When the polling stations close at 10pm on 4 July, thousands of ballot counters will be flexing their fingers, ready for what could be a very long night’s work.
All the country’s votes will be counted – and recounted – by hand.
But what is it like to be one of the people tasked with delivering democracy by dawn?
Sky News spoke to five ballot counters – who between them have worked more than 100 elections – to find out.
The Newcastle-Sunderland urban myth
Ian Humphries is clocking up his 50th election with Newcastle City Council with 2024’s general election.
You’ll find him in a cavernous sports hall at Northumbria University, just another “Joe Bloggs” getting through the count “as efficiently and quickly as I can”.
Image: Ian Humphries. Pic: Newcastle City Council
What his fellow counters might not realise is that he is one of the people responsible for taking Newcastle from being around the 300th council to declare its results, to first in the Brexit referendum and then again in the 2017 and 2019 general elections.
The former elections manager tells Sky News it’s an “urban myth” there is a race between Newcastle and Sunderland for who will declare first (Sunderland held the crown from 1992 to 2015).
It’s not about being fast per se, but maximising “accuracy and efficiency”, he says.
Advertisement
Still, there are tactics to deliver that. A move to a new venue was key – a bigger space meant more people, each “blitzing” through just a few boxes each.
If you can get the count done quickly, before tiredness – and sloppiness – sets in, recounts are less likely to be necessary, he says.
“At 5am, how accurate are you?” Ian questions.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
The quest to “shave off minutes” starts at the polling station, where staff are primed to get ballot boxes out the door and into the car of the presiding officer – the person in charge of the polling station – as quickly as possible.
They will ferry the box by the most efficient route to the count venue, where a slick operation is waiting at the door.
The car pulls up, a worker opens the passenger door, grabs the ballot box from where it’s waiting on the passenger seat, closes the door and away the car drives.
The box is handed to a “runner” – normally a university student employed for a night of manual labour – who hurries it into the building to be checked off.
The time-saving strategies mean counting can start soon after 10pm, when previously all the boxes may not have arrived until 11pm.
Image: File pic: Reuters
The counting process has also been honed to make it as accurate and efficient as possible.
Once the number of ballot papers has been verified, they are sorted into piles for each candidate, which are then counted into bundles of 50.
Each bundle has an elastic band running north to south so a “flick check” can be performed.
The counter thumbs through the pile like a flip book – a quick way to see if the same box has been marked on each paper in the stack.
But with boundary changes to contend with in this election, Ian isn’t holding his breath for Newcastle to be the first constituency to declare.
“All bets are off,” he says.
Either way, he’s anticipating an “electric atmosphere” when the sports hall is filled with counters, candidates and their agents.
“Their excitement and sense of jeopardy – you can almost taste it,” Ian says.
The day Chris really earned his pay…
Chris Hobbs has worked every election bar one since 1988, as a poll clerk, presiding officer and counting assistant with Tandridge District Council in Surrey.
During counts that sometimes lasted until 4 or 5am, he has seen every “phallic symbol” and expletive going as voters spoil their ballots.
He says: “I’ve seen cat faces, huge rafts of text explaining why they are spoiling their votes, some abusive text about individual candidates.
“‘Vote for clowns, get a f****** circus!’ was particularly amusing at two o’clock in the morning.”
Image: Pic: Chris Hobbs
The voters provide an occasional laugh, but you also feel part of something important, he says, as “democracy happens right before your eyes”.
The Brexit referendum was the busiest election Chris has worked due to the sheer number of voters.
He says he definitely “earned my pay” that day, working as the presiding officer in a polling station set up in a room of a country pub.
“It was a challenging day as people arrived to vote and stayed for a drink or four,” he says.
“It got raucous for a while as well-refreshed folk kept popping back in to try to vote.
“Egged on by their drinking buddies, every hour or so the pub dog was ‘slid’ into the room from the pub to much laughter, covered in political rosettes!”
Image: The count run by Tandridge District Council. Pic: Tandridge District Council
Thatcher, 1997 and the lady who wouldn’t stop talking
Andy Wragg keeps saying each election will be his last – but he’s on 41 and counting, the majority with Rushcliffe Borough Council in south Nottinghamshire.
His first working general election was Margaret Thatcher’s landslide 1983 victory, when he was appointed as a presiding officer aged 22.
It’s a role he’s repeated many times since, as well as working as a ballot counter.
Image: Andy Wragg and his wife Marie, who used to work with him as a poll clerk when he was presiding officer. Pic: Andy Wragg
Getting all the ballot boxes from the polling stations to the count venue was more fraught in the days before widespread mobile phones, he tells Sky News.
The verification process – where ballot papers are tallied before the proper count starts – cannot begin until all the boxes are received.
But in one memorable incident, a presiding officer bringing in a ballot box missed a turning and “kept driving south”. In the end, the police had to be dispatched to find her, 50 miles from where she should have been, Andy says.
Having been expected by 11pm, she arrived “rather sheepishly” at around 1.30am.
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
The 1997 election was another big one to work on: “You just felt the sway really of it… You felt something was coming at that point,” Andy says.
He once worked at one of the smallest polling stations in the country – a farm cottage “in the middle of nowhere” repurposed for the day for about 150 locals.
The problem was, Andy says, the host of the house knew everyone – and she couldn’t resist popping into the lounge where people were voting for a natter.
They reached a compromise where after people had voted, he sent them through to the kitchen for tea and cake and they then left by the back door.
“Adding cake to the electoral process was unusual, but we had to get them to flow through,” he says.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:58
How the vote count works
‘You wouldn’t believe the amount of dicks’ – and they’re put on the big screen
As one of the more confident Welsh speakers at Cardiff Council, Cai Maxwell will be making announcements during the ballot count after a day on the road as a polling station inspector.
The count is “high intensity”, he says, with the tension ratcheted up by the intense scrutiny of candidates’ counting agents who make sure everything is accurate.
They “pick you up on everything,” he says.
He remembers one run-in he had when he failed to shake the ballot box upside down to show there were no stray papers tucked in the bottom, resulting in a complaint to the returning officer.
Image: Cai Maxwell worked as a professional pianist before joining Cardiff City Council. Pic: Libby Gay
Cai also takes great joy in the spoilt votes – not least because of how they are inspected, with a spotlight and camera set up so a blown-up version can be displayed on a TV.
“The amount of people who put dicks on ballot papers you would not believe,” he says.
“When you’ve got graffiti like that it’s hilarious because it’s a really formal procedure.
“You’ve got all these people in suits going through this process, looking at the ballot papers and all of them obviously nodding in agreement that yes, that’s invalid.”
But working behind the scenes gives you an insight into how strictly monitored the count is, he says.
As well as the eagle eyes of counting agents, there are strict protocols such as sealing the ballot boxes with tabs (something Andy Wragg remembers being done with wax). This means there is no way for the box to be opened while it’s being taken from the polling station to the count venue.
“I think a lot of people take pride in it because once you’ve seen it from our perspective, there’s absolutely no way it can be meddled with or fixed.”
Holly Hancocks has worked elections since 2008 – and has seen a lot of the same faces year on year.
“It’s always quite jolly and funny to start,” she says, as workers catch up with people they haven’t seen since the last election.
“Then once the counting begins, it’s very quiet. It’s quite a studious environment.”
She has held various roles, including at polling stations as a poll clerk and presiding officer, and at the count venue as a runner, counting assistant and count supervisor.
There are always “lots of boiled sweets around” during the count.
“You can’t have anything that would dirty the ballot papers,” Holly explains – and that’s just one of the rules workers must follow.
They’re all about preserving the “sanctity of the ballot paper” and making sure the count is fair, she says.
Image: Holly can be seen in the bottom right during a count. Pic: Redditch Borough Council
Ballot papers must remain face up so the ballot number on the bottom is hidden and the candidates can see the votes.
All the workers must also wear neutral-coloured clothes so they are not seen to be supporting a particular party.
Holly says: “You leave your own political opinions at the door. And you have to be a completely neutral party, and that can sometimes feel a bit weird.
“Say there’s 100 count assistants in a room and somebody gets announced as being the victor… and you’ve got 100 people in the room that are just kind of politely clapping without really showing any emotion.”
It’s an “odd juxtaposition” to the exuberant celebrations of the winning party, she says.
Redditch, where she has mostly worked, is a swing seat, which Holly says makes it particularly exciting.
It also means the ballot counters can be in for a long night if it is particularly close and requires a recount.
Holly has seen local elections “where there’s one vote in it, so a full recount has happened… that’s always very tense”.
A group of US Senate Democrats known for supporting the crypto industry have said they would oppose a Republican-led stablecoin bill if it moves forward in its current form.
The move threatens to stall legislation that could establish the first US regulatory framework for stablecoins, according to a May 3 report from Politico.
Per the report, nine Senate Democrats said in a joint statement that the bill “still has numerous issues that must be addressed.” They warned they would not support a procedural vote to advance the legislation unless changes are made.
Among the signatories were Senators Ruben Gallego, Mark Warner, Lisa Blunt Rochester and Andy Kim — all of whom had previously backed the bill when it passed through the Senate Banking Committee in March.
The bill, introduced by Senator Bill Hagerty, is formally known as the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act.
The Senate is expected to begin floor consideration of the bill in the coming days, with the first vote potentially taking place next week.
The bill has been championed by the crypto industry as a landmark step toward regulatory clarity. However, the Democrats’ about-face reflects growing unease within the party.
Although revisions were made to the bill after its committee approval to address Democratic concerns, the lawmakers said the changes fell short. They called for stronger safeguards related to Anti-Money Laundering, national security, foreign issuers, and accountability measures for noncompliant actors.
The statement was also signed by Senators Raphael Warnock, Catherine Cortez Masto, Ben Ray Luján, John Hickenlooper and Adam Schiff.
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand and Senator Angela Alsobrooks were absent from the list, who co-sponsored the bill alongside Hagerty.
Despite their objections, the Democratic senators emphasized their commitment to shaping responsible crypto regulation. They reportedly said they “are eager to continue working with our colleagues to address these issues.”
On April 27, Caitlin Long, founder and CEO of Custodia Bank, criticized the US Federal Reserve for quietly maintaining a key anti-crypto policy that favors big-bank-issued stablecoins, despite relaxing crypto partnership rules for banks.
The guidance, according to Long, blocks banks from engaging directly with crypto assets and prohibits them from issuing stablecoins on permissionless blockchains.
However, Long noted that once a federal stablecoin bill becomes law, it could override the Fed’s stance. “Congress should hurry up,” she urged.
Bitcoiners and United States government officials have criticized Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs’s decision to veto a bill that would have allowed the state to hold Bitcoin as part of its official reserves.
“This will age poorly,” Casa co-founder and cypherpunk Jameson Lopp said in a May 3 X post. Bitcoin (BTC) entrepreneur Anthony Pompliano said, “Imagine the ignorance of a politician to believe they can make investment decisions.”
Call for government officials who understand Bitcoin is “the future”
“If she can’t outperform Bitcoin, she must buy it,” Pompliano said. Crypto lawyer Andrew Gordon said, “We need more elected officials who understand that Bitcoin and crypto are the future.”
Wendy Rogers, who co-sponsored the bill with State Representative Jeff Weninger, also voiced her disappointment.
“Politicians don’t understand that Bitcoin doesn’t need Arizona. Arizona needs Bitcoin,” Rogers said.
On May 2, Hobbs vetoed the Arizona Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Act, which would have permitted Arizona to invest seized funds into Bitcoin and create a reserve managed by state officials. “Today, I vetoed Senate Bill 1025. The Arizona State Retirement System is one of the strongest in the nation because it makes sound and informed investments,” Hobbs said.
Rogers said she would refile the bill during her next session. Rogers also pointed out that Arizona’s state retirement system already holds stocks of Michael Saylor’s Strategy (MSTR).
“Which is basically a leveraged Bitcoin ETF. Arizona’s Strategic Bitcoin Reserve bill will be back. HODL,” Rogers said. The stock price of Strategy rose 32% in April, the most significant monthly gain since November 2024.
However, well-known crypto skeptic Peter Schiff sided with Hobbs. “The government should not be making decisions to use public funds to speculate in cryptocurrencies,” Schiff said.
Arizona would have become the first US state to establish a Bitcoin Strategic Reserve if it had passed.
Arizona joins several other US states where similar efforts have failed. Similar proposals in Oklahoma, Montana, South Dakota and Wyoming have stalled or been withdrawn recently.
The Conservatives are calling for Lucy Powell to resign after the Labour MP’s exchange with a commentator about grooming gangs.
The comment was made by Ms Powell, the leader of the House of Commons, after Conservative political commentator Tim Montgomerie started to ask a question on BBC Radio 4’s Any Questions.
“I don’t know if you saw the documentary on Channel 4 about rape gangs,” he started, in relation to the recent programme Groomed: A National Scandal, which centred around five girls who were sexually abused by rape gangs.
Ms Powell, who is MP for Manchester Central, responded: “Oh, we want to blow that little trumpet now, do we? Yeah, OK, let’s get that dog whistle out.”
Sir Keir Starmer and the government have been under sustained pressure from political opponents over the handling of historical sex abuse cases in the UK.
ConservativeHome founder Mr Montgomerie, who will be appearing on Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips, continued: “There is a real issue where… There were so many people in local government, in the authorities, who, for good reason, were worried about upsetting community tensions, that those girls went undefended.”
The conversation moved on, but politicians criticised Ms Powell’s comment, with some calling for her to resign.
More on Labour
Related Topics:
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said in a statement: “This shocking outburst from a Labour cabinet minister belittles the thousands of girls and women who were raped by grooming gangs over decades.
“We have consistently called for a national enquiry in parliament, which has been blocked by Labour ministers who don’t seem to know or care about the disgusting crimes which have been perpetrated.
“Anyone who has seen the shocking Channel 4 documentary will know that it is clearer than ever that this is not a ‘dog whistle’.
“To dismiss thousands of victims who were raped and the cover up that followed is sickening. She should resign.”
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick said: “Labour’s Lucy Powell thinks it’s a ‘dog whistle’ to demand arrests and accountability for the rape gangs. What a disgusting betrayal of the victims. They are part of the cover-up.”
Ousted Reform MP Rupert Lowe, now an independent, shared a letter he wrote to Ms Powell demanding she apologise, calling her comments “deeply, deeply offensive”.
X
This content is provided by X, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable X cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to X cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow X cookies for this session only.
On X on Saturday night, Ms Powell said: “In the heat of a discussion on AQ, I would like to clarify that I regard issues of child exploitation and grooming with the utmost seriousness. I’m sorry if this was unclear.
“I was challenging the political point scoring around it, not the issue itself. As a constituency MP I’ve dealt with horrendous cases. This Gvt is acting to get to the truth, and deliver justice.”
Tech billionaire Elon Musk had accused Sir Keir of being “complicit” in the failure of authorities to protect victims and prosecute abusers while the PM was director of public prosecutions from 2008-2013.
The prime minister has repeatedly defended his record, saying it shows he tackled the issue head-on.