staff-level briefing no later than May 1, providing “detailed information on the rationale behind these decisions.” 

Targeting Trump family crypto endeavors 

The letter also took a swipe at the Trump family’s crypto projects, suggesting potential conflicts of interest.

Related: SafeMoon boss cites DOJ’s nixed crypto unit in latest bid to toss suit

A press release accompanying the letter stated that the senators are raising concerns about the “potential connections” between the DOJ’s actions and the crypto ventures of President Donald Trump and his family.

The Trumps have an interest in and have backed the crypto platform World Liberty Financial along with its token. The platform is also planning to launch a stablecoin while President Trump’s sons, Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr., are working to launch a crypto-mining company called American Bitcoin.

“Your decisions give rise to concerns that President Trump’s interest in selling his cryptocurrency may be the reason for easing law enforcement scrutiny,” the Democrats stated.  

In a memo announcing the crypto enforcement team’s disbandment, Blanche accused the Biden administration of using the Justice Department to “pursue a reckless strategy of regulation by prosecution.”

Magazine: Illegal arcade disguised as … a fake Bitcoin mine? Soldier scams in China: Asia Express

Continue Reading

Politics

NY attorney general urges Congress to keep pensions crypto-free — ‘No intrinsic value’

Published

on

By

NY attorney general urges Congress to keep pensions crypto-free — ‘No intrinsic value’

NY attorney general urges Congress to keep pensions crypto-free — ‘No intrinsic value’

New York Attorney General Letitia James has sent a letter to US congressional leaders urging “common sense” federal crypto regulations and to keep digital assets out of US pensions.

“I am urging Congress to pass legislation that would strengthen federal regulations on the cryptocurrency industry to protect investors, strengthen financial markets, and stop fraud,” James said in a 14-page letter shared on April 10, outlining six major risks if the sector remains unregulated.

She said that without appropriate safeguards, the “unchecked proliferation of digital assets” undermines US dollar dominance, weakens national security due to criminal activity, and “undermines the stability of financial markets.” 

Unregulated crypto also subjects investors to “price manipulation and rigged markets,” facilitates fraud that “drains billions of dollars from hardworking Americans, and extracts assets and investments from the American economy,” she said. 

NY attorney general urges Congress to keep pensions crypto-free — ‘No intrinsic value’

An excerpt of James’ letter to Congress. Source: Office of the New York State Attorney General

James made a number of recommendations and pushed Congress for legislation that would require stablecoin issuers to have a US presence and regulatory oversight and mandate backing stablecoins with US dollars or treasuries. 

She also wants regulations that require platforms to work only with anti-money laundering-compliant entities, establish registration requirements for issuers and intermediaries, protect against conflicts of interest and promote price transparency and require fraud prevention measures.

No crypto assets in pension funds 

The New York’s top lawyer also aired her concerns about including crypto in pension funds. 

“Digital assets are uniquely unsuitable for retirement savings due to their high volatility,” she said, claiming that they have no value.

“The underlying value of cryptocurrency is unpredictable and not determined by true price discovery because they have no intrinsic value on which their prices are based.”

James also urged against retirement funds investing in crypto-tracking exchange-traded funds, stating that “unlike traditional exchange-traded funds backed by stocks and bonds, cryptocurrency held to back cryptocurrency ETFs are at risk of permanent theft.” 

Related: US lawmaker will reintroduce crypto retirement bill to help Trump agenda

“As Congress takes the mantle to propose legislation governing the cryptocurrency industry, we hope it also takes action to mitigate the risks posed by the industry to America’s national security, financial stability, and citizens,” James said. 

The call for regulation follows the US Department of Justice’s reported dismantling of its federal criminal cryptocurrency fraud enforcement division.

Magazine: 3 reasons Ethereum could turn a corner: Kain Warwick, X Hall of Flame

Continue Reading

Trending